在數量折扣及信用期下的通路協調決策

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：52

、訪客IP：3.135.212.183

姓名

陳家麟(Chia-Lin Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

在數量折扣及信用期下的通路協調決策
(Channel Coordination under the Condition of Quantity Discounts with Credit Period Policy)

相關論文

★ 以類神經網路探討晶圓測試良率預測與重測指標值之建立	★ 六標準突破性策略—企業管理議題
★ 限制驅導式在製罐產業生產管理之應用研究	★ 應用倒傳遞類神經網路於TFT-LCD G4.5代Cell廠不良問題與解決方法之研究
★ 限制驅導式生產排程在PCBA製程的運用	★ 平衡計分卡規劃與設計之研究-以海軍後勤支援指揮部修護工廠為例
★ 木製框式車身銷售數量之組合預測研究	★ 導入符合綠色產品RoHS之供應商管理-以光通訊產業L公司為例
★ 不同產品及供應商屬性對採購要求之相關性探討－以平面式觸控面板產業為例	★ 中長期產銷規劃之個案探討 -以抽絲產業為例
★ 消耗性部品存貨管理改善研究-以某邏輯測試公司之Socket Pin為例	★ 封裝廠之機台當機修復順序即時判別機制探討
★ 客戶危害限用物質規範研究-以TFT-LCD產業個案公司為例	★ PCB壓合代工業導入ISO/TS16949品質管理系統之研究-以K公司為例
★ 報價流程與價格議價之研究–以機殼產業為例	★ 產品量產前工程變更的分類機制與其可控制性探討-以某一手機產品家族為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究從通路合作的角度來探討當供應商同時提供數量折扣與信用期兩項機制給零售商時的通路協商問題。其環境假設為只有單一賣方提供單一產品給予單一買方的三層式架構，且產品具有價格敏感性。本文分別從買賣雙方的資金機會成本與銀行利息兩個層面來加以探討，並假設其利息收入與支出的比率相同。
本研究以求得上述問題之買賣雙方的最佳決策以達成通路合作為目標，並針對買賣雙方處於獨立決策以及聯合決策等模式下發展出一些演算法以求取買方的最佳訂購及訂價決策。本文指出當買賣雙方處於獨立作決策的情形下，唯有當買方同意訂購至一定數量的產品且得已最大化賣方獲利時，賣方才有意願同時提供數量折扣及信用期給買方；而本文也指出通路獲利的最大化可藉由買賣雙方透過數量折扣與信用期兩個機制所作的通路聯合決策來加以達成，且買賣雙方透過通路合作所產生的通路聯合利潤必大於買賣雙方在各自作單獨決策時所產生的通路聯合利潤。另外，本文也指出當我們將銀行利息納入考量時，同時提供數量折扣與信用期兩項機制所獲得的通路聯合獲利必高於單一提供其任一機制時所獲得的通路聯合獲利。根據Nash (1950)所提出的理論，本文指出最佳的信用期應設定於當買賣雙方具有相同的議價能力時，其獲利最高。最後，本研究透過數學實驗與敏感度分析來探討分別針對買賣雙方處於獨立決策以及聯合決策等模式下，同時提供數量折扣與信用期兩個機制時對於買賣雙方以及整體通路所產生的獲利影響。

摘要(英)

This research focuses on the problem of channel coordination under the condition of the supplier who simultaneously offers the quantity discounts scheme and the credit period policy to the retailer. Market structure involves only one single supplier who sells one item to a single retailer, demand of the product is presented as a downward slopping function of retail price. The problem is discussed from the perspective of the capital opportunity cost and bank interest respectively. Yearly unit interest pay rate and yearly unit interest gain rate are assumed to be the same in this study.
The objective of this research is to determine the optimal policies of both parties to achieve channel coordination under the situations described above. Algorithms are developed to determine the optimal pricing and ordering policies under non-cooperative and cooperative relationships between both parties. We demonstrate that under non-cooperative relationship of both parties, the supplier only has the incentive to offer these mechanisms if the retailer orders up to a certain quantity that maximizes the supplier’s annual net profit. As for the situation when both parties are cooperated, channel coordination can be achieved by simultaneously applying the quantity discounts scheme and the credit period policy, and joint annual net profit under cooperative relationship is always higher than the joint annual net profit under unilateral decisions made by each party. We also demonstrate that when bank interest is in consideration, joint channel profit is higher under simultaneously applying the quantity discounts scheme and the credit period policy than applying either of them independently. According to Nash (1950), we illustrate that optimal credit period should be determined under the condition when both the supplier and retailer have the same bargaining power. Finally, numerical experiments and sensitivity analyses are applied to discuss the effectiveness of using both the quantity discounts and credit period as the mechanism to achieve channel coordination under non-cooperative and cooperative relationships between both parties.

