博碩士論文 91426028 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:32 、訪客IP:3.15.0.88
姓名 陳建銘(Chien-Ming Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 工業管理研究所
論文名稱 針對供應商選擇問題建構一模糊決策支援模型
(A fuzzy-based decision support model to vendor selection problems)
相關論文
★ 以類神經網路探討晶圓測試良率預測與重測指標值之建立★ 六標準突破性策略—企業管理議題
★ 限制驅導式在製罐產業生產管理之應用研究★ 應用倒傳遞類神經網路於TFT-LCD G4.5代Cell廠不良問題與解決方法之研究
★ 限制驅導式生產排程在PCBA製程的運用★ 平衡計分卡規劃與設計之研究-以海軍後勤支援指揮部修護工廠為例
★ 木製框式車身銷售數量之組合預測研究★ 導入符合綠色產品RoHS之供應商管理-以光通訊產業L公司為例
★ 不同產品及供應商屬性對採購要求之相關性探討-以平面式觸控面板產業為例★ 中長期產銷規劃之個案探討 -以抽絲產業為例
★ 消耗性部品存貨管理改善研究-以某邏輯測試公司之Socket Pin為例★ 封裝廠之機台當機修復順序即時判別機制探討
★ 客戶危害限用物質規範研究-以TFT-LCD產業個案公司為例★ PCB壓合代工業導入ISO/TS16949品質管理系統之研究-以K公司為例
★ 報價流程與價格議價之研究–以機殼產業為例★ 產品量產前工程變更的分類機制與其可控制性探討-以某一手機產品家族為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 供應商選擇問題一直是供應鏈管理上一個非常重要的議題。因此,有許多研究針對供應商的評估與選擇提出各種的方法論。然而,這些方法論並沒將供應商的表現是唯一個隨時間變動的系統。另外,在決策環境中的各種不確定性,也沒在現有的方法論中獲得完整的討論,導致決策者無法信賴由這些方法論所獲得的解,而且決策者無法經由以往的經驗取得學習效果。本研究提出了一個模糊決策支援模式來解決上述的問題。在本模式中,存在於數學規劃之目標式、限制式中的不確定因素都被同時考慮。本研究中供應商的評價是經由一動態的模式考量,也就是供應商過去的表現會影響其未來的評量。此外,本模式中採用模糊理論在管理上能夠有效達成供應鏈中協同計畫之目標。本模式同時還利用供應商效率變動分群,決策者經由這項資訊能夠針對解進行下一步的改善,以及提供下一步分析進行的方向。本模式可應用於多產品、多供應商之環境。
摘要(英) Vendor selection problems have long been a critical issue in achieving a successful supply chain management. Numerous methodologies have been proposed for efficient evaluation and selection of vendors. However, these methodologies fail to treat performances as a time-varying process. Moreover, the fuzziness of decision-making has not been considered in a comprehensive way. As such, the solutions provided likely are unreliable, and the possibilities for decision makers to learn over time will be eliminated. This article presents a fuzzy-based decision support model to fill the gap. In the proposed model, the fuzziness within the objective function matrix and the right-hand-side of constraints are both considered. The dynamics of performance variations are incorporated in such a way that vendor’s current performance has a lasting effect on its future performance evaluation. The adoption of fuzzy theory has far-reaching managerial implications in achieving successful collaborative planning across a supply chain. The model also features “vendor grouping” analysis which will shed light on the constitutions of the obtained solutions. The proposed decision support model is capable of accurately assessing vendors’ performance profiles, in a general multi-items, multi-vendors scenario.
關鍵字(中) ★ 採購
★ 模糊理論
★ 決策支援
關鍵字(英) ★ Decision support systems
★ Purchasing
★ Fuzzy Sets
論文目次 Contents:
1. Introduction........................................................1
2. Literature Review...................................................5
3. Fuzzy Set and Fuzzy Linear Programming..............................9
3-1. Fuzzy Set Theory..................................................9
3-2. Fuzzy Linear Programming.........................................15
3-3. Multiobjective Fuzzy Linear Programming ........................21
4. Model Development..................................................24
4-1. Single item, multi-vendor model..................................27
4-2. Multi-item, multi-vendor model...................................27
4-3. Multi-item, multi-vendor, with vendor number constraint..........28
4-4. Other optional constraints.......................................28
4-5. Solution methodology.............................................31
4-6. Interactive Fuzzy Linear Programming & Decision Support Model....33
5. An Illustrative Example............................................42
6. Conclusion & future research.......................................49
Appendix-a: Revision of the max-min approach to vendor evaluation.....51
Appendix-c: vendor selection model....................................59
References:...........................................................60
參考文獻 1. Barbarosoglu, R. D., Yazgac, T., (1997), “An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem,” Production and Inventory Management Journal 38(1), 14-21.
