支援國小學童網路出題與評題活動之系統設計與應用

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：58

、訪客IP：3.149.239.209

姓名

湯泰源(Tai-yuan Tang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

支援國小學童網路出題與評題活動之系統設計與應用
(A System to Support Web-based Question-posing and Peer-assessment Activities for Pupils)

相關論文

★ 探索電玩遊戲頻率對於視覺注意力表現能力的效應	★ 代理表現學習模式—以動物同伴為例
★ 常用邏輯句型重組之學習	★ 電腦支援國小數學文字題擬題活動初探
★ 解釋數學：透過科技支援創作與討論以增強小學生的數學溝通能力	★ 提問式鷹架教學結合數位閱讀寫作系統對國小低年級學生語文能力的影響
★ 數學島：興趣驅動之國小數學線上平台設計與初步評估	★ 以「猜擬題」活動增進學生數學文字題解題能力
★ 基於學生練習使用回饋之學習成效預測模型與動態題數練習機制	★ 透過主題地圖與寵物同伴促進閱讀更深更廣的書籍
★ 具推薦書籍功能之閱讀島系統架構設計	★ 透過學生影片創作進行國小數學學習:趣創者理論之應用
★ 英文單字樂園：學生自創字卡搭配複習機制強化英文字彙學習之系統設計及學習成效初探	★ 設計與實作明日寫作系統增進國小學生寫作表現
★ 設計與實踐「提升式寫作」活動以提升國小學生寫作品質與寫作興趣	★ TTPR：設計科技強化型全肢體反應為了小學生和國中生在印尼學習英語詞彙

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

學生出題與同儕互評是很好的學習策略，有助於學生反思和批判性思考。然而，由於國小學童語文閱讀能力尚未成熟，因此需要較多的引導與輔助，才能讓學童在出題與互評 (Question Posing and Peer Assessment)活動中，獲得學習助益。因此本研究針對國小學童設計了一套Rabi線上出評題系統，可支援出題與評題活動。同時，Rabi系統於出題階段加入評題準則、出題者解釋二個機制，以協助學生順利自我出題；在評題階段加入答題、回顧修改二個機制，以提升同儕互評的成效。Rabi系統實作後，先後進行兩次的初步預試，收集使用者意見作為系統修正，並在此基礎下，Rabi系統實際應用於一個網路金融理財的出題答評活動。

摘要(英)

Question-posing and peer-assessment are two potential leanring strategies that are helpful to students’ self-reflection and critical thinking. However, due to the immaturity of pupils’ literacy ability, they often need more helps or guides in the question-posing and peer-assessment activities. In this study, a web-based question-posing and peer-assessment system, named Rabi, is developed to help pupil perform learning tasks in these two activities. Meanwhile, the Rabi system designs two new features, assessment criteria and notes, to benefit students in the question-posing stage. In addition, question-answering and question-revision are also designed to ensure the effect of peer-assessment. After implementing the Rabi system, two pilot studies were conducted in the elementary school to collect users’ feedbacks for system revision. Nevertheless, the Rabi system was used to support a web-based financial education program for kids.

關鍵字(中)

★ 出題
★ 同儕互評
★ 評題準則
★ 出題者解釋

關鍵字(英)

