兩製造商之自有品牌合約競爭問題

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：26

、訪客IP：3.145.84.198

姓名

蕭雅綺(Ya-Chi Hsiao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

兩製造商之自有品牌合約競爭問題
(Contracting campaign of the private label between two manufacturers)

相關論文

★ 二階段作業研究模式於立體化設施規劃應用之探討–以半導體製造廠X及Y公司為例	★ 推行TPM活動以改善設備總合效率並提昇企業競爭力...以U公司桃園工廠為例
★ 資訊系統整合業者行銷通路策略之研究	★ 以決策樹法歸納關鍵製程暨以群集法識別關鍵路徑
★ 關鍵績效指標(KPI)之建立與推行 - 在造紙業	★ 應用實驗計劃法- 提昇IC載板錫球斷面品質最佳化之研究
★ 如何從歷史鑽孔Cp值導出新設計規則進而達到兼顧品質與降低生產成本目標	★ 產品資料管理系統建立及導入-以半導體IC封裝廠C公司為例
★ 企業由設計代工轉型為自有品牌之營運管理	★ 運用六標準差步驟與FMEA於塑膠射出成型之冷料改善研究(以S公司為例)
★ 台灣地區輪胎產業經營績效之研究	★ 以方法時間衡量法訂定OLED面板蒸鍍有機材料更換作業之時間標準
★ 利用六標準差管理提升生產效率－以Ａ公司塗料充填流程改善為例	★ 依流程相似度對目標群組做群集分析- 以航空發動機維修廠之自修工件為例
★ 設計鏈績效衡量指標建立 —以電動巴士產業A公司為例	★ 應用資料探勘尋找影響太陽能模組製程良率之因子研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年來，越來越多的零售商紛紛投入發展自有品牌，並視其為一項增加獲利的重要來源。本文中，我們以一個數學模型，探討在雙頭壟斷的市場中，兩個製造商彼此生產具替代性的產品，且將自身商品賣給同一個零售商。然而，當零售商的自有品牌加入市場後，兩個相互競爭的製造商應如何訂定自有品牌的批發價格，以期獲得與零售商合作生產自有品牌。藉此，製造商可彌補因為自有品牌出現後所造成需求減少帶來的損失，甚至透過這樣的合作關係，可以賺取更多的利潤。利用數學模型，以製造商的角度出發，找出最佳的定價策略。除此之外，我們也討論參數對我們模型的影響，例如產品替代率，製造成本以及市場基礎。最後，提出一些例題解釋我們得到的研究以及觀察結果。

摘要(英)

Recently, more and more retailers invest in developing private labels (PLs) and think it is the important source of increasing profit. In this study, we propose a duopoly model of two manufacturers who produce substitutable products, and sell their goods through the same retailer. When retailer’s PL has been introduced in this market, what the wholesale prices two competed manufacturers should offer to win the production of PLs. The motivation for manufacturers to react is that it can compensate the loss of profit and may earn more than their loss. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to determine an appropriate wholesale price which the manufacture can get the opportunity to cooperate with the retailer. Furthermore, we discuss how the parameters such as product substitutability, manufacturing cost and the base level of demand affect the model. We also provide example to illustrate some observations at the end.

關鍵字(中)

★ 雙頭壟斷
★ 替代率
★ 自有品牌

關鍵字(英)

★ Private labels
★ Substitutability
★ Duopoly

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
Content iii
List of Figures iv
List of Tables v
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Objectives 2
1.3 Research framework 2
2. Literature review 4
2.1 The study of PLs 4
2.2 The channel structure and the product substitutability 6
2.3 The source of our demand function 7
3. The Model 8
3.1 Scenario setting 8
3.2 Demand function and notation 9
3.3 The original model without the PL 11
3.4 The model with the PL 13
4. Sensitivity Analysis 15
4.1 The numerical result of the model with the PL 15
4.2 Analysis of substitutability and competitive degree 16
4.3 Analysis of the manufacturing cost 18
4.4 Analysis of the base level of demand 19
5. Summary and Future Research 22
Reference 24

參考文獻

1. Apelbaum, Eidan, Eitan Gerstner, and Prasad A. Naik. (2003). “The Effects of Expert Quality Evaluations Versus Brand Name on Price Premiums,” The Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 12, No. 2/3, pp. 154–165.
2. Ailawadi Kusum L. and Bari Harlam. (2004). “An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of RetailMargins: The Role of Store-Brand Share,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 147–165.
3. Choi, S.C., (1991). “Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer,” Marketing Science, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 271–296.
4. Choi, S. C, (1996). “Price competition in a duopoly common retailer channel,” Journal of Retailing, Vol.72, No.2, pp.117-134.
5. Corstjens, M. and Rajiv Lal. (2000). “Building Store Loyalty Through Store Brands,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.37, August, pp. 281–291.
6. Corstjen, M. and Lal, R. (2000). “Building store loyalty through store brands,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 37, August, pp. 281–291.
7. Cotterill, R. W., Dhar, R. and Putsis, W. (2000). “Assessing the competitive interaction between private labels and national brand,” Journal of Business, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 109–137.
8. Chintagunta, Pradeep K., Andr’ e Bonfrer, and Inseong Song. (2002). “Investigating the Effects of Store-Brand Introduction on Retailer Demand and Pricing Behavior,” Management Science, Vol. 48, No. 10, pp. 1242–1267.
9. Cheng Wu, C. and Jen Wang, C. (2005). “A positive theory of private label: a strategic role of private label in a duopoly national-brand market,” Marketing Letters, Vol. 16,No. 2, pp. 143–161.
10. Dhar, S. K., and S. J. Hoch (1997).”Why Store Brand Penetration Varies by Retailer,” Marketing Science, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 208-227.
11. Dunne, David and Chakravarthi Narasimhan. (1999). “The New Appeal of Private Labels,” Harvard Business Review, May-June, 41–52.
12. Hoch, Stephen J. and Shumeet Banerji. (1993). “When Do Private Label Succeed?” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 34, Summer, pp. 57–59.
13. Hoch, Stephen J. (1996). “How Should National Brands Thinks About Private Labels?” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 37, Winter, pp. 89–