根據多樣組數據評估製程品質績效

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：43

、訪客IP：3.147.140.37

姓名

林鴻欽(Hung-Chin Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

根據多樣組數據評估製程品質績效
(Process Performance Evaluation Based on Multiple Samples)

相關論文

★ 以類神經網路探討晶圓測試良率預測與重測指標值之建立	★ 六標準突破性策略—企業管理議題
★ 限制驅導式在製罐產業生產管理之應用研究	★ 應用倒傳遞類神經網路於TFT-LCD G4.5代Cell廠不良問題與解決方法之研究
★ 限制驅導式生產排程在PCBA製程的運用	★ 平衡計分卡規劃與設計之研究-以海軍後勤支援指揮部修護工廠為例
★ 木製框式車身銷售數量之組合預測研究	★ 導入符合綠色產品RoHS之供應商管理-以光通訊產業L公司為例
★ 不同產品及供應商屬性對採購要求之相關性探討－以平面式觸控面板產業為例	★ 中長期產銷規劃之個案探討 -以抽絲產業為例
★ 消耗性部品存貨管理改善研究-以某邏輯測試公司之Socket Pin為例	★ 封裝廠之機台當機修復順序即時判別機制探討
★ 客戶危害限用物質規範研究-以TFT-LCD產業個案公司為例	★ PCB壓合代工業導入ISO/TS16949品質管理系統之研究-以K公司為例
★ 報價流程與價格議價之研究–以機殼產業為例	★ 產品量產前工程變更的分類機制與其可控制性探討-以某一手機產品家族為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

過去製程良率是評估製程品質績效的一項重要依據，然而近二十年來產業已大多採用製程能力指標為量測製程績效的工具。製程能力指標是一無單位的量化值，衡量製程生產出符合要求規格產品的能力，其中，Cpk指標是一個重要且是目前業界常用的能力指標。由於Cpk指標是製程平均數和製程標準差的函數；其中製程平均數與製程標準差大多是未知且必須透過樣本數據予以估計，一般實務應用皆根據樣本數據以點估計的方式來估計Cpk指標值；不過，Cpk指標該視為滿足某種分配性質的隨機變數；而不應只是根據樣本數據以點估計的方式來評估製程的品質績效，不然將會忽略抽樣誤差所造成的效應。又過去的文獻大多探討單一樣組抽樣估計的方式計算Cpk指標估計值；然而製程樣本數據往往可以是以多樣組的型態呈現。另一方面，由於生產過程中投入的原物料或零組件或許由具有不同品質水準的多家供應商所提供，亦或同一家供應商於不同時期所提供的原物料或零組件有著不一致的品質水準等；因此，視製程平均數為一常數並非適當。本文根據樣本數據的收集呈現多樣組的形態時，考慮不同估計製程標準差的方式而定義四種Cpk指標的類似貝氏估計式，其中估計製程標準差的方法包括整體樣本標準差、混合樣本標準差、樣組標準差的平均和樣組全距的平均。本文的具體貢獻主要有三個方面，第一方面討論前兩種Cpk指標估計式的分配和推論統計性質，以說明並確認其估計Cpk指標的適度性。第二方面探討當大樣本時，估計式的漸近分配性質，並建立Cpk指標的近似信賴界限。第三方面根據統計假設檢定的理論考慮抽樣誤差，就四種不同的Cpk指標類似貝氏估計式發展較具有可靠性的評估製程品質績效的方法，決定判定臨界值以評估製程是否能夠滿足品質的要求。其中，利用樣組標準差的平均和樣組全距的平均所建立的Cpk指標估計式無法得到確實的抽樣分配，因此，本文應用Hamaker近似法則以常態逼近方式以避免原本複雜或未知的抽樣分配之使用，而求得近似並保守的判定臨界值和檢定力。再者，本文進一步利用兩定點技巧建構Cpk指標的評估計畫，即決定適當的判定臨界值以及需要達到最少的樣本總數。本研究最後提供實務執行的步驟以供業界在評估製程品質績效時的更有效的決策方式。

摘要(英)

