台灣企業薪酬策略之決定因素探討

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：12

、訪客IP：3.137.192.3

姓名

楊川逸(Pierce Yang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

台灣企業薪酬策略之決定因素探討
(The Determinants of Compensation Strategy: An Empirical Research in Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應	★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯	★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響	★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響	★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例	★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯－以IC設計產業為例	★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例	★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

企業組織必須運用不同的薪酬決定因素來設計薪資系統，同時獎酬的策略決策也涵括多樣的構面，組織要如何訂定合理的薪資制度，吸引並留任優秀的人員同時藉此提高員工的績效表現，最後還要有效控制組織中的人事成本，卻是一門相當複雜的學問。每一個環節都必須相互配合才能發揮真正的功用，因此本研究將由不同的薪酬決策特性出發，探討組織的整體薪酬制度的現況，以及與其他變項之關聯性。
本研究的研究對象是國內上市櫃共1106家企業，利用紙本郵寄或是電子郵件的方式來發放問卷，問卷主要的填答對象是人力資源部門的主管，瞭解到底哪些因素會影響組織制訂薪酬策略。
結果指出，不同的薪酬制度之間彼此並非是相互排斥，相反地，這些因子彼此間是具有高度的相關性，組織可以依據不同的產業環境和組織特性來選擇不同的策略組合。同時影響薪酬制度的因素中，員工參與是一個相當重要的變項，組織雖然擁有制訂和執行薪酬策略的能力，但是並不代表制度對員工一定具有影響力，能不能讓員工接受才是更重要的部分。所以組織必須瞭解員工的期望和需求才能夠達到組織所期望的目標。

摘要(英)

Organization must allocate its limited resources because of pursuing efficiency and effectiveness. Compensation is the most flexible strategy to achieve company’s goal. Not only can it influence employees’ behavior such as attraction, retention and work-related performance, but also help organization to have better performance. Therefore, this study has two general focuses. Firstly, after reviewing the literatures on compensation, we will figure out the dimensions of compensation. Secondly, there are many determinants influencing organization to design pay system and examining which factor will influence which dimension.
This study used questionnaires to survey the HR managers who are responsible for employees’ compensation. Sampling unit is firm and there are 1106 public listed companies, including 672 companies listed in TSE (Taiwan-Stock-Exchange) market and 434 companies listed in OTC (Over-The-Counter) market.
Findings indicate that dimensions of compensation strategy are not exclusively; instead they are highly interrelated. Organizations can choice pay strategy depending on their consideration and offset each dimension’s shortages by one another. The usage of compensation strategy is rather flexible and complementary .The results also suggest that Employee Participation is very important factor when designing compensation system. Although the organization have an authority to design and implement policy, it is more important for company to make employee buy in the program. Only when understanding the need and expectation of members can organization motivate employee by reward system.

關鍵字(中)

★ 薪酬決定因素
★ 員工參與
★ 薪酬構面

關鍵字(英)

★ the Determinants of Compensation Strategy
★ Compensation

論文目次

第一章、緒論 …………………………….……………………………1
第一節、研究動機 …………………………………………………1
第二節、研究目的 …………………………………………………3
第二章、文獻探討 …………………………………………………….4
第一節、薪酬的定義 ………………………………………………4
第二節、薪酬的內涵 ………………………………………………6
第三節、薪酬特性因子構面 ……………………………………...13
第四節、企業組織薪酬決定因素 …………………………………20
第三章、研究方法 …………………………………………………….27
第一節、研究架構 …………………………………………………27
第二節、資料來源 …………………………………………………28
第三節、問卷設計與變數之操作型定義 …………………………29
第四節、統計分析方法 ……………………………………………35
第四章、實徵結果 …………………………………………………….37
第一節、樣本特性分析 ……………………………………………37
第二節、相關分析 …………………………………………………39
第三節、研究結果與討論 …………………………………………41
第五章、結論與建議 ………………………………………………….50
第一節、研究摘要 …………………………………………………50
第二節、管理意涵 …………………………………………………53
第三節、研究限制與未來研究方向 ………………………………55
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………57

