感知與偏好量表之效度驗證與評估－以某高科技公司為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：30

、訪客IP：18.119.104.238

姓名

李耕輔(Ken-Fu Lee) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

感知與偏好量表之效度驗證與評估－以某高科技公司為例
(Validity for Perception and Preference Inventory – on the example of a Taiwan High-Tech Company)

相關論文

★ 人格特質對工作績效影響之探討-以F銀行財富管理事業群人員為例	★ 護理人員的人格特質與工作滿意及工作績效之關係—以工作壓力為調節變項
★ 護理人員之工作壓力、工作動機、工作滿意與工作績效的影響-以某公立醫院為例	★ 心理契約與勞雇關係之關聯性探討
★ 情緒智力對工作動機、工作滿意及工作績效之影響-以人力資源工作者為例。	★ 社會人際行為模式測驗與工作績效間關連性之探討
★ 財務與非財務獎酬對工作動機與工作滿意度之干擾研究-以M直銷公司為例	★ 薪酬制度與員工績效表現之個案研究
★ 領導行為、員工創新行為及績效表現關聯性之個案探討	★ 高科技廠商薪資策略與離職率關係之探討
★ 人力資源管理系統與組織文化之交互作用對組織績效的影響	★ 情境式與行為描述式結構性面談之比較研究
★ 日薪人員與月薪人員之工作動機傾向對其工作績效與工作滿意之影響	★ 本地員工人格特質與對外派人員的利他行為、互動適應之關連探討
★ 五大人格量表的效用分析—以Taylor-Russell、Naylor-Shine 及Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser 模型為例	★ 工作動機的效用分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

個案公司為台灣一家以光電產業為主的高科技公司，2004年曾經針對所採用的甄選工具「感知與偏好量表」進行效度的驗證。結果顯示各職業別高低績效的員工在人格特質上並沒有顯著的差異，也因此產生實務上的懷疑。所以本研究主要的目的有二：第一是是考驗感知與偏好量表與主管評核績效之關聯性；第二是比較研發工程人員與非研發工程人員高低績效在人格特質上的差異性。
本研究採用2006年工作績效作為效標，進行預測性效度的檢驗。研究發現感知與偏好量表解釋總變異量為5.5%，其解釋總變異增加了1.8％並達到顯著的水準(p=0.039＜0.05)。其中生活步調達到顯著水準(標準化β係數為0.12，t值為2.44，p值＜0.05)。
研究進一步探討全體員工、行銷研發人員、非行銷研發人員高低績效員工人格特質有哪些顯著的差異。結果發現全體員工績效特優組的成就需求得分顯著較高（平均差=1.09；t=2.53；p<0.05）。但是在細緻性上績效特優組顯著較低（平均差=-1.18；t=-1.96；p<0.05）。研發工程人員在活動性、成就需求、喜新性等構面上，績效特優組的得分顯著高於績效落後組（平均差=1.72；t=2.47；p<0.05；平均差=2.05；t=3.51；p<0.01；平均差=1.13；t=2.10；p<0.01）。但是在細緻性上績效特優組則低於績效落後祖（平均差=-2.19；t=3.20；p<0.01）。至於非研發工程人員高低績效在人格特質上則沒有顯著的差異。

摘要(英)

Case Company is a High-tech Company mainly focused on the optoelectronic industry. The selection tool which Case Company is now adopting called PAPI (Perception and Preference Inventory). They had an investigation on in 2004 and the validity turns out to be low. No evident reveals that there is any significant difference between high performance employees and low performance in any career. As a result the study has two purposes: First, Using 2006 performance evaluated by supervisors as criterion to discuss the predictive validity of PAPI (Perception and Preference Inventory). Second, to investigate whether employees have significant difference in personality between high and low performance employees.
The study proves that PAPI do have significant predictive validity(total variance 5.5%;incremental variance1.8％,p=0.039＜0.05).The construct “Life pace” is a useful predictor (standardβ=0.12,t=2.44，p＜0.05).
At the whole employees’ part, high performance employees have significant higher scores in the following personality constructs: “Achievement Needs”（mean difference=1.09；t=2.53；p<0.05）.High performance employees also have significant lower scores in “Attention to detail” (mean difference=-1.18；t=-1.96；p<0.05) constructs.
At the Research engineering employees’ part, high performance employees have significant higher scores in the following personality constructs: ” Need for change”,” Achievement Needs”,” Work pace”（mean difference =1.72；t=2.47；p<0.05；mean difference =2.05；t=3.51；p<0.01；mean difference =1.13；t=2.10；p<0.01）.High performance employees also have significant lower scores in “Attention to detail” (mean difference=-2.19；t=3.20；p<0.01) constructs. At the Non-Research engineering employees’ part, there is no significant difference between high and low performance employees.

