製造程序外包時學習與品質之關係

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：30

、訪客IP：3.145.119.199

姓名

周德芳(Te-fang Chou) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

製造程序外包時學習與品質之關係
(The quality learning on manufacturing outsourcing)

相關論文

★ 二階段作業研究模式於立體化設施規劃應用之探討–以半導體製造廠X及Y公司為例	★ 推行TPM活動以改善設備總合效率並提昇企業競爭力...以U公司桃園工廠為例
★ 資訊系統整合業者行銷通路策略之研究	★ 以決策樹法歸納關鍵製程暨以群集法識別關鍵路徑
★ 關鍵績效指標(KPI)之建立與推行 - 在造紙業	★ 應用實驗計劃法- 提昇IC載板錫球斷面品質最佳化之研究
★ 如何從歷史鑽孔Cp值導出新設計規則進而達到兼顧品質與降低生產成本目標	★ 產品資料管理系統建立及導入-以半導體IC封裝廠C公司為例
★ 企業由設計代工轉型為自有品牌之營運管理	★ 運用六標準差步驟與FMEA於塑膠射出成型之冷料改善研究(以S公司為例)
★ 台灣地區輪胎產業經營績效之研究	★ 以方法時間衡量法訂定OLED面板蒸鍍有機材料更換作業之時間標準
★ 利用六標準差管理提升生產效率－以Ａ公司塗料充填流程改善為例	★ 依流程相似度對目標群組做群集分析- 以航空發動機維修廠之自修工件為例
★ 設計鏈績效衡量指標建立 —以電動巴士產業A公司為例	★ 應用資料探勘尋找影響太陽能模組製程良率之因子研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

從前公司主要集中於生產成本的考量，也就是盡可能地減少成本的花費，以此來增加他們的利潤，然而環境變動,如策略也隨之改變了，所以如何將供應鏈營業成本減到最小和最大化供應鏈利潤成為了企業主要目標。再加上消費者對品質的重視，故產品品質和節省成本越來越重要。而外包也是一種使企業增加他們的利潤戰略，它的意思為:保留核心能力，非核心能力的部分交給其他更有專業的公司來負責。因此為了獲得更多利潤，企業必須考慮將產品外包給更專業的製造商，並且當企業決定外包數量時，必須考量製造商在品質上的學習效果。
在本文裡, 我們將從需求談論學習作用和產品品質之間的關係,意味著比較好的產品品質會帶來更高的產品價格和更多需求數量。由決策面來看, 企業的外包數量影響製造商的學習作用, 帶來產品的更好的品質。在需求端,假設更好的品質將會提高我們的保留價格，進而使產品價格提高，購買數量增加。最後我們分析這樣關係在二個連貫銷售期間以及多期，同時求出使企業利潤最大化的最佳外包數量。

摘要(英)

In the past, companies mostly focused on production costs. They increased their profit by cutting down costs. Due to the environmental changes, the strategy has been changed. To minimize supply chain operating cost and to maximize supply chain profits have become the main goals. In addition, the consciousness of the consumers makes them care more about quality, and the product quality and cost saving are more and more important. Therefore, outsourcing meaning “Keeping the core specialty, leaving behind the others.” has been regarded as one of the strategies for enterprises to increase their profit. Moreover, in order to obtain more profits, the enterprise has to take the manufacturer’s learning effect on product quality into consideration when the enterprise decides the outsourcing quantity.
The learning effect on the product quality during the manufacturing process draws less attention. In this paper, we discuss the relation between the learning effect and the product quality from the demand side, which shows that better product quality results in higher product price and more demand quantity. In the decision end, the outsourcing quantity of an enterprise affects the learning effect of the committed manufacturer, which brings better quality of the products. In the demand end, through the reservation price distribution, the quality affects the consumers’ interests in the product and reservation prices they are willing to pay for the product. We analyze such relation within two consecutive sale periods and then extend it to multi-periods. The optimal quantities in consecutive periods and multi-periods are then determined to maximize the profits of the enterprise.

