多源評量受評者之「期望–認知」落差對自我發展意圖之影響—以期望不確認理論之觀點

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：101

、訪客IP：3.147.77.245

姓名

何致瑄(Chih-Hsuan Ho) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

多源評量受評者之「期望–認知」落差對自我發展意圖之影響—以期望不確認理論之觀點
(The Relationship between disconfirmation of feedback accuracy and intention to self-development: A view of expectation-disconfirmation theory)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來，企業在進行人力資源發展計畫時，多導入360度評量制度，希望藉由多源來源的評估方式，使得評量結果更為客觀與正確。過去關於評核系統內涵效益之研究曾發現，當員工發現當實際結果與期望間的差距越大或越不一致時，評核系統的效益越低。360度評量既屬於評估系統的一類，受評者對於評量制度的預期與認知之落差是否影響評量制度的效能，應是値得重視之議題，但過去有關360度評量之研究卻顯少提及。因此，本研究以Oliver (1980) 所提及之期望不確認理論以及後續學者修正過後之期望不確認理論為基礎，探討受評者之評量結果「預期–認知」落差是否影響其自我發展意圖。
本研究採用問卷調查法，個案公司為某間正在導入360度評量系統之區域醫院，針對擔任受評者角色之主管進行前後測問卷調查。研究結果發現，受評者之評量結果「正確性『預期–認知』落差」對「有用性知覺」、「評量滿意度」有正向之影響；「有用性知覺」對「評量滿意度」、「自我發展意圖」有正向之影響；「評量滿意度」對「自我發展意圖」亦有正向之影響；同時「有用性知覺」與「評量滿意度」會作為中介變數，影響「正確性『預期–認知』落差」與「自我發展意圖」間的關係。

摘要(英)

360 degree feedback plays an important role in human resource development.
This study used the expectation-disconfirmation theory and Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) information system continuance model as a theoretical framework to examine how 360 degree ratees’ discrepancies between the expectation and the reality affect the intention to self-development.
This study conducted in a regional hospital which implemented 360 degree feedback for the first time. 80 employees were surveyed before starting 360 degree feedback. Ratees’ perceived accuracy, perceived usefulness, feedback satisfaction, and intention to self-development were investigated after 6 months. The results indicated that disconfirmation of accuracy was positively related to perceived usefulness and feedback satisfaction. It suggested when results are more accurate than ratees’ expectations, feedback will be more useful. Those who found feedback more accurate than expected also satisfied with the results. Perceived usefulness was positively related to feedback satisfaction and intention to self-development, and feedback satisfaction was positively related to intention to self-development, too. The results also indicated that perceived usefulness and feedback satisfaction mediate the relationship between disconfirmation of feedback accuracy and intention to self-development.

關鍵字(中)

★ 360度評量
★ 「預期–認知」落差
★ 有用性知覺
★ 滿意度
★ 自我發展意圖

關鍵字(英)

★ intention to self-development
★ 360 degree feedback
★ feedback disconfirmation
★ perceived usefulness
★ feedback satisfaction

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 3
第二章文獻探討 4
第一節 360度評量 4
第二節期望不確認理論 6
第三節以期望不確認理論解構360度評量制度 11
第三章研究方法 18
第一節研究架構 18
第二節研究對象 19
第三節研究流程 20
第四節研究工具 21
第五節統計分析方法 24
第四章研究結果 28
第一節敘述性統計分析 28
第二節驗證性因素分析 30
第三節結構模式分析 39
第四節中介效果檢驗 46
第五章研究結論與建議 49
第一節研究結論 49
第二節研究討論 52
第三節管理實務意涵與應用 55
第四節研究限制 58
第五節研究建議 60
參考文獻 62