關鍵字(中)

★ 效度驗證
★ 感知與偏好量表
★ 人格特質
★ 人格

關鍵字(英)

★ personality traits
★ Perception and Preference Inventory
★ personality

論文目次

中文摘要 ………………………………………………………… i
英文提要 ………………………………………………………… ii
誌謝 ……………………………………………………………iii
目錄 ……………………………………………………………iv
表目錄 ……………………………………………………………v
圖目錄 ……………………………………………………………vi
第一章序論 ……………………………………………………… 1
第一節研究動機………………………………………………1
第二節研究目的………………………………………………3
第貳章文獻探討……………………………………………………4
第一節人格特質…………………………………………… 4
第二節人格特質理論…………………………………………6
第三節人格特質的衡量方法…………………………………8
第四節感知與偏好量表………………………………………10
第五節工作績效…………………………………………… 15
第六節人格特質與工作績效的關係……………………………20
第參章研究方法 ………………………………………………… 31
第一節個案公司簡介…………………………………………31
第二節研究對象………………………………………………32
第三節研究架構………………………………………………34
第肆章資料分析結果 …………………………………………… 38
第一節全體員工分析資料結果………………………………38
第二節相關分析………………………………………………40
第三節信度分析………………………………………………42
第四節迴歸分析………………………………………………43
第五節獨立樣本平均數比較…………………………………45
第伍章結果討論 ………………………………………………… 51
第一節研究結論………………………………………………51
第二節實務建議………………………………………………53
第三節研究限制………………………………………………55
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………… 56

