五大人格量表的效用分析－以Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser及Raju-Burke-Normand Model為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：81

、訪客IP：18.116.80.217

姓名

李鈴惠(Ling-hui Lee) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

五大人格量表的效用分析－以Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser及Raju-Burke-Normand Model為例
(The Utility Analysis of Big Five Personality by Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser Model and Raju-Burke-Normand Model)

相關論文

★ 人格特質對工作績效影響之探討-以F銀行財富管理事業群人員為例	★ 護理人員的人格特質與工作滿意及工作績效之關係—以工作壓力為調節變項
★ 護理人員之工作壓力、工作動機、工作滿意與工作績效的影響-以某公立醫院為例	★ 心理契約與勞雇關係之關聯性探討
★ 情緒智力對工作動機、工作滿意及工作績效之影響-以人力資源工作者為例。	★ 社會人際行為模式測驗與工作績效間關連性之探討
★ 財務與非財務獎酬對工作動機與工作滿意度之干擾研究-以M直銷公司為例	★ 薪酬制度與員工績效表現之個案研究
★ 領導行為、員工創新行為及績效表現關聯性之個案探討	★ 綠⾊⼈⼒資源管理對員⼯綠⾊⾏為影響-以綠⾊⼼理氛圍為調節變項
★ 高科技廠商薪資策略與離職率關係之探討	★ 人力資源管理系統與組織文化之交互作用對組織績效的影響
★ 情境式與行為描述式結構性面談之比較研究	★ 日薪人員與月薪人員之工作動機傾向對其工作績效與工作滿意之影響
★ 本地員工人格特質與對外派人員的利他行為、互動適應之關連探討	★ 五大人格量表的效用分析—以Taylor-Russell、Naylor-Shine 及Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser 模型為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

人格特質的測量的確有助於行為的預測，因此常被用來當作甄選工具(Costa & McCrae, 1992; Barrick & Mount, 2005)。與工作有關的人格特質可以被歸類為五大構面，即所稱的五大人格(Barrick, Mount & Judge, 2001)。有關人格特質與工作績效之關係的研究不乏其數，但在測量人格特質在工作績效之效用一直是個很大的挑戰。效用分析模型是用以反映組織內方案執行成果之模型，反映任務或專案對組織增加的價值，本研究即探討五大人格與工作績效之間的關係，並運用效用分析的概念，使用Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser (1965)與Raju-Burke-Normand(1990)兩種模型，計算出五大人格對工作績效以金錢單位所表示的影響程度。
　　研究以個案公司現職員工為樣本，針對有效回收及與績效配對成功的369個樣本進行分析與測量。研究結果如下：(1)勤勉謹慎性對他評工作績效有正向影響；親和性、勤勉謹慎性、開放學習性對自評工作績效有正向影響；(2)人格對他評績效影響之金錢價值，以BCG模型測得新台幣2,290,141元，以RBN模型測得新台幣717,854元；(3) 人格對自評績效影響之金錢價值，以BCG模型測得新台幣18,156,872元，以RBN模型測得新台幣3,226,369元。之後針對研究結果對效用分析在實務運用上給予建議與討論。

摘要(英)

As Jim Collin (2001) says, “The executives who ignited the transformation from good to great first got the right people on the bus,” to emphasizing the importance of human capital. Researches investigating the nature of Person-Organization Fit which argues that people leave jobs that are not compatible with their personalities (Bowen, Ledford & Nathan, 1991; Kristof, 1996; Schneider, 1987; Schneider, Goldstein & Smith, 1995) have been one of major issue in HR field. People matters to which the extent we think it were. Years of research have resulted in a number of practically utility models in selection instruments, such as assessment center and cognitive ability test. However, previous researches draw less attention on the utility models in personality. This study presents Big Five Model of personality as a predictor of job performance and estimates the utility of personality tests by applying the Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser and the Raju-Burke-Normand utility models. 369 samples gathered from the company. Goldberg’s (2001) International Personality Inventory Pool (IPIP) Big Five questionnaire is used. The results show that : (1) Conscientiousness has positive effect on job performance rated by supervisors; Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience are valid predictors of job performance rated by oneself; (2) In supervisor-rating performance, total utility in Big Five personality test yields NT$ 2,290,141 via Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser model and NT$ 717,854 via Raju-Burke-Normand model; (3) In self-rating performance, total utility in Big Five personality test yields NT$ 18,156,872 via Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser model and NT$3,226,369 via Raju-Burke-Normand model. After the calculations, implications and restrictions are mentioned to fulfill the better utility analysis in practice.