★ Question-posing
★ Peer-assessment
★ assessment criteria

論文目次

目錄
第一章緒論.................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 研究背景......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 研究動機與目的............................................................................................. 2
1.3 論文架構......................................................................................................... 3
第二章文獻探討.......................................................................................................... 4
2.1 出題的學習策略與相關研究......................................................................... 4
2.1.1 出題定義.............................................................................................. 4
2.1.2 出題與解題的關係.............................................................................. 5
2.1.3 出題與閱讀的關係.............................................................................. 6
2.2 同儕互評的定義與相關研究......................................................................... 8
2.3 相關題系統與活動....................................................................................... 10
2.3.1 AGQ (Ask Good Question) ................................................................. 10
2.3.2 QPPA (Question Posed and Peer Assessment) .................................... 11
2.3.3 ExamNet ............................................................................................. 13
2.3.4 Network Peer Assessment System (NetPeas) ..................................... 13
2.3.5 Web-based Tool ................................................................................... 14
2.3.6 DIYexamer .......................................................................................... 15
2.3.7 綜合比較表........................................................................................ 15
第三章活動設計........................................................................................................ 17
3.1 出題活動....................................................................................................... 18
3.2 答評活動....................................................................................................... 19
3.2.1 進行方式............................................................................................ 20
3.2.2 評題準則設計.................................................................................... 20
3.3 回顧修改活動............................................................................................... 22
第四章 Rabi 系統架構與實作 .................................................................................. 24
4.1 Rabi系統環境與架構 ................................................................................... 25
4.2 系統功能與介面........................................................................................... 26
4.3 使用者端....................................................................................................... 26
4.4 管理者端....................................................................................................... 32
4.4.1活動建立............................................................................................. 32
4.4.2 回合管理............................................................................................ 33
4.4.3 分派機置............................................................................................ 34
4.5 資料庫設計................................................................................................... 40
第五章預試（一）系統穩定度測試........................................................................ 41
5.1 預試目的....................................................................................................... 41
V

5.2 活動設計....................................................................................................... 41
5.3 資料分析與討論........................................................................................... 43
第六章預試 (二) Rabi導入閱讀活動初探 ............................................................. 51
6.1 研究架構....................................................................................................... 51
6.2 研究設計....................................................................................................... 52
6.3 施測對象....................................................................................................... 53
6.4 研究工具....................................................................................................... 54
6.5 資料分析方式............................................................................................... 57
6.6 資料分析結果............................................................................................... 58
6.7 小結............................................................................................................... 60
第七章網路應用........................................................................................................ 63
7.1活動簡介........................................................................................................ 63
7.2 活動時程....................................................................................................... 64
7.3 學生活動進行方式 ...................................................................................... 64
7.4 開發歷程....................................................................................................... 65
7.5 出評題活動時程........................................................................................... 66
7.5 活動成果....................................................................................................... 67
7.6 資料分析方式............................................................................................... 68
7.7 發現與討論................................................................................................... 68
第八章結論與未來發展............................................................................................ 83
8.1 結論............................................................................................................... 83
8.2 未來發展....................................................................................................... 83
英文參考文獻.............................................................................................................. 85
中文參考文獻.............................................................................................................. 89
附錄.............................................................................................................................. 90

參考文獻

英文參考文獻
Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes, In K.W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology oflearning and motivation. London: Academic Press.
Brown, A. L. & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: the development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968-979.
Carver, R. P. (1973). Reading as reasoning: Implications for measurement. In W. H. MacGinitie (Ed.), Assessment problems in reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Chang, S. B., Tung, K. J., Huang, H. M., & Chan, T. W. (2005). AGQ: a model of student question generation supported by one-on-one educational computing. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning.
Chall, J. S. (1976). The Great Debate: Ten Years Later, with a Modest Proposal for Reading Stages. In L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory & practice in early reading Vol. 1, (pp. 29-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R.E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In M. Pressley & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Educational applications (pp. 87-131). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Cunningham, R. F. (2004). Prpblem posing: an opportunity for increasing studentresponsibility. Mathematics and Computer Education, 38, 83-89.
Dillon, J. T. (1988). Levels of problem posing vs. problem solving. Questioning Exchange 2,105-115.
Falchikov, N. & Magin, D. (1997). Detecing gender bias in peer marking of students’ group process work. Assessment & Evaluation if Higher Education, 22(4), 385396.
Graesser, A.C. & Person, N.K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137.
Isaacs, G. (1998). Brief briefing: Peer and Self Assessment. Conference Effective
Assessment at University, Brisbane, November.
Belanich, J., Wisher , R. A. & Orvis , K. L. (2004). A Question-Collaboration Approach to Web-Based Learning. The Americ Journal of Distance education. 18(3), 169-185.
King, A. (1992). Facilitating Elaborative Learning Through Guided Student Generated Questioning. Education Psychologist, 27, 1, 111-126.
King, A. (1991) Improving Lecture Comprehension: Effects of a Metacognitive Strategy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 331-346
King, A. (1994). Autonomy and question asking: The role of personal control in guided student-generated questioning. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 163-185.
Leung, S. S. (1993). The relation of mathematical problem posing of prospective elementary school teachers on tasks differing in numerical information content. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Liu, Z. F. Chiu, C. H., J. Lin, S. J. & Yuan. S. M.(1999). Student participation in computer science courses via the Network Peer Assessment System. Proceedings of the ICCE ’99, vol. 1, p. 744-747
Leslie, J.L. & Caldwell, J. (1995). Qualitative reading inventory-II. NY：Harper Colins College Publishers,pp.293-319.
Olson, M. W. (1985). Text type and reader ability: The effects on paraphrase and text-based inference questions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17(3), 199-214.
Palincsar, A. S. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117-175.
Polya, G. (1945). How to slove it. Princeton: Princeton University of Chicago Press.
Sivan, A. (2000). The implementation of peer assessment : an action research approach. Assessment in Education,7(2),193-213.
Silver, E.A. & Cai, J. (1993).Mathematical problem posing and problem solving by middle school students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational research association, Atlanta, GA.
Chang, S. B. , Tung, K. J., Huang, H. M. & Chan, T. W. (2005). AGQ: a model of student question generation supported by one-on-one educational computing.
Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Proceedings of th 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years!
Tamir, P. (1997). Justifying the selection of answers in multiple choice items. International Journal of Science Education, Vol 12, No 5, p563-573.
Topping, K. J. & Ehly, S. E. (2001). Peer-assisted learning. Jorunal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2),113-132.
Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276.
Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer Assessment Between Studerts in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research, vol. 68,249-276.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional-design theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rigby, J.W. (1978). Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective. In H.F. O'Neil (Ed.), Learning strategies (pp. 165-205). New York: Academic Press.
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C. & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181-221.
Wilson, E. V. (2004). ExamNet asynchronous learning network: augmenting face-to-face courses with student-developed exam questions. Computers & Education, 42,87-107.
Wittrock, M. C. (1978). The cognitive movement in instruction. Educational Psychology, 13, 15-29.
Lin, Y. D., Sun, W. C., Chou, C. & Wei, H. Y. (2001). DIYexamer: A Web-based Multi-Server Testing System with Dynamic Test Item Acquisition and Discriminability Assessment. Proceedings of the ICCE 2001, vol.2.
Yu, F.Y., Liu, Y.H. & Chan, T.W. (2002). The Efficacy of a Web-based Domain Independent Question-Posing and Peer Assessment Learning System. Proceedings of ICCE’02.
Yu. F.Y., Liu, Y.H. & Chan, T.W. (2004). A Web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment: Pedagogical design and preliminary evaluation. To appear in Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42 (2).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge , MA: Harvard University Press.
中文參考文獻
于富雲、洪琮琪、劉祐興、葉家忠、陳德懷。(民92年)。網路出題互評瀏覽學習系統之建置與學科應用。教學科技與媒體，P53-67。
余民寧。(民86年)。教育測驗與評量－成就測驗與教學評量。心理出版社。
張碧容、鄒慧英。(民94年)。國小四年級學童閱讀摘要實作表現及自我評量之研究。「南大學報」第39卷第1 期教育類，P149‐174
張春興。(民80年)。現代心理學。東華出版社。
梁淑坤。(民83年)。擬題的研究及其在課程的角色。國兄小學數學科新課程概說，P152-167。
歐滄和。(民92年)。教育測驗與評量。心理出版社。
龔春燕。(民90年)。終生學習的關鍵：學會問。

指導教授

陳德懷(Tak-wai Chan)

審核日期

2008-9-23

推文