參考文獻

一、中文部份：
司運善，企業核心人才能力與核心競爭力，企業活力月刊，第一期 pp26-27，民國九十三年。
沈慶龍，業務人員人格特質、推銷行為及其績效之研究－以汽車代理商為例，人力資源管理學報，第二卷，第四期，pp107-126，民國九十一年。
邱皓政，量化研究與統計分析，台北：五南圖書出版社，頁5，民國九十五年。
房美玉，儲備幹部人格特質甄選量表之建立與應用－以某高科技公司為例，人力資源管理學報，第二卷，第一期，pp001-018，民國九十一年。
房冠寶，人格特質與工作績效的關聯性研究－以證券業後勤行政人員為例，台北：國立台灣科技大學管理研究所未出版之碩士論文，民國八十九年。
吳秉恩，組織行為學。台北:華泰書局，民國七十五年。
吳明隆，Spss 統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計，第二版，台北：知城，頁6.17-6.24，民國九十四年。
段美玉，台灣市面販售用於人事甄選之心理測驗的比較研究，中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，民國九十五年。
徐蓉芬，研發人員人格特質與工作績效關係之研究，中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，民國九十一年。
陳靜怡譯，Shermerhorn,John R著,管理學，台灣西書出版社，民國八十八年。
黃仁宏、沈聰益，人格五因素模式預測銷售績效的效度-NEP-PI-R量表的檢驗與應用，管理學報，第二十卷，第三期，pp457-481，民國八十九年。
黃同圳，「人力資源管理策略」，人力資源管理的12 堂課，李誠等主編，天下遠見，頁39-41，民國八十九年。
黃希庭著，張春主編，人格心理學，世紀心理學叢書9，東華書局印行，民國八十七年。
張春興、楊國樞，心理學，三民書局，民國八十年。
張裕隆，我國「管理才能評鑑工具」發展及信效度分析研究，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告，民國八十六年。
張錫惠，績效管理-非營利組織經營管理研修精要，洪健全基金會，民國八十六年。
黃曼琴，應用中介模式探討Type A/B人格特質為中介變項對工作壓力與工作滿足、工作績效之影響。人力資源學報，創刊號，pp 59-74，民國八十八年。
黃靖雅，職業傾向與五大人格特質量表之甄選效度驗証與比較─以某電子公司為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，民國九十一年。
蔡維奇，「招募策略」，人力資源管理的12 堂課，李誠等主編，天下遠見，頁55-73，民國八十九年。
鄭臻妹，內外控人格特質、工作特性及工作績效之分析研究－以高科技產業員工為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理學系，碩士論文，民國九十年。
簡嘉誠，領導風格型態、創造力人格特質搭配對組織承諾與創新績效影響關係之研究，中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文，民國八十九年。
羅世輝、湯雅云，內外控人格特質與授權賦能認知對工作滿足之影響─以金融保險業為例，人力資源管理學報，第三卷，第一期，PP 001-019，民國九十二年。
洪光遠、鄭慧玲譯，Lawrence A. Pervin著，人格心理學，台北，桂冠書局，民國八十四年。
二英文部份：
Anderson, Michael G., The team personality-outcomes relationship moderated by task type: A meta-analytic investigation., The University of Tulsa., 136 pages，2006.
Armstrong, M., Baron, A., Performance Management: The New Realistic, Institute of Personnel and Development, London,1998.
Atchison, T, The employment relationship: Untiedor re-tied., Academy of Management Executive.,5(4), 52–62,1991.
Barney, J. B., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage., Journal of Management.,17, 99–120,1991.
Barney, J. B., & Wright, P. M., On becoming a strategic player: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage., Human Resource Management, 37, 31–46,1998.
Boxall, P., The strategic HRM debate and the resource based view of the firm., Human Resource Management Journal., 6(3), 59–75,1996.
Barrick, M.R., and Mount, M.K., The Big-Five personality dimensions in job performance ： A meta analysis., Personnel Psychology., 44 pp.1-26. 1991.
Carroll, Robert Todd., Myers-Briggs Type IndicatorR. The Skeptic's Dictionary., Retrieved January 8, 2004.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W., Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix., Psychology Bulletin., 56:81-105, 1959.
Collis, D., & Montgomery, C., Competing on resources : Strategy in the 1990s., Harvard Business Review ., 76(3), 118–128,1995.
Cummings, A. R Oldham, G. R.,Enhancing creativity: Managing work contexts for the high potential employee., California Management Review., Fall, 1997.
Day, David V., Personality And Job Performance: Evidence Of Incremental Validiy., Personnel Psychology., Durham,1989.
Day D.V.& Silverman S.B., Personality and Job Performance: Evidence of Incremental Validity,. Personnel Psychology., 42:25-36,1989.
Devellis,R.F. Scale Development Theory and Aplication.,London,1991.
Sage Elizabeth Seigne,Iain Coyne, Peter Randall,Jonathan Parker, Personality Traits of Bullies as A Contributory Factor In Workplace Bullying.International., Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior.,2007.
Eysenck, H. J.,Hankbook of abnormal psychology : An experimental approach ., New York : Basic Books., 97-725,1961.
Eysenck, H. J., Personality,stress,and disease:An interactionist perspective., Psychological Inquiry., 2 ,221-232,1991.
Fletcher,C., Self-awareness - a neglected attribute in selection and assessment, International Journal of Selection and Assessment.,5(3):183-187,1997.
Gatewood, R. D. and Field, H. S., Human Resources Selection, 5th, USA, Mike Roche,2001.
Guilford, T. P., Personality., New York: Megraw-Hill,1959.
Galton, F Measurement of character., Fortnightly Review., 42,181 ,1884.
Harris, M. M., & Sehaubroech, J.,A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer and peer-supervisor ratings., Personnel Psychology., 41, 42-62. ,1988.
Heilbrun,A.B., In O.KBuros（Ed.）The Edwards Personal Preference Schedule., Seventhmentalmeasurement year book.,Highland Park,N.J Gryphon.,1972.
Hogan T.P., Psychological Testing: A Practical Introduction,, 1st, Wiley, 2003.