2. Bellman, R., Zadeh, L. A., (1970), “Decision making in a fuzzy environment,” Management Science 17, 141-164.
3. Bloom, P., Perry, V., (2001), “Retailer power and supplier welfare-The case of Wal-Mart,” Journal of Retailing 77, 379-396.
4. Bojadziev G., Bojadziev, M., 1997, Fuzzy Logic for Business, Finance, and Management, World Scientific Publishing Co.
5. Bhutta, K., Huq, F., (2002), “Supplier selection problem: a comparison of total cost ownership and analytic hierarchy process,” Supply chain management 17(3) 126-135.
6. Burt, D.N., Dobler, D.W., Starling, S. L., (2003), World Class Supply Management, McGraw-Hill Co.
7. Borges, A.R., Antunes C.H., (2003a), “A weight space-based approach to fuzzy multiple-objective linear programming,” Decision Support Systems 34(4), 427-443.
8. Borges, A.R., Antunes C.H., (2003b), “A fuzzy multiple decision support model for energy-economy planning,” European Journal of Operational Research 145, 304-316.
9. Chanas, S., (1983), ‘The use of parametric programming in fuzzy linear programming,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11, 243-251.
10. Chao, T. Y., Hartley, (1996), “An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply chain,” Journal of Operation Management 14, 333-343.
11. Cohon, J.L., 1978, Multiobjective Programming and Planning, Academic Press, New York.
12. Dahel N.E., (2003), “Vendor selection and order quantity allocation in volume discount environments,” Supply Chain Management 8(4), 335-342.
13. Degraeve, Z. and Roodhooft, F., (1999), “Effectively selecting suppliers using total cost of ownership,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(1), 5-11.
14. Degraeve, Z., Labra, E., Roodhooft, F., (2000), “An Evaluation of Vendor Selection Models from a Total Cost of Ownership Perspective,” European Journal of Operational Research 125, 34-58.
15. Dickson, G..W., (1966), “An analysis of vendor selection system and decisions,” Journal of purchasing 2(1), 5-17.
16. Ellram, L.M., (1993), “Total cost of ownership: elements and implementation,” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 15(1), 3-11.
17. Ellram, L.M., Carr, A., (1994), “Strategic purchasing: A history and review of the literature,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 30(2), 10-19.
18. Feng, C.X., Wang, J., Wang, J.S., (2001), “An optimization model for concurrent selection of tolerances and suppliers,” Computers & Industrial Engineering 40, 15-33.
19. Gelinas, R., Jacob, R., Drolet, J., (1996), “Just-in-Time Purchasing and the Partnership strategy,” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 2(1), 39-45.
20. Ghodsypour, S.H., O’Brien, C., (1998), “A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming,” International Journal of Production Economics, 56–57, 199–212.
21. Herberling, M.E., (1993), ‘The rediscovery of modern purchasing,” Journal of Supply Chain Management 29(4), 48-53.
22. Karpak, B., Kumcu, E., Kasuganti, R., (1999), “An Application of Visual Goal Interactive Goal Programming: A Case in Vendor Selection Decisions,” Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis 8, 93-105.
23. Kasanan, K., Wallenius, H., Wallenius, J., Zionts, S., (2000), “A study of high-level managerial decision processes, with implications for MCTHE DECISION MAKER research,” European Journal of Operational Research 120, 496-510.
24. Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.M., 1999, Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
25. Kwong, C.H., Pang, W.H., Wang, C.W.K., (2002), “Combing Scoring Method and Fuzzy Systems Approach to Supplier Assessment: a case study,” Integrated Manufacturing System 13(7), 512-519.
26. Kruskal, W.H., Wallis, W.A., (1952), “Use of ranks in one-criterion analysis of variance,” Journal of American Statistic Association 47, 583-621.
27. Kumar, M., Vrat, P., Shankar, R., (2004), “A fuzzy goal programming approach for vendor selection problems in a supply chain,” Computers & Industrial Engineering 46, 69-85.
28. Lai, Y.J., Hwang, C.L., 1992, Fuzzy Mathematical Programming -methods and applications, Springer-Verlag.
29. Lai, Y.J., Hwang, C.L., 1994, Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making -methods and applications, Springer-Verlag.
30. Lau, H.C.W., Pang W.K., Wong W.Y.C., (2002), “Methodology for monitoring supply chain performance: A fuzzy logic approach,” Logistics Information Management 15(4), 271-281.
31. Leenders, M., Fearon, H.E., Flynn, A.E., Johnson, P.F., 2002 “Purchasing and Supply Management,” McGraw-Hill Co..
32. Li, C.C., Fun, Y.P., Hung, J.S., (1997), “A new measure for supplier performance evaluation,” IIE Transactions 29, 753-758.
33. Moller, K.E. K., Torronen P., (2003), “Business Suppliers’ Creation Potential—A Capacity-Based Analysis,” Industrial Marketing Management 32, 109-118.
34. Monozka, R.M., Trecha, S.J., (1988), “Cost-based supplier performance evaluation,” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 24(1), 2-7.
35. Monozka, R.M., Trent, R., Handfield, R., 1998, Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, International Thomson Publishing.
36. Mohanty, R.P., (1990), “How development is materials management in India? A survey,” Productivity 9, 5-12.
37. Narasimhan, R., (1983), “An Analytical Approach for Vendor Selection,” Journal of Purchasing and Materials management 19(4), 27-32.
38. Narasimhan, R., (2001), “Supplier evaluation and rationalization via data envelopment analysis: an empirical examination,” Journal of Supply Chain Management 37(3), 28-37.
39. Noci, G., (1997), “Designing ‘green’ vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier’s environmental performance,” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 13(2) 103-114.
40. Nydick, R.L., Hill, R.P., (1992), “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to structure the supplier selection procedure”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 28(2), 31-36.
41. Petroni, A., Braglia, M., (2000), “Vendor selection using principle component analysis”, The Journal of Supply Chain Management 36(2), 63-69.
42. Pearson, J.N, Ellram, L.M., (1995), “Supplier selection and evaluation in small versus large electronics firms,” Journal of Small Business Management 33(4), 53-65.
43. Reese, J., Geisel, R., (1997), “JIT procurement—A comparison of current practices in German manufacturing industries,” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 3(3), 147-154.
44. Render, B., Stair, R.M., Hanna, M.E., 2003, Quantitative analysis for management, Pearson Education, Inc.
45. Rommelfanger H., (1996), “Fuzzy linear programming and applications,” European Journal of Operational Research 92, 512-527.
46. Simchi-Levy, D., Kaminsky, P., Simchi-Levy, E., 2003, Deciding & Managing the Supply Chain-concepts, strategies & case studies, 2nd edition, McGraw Hill publishing company.
47. Stanciulescu, C., Fortemps, P., Installe, M., Wertz, V., (2003), “Multiobjective fuzzy linear programming problems with fuzzy decision variables,” European Journal of Operational Research 149, 654-675.
48. Swift, C.O., (1995), “Preferences for Single Sourcing and Supplier Selection Criteria,” Journal of Business Research 32, 105-111.
49. Tagaras, G., Lee, H., (1996), “Economic models for vendor selection,” Management Science 42(11), 1531-1543.
50. Taha, H.A., 1992, “Operations research—an introduction”, Macmillan Inc.
51. Talluri, S., Narasimham, R., (2003), “Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max-min approach,” European Journal of Operational Research 146, 543-552.
52. Talluri, S., (2002a), “A buyer-seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids,” European Journal of Operational Research 143, 171-180.
53. Talluri, S., (2002b), “Enhancing supply decisions through the use of efficient marginal costs models,” Journal of Supply Chain Management 38, 4-11
54. Tam, M.C.Y., Tummala, V.M.R., (2001), “An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system,” Omega 29, 171-182.
55. Verma, R., Pullman, M.E., (1998), “An analysis of the supplier selection process,” Omega 26(6), 739-750.
56. Walter, A., Muller, T.A., Helfert, G., Ritter, T., (2003), “Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality,” Industrial Marketing Management 32, 159-169.
57. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Benton, W.C., (1991), “Vendor selection criterion and methods,” European Journal of Operational Research 50, 2-18.
58. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., (1993), “A multiobjective approach to vendor selection,” European Journal of Operational Research 68, 173-184.
59. Weber, C.A., Ellram, L.M., (1993), “Supplier selection using multiobjective programming: A decision support system approach,” International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 23(2), 3-14.
60. Weber, C.A., Ellram, L.M., (1997), “Success factors in supplier development,” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 27(1), 39.
61. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Desai, A., (1998), “Non-cooperative strategies for vendor selection,” European Journal of Operational Research 108, 208-233.
62. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Desai, A., (2000), “vendOR: a structured approach to vendor selection and negotiation,” Journal of Business Logistics 21(1), 135-167.
63. Werners, B., (1987), “Interactive multiple objective programming subject to flexible constraints,” European Journal of Operational Research 31, 342-349.
64. Willis, T.H., Huston, C.R., Pohlkamp, F., (1993), “Evaluation measure of just-in-time supplier performance,” Production and Inventory Management Journal 34(2), 1-5.
65. Wilson, E.J., (1994), “The relative importance of supplier selection criteria: A review and update,” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 30(3), 34-41.
66. Zadeh, L.A., (1965), “Fuzzy Sets,” Information and control 8, 338-353.
67. Zadeh, L.A., (1975), “The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning,” Information Science 8, 199-249.
68. Zhu, J., (2004), “A buyer-seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids: Extension and new models,” European Journal of Operational Research 154, 150-156.
指導教授 張東生、沈國基
(Dong-Sheng Chang、Gwo-Ji Sheen)
審核日期 2004-6-14
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明