參考文獻

--中文文獻--
諸承明、戚樹誠、李長貴，1998。我國大型企業薪資設計現況及其成效之研究—以「薪資設計四要素模式」為分析架構，輔仁管理評論，第五卷第一期：97-116。
諸承明，2001。薪酬設計理論與實務之整合模式--台灣大型企業實徵分析，人力資源管理學報，第一卷第一期：1-26。
黃家齊，2002。人力資源管理系統與組織績效-智慧資本觀點。中山管理評論，第8卷第3期：3-13。
王秉鈞，1994。管理學，台北：華泰書局。
李誠，2001。高科技產業人力資源管理，台北：天下文化出版社。
李誠，2002。人力資源管理的12堂課，再版，台北：天下文化出版社。
何永福、楊國安，1995。人力資源策略管理，再版，台北：三民書局。
李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬。1992，組織行為學，第六版，台北：華泰書局。
許士軍，1990，管理學，台北：台灣東華書局股份有限公司。
湯明哲，2003。策略精論基礎篇，台北：天下文化出版社。
張火燦，1997。策略性人力資源管理，2版，台北：揚智出版社。
黃英忠，1997。人力資源管理，台北：三民書局。
賴文珍譯，2002。人力資源管理的未來，台北：商周出版
諸承明，1995。薪資設計要素與組織效能關係之研究:以組織特性與任務特性為情境變項，國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版之博士論文
趙曉玲，2002。員工分紅入股制度對組織績效的影響，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之論文。
--英文文獻--
Armstrong, M., & Murlis, H., 1994. Reward Management: A Handbook of Remuneration Strategy and Practice, 3 rd : 23-44, London: Kogan Page Limited.
Barkema, H. G., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R., 1998. Managerial Compensation and Firm Performance：A General Research Framework, Academy of Managerial Journal, 41(2): 135-145.
Bergmann, T. J., & Scarpello, V. G., 2002. Compensation Decision Making, 4e, Ohio: South-Western Co.
Becker, G. S., 1993. Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bloom, M., & Milkovich, G. T., 1998. Relationship among Risk, Incentive Pay, and Organizational Performance, Academy of Managerial Journal, 41(3): 283-297.
Brown, C., 1990. Firms’ choice of method of pay, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43: 165-182.
Campion, M. A., & Thayer, P. W., 1989, Personnel Journal, 68(1): 43-46
Daft, R. L., 2001. Organization Theory and Design: 49-81, Ohio: South-Western Publishing Co.
Deci, E.L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R.M., 1999. A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation, Psychological Bulletin, 125(6): 627-668.
Deckop, J.R., Mangel, R., & Cirka, C. C., 1999. GETTING MORE THAN YOU PAY FOR: ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR AND PAY FOR PERFORMANCE PLANS, Academy of Managerial Journal,(42)4: 420-428
Dessler, G., 1997. Human Resource Management, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall Inc.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B., 1992. Compensation, Organizational Strategy, and Firm Performance, Ohio: South-Western Publishing Co.
Gomez-Mejia, L.R., & Welbourne, T. M., 1988. Compensation strategy: An overview and future steps, Human Resource Planning, 11(3): 173-189.
Gerhart, B., & Milkovich, G. T., 1990. Organizational Differences in Managerial Compensation and Financial Performance, Academy of Managerial Journal, 33﹙4﹚: 663-691.
Gerhart, B., & Rynes, S. L., 2003. Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications, California：Sage Publication, Inc.
Groshen, E. L., 1991. Five Reasons Why Wage Vary Among Employers, Industrial Relations, 30(3): 350-379.
Gupta, N., Schweizer, T.P., & Jenkins, G.D, Jr., 1987. Pay-for-Knowledge Compensation Plans: Hypotheses and Survey Results, Monthly Labor Review; Oct: 40-43.
Eisenhardt, K. M., 1989. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review, Academy of Managerial Journal, 14(1): 57-74
Hackett, T.J., & McDermott, D. G., 1999. A Holistic Approach to Compensation Design, Compensation and Benefit Review, 31(3): 36-42
Hill, Charles W.L., & Jones, G.R., 2004. Strategic Management, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Jenkins, G. D., Gupta, N., Mitra, A., & Shaw, J.D., 1998. Are Financial Incentive Related to Performance？A Meta-Analytic Review of Empirical Research, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5): 777-787.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-350.
Katzell, R.A., & Thompson, D.E., 1990. Work Motivation: Theory and Practice, American Psychologist, 45: 144-153.