關鍵字(中)

★ 工作績效
★ 人格
★ 五大人格
★ 效用分析

關鍵字(英)

★ Big Five
★ personality
★ job performance
★ utility analysis

論文目次

Chapter One Introduction 1
Chapter Two Literature Review 5
2-1 Personality 5
2-1-1 Personality and Selection 6
2-2 Big five 7
2-2-1 Agreeableness. 8
2-2-2 Conscientiousness. 8
2-2-3 Extroversion. 8
2-2-4 Neuroticism (Emotional Stability) 8
2-3-5 Openness to Experience. 9
2-3 Big Five Personality and Its Relationship with Performance 10
2-4 Utility Analysis 15
2-4-1 Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser Model. 17
2-4-2 Raju-Burke-Normand Model. 18
2-5 Utility Aspects of Selection 20
Chapter Three Method 22
3-1 Research Design 23
3-2 Utility Models 23
3-3 Measurement of Job Performance in Dollar Amount 26
3-4 International Personality Inventory Pool Questionnaire (IPIP) 27
3-3-1 Contents of IPIP. 27
3-5 Participants 29
3-6 Data Collection 30
3-6-1 Big Five Personality. 30
3-6-2 Performance Appraisal. 30
3-6-3 Compensation. 31
3-7 Data Analysis Procedures 31
Chapter Four Result 32
4-1 Descriptive Statistics 32
4-2 Factor Analysis 34
4-3 Reliability Analysis 35
4-4 Correlation Analysis 36
4-5 Multiple Regression Model 38
4-6 Utility Calculation 40
4-6-1 Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser Model. 40
4-6-2 Raju-Burke-Normand Model.. 41
4-7 Discussion 44
Chapter Five Conclusion and Suggestion 47
5-1 Conclusion 47
5-2 Limitations and Future Research Suggestion 48
5-3 Managerial Implications 49
Reference 50
Appendix56

參考文獻

Allport, G. W. 1937. Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Allport, G. W. & Odbert, H. S. 1936. Trait-names; A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1): 211.
Anderson, G. and Viswesvaran, C., 1998. An update of the validity of personality scales in personnel selection: A meta-analysis of studies published after 1992, Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. 1991. The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1): 1-26.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. 2005. Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human Performance, 18: 359–372.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. 2001. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., Mount, M. K. 1998. Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of applied psychology, 83: 377-391.
Barry, B., & Friedman, R. 1998. Bargainer characteristics in distributive and integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 345–359.
Bell, S. 2007. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 595–615.
Blum, M. L., Naylor, J. C. 1968. Industrial Psychology: Its Theoretical and Social Foundations. New York: Harper & Row.
Boudreau, J. W. 1992. Utility Analysis for Decisions in Human Resource Management in M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, (2rd ed. ), Palo Alto, CA: Calif Consulting Psychologists Press.
Boudreau, J. W., Boswell, W. R., & Judge, T. A. 2001. Effects of personality on executive career success in the United States and Europe. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 53-81.
Boudreau, J. W., & Rynes, S. L. 1985. The role of recruiting in staffing utility analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70: 354-366.
Bowen, D. E., Ledford, G. E. Jr., & Nathan, B. R. 1991. Hiring for the organization, not for the job. Academy of Management Executive, November: 35-51.
Brogden, H. E. 1946. On the interpretation of the correlation coefficient as a measure of predictive efficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 37: 65–76.
Brogden, H. E. 1949. When testing pays off. Personnel Psychology, 2: 171–183.
Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. 1997. Interviewers' perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 546-561
Carson, K.P., Becker, J.S., Henderson, J.A. 1998. Is utility really futile? A failure to replicate and an extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 84-96.
Cascio, W. F. 2000. Costing Human Resources: The Financial Impact of Behavior in Organizations (4th Ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.
Cascio, W. F., & Ramos, R. 1986. Development and application of a new method for assessing job performance in behavioral/economic terms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 20-28.
Cattell, R. B. 1943. The Description of Personality: Basic Trait Resolved into Clusters, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38: 476-506.
Collins, J., 2001. Good to Great. New York: HarperCollins.
Conn, S. R., & Rieke, M. L. 1994. The 16PF fifth edition technical manual. Campaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. 1992. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. 1965. Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions (2nd Ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Cronshaw, S. F. 1997. Lo! The stimulus speaks: The insider’s view of Whyte and Latham’s ”The futility of utility analysis. ” Personnel Psychology, 50: 611-615.
Erdheim, J., Wang, M., & Zickar, M. J. 2006. Linking the Big Five personality constructs to organizational commitment. Personality and Individual Differences, 41: 959–970.
Fitz-Enz, J. 2002. How to measure human resource management, (3rd Ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Fuh, I. T. 2004. The effect of personality trait on voluntary and organization citizenship behavior. Unpublished master thesis, NCNU, Nantau, Taiwan,
Goldberg, L.R., 1992. The development of markers for the Big-Five Factor Structure. Psychological Assessment, 4: 26-42.
Goldberg, L.R., 1993. The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits, American Psychologist, 48(1): 26-34.
Goldberg, L. R., 1999. A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models, Personality Psychology in Europe, 7: 7-28.
Goldberg, L. R., 2001. International personality item pool. Web address can be obtained from authors.
Goldberg, L. R., Zheng, L., Zhao, Y., & Liu, L., 2008. Reliability and concurrent validation of the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in China, Personality and Individual Differences, 45: 649-654
Gough, H. G., & Bradley, P. 1996. CPI manual (3rd ed). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Gow, A. J., Whiteman, M. C., Pattie, A., & Deary, I. J., 2005, Goldberg’s ”IPIP” Big-Five factor markers: Internal consistency and concurrent validation in Scotland, Personality and Individual Differences, 39: 317-329
Grant, S., & Langan-Fox, J. 2006. Occupational stress, coping and strain: The combined/ interactive effect of the Big Five traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 41: 719–732.
Guion, R. M., & Gottier, R. F., 1965. Validity of personality measures in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 18: 135-164.
Hazer, J. T., & Highhouse S. 1997. Factors influencing managers’ reactions to utility analysis: Effects of SDy method, information frame, and focal intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 104–112.
Highhouse, S. 1996. The utility estimate as a communication device: Practical questions and research directions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 11(1): 85-100.
Hoffman, C. C., & Thornton, G. C. III. 1997. Examining selection utility where competing predictors differ in adverse impact. Personnel Psychology, 50: 455-470.
Hogan, J., & Hogan, R. 1989. How to measure Employee Reliability? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 273-279.
Hogan, J., & Holland, B. 2003. Using theory to evaluate personality and job performance relations: A socianalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 100–112.
Hough, L.M. 1992. The Big Five personality variables-Construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5: 139-155.
Hough, L.M., Eaton, N.K., Dunnette, M.D., Kamp, J.D., McCloy, R.A. 1990. Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 581-95.
Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. 2002. Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 530–541.
Judge, T. A., Higgins, C., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. 1999. The Big Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52: 621-652.