Hough,L.M., The“big five”Personality Variables－Construct Confusion：Description Versus Prediction., Human Performance., 5（1&2）：139-155,1992.
Holland , J. L., Making vocational choices : A theory of vocational personalities and work environments .,(2nd ed) Englewood , NJ :Prentice-Hall,1985.
Howell, Jane M. & Christine M. Shea.,Individual Difference,
Environmental Scanning, Innovation Framing, and Champion Behavior:Key Predictors of Project Performance., The Journal of ProductInnovation Management, 18, pp. 15-27,2001.
James W Westerman & Bret L Simmons ,The Effects of Work Environment on thePersonality-Performance Relationship: An Exploratory Study., Journal of Managerial Issues.,19, Iss. 2; pg.288-307,2007.
Jain, R.K., Triandis, H.C., Management of R&D Organizations. Managing the Unmanageable., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY,1990.
Jill R Hough, d t ogilvie.,An Empirical Test of Cognitive Style and Strategic Decision Outcomes., The Journal of Management Studies.42, pg.417,2005.
Judge, T. A. and Bono,J.E., Relationship of Core self-EvaluationTraits -Self-Esteem, Generalized Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and Emotional Stability-with Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis., Journal of Applied Psychology., 86(1)： 80-92,2001.
Lowe, E.A. & Taylor, W.G.K., Creativity in Life Sciences Research., R&D Management., 16(1), 45-61,1986.
Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A., The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development., Academy of Management Review., 24, 31–48,1999.
Lewis, C., & Anderson, P.,PAPI Technical Manual., London: Cubiks,1998.
McCrae, R R; Costa, P.T., Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator From the Perspective of the Five-Factor Model of Personality., Journal of Personality., 57(1) :17-40,1989.
Michael Mount, Remus Ilies, Erin Johnson, Relationship Of Personality Traits and Counterproductive Work Behaviors .,Personnel Psychology, 59, 3; pg.591,2006.
Muchinsky, P.M.,Personnel Selection method., In C. L. Cooper & I.T. Roberstion (eds), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York: John Wile, P.60,1986.
Murray R Barrick; Laura Parks; Michael K Mount, Self-monitoring As A Moderator Of The Relasionships Between Personality Trait.,Personnel Psychology., 58, 3; pg.745,2005.
Neuman,G.A.,Wagner,S.H.,and Christiansen, N.D.,The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams., Group & Organization Management., 24(1),pp.28-45,1999.
Pervin, L.A., John,O.P., Personality :theory and research., NewYork , 1997.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G., The core competence of the corporation., Harvard Business Review.,68(3), 79–91,1990.
Podsakoff, P.M. & Organ, D.W., Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management., 12(4):531-544,1986.
Reed, R., & DeFilippi, R., Causal ambiguity,barriers to imitation and sustained competitive advantage., Academy of Management Review., 15,88–102,1990.
Roberts, E.B. & Fusfeld, A.R., Staffing the Innovative technology-based Organization., Sloan Management Review., 22, 19-34,1981.
Robert Guison and Richard Gottier, Validity of Personality Measures in Personnel Selection.,Personnel Psychology.,18：135-164,1966.
Robbins, S. P., Organizational Behavior(8th ed.)., Upper Saddle River,NJ. Prentice Hall International.,1998.
Russel L Thompson, Daniel F Brossart, Alfred F Carlozzi & Marie L Miville, Five-factor model (big five) personality traits and universal- diverse orientation in counselor trainees The Journal of Psychology., Provincetown: Vol. 136, Iss. 5; p. 561,2002.
Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E ., The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings., Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 124, pp. 262-274,1998.
Scott, Robert C. & Mitchell, Productivity Improvement through better Management of Human Resources., 49(1) ,pp.14-24. ,1972.
Susan E.Jackson & Randall S .Schuler,Managing Human Resources - A Partnership Perspective seventh edition., Newjersey： Thompson Learning INC,522-527,2000.
Tett,Jackson & Rothstein, Personality Measures as Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review., Personnel Psychology; 44(4), p703-742,1991.
Timothy A.Judge,Joyce E.Bono,Relationship of Core Self-Evaluations Traits—Self-Esteem, Generalized Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and Emotional Stability—With Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis.,Journal of Applied Psychology., Vol. 86, No. 1, 80-92,2001.

指導教授

房美玉(Meiyu Fang)

審核日期

2008-1-23

推文