Process yield is a reasonable approach used in industry for assessing process performance. There is also another and more common approach to measuring and communicating the assessment of process performance, called process capability indices. Process capability indices have been used widely in the industry to provide a numerical measure to determine whether a process is capable of producing items within the established specification limits present by the customer or designer. Among various capability indices, companies use capability indices to measure process improvement or to compare the processes of vendors and internal suppliers continue to rely heavily on Cpk index. Since the estimator of Cpk index is a random variable with a corresponding distribution, simply reporting from the sample data and then making a conclusion on whether the process is considered capable is not reliable. In practice, process information about process characteristics is often derived from multiple samples rather than from one single sample, particularly, when a daily-based production control plan is implemented for monitoring process stability. Applications in real situation, the production may require multiple supplies with different quality levels on each single shipment of the raw materials or components, or the raw materials or components from supply with unequal performance level on each period. Therefore, the common assumption that the process mean stay as a constant may not be satisfied in real situations. In this dissertation, There are four various standard deviation estimators are substituted for the process standard deviation, including the un-pooled sample standard deviation, the pooled sample standard deviation, the average of the subsample standard deviation and the average of the subsample range. The concrete contributions of this dissertation are threefold. The first is to investigate the distributional and inferential properties of the estimators of Cpk index based on un-pooled and pooled standard deviation estimators. The second is to investigate the asymptotic distributions of these estimators of Cpk index for arbitrary population under fairly general conditions of regularity, assuming that the fourth central moment exists. The third is to ensure the performance assessment reliable, the theory of testing hypothesis using the sampling distributions of these estimators of Cpk index are implemented, which is provided the critical values required for making decisions. Following Hamaker’s approximation, the testing procedures can be adequately derived from normal approximations while avoiding more complicated distributions. By further applying a two-point adjustment, equations to determine the critical values and to estimate the sample sizes necessary to achieve the recommended minimal value for Cpk index are provided. We then develop a step- by-step procedure for testing Cpk index. Practitioners can use the procedure to assess whether their processes meet the quality requirement.

關鍵字(中)

★ 製程能力指標
★ 均方差
★ 檢定力
★ 計量值管制圖
★ 假設檢定
★ 漸近信賴界限
★ 漸近分配

關鍵字(英)

★ Asymptotic confidence bound
★ Asymptotic distribution
★ Hypothesis Testing
★ Power
★ Process capability indices
★ Mean square error
★ Variable control chart

論文目次

Abstract (Chinese) i
Abstract ii
Preface iv
List of Contents v
List of Figures vii
List of Tables viii
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Objectives 3
Chapter 2. Literature Review 5
2.1 Estimation of Cpk 7
2.2 Critical Value for Test on Cpk 10
Chapter 3. Estimating Process Performance Index Based on Multiple Samples 14
3.1 Introduction 14
3.2 Estimating Cpk Index Based on Un-Pooled Variance Estimator 15
3.3 Estimating Cpk Index Based on Pooled Variance Estimator 19
3.4 Conclusion 25
Chapter 4. Measuring Process Performance Based on Large Multiple Samples 28
4.1 Introduction 28
4.2 Measuring Cpk Index Based on Un-Pooled Variance Estimator 29
4.3 Measuring Cpk Index Based on Pooled Variance Estimator 35
4.4 Conclusion 39
Chapter 5. Un-Pooled and Pooled Variance Estimators on Process Performance Assessment When Using Multiple Samples 40
5.1 Introduction 40
5.2 Testing Cpk Index 40
5.3 Normal Approximation for Testing Cpk Index 42
5.4 A Numerical Example 52
5.5 Sampling Requirements 53
5.6 Conclusion 56
Chapter 6. Process Performance Assessment Based on Variable Control Chart Samples 59
6.1 Introduction 59
6.2 Estimating Cpk Index Based on Variable Control Chart Samples 59
6.3 Normal Approximation for Testing Cpk Index Based on Variable Control
Chart Samples 67
6.4 A Numerical Example 77
6.5 Sampling Requirements 78
6.6 Conclusion 80
Chapter 7. Conclusions 83
References 85
Appendix: The Normality Assumptions 88