Knight, D., Durhan, C. C., & Locke, E. A., 2001. The Relationship of Team Goals, Incentives, and Efficiency to Strategic Risk, Tactical Implementation, And Performance, Academy of Managerial Journal, 44(2): 326-338
Kohn, A., 1993. Why Incentive Plans Cannot Work, Harvard Business Review, 74(5): 54-61
Kolter, P., 2003. Marketing Management: 443-469, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall Inc.
Laurie, B., Scott, C., & Eleesha, L., 1998. Trends in workplace learning: Supply and demand in interesting times, Training and Development, 52(11): 51-75.
Lawler Ⅲ, E. E., 1983. Pay and Organization Development, California: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Lawler Ⅲ, E. E., 1994. From job-based to competency-based organizations, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15: 3-15.
Lawler Ⅲ, E.E., & Ledford, G.E., 1993. Who Uses Sill-Based Pay and Why, Compensation and Benefit Review, 25(2): 22-27.
Lazear, E. P., 1995. PERSONNEL ECONOMICS FOR MANAGERS, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Locke, E.A., 1982. Employee Motivation：A Discussion, Journal of Contemporary Business, 11(2): 71-82
Mahoney, T. A., 1989. Multiple Pay Contingencies: Strategic Design of Compensation. Human Resource Management, 28(3): 337-347
Mirvis, P. H., & Hackett, E, J., 1983. Work and work force characteristics in the nonprofit sector. Monthly Labor Review, 106(4): 3-12
Martin, G., & Pear, J., 1996. Behavior Modification：What it is and How to do it 5th：78-94, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall Inc.
Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M., 1994. Compensation 3rd, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M., 2002. Compensation 7th, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Murray, B., & Gerhart, B., 1998. An empirical analysis of a skill-based pay program and plant performance outcome, Academy of Management Journal, 41(1): 68-78
Noe, R. A., 2002. Employee Training & Development：108-117, New York: McGraw-Hill
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright P. M., 2003. Human Resources Management: Gaining a competitive advantage 4th, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rynes, S. L., & Bono, J. E., 2000. Psychological Research on Determination of Pay, In Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B., 2000. Compensation in Organization, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Rousseau, D. M., & Ho, V. T., 2000. Psychological Contract Issues in Compensation, In Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B., 2000. Compensation in Organization, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Skinner, B. F., 1953. Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Ulrich, D., 1997. Measuring Human Resources: An Overview of Practice and a Prescription for Result, Human Resource Management, 36(3): 303-320
Wagner Ⅲ, J. A., 1994. Participation’s effects on performance and satisfaction: A reconsideration of research evidence. Academy of Management Review, 19: 312-330
Weiner, N., & Mahoney, T. A., 1981. A Model of Corporate Performance as a Function of Environmental, Organizational, and Leadership Influence, Academy of Managerial Journal, 24 (3): 453-470
Worley, C.G, Bowen, D.E., & Lawler Ⅲ, E. E., 1992. On the relationship between objective increases in pay and employees subjective reactions, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13: 559-571
Zabojnik, J., & Bernhardt, D., 2001. Corporate tournaments, human capital acquisition, and the firm size-wage relationship, The Review of Economic Studies, 68: 693-715
Zenger, T. R., & Marshall, C.R., 1995. GROUP-BASED PAY PLAN: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SIZE, INCENTIVE INTENSITY, AND PERFORMANCE, Academy of Managerial Journal: 161-166

指導教授

劉念琪(Nien-Chi Liu)

審核日期

2004-6-16

推文