關鍵字(中)

★ 保留價格
★ 學習效果
★ 品質
★ 外包

關鍵字(英)

★ reservation price
★ learning effect
★ quality
★ outsourcing

論文目次

Contents
Chinese abstract........... i
Abstract................... ii
Contents................... iv
The contents of figures.... vi
The contents of tables..... vii
1 Introduction............. 1
1.1 Background/Motivation...1
1.2 Research objectives.... 4
1.3 Thesis framework....... 6
2 Literature review........ 9
2.1 Outsourcing reasons and characteristic on failure rate.........................9
2.2 Learning on manufacturing process.........11
2.3 Reservation price to represent customer choice.... 14
3 Two-periods model and analysis.... 15
3.1 Base model.... 16
3.1.1 The learning curve model on manufacturing process..16
3.1.2 The function of customers’ behavior... 17
3.1.3 Cost function within the enterprise.... 19
3.2 Manufacturing is without learning effect..19
3.3 The enterprise doesn’t take the learning effect into consideration.................................20
3.4 The enterprise only considerate learning effect in the second period.................................23
3.5 The enterprise takes into the learning effect within both periods..................................25
4 Multi-periods model and analysis........... 29
4.1 The learning effect is considered but only bases on the outsourcing quantity of the immediately previous period........................................29
4.2 The learning effect is considered and the dynamic analysis is applied among all periods.........30
5 Sensitivity analysis........................36
5.1 The effects of the failure rate in the first period..36
5.2 The effects of the amount of potential demand in the first period...................................37
5.3 The effects of the unit outsourcing cost............39
5.4 The effects of the level that the quality affects consumers...........................................42
5.5 The effects of the effects of the learning effect parameter...........................................42
5.6 The effects of the highest price that all consumers thought for perfect goods...........................46
5.7 The effects of the lowest price that all consumers thought for perfect goods...........................46
6 Conclusion and future research....................50
References..........................................53
Appendix 56
A1. Proof of Proposition 1..........................56
A2. Proof of Proposition 2..........................56
A3. Proof of Proposition 3..........................57
A4. Proof of Proposition 4..........................57
A5. Proof of Proposition 5..........................58
A6. Proof of Proposition 6..........................58
A7. Proof of Proposition 7..........................58
The contents of figures
Figure 1-1 This relation between the learning effect and the product quality..............................6
Figure 1-2 The process of this research..........8
Figure 5-1 The effects of the failure rate in the first period..........................................38
Figure 5-2 The effects of the amount of potential demand in the first period..............................40
Figure 5-3 The effects of the unit outsourcing cost..41
Figure 5-4 The effects of the level that the quality affects consumers................................43
Figure 5-5 The effects of the effects of the learning effect parameter.................................45
Figure 5-6 The effects of the highest price that all consumers thought for perfect goods.............47
Figure 5-7 The effects of the lowest price that all consumers thought for perfect goods..............49
The contents of tables
Table 4-1 The learning effect is considered but only bases on the output quantity of the immediately previous period...............................................32
Table 4-2 The learning effect is considered and the dynamic analysis is applied among all the periods....33
Table 4-3The quantity in the model 4.1and model 4.2 by twelve periods analysis..............................34
Table 4-4 in the model 4.1 and model 4.2 with ....... 35

