 |
|
|
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：58 、訪客IP：3.145.64.152
姓名 王薌君(Hsiang-Chun Wang) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 工業管理研究所 論文名稱 應用認知工作分析法組織協同設計團隊
(Applying Cognitive Work Analysis to Organize the Collaborative Design Team)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中) 建立一個複雜的協同產品開發系統是一個必須多方考量的問題，其需要一個良好的團隊來設計規劃此系統所有的組成條件。然而現今的團隊設計方法並不能廣泛地使用在發展中的系統，此論文採用的認知工作分析法(Cognitive Work Analysis, CWA)更適合於運用在發展中的系統。認知工作分析法是一個以系統為基準的方法，常用來分析、模型化及設計複雜的social-technical 系統。本文引用Naikar等人提出的以認知工作分析法為基礎的團隊設計方法(CWA-based team design method)加以延伸，在領域上，從原本的軍事到工管領域中的新產品開發，在方法上加入了協同這個變數。方法論的第一步是採用Work Domain Analysis (WDA)，來描繪與分析出系統的界線與組成條件；再來使用Control Task Analysis (CTA)來分析工作者的處境與問題；最後運用Table-top analysis 來分析之前所得之資訊，並產生各種可行的團隊設計。在描述更細部的流程後，我們將此方法論應用於汽車電子的一個例子裡。本文的目的是給予協同產品開發的專案管理者一個團隊設計的建議，使開發過程順利及產品開發成功。 摘要(英) Developing complex collaborative product development systems is a multidimensional problem that requires a good team to design all the requirements of the system. Whereas current team design approaches are not used widely for evolutionary systems, other approaches, such as those from within the Cognitive Work Analysis (CWA), may be better suited to revolutionary systems. CWA is a systems-based approach to the analysis, modeling, and design of complex socio-technical systems. We adopt a CWA-based team design method from Naiker et al. (2003), but apply it on different domain (e.g. collaborative product development). First step is using Work Domain Analysis (WDA), which can easily draw the boundary and analyze system requirements. Second, Control Task Analysis (CTA) is used to analyze workers’ situations and problems in a matrix. Third, table-top analysis will use preceding information and come out feasible team designs. After presenting detail process of team design, we apply it on a case and see the performance. However, the purpose is trying to give project manager who need to develop a team some suggestions before collaborative product development and achieve new product development success ultimately. 關鍵字(中) ★ 團隊設計
★ 協同產品開發
★ 汽車電子
★ 認知工作分析法關鍵字(英) ★ CPD
★ Team development
★ CWA
★ Automotive electronic論文目次 List of figures ...................................... viii
List of tables ...........................................x
Chapter I Introduction....................................1
1.1 Introduction of the problem.......................... 1
1.1.1 New product development ........................... 1
1.1.2 Collaboration in new product development........... 1
1.1.3 Teams play important roles ........................ 2
1.1.4 The reason for using cognitive work analysis....... 3
1.2 Purposes and the objectives ......................... 3
1.3 Outline of the thesis ............................... 3
Chapter II Literature Review ............................ 4
2.1 New product development ............................. 4
2.1.1 The process of new product development ............ 5
2.2 Collaborative product design/development ............ 6
2.2.1 The process of collaborative product design/development (CPD) ... 7
2.2.2 Collaborative Planning, Forecasting, and Replenishment .............. 9
2.3 Team development ................................... 10
2.3.1 Traditional approaches of designing teams......... 10
2.4 Cognitive engineering............................... 11
2.4.1 Cognitive work analysis........................... 12
2.4.1.1 Introduction of CWA ............................ 12
2.4.1.2 Phase1: Work domain analysis ................... 13
2.4.1.3 Phase2: Control task analysis .................. 14
2.4.1.4 Phase3: Strategies analysis .................... 16
2.4.1.5 Phase4: Social organization and cooperation analysis................... 17
2.4.1.6 Phase5: Work Competencies analysis.............. 18
Chapter III Research Methodology.........................19
3.1 The modeling framework............................................... 19
3.1.1 Refer to CWA-based technique for team design...... 19
3.1.2 Apply CWA to collaborative product design-- A Methodology
framework............ 24
3.2 The Detail Description of using CWA in Team Design ..28
3.2.1 Step1: Conducting work domain analysis............ 28
3.2.2 Step2: conducting control task analysis........... 30
3.2.3 Step3: Table top analysis......................... 32
Chapter IV Case Study....................................34
4.1 The automotive-electronic industry ................. 34
4.1.1 From automotive to automotive electronic.......... 34
4.1.2 Case/system description........................... 37
4.2 Design a team for collaborative ABS development..... 39
4.2.1 Identify the domain of collaborative ABS development ....................... 39
4.2.2 Conducting CTA-identify work systems ............. 45
4.2.3 Table top analysis-Assign job to team members..... 54
Chapter V Conclusion ....................................59
Reference................................................60參考文獻 1. Brown, S.L. and Eisenhardt, K.M. (1995). “Product Development: Past Research, Present Finding, and Future Directions,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.18, 343-378.