Judge, T. A., & Ilies, R. 2002. Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 797–807.
Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. 2007. Personality and career success. Handbook of career studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Judge, T. A., Klinger, R., Simon, L. S., & Yang, I. W. F. 2008. The contributions of personality to organizational behavior and psychology: Findings, criticisms, and future research directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2: 1982-2000.
Judge, T. A., & Sturman M. C. 2001. Utility Analysis for Multiple Selection Devices and Multiple Outcomes. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 6(2): 9-28.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. 2002. Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 765–780.
Judiesch, M. K., Schmidt, F. L., Mount, M. K. 1992. Estimates of the dollar value of employee output in utility analyses: An empirical test of the two theories. Journal of Applied Psychology,77: 234-250.
Judiesch, M. K., Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E. 1993. Has the problem of judgement in utility analysis been solved? Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 903-911.
Kristof, A. I. 1996. Person-Organization Fit: An Integrative Review of Its Conceptualizations, Measurement, and Implications. Personnel Psychology, Spring: 1-49
Law, K. S. 1995. Estimating the Dollar Value Contribution of Human Resource Intervention Programs: Some Comments on the Brogden Utility Equation. Australian Journal of Management, 20 (2): 197
Law, K. S. & Myors, B. 1999. A Modification of Raju, Burke and Normand's (1990) New Model for Utility Analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 37(1): 39.
Latham, G. P., Whyte, G. 1994. The futility of utility analysis. Personnel Psychology, 47, 31-46.
Liu, L., Friedman, R., & Chi, S. 2005. ‘Ren Qing’ versus the ‘Big Five’: The role of culturally sensitive measures of individual difference in distributive negotiations. Management and Organization Review, 1: 225–247.
Locke, E. A. & Hulin, C. L. 1962. A review and evaluation of the validity studies of activity vector analysis. Personnel Psychology, 15: 25-42
Mabon, H. 1996. The cost of downsizing in an enterprise with job security. Journal of Human Resource Costing and Accounting, 1: 35-62.
Mabon, H. 1998. Utility Aspects of Personality and Performance. Human Performance, 11(2): 289-304.
Macan, T. H. & Foster, J. 2004. Managers' Reactions to Utility Analysis and Perceptions of What Influences Their Decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(2): 241-253.
McCrae R. R., & Costa P. T. Jr. 1992. An Introduction of the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications, Journal of Personality, 60: 175-215.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. 2003. Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. 2004. A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596.
Milkovich, G. T., & Boudreau, J. W. 1991. Human resource management. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Mischel, W. 1996. From good intentions to willpower. The psychology of action, Guilford: New York, 249-292.
Mount, M.K., & Barrick M.R. 2002. The Personal Characteristics Inventory manual. Libertyville, IL: The Wonderlic Corporation.
Nauta, A., & Sanders, K. 2000. Interdepartmental negotiation behavior in manufacturing organizations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11: 135-161.
Naylor, J. C. & Shine, L. C. 1965. A table for determining the increase in the mean criterion score obtained by using a selection device. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 3: 33-42.
Norman, W. T. 1963. Toward an Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attributes.　Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 66: 574-583
Raju, N. S., Burke, M. J., & Normand, J. 1990. A new approach for utility analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 3-12.
Rauschenberger, J. M. & Schmidt, F. L. 1987. Measuring the economic impact of human resource programs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2(1): 50-59.
Reilly, R. R. & Chao, G. T. 1982. Validity and fairness of some employee selection procedure. Personnel Psychology, 35:1-62.
Roche, W. J. Jr. 1961. The Cronbach-Gleser utility function in fixed-treatment employee selection. Dissertation Abstracts International 22, 4413. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Ryckman, R. 2004. Theories of Personality. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Salgado, J. F. 1997. The five factor model of personality and performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 30-43.
Salgado, J. F. 2003. Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76: 323–346.
Schmitt, N., Gooding, R., Noe, R., & Kirsch, M. 1984. Meta-analyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37(3): 407-422.
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., McKenzie, R. C., & Muldrow, T. W. 1979. Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 609–626.
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Pearlman, K. 1982. Assessing the economic impact of personnel programs on workforce productivity. Personnel Psychology, 35(2): 333-347.
Schneider, B.1987. The People Make the Place. Personnel Psychology, 40 (3): 437.
Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. 1995. The ASA Framework: An Update. Personnel Psychology, Winter: 747-73.
Taylor, H. C. & Russell, J. T. 1939. The relationship of validity coefficients to the effectiveness of tests in selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23: 565-578.
Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N. & Rothstein, M., 1991. Personality Measures as　Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-analytic Review, Personnel　Psychology, 44: 703-742
Vinson, G. A., Connelly, B. S. and Ones, D. S., 2007. Relationships between personality and organization switching: Implications for utility estimates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(1): 118-133.
Wiggins, J. S. 1968. Personality structure. Annual Review of Psychology. 19: 293-350.
Witt, L. A. Burke, L. A., Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. 2002. The interactive effects of Conscientiousness and Agreeableness on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 164-169.
Whyte, G., & Latham, G. P. 1997. The futility of utility analysis revisited: When even an expert fails. Personnel　Psychology, 50,601-610.

指導教授

房美玉(Mei-yu Fang)

審核日期

2009-7-20

推文