參考文獻

References
1. Benjaafar, S., Elahi, E., and Karen, L. (2007), “Outsourcing via Service Competition” , Management Science, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 241-259.
2. Berggren, C. (2004), “Rethinking Outsourcing in Manufacturing: A Tale of Two Telecom Firms”, European Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 211-223.
3. Bowon, K. (2003), “Dynamic outsourcing to contract manufacturers with different capabilities of reducing the supply cost”, International Journal of production economics, Vol. 12, No.1, pp. 63-80.
4. Bitran, R., and Mondschein V. (1997), “Periodic pricing of seasonal products in retailing”, Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 64-79.
5. Cabral, B. and Riordan, H. (1994), “The Learning Curve, Market, Dominance, and Predatory Pricing”, Econometrica, Vol. 23, No.2, pp. 1115-1135.
6. Chang, S. and Kinnucan, W. (1991), “Advertising, Information, and Product Quality: The Case of Butter”, American Journal Economics, Vol. 73, No.4, pp. 1195-1203.
7. Chand, S. (1989), “Lot Sizes and Setup Frequency with Learning in Setups and Process Quality”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 42, pp. 192-202.
8. Chen, Y. (1999), High tech economic analysis, Third Edition, pp. 192-202.
9. Ehie, C. (2001), “Determinants of success in manufacturing outsourcing decisions: a survey study”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 42, No.1, pp. 31-39.
10. Evans, R. and Lindsay, M. (1997), The Management and Control of Quality, Third Edition, pp. 68
11. Fine, H. (1986), “Quality Improvement and Learning in Productive Systems”, Management Science, Vol. 42, No.10, pp. 1302-1315.
12. Ferdows, K., Miller, G., Nakane, J., and Vollmann, E. (1986), “Evolving global manufacturing strategies: Projections into the 1990s”, International Journal of operations and production management, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 6-16.
13. Garvin, A. (1984), “What Dose Quality Really Mean?”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 25-43.
14. Garvin, A. (1987), “Competing on the eight dimensions of quality”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 101-109.
15. George, L. and Rajagopalan, S. (1998), “Process Improvement, Quality, and Learning Effects”, Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 11, pp. 1517-1532.
16. Juran, M. (1999), Quality Control Handbook, Third Edition, pp. 20.
17. Kakabadse, A. and Kakabadse, N. (2002), “Trends in Outsourcing: Contrasting USA and Europe”, European Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 189-198.
18. Kotler, P. and Stonich, J. (1991), “Turbo marketing through time compression”, The Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 24-29.
19. Lacity, C. and Hirschheim R. (1993), “Implementing Information Systems Outsourcing：Key Issues and Experiences of an Early Adopter”, Journal of General Management, Vol.19, No.1, pp.17-30.
20. Lee, H., Chandra, J., and Deleveaux, J. (1997), “Optimal Batch Size and Investment in Multistage Production Systems with Scrap”, Production Planning and Control, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 586-596.
21. Lazear, P. (1986), “Retail pricing and clearance sales”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 14-32.
22. Marcellus, L. and Dada, M. (1991), “Interactive Process Quality Improvement”, Management Science, Vol. 37, No. 11, pp. 1365-1376.
23. Quelin, B. and Duhamel, O. (2003), “Bringing Together Strategic Outsourcing and Corporate Strategy: Outsourcing Motives and Risks”, European Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 647-661.
24. Robert, E. (1992), “The quality revolution”, production and operations management, Vol. 52, No.1, pp. 118-120.
25. Russell, H. and Taylor, D. (1998), Operations Management, Fifth Edition, pp. 79-80.
26. Tapiero, S. (1987), “Production Learning and Quality Control”, IIE Transactions, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 362-369.
27. Tarakci, H., Tang, W., and Teyarachaku, S. (2007), “Learning effects on maintenance outsourcing”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 17, No. 5 , pp. 53-76.
28. Thomas, B. (1992), “ Total Quality Training: The Quality Culture and Quality Trainer”, McGraw-Hill Book Company, pp. 21-58.
29. Tracey, R. (2003), Calculating Costs and Benefits, Human Resources Management and Development Handbook, Second Edition, pp. 1362-1385.
30. Wright, P. (1936), “Learning Curve”, Journal of the Aeronautical Science, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp.131-252.
31. T. Xiao, and Y. Xia, and Zhang, P. (2007), “Strategic Outsourcing Decisions for Manufacturers that Produce Partially Substitutable Products in a Quantity-Setting Duopoly Situation”, Decision Science, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 79-113.
32. Yelle, E. (1979), “The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive survey”, Decision Science, Vol. 33, No. 10, pp. 302-328.

指導教授

曾富祥(Fu-Shiang Tseng)

審核日期

2008-6-25

推文