2. Burns, C.M. and Vicente, K.J. (2001). “Model-Based Approaches for Analyzing Cognitive Work: A Comparison of Abstraction Hierarchy, Multilevel Flow Modeling, and Decision Ladder Modeling,” International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, Vol.5, 357-366.
3. Chowanietz, E. (1995). “Automobile Electronics,” London: Newnes
4. Cummings, M.L. (2004).Designing Decision Support Systems for Revolutionary Command and Control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Virginia.
5. Cummings, M.L. (2006), “Can CWA Inform the Design of Networked Intelligent systems,” Moving Autonomy Forward Conference
6. Lintern, G. (2005). “Work Domain Analysis: Tutorial,” General Dynamics, Dayton, Ohio
7. Qin, J., Lancaster, F.W. & Allen, B. (1997).”Types and Levels of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences,” Journal of American Society for Information Science, Vol.48, 893-916
8. Judd, T.C. (2005). Program Level Design for Six Sigma. Cognition Corporation and SAE International
9. Kirwan, B. & Ainsworth, L.K. (1992). A Guide to Task Analysis: The Task Analysis Working Group. Taylor & Francis.
10. Kumar, K., Fenema, P.C. & Glinow, M.A. (2004). Intense Collaboration in Globally Distributed Teams: Evolving Patterns of Dependencies and Coordination. The Netherlands: ERIM Report Series Research in Management
11. Hoegl, M. (2005). “Buyer-Supplier Collaboration in Product Development Projects,” Journal of Management, Vol.31, 530-548
12. Steward, G.L., Manz, C.C. & Sims, H.P. (1999). Team Work and Group Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons.
13. Mcshane, S. and Travaglione, T. (2003) ”Organizational behaviour” Australia: McGraw-Hill
14. Naikar, N., Pearce, B., Drumm, D. & Sanderson, P.M. (2003). “Designing Teams for First-of-a-Kind, Complex Systems Using the Initial Phases of Cognitive Work Analysis: Case Study,” Human Factors, Summer, 202-217
15. Naikar, N., Hopcroft, R. & Moylan, A. (2005).Work Domain Analysis: Theoretical Concepts and Methodology. Australia: Air Operations Division
Defence Science and Technology Organisation
16. Naikar, N. (2006).”Beyond Interface Design: Further applications of cognitive work analysis,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,Vol.36, 423-438
17. Naikar, N., Moylan, A. & Pearce, B. (2006).”Analyzing activity in complex systems with cognitive work analysis: concepts, guidelines and case study for control task analysis,” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science ,Vol.7,No.4, July-August, 371-394
18. Osteras, T., Murthy, D.N.P. & Rausand, M. (2006).”Product Performance and Specification in New Product Development, ” Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 17 ,177-192
19. PDMA (2002). The PDMA Toolbook for New Product Development. New York: Wiley.
20. Rasmussen, J. (1980). The Human as a systems component. Human Interaction with Computers, H. T. Smith and T. R. G. Green (Eds), pp.67-96 (London: Academic Press).
21. Rasmussen, J. (1981). Models of mental strategies in process plant diagnosis. In Rasmussen, J. & Rouse, W.B. (Eds), Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures. New York: Plenum Press.
22. Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A.M., & Goodstein, L.P. (1994). Cognitive Systems Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons
23. Robert Bosch GmbH(2004), “Automotive Electrics Automotive Electronics,” Automotive engineer
24. Sanderson, P. (1998). Cognitive Work Analysis and the Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human-Computer Interactive Systems. Victoria, U.S.: Swinburne Computer-Human Interaction Laboratory
25. Tjosvold, D. (1984). “Cooperation Theory and Organizations,” Human Relations, Vol.37, 743-767
26. Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (1995), “Product Design and Development,” MacGraw-Hill.
27. Vicente, K.J.(1999), “Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work,” New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
28. Wang, H.F., Zhang, Y.L. (2002). “CAD/CAM integrated system in collaborative development environment,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol.18, 135-145
29. Wind, J. and Mahajan, V. (1997), “Issues and Opportunities in New Product Development: An Introduction to the Special Issue,” Journal of Marketing Research, February, 1-12
30. Yang, Y. J., Zhang, J, Wan, L., Chen, L.P. (2006), “Internet-based collaborative product development chain for networked product development,” Manufacture Technology,Vol.28, 845-853
31. Voluntary Interindustry Commerce Standards CPFR Advisory Team (2004).Collaboration Planning, Forecasting and Replenishment-An Overview. VICS指導教授 高信培(Hsing-Pei Kao) 審核日期 2007-7-13 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit