電腦輔助同儕互教數學解題策略之初探–以國小四年級多步驟解題之題型為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：17

、訪客IP：18.188.40.207

姓名

張雅惟(Ya-Wei Chang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

電腦輔助同儕互教數學解題策略之初探–以國小四年級多步驟解題之題型為例
(An initial study on computer supported reciprocal peer tutoring - solving multiple-step math problems in the fourth grade as example)

相關論文

★ 探索電玩遊戲頻率對於視覺注意力表現能力的效應	★ 代理表現學習模式—以動物同伴為例
★ 常用邏輯句型重組之學習	★ 電腦支援國小數學文字題擬題活動初探
★ 解釋數學：透過科技支援創作與討論以增強小學生的數學溝通能力	★ 提問式鷹架教學結合數位閱讀寫作系統對國小低年級學生語文能力的影響
★ 數學島：興趣驅動之國小數學線上平台設計與初步評估	★ 以「猜擬題」活動增進學生數學文字題解題能力
★ 基於學生練習使用回饋之學習成效預測模型與動態題數練習機制	★ 透過主題地圖與寵物同伴促進閱讀更深更廣的書籍
★ 具推薦書籍功能之閱讀島系統架構設計	★ 透過學生影片創作進行國小數學學習:趣創者理論之應用
★ 英文單字樂園：學生自創字卡搭配複習機制強化英文字彙學習之系統設計及學習成效初探	★ 設計與實作明日寫作系統增進國小學生寫作表現
★ 設計與實踐「提升式寫作」活動以提升國小學生寫作品質與寫作興趣	★ TTPR：設計科技強化型全肢體反應為了小學生和國中生在印尼學習英語詞彙

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在過去的一些實證研究裡發現，讓學生處於一個「爲了要教別人而學習」的情
境中，可以引發學生想要理解知識的內在動機，同時也能讓學生進行高層次的思考。
但目前一些教室內的同儕互教活動，不強調問題解決的思考歷程與相關的準備教學
活動。因此，本論文提出一個提升國小學童數學科問題解決能力的「交互式同儕教
學」學習活動設計( Reciprocal Peer Tutoring for Math Problem Solving，簡稱為
RPT-MPS ) ，並以電腦系統支援該設計，目的在讓從教導同儕的過程中學習並強化
自身的數學解題策略。
在RPT-MPS 活動中，學生為了要教別人而努力學習，然後，學生分別輪流扮
演「指導者」( Tutor ) 與「學習者」( Tutee ) 兩種角色。當「學習者」在練習問題
時，「指導者」可以觀察「學習者」的行為並對「學習者」發問以引導他說出想法和
給予幫助，「學習者」則在練習過程中不但要思考問題的關鍵並且可以和「指導者」
互相討論，共同去尋找其他可能的答案，也就是教學相長( Learning by Tutoring ) 的
合作學習。
爲了解RPT-MPS 如何激勵學生學習、促進學生互動、設計上的合理性，本研
究進行了一次需求分析與兩次評估活動。本論文將說明研究背景、動機、學習活動
設計、描述電腦輔助系統的設計與介面，以及評估活動的發現結果，並提出一些對
未來工作的建議。

摘要(英)

Several researches have found that let students in a situation for teaching others can lead their inner motivation to understand the knowledge to be taught and engage them in higher level thinking activities. However, some existed intra-class peer tutoring programs do not emphasis students tutors in the thinking progress of problem-solving or involve the learning process for peer tutoring. Therefore, this thesis proposes a pedagogic design called RPT-MPS, standing for promote elementary students’ math problem-solving ability, and an embryo system design to support RPT-MPS. The RPT-MPS learning activities and system design are for tutors to learn and strengthen his/ her own math problem-solving strategy via teaching peer tutees.
In RPT-MPS, students learn lessons hardly to prepare for teaching peer tutees, and play two roles “tutor” and “tutee” by turns. Tutors observe on tutee, lead tutee talk about his/her own thoughts and help instantly. Tutees think about the key point of question and discuss with his/ her own tutor via synchronous interaction and instant feedback functions for students and teachers.
One requirement analysis and two evaluation activities were conducted to investigate how RPT-MPS designs can motivate student tutors to learn, encourage the teaching interaction, the model design, and the role of system. This thesis gives accounts for the research background, motivation, purposes and the activity model, describes the system designs and interfaces, and reports results of evaluation activities. Recommendations for further study are addressed in the final part of this thesis.

關鍵字(中)

★ 電腦輔助同儕互教
★ 同儕互教
★ 科技當作媒介工具

關鍵字(英)

★ computer supported reciprocal peer mentoring
★ RPT
★ technology as mediate

論文目次

中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
致謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
第一章、緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 4
1.3章節架構 5
第二章、相關研究 6
2.1 學習活動的相關概念 6
2.2 解題策略的相關概念 10
2.3 相關系統 12
2.4 活動比較 14
第三章、活動設計 16
3.1 RPT-MPS完整概念 16
3.2 課中活動設計 17
第四章系統設計與實作 21
4.1 需求分析 21
4.2 雛型系統開發環境 26
4.3 雛型系統架構 28
4.4 雛型系統功能設計 29
4.5 雛型系統實作 30
第五章、實驗與討論 42
5.1 實驗目的 42
5.2 實驗對象與環境 43
5.3 第一階段實驗 45
5.4 第二階段實驗 67
5.5 綜合討論 72
第六章、結論 74
參考文獻 77
附錄一、紙筆測驗試題範本(含解題策略鷹架) 82
附錄二、紙筆測驗問卷調查表 83
附錄三、紙筆測驗訪談問題表 85
附錄四、電腦實驗題型範本 86
附錄五、電腦實驗詳解範本 87
附錄六、電腦實驗問卷 88
附錄七、電腦實驗訪談問題表 89
附錄八、後設認知量表-數學科學習經驗問卷 90

參考文獻

Annis, L. F. (1982). The cognitive benefits of peer tutoring. Paper presented at meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1984). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Education Psychology, 72, 593-604.
Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effectives as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16
Bossert, S. T. (1989). Cooperative activities in the classroom. Review of Research in Education, 15, 225-250.
Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1992) . Rational number, ratio, and proportion. In D.A. Grouws (ED) , Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 296-333.
Chan, T. W. and Baskin, A. B. (1988). Studying with the principle: The Computer as a Learning Companion. The Proceedings of International Conference of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 1988, June, Montreal, Canada, p199.
Chan, T. W. and Baskin, A. B. (1990) . Learning companion systems. In C. Frasson & G. Gauthier (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems: At the Crossroads of Artificial Intelligence and Education, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 6-33.
Chan, T. W. and Chou, C. Y. (1995). Simulating a learning companion in reciprocal tutoring system. Proceedings of CSCL’95, 49-56
Chan, T.W. and Chou, C. Y. (1997). Exploring the design of computer supports for reciprocal tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 1-29.
Chan, T. W. (2005). Computer Supported Learning by Teaching. Unpublished manuscript, National Central University, Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology, Jungli, Taiwan.
Cole, P., & Chan, L. (1990). Method and strategies for special education. Sydney Prentice Hall.
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (1985): Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: lenum.
Delquadri, J. C., Greenwood, C. R., Whorton, D., Carta, J. J., and Hall, R.V. (1986) . Classwide peer tutoring. Exceptional Children, 52, 535-542.
Dewey, J. (1960). How to think: A restatement of relation of reflect thinking to the educative process. Lexington, Mass: Heath.
Ehly, S., & Larsen, S. (1980) . Peer tutoring for individualized instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Fantuzzo, J. W., Riggio, R. E., Connelly, S., & Dimeff, L. A. (1989). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2 ) , 173-177.
Fantuzzo, J. W., King. J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992) . Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis, Journal of Education Psychology, 84(3 ) , 331-339.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students’ helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematics explanations. Elementary School Journal, 97(3 ) , 223-249.
Foot, H. C., Morgan, M. J., & Shute, R. H. (1990). Children helping children. England: John Wiley & Sons.
Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. School Psychology Review, 17, 258-275.
Greenwood, C. R., Delquardri, J. C., and Hall, V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring, Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 3. 371–383.
Heward, W. L., Herron, T. E., and Cooke, N. L. (1982) . Tutor huddle: Key element in a classwide peer tutoring system. Elementary School Journal, 82, 115-123.
Julian, J., and Perry, F. (1967) . Cooperation contrasted with intra-group and inter-group competition. Sociometry, 30, 79-90.
Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. (1990) : Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: International Book Company.
King, A., Staffieri, A., & Adelgais, A. (1988) . Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2 ) , 338-368.
King, A. (1991, 1997). ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning. Educational Psychologist. 32(4 ) ,221-235.
Malone, T. W., and Lepper, M. R. (1987) . Marking learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivation for learning. In Snow, R. E. and Farr, M. J. (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 3. Cognitive and Affective Process Analyses. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mayer, R. E., (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. W. H. Freeman and company New York.
Michelene, T. H. Chi, Stephanie A. S., Heisawn J., Takashi Y., Robert G. H. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533.
Miller, S.R., Miller, P.F., Armentrout, J.A., & Flannagan, J.W. (1995). Cross-age peer tutoring: A strategy for promoting self-determination in students with severe emotional disabilities/behavior disorders. Preventing School Failure, 39(4 ) , 32-37.
Polya, G. (1945). A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University press.
Rich, D. (1922). Mega skills. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Topping, K. (1988). The peer tutoring handbook: Promoting cooperative learning.London: Croom Helm.
Turman, S. K., ＆ Widerstrom, A. H. (1990). Infants and young children withspecial needs：A developmental and ecological approach (2nd ed). Baltimore：Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Utley, C. A., Mortweet, S. L. & Greenwood, C.R. (1997). Peer-mediatedinstruction and interventions. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29, 1-23.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Eds. And Trans). Cambridge, MA: The MIT. Press (Original work published 1934 ) .
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman. Eds,. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Whittemore, I. C. (1924). The influence of competition on performance: an experimental study. Journal of Abnormal and social Psychology, 19, 236-253.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
Weinberg, R., and Jackson, A. (1979): Competition and extrinsic rewards: effect on intrinsic motivation and attribution. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 649-657.

指導教授

陳德懷(Tak-Wai Chan)

審核日期

2006-9-23

推文