參考文獻

1.Anderson, T. W. (1984). An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
2.Arnold, S. F. (1990). Mathematical Statistics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
3. Bissell, A. F. (1990). How reliable is your capability index? Applied Statistics, 39(3), 331–340.
4.Boyles, R. A. (1991). The Taguchi capability index. Journal of Quality Technology, 23(1), 17–26.
5.Chan, L. K., Cheng, S. W. and Spiring, F. A. (1988). A new measure of process capability: Cpm. Journal of Quality Technology, 20, 162–175.
6.Chan, L. K., Xiong, Z. and Zhang D. (1990). On the asymptotic distributions of some eprocess capability indices. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 19(1), 11–18.
7.Chen, S. M. and Hsu, N. F. (1995). The asymptotic distribution of the process capability index Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 24(5), 1279–1291.
8.Chen, S. M. and Pearn, W. L. (1997). The asymptotic distribution of the estimated process capability index Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 26(10), 2489–2497.
9.Chou, Y. M. and Owen, D. B. (1989). On the distributions of the estimated process capability indices. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 18, 4549–4560.
10.Chou, Y. M. and Polansky, A. (1993). Power of tests for some process capability indices. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 22(2), 523–544.
11.Gunter, B. H. (1989a). The use and abuse of Cpk, part 1. Quality progress, 22(1), 72–73.
12.Gunter, B. H. (1989b). The use and abuse of Cpk, part 2. Quality progress, 22(3), 108– 109.
13.Gunter, B. H. (1989c). The use and abuse of Cpk, part 3. Quality progress, 22(5), 79–80.
14.Gunter, B. H. (1989d). The use and abuse of Cpk, part 4. Quality progress, 22(7), 86–87.
15.Hald, A. (1952). Statistical Theory with Engineering Applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
16.Hamaker, H. C. (1979). Acceptance sampling for percent defective by variables and by attributes. Journal of Quality Technology, 11(2), 139–148.
17.Johnson, N. L. and Welch, B. L. (1940). Applications of the noncentral t distribution. Biometrika, 31, 362–389.
18.Kane, V. E. (1986). Process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 18(1), 41–52.
19.Kirmani, S. N. U. A., Kocherlakota, K. and Kocherlakota, S. (1991). Estimation of σ and the process capability index based on subsamples. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 20(1), 275–291.
20.Kotz, S. and Lovelace, C. R. (1998). Process Capability Indices in Theory and Practice. Arnold, London, U. K.
21.Kotz S., Pearn, W. L. and Johnson, N. L. (1993). Some process capability indices are more reliable than one might think. Applied Statistics, 42, 55–62.
22.Li, H., Owen, D. B. and Borrego, S. A. (1990). Lower confidence limits on process capability indices based on the range. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 19(1), 1–24.
23.Lord, E. (1947). The use of range in place of standard deviation in the t-test. Biometrika, 41, 41–67.
24.Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
25.Patnaik, P. B. (1950). The use of mean range as an estimator of variance in statistical tests. Biometrika, 37, 78–87.
26.Pearn, W. L. and Chen, K. S. (1996). A Bayesian-like estimator of Cpk. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 25, 321–329.
27.Pearn, W. L. and Chen, K. S. (1997). A practical implementation of the process capability index Cpk. Quality Engineering, 9(4), 721–737.
28.Pearn, W. L. and Chen, K. S. (1999). Making decisions in assessing process capability index Cpk. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 15, 321–326.
29.Pearn W. L., Kotz, S. and Johnson, N. L. (1992). Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. Journal of Quality Technology, 24(2), 216–231.
30.Pearn, W. L. and Lin, G. H. (2003a). A Bayesian-like estimator of the process capability index Cpmk. Metrika, 57, 303–312.
31.Pearn, W. L. and Lin, G. H. (2003b). A reliable procedure for testing linear regulators with one-sided specification limits based on multiple samples. Microelectronics Reliability, 43, 651–664.
32.Pearn, W. L. and Lin, P. C. (2004). Testing process performance based on capability index Cpk with critical values. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 47, 351–369.
33.Pearn, W. L. and Shu, M. H. (2003). Manufacturing capability control for multiple power-distribution switch processes based on modified Cpk MPPAC. Microelectronics Reliability, 43, 963–975.
34.Pearn, W. L., Wu, C. W. and Chuang, H. C. (2005). Procedures for testing manufacturing precision Cp based on or control chart samples. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25, 598–607.
35.Pearson, E. S. and Hartley, H. O. (1976). Biometrika Tables for Statisticians: Vol. 1. Biometrika Trust, London, U. K.
36.Perakis M. and Xekalaki, E. (2003). On a comparison of the efficacy of various approximations of the critical values for tests on the process capability indices CPL, CPU, and Cpk. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 32, 1249– 1264.
37.Ramakrishnan, B., Sandborn, P. and Pecht, M. (2001). Process capability indices and product reliability. Microelectronics Reliability, 41, 2067–2070.
38.Rodriguez, R. N. (2002). Discussion: process capability indices–a review, 1992–2000. Journal of Quality Technology, 34(1), 28–31.
39.Serfling, R. J. (1980). Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
40.Shiau, J. J. H., Chiang, C. T., and Hung, H. N. (1999). A Bayesian procedure for process capability assessment. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 15, 369–3789.
41.Shiau, J. J. H., Hung, H. N. and Chiang, C. T. (1999). A note on Bayesian estimation of process capability indices. Statistics & Probability Letters, 45, 215–224.
42.Shina, S. G. (2002). Six Sigma for Electronic Design and Manufacturing. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
43.Summers, D. C. S. (2000). Quality. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
44.Wetherill, G. B. and Köllerströms, J. (1979). Sampling inspection simplified. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 142(1), 1–32.

指導教授

沈國基(Gwo-Ji Sheen)

審核日期

2006-7-4

推文