關鍵字(中)

★ 通路合作
★ 數量折扣
★ 信用期

關鍵字(英)

★ Credit period
★ Quantity discount
★ Channel coordination

論文目次

Contents
Abstract Ⅰ
Contents Ⅲ
List of figures Ⅳ
List of tables Ⅴ
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Research background and motivation 1
1.2 Problem description 3
1.3 Research objectives 4
1.4 Research methodology and framework 5
1.4.1 Research methodology 5
1.4.2 Research framework 6
2. Literature review 7
2.1 Quantity discount 7
2.2 Delay in payment 10
2.2.1 Credit period 11
2.2.2 The effectiveness of credit period to the distribution channel 13
2.3 Channel coordination 16
3. Mathematical formulation from the aspect of the capital opportunity cost 18
3.1 Assumptions and notations 18
3.2 Model formulation 20
3.2.1 Non-cooperative relationship between the supplier and retailer 22
3.2.2 Cooperative relationship between the supplier and retailer 26
4. Mathematical formulation from the aspect of the bank interest 31
4.1 Non-cooperative relationship between the supplier and retailer 31
4.2 Cooperative relationship between the supplier and retailer 36
5. Numerical experiment and sensitivity analysis 41
5.1 When capital opportunity cost is in consideration 41
5.2 When bank interest is in consideration 45
6. Conclusion 48
6.1 Research contribution 48
6.2 Research limitation 49
6.3 Further research direction 49
Reference 51
Appendix 1. 54
Appendix 2. 55
Appendix 3. 56
Appendix 4. 57

參考文獻

1.Abad, P. L., “Determining optimal selling price and lot size when the supplier offers all-unit quantity discounts,” Decision Science, Vol.19 (1988a), 622-634.
2.Abad, P. L., “Joint price and lot-size determination when supplier offers incremental quantity discounts,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol.39, No.6 (1988b), 603-607.
3.Abad, P. L. and Jaggi, C. K., “A joint approach for setting unit price and the length of the credit period for a seller when end demand is price sensitive,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.83 (2003), 115-122.
4.Benton, W. C. and Park, S., “A classification of literature on determining the lot size under quantity discounts,” European Journal of Operational Research 92 (1996), 219-238.
5.Chang, C. T., “An EOQ model with deteriorating items under inflation when supplier credits linked to order quantity,” International Journal of Production Economics 88 (2004), 307-316.
6.Chapman, C. B., Ward, S. C., Cooper, D. F., and Page, M. J., “Credit policy and inventory control,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol.35, No.12 (1984), 1055-1065.
7.Chung, K. H., “Inventory control and trade credit revisited,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol.40, No.5 (1989), 495-498.
8.Chung, K. J., “A theorem on the determination of economic order quantity under conditions of permissible delay in payments,” Computers and Operations Research, Vol.25, No.1 (1998), 49-52.
9.Corbett, C. J. and Xavier de Groote, “A supplier’s optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric information,” Management Science, Vol.46, No.3 (2000), 444-450.
10.Goyal, S. K., “An integrated inventory model for a single supplier-single customer problem,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol.15, No.1 (1976), 107-111.
11.Goyal, S. K., “Economic order quantity under conditions of permissible delay in payments,” Journal of The Operational Research Society, Vol.36, No.4 (1985), 335-338.
12.Haley, C. W. and Higgins, R. C., “Inventory policy and trade credit financing,” Management Science, Vol.20, No.4 (1973), 464-471.
13.Huang, Y. F., “Optimal retailer’s ordering policies in the EOQ model under trade credit financing,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol.54, No.9 (2003), 1011-1015.
14.Hwang, H., Moon, D. H., and Shinn, S. W., “An EOQ model with quantity discounts for both purchasing price and freight cost,” Computers and Operations Research, Vol.17, No.1 (1990), 73-78.
15.Jeuland, A. P. and Shugan, S. M., “Managing channel profits,” Marketing Science, Vol.2, No.3 (1983), 239-272.
16.Kim, J., Hwang, H., and Shinn, S. W., “An optimal credit policy to increase supplier’s profits with price-dependent demand functions,” Production Planning and Control, Vol.6, No.1 (1995), 45-50.
17.Lal, R. and Staelin, R., “An approach for developing an optimal discount pricing policy” Management Science, Vol.30, No.12 (1984), 1524-1539.
18.Lewis, C. D., “Establishing a practical range of price discounts that should be aimed for when purchasing more than the EOQ,” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 4 (1998), 153-162.
19.Li, S. X. and Huang, Z., “Managing buyer-seller system cooperation with quantity discount considerations,” Computers and Operations Research, Vol.22, No.9 (1995), 947-958.
20.Mehta, D., “The formulation of credit policy models,” Management Science, Vol.15, No.2 (1968), B30-B50.
21.Monahan, J. P., “A quantity discount pricing model to increase vendor profits,” Management Science, Vol.30, No.6 (1984), 720-726.
22.Nash, J. F., “The bargaining problem,” Econometrica 18 (1950), 155-162.
23.Rachamadugu, R., “Effect of delayed payments (trade credit) on order quantities,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol.40, No.9 (1989), 805-813.
24.Shinn, S. W., “Determining optimal retail price and lot size under day-terms supplier credit,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol.33, Nos 3-4 (1997), 717-720.
25.Shinn, S. W. and Hwang, H., “Optimal pricing and ordering policies for retailers under order-size-dependent delay in payments,” Computers and Operations Research 30 (2003), 35-50.
26.Teng, J. T., “On the economic order quantity under conditions of permissible delay in payments,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol.53, No.8 (2002), 915-918.
27.Viswanathan, S. and Wang, Q., “Discount pricing decisions in distribution channels with price-sensitive demand,” European Journal of Operational Research 149 (2003), 571-587.
28.Weng, Z. K., “Channel coordination and quantity discounts,” Management Science, Vol.41, No.9 (1995), 1509-1522.

指導教授

沈國基(Gwo-Ji Sheen)

審核日期

2005-7-6

推文