參考文獻

中文部份：
1.王欣婉，2008，360度評量影響受評者工作目標設定行為因素之探討—結果正確性知覺的干擾或中介效果檢驗，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
2.李芳齡，2002，績效躍進：才能評鑑法的極致運用 (Dubois, David, 2001)，台北：城邦文化。
3.吳明隆，2007，結構方程模式—AMOS 的操作與應用，台北：五南。
4.徐崇文，2000，以360度回饋探討影響主管人員行為改變意圖相關因素之實證研究，國立政治大學心理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
5.梁仁傑，2005，虛擬社群知識分享持續意圖之探討—公平與知識品質所扮演的角色，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
6.黃芳銘，2004，結構方程模式理論與應用，台北：五南。
7.諸承明，1998，績效評核系統內涵及其效益之研究—採「期望/實際」差距分析模式，台大管理論叢，第9卷第1期：113-151。
英文部份：
1.Adamik, R. J., 2003. The Practice and Theory of Multi-rater Feedback Evaluations in Public Sector Management, unpublished manuscript, school of public affairs and health administration, University of La Verne, California
2.Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W., 1988. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411-423
3.Antonioni, D., 1996. Designing an Effective 360-degree Appraisal Feedback Process, Organizational Dynamics, 25(3): 24-29
4.Atwater, L. E., & Brett, J. F., Antecedents and Consequences of Reactions to 360-degree feedback, unpublished manuscript, School of Management, Arizona State University West
5.Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y., 1998. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16(1): 76-94
6.Bailey, C., & Fletcher, C., 2002. The Impact of Multiple Source Feedback on Management Development: Findings from a Longitudinal Study, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 853-867
7.Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A., 1986. The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction on Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statisticals Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-1182
8.Bentler, P. M., 1988. Theory and Implementation of EQS: A Structural Equations Program. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.Bernadin, H. J., Dahmus, S. A., Redmon, G., 1993. Attitudes of First-Line Supervisors toward Subordinate Appraisals, Human Resource Management, 32(2-3): 315-324
10.Bhattacherjee, A., 2001. Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model, MIS Quarterly, 25(3): 351-370
11.Bollen, K. A., 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. NY: Wiley
12.Bracken, D. W., Timmreck, C. W., Fleenor, J. W., & Summers, L., 2001. 360 Feedback From Another Angle, Human Resource Management, 40(1): 3-20
13.Brett, J. F., & Atwater, L. E., 2001. 360-degree Feedback: Accuracy, Reactions, and Perceptions of Usefulness, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5): 930-942
14.Churchill, G. A. JR., & Surprenant, C., An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Research, 1982(19): 491-504
15.Cronin, J. J. Jr., & Taylor, S. A., 1992. Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension, Journal of Marketing, 56(3): 55-68
16.Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R., 1989. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, 35(8): 982-1003
17.Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R., 1992. Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable, Information Systems Research, 6(2): 252-263
18.Eisenberger, R., Hunttington, R., Huchison, S., & Sowa, D., 1986. Perceived Organizational Support, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3): 500-508
19.Fletcher, C., & Baldry, C., 2000. A Study of Individual Differences and Self-awareness in the Context of Multi-source Feedback, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73: 303-129
20.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F., 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobervables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 39-50.
21.Garavan, N. T., Morley, M., & Flynn, M., 1997. 360-degree Feedback: Its Role in Employee development, Journal of Management Development, 16(2): 134-147
22.Gosselin, A., Werner, J. M., & Halle, N., 1997. Ratee Preference Concerning Performance Management and Appraisal, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8(4): 315-332
23.Greenhaus, J., 1989. Career Management. New York: Dryden Press.
24.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C., 1998. MultivariateData Analysis, 5th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
25.Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S., 1979. Consequences of Individual Feedback on Behavior in Organizations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4): 349-371
26.Ivancevich, J. M., 1982. Subordinates’ Reactions to Performance Appraisal Interviews: A Test of Feedback and Goal-Setting Techniques, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(4): 581-587
27.Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D., 1993. LISREL 8 User’s Reference Guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.
28.Kinicki , A. J., Prussia, G. E., Wu, B., & McKee-Ryan, F. M., 2004. A Covariance Structure Analysis of Employees’ Response to Performance Feedback, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6): 1057-1069
29.Landy, F., & Farr, J., 1980. Performance Rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87: 72-107
30.Lawler, E. E., 1967. The Multitrait-multirater Approach to Measuring Managerial Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(5): 369-383
31.London, M., & Beatty, W. R., 1993. 360-degree Feedback As a Competitive Advantage, Human Resource Management, 32: 353-372
32.London, M., Larsen, H. H., & Thisted, L. N., 1999. Relationships between Feedback and Self-Development, Group & Organization Management, 24(1): 5-27
33.London, M., & Smither, J. W., 1995. Can Multi-source Feedback Change Perceptions of Goal Accomplishment, Self-evaluations, and Performance-related Outcomes? Theory-based Applications and Directions for Research, Personnel Psychology, 48: 803-839
34.Makiney, J., & Levy, P., 1998. The Influence of Self-ratings Versus Peer Ratings on Supervisors Performance Judgment, Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions, 74: 212-28
35.McKinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F., 2002. The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach, Information Systems Research, 13(3): 296-315
36.Metz, J. E., 1998. Designing Succession System for New Competitive Realities, Human Resource Planning, 21(3): 31-37
37.Murphy, K. R., & Clevelend, J. N., 1995. Understanding Performance Appraisal, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
38.Nadler, D. A., 1977. Feedback and Organization Development: Using Data-based Methods, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
39.Neo, R. A., & Wilk, S. L., 1993. Investigation of the Factors That Influence Employees’ Participation in Development Activities, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 291-302
40.Oliver, R. L., A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions, Journal of Marketing Research, 1980(17): 460-469
41.Seifert, F. C., McDonald, R. A., & Yukl, G., 2003. Effects of Multisource Feedback and a Feedback Facilitator on the Influence Behavior of Managers toward Subordinates, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3): 561-569
42.Spreng, R. A., MacKenie, S. B., & Olshavsky, R. W., 1996. A Reexamination of the Determainants of Consumer Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing, 60: 15-32
43.Taylor, M. S., Fisher, C. D., & Ilgen, D. R., 1984. Individuals‘ Reactions to Performance Feedback in Organizations: A Control Theory Perspective, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 2: 81-124
44.Tornow, W. W., 1993. Perception or Reality: Is Multi-perceptive Measurement a Mean or an End?, Human Resource Management, 32(2&3): 223-229
45.Woodside, A. G., Frey, L. L., & Daly, R. T., 1989. Linking Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, and Behavior Intentions, Journal of Health Care Marketing, 9(4): 5-17
46.Yammarino, F., & Atwater, L. E., 1997. Do Managers See Themselves as Others See Them? Implications of Self-Other Rating a Agreement for Human Resource Management, Organizational Dynamics, 25(4): 35-44
47.Zeithaml, V. A., 1988. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence, Journal of Marketing, 52: 2-22
48.Zeme, R., & Zemke, S., 1999. Putting Competencies to Work, Training, 36(1): 70-76

指導教授

林文政(Wen-jeng Lin)

審核日期

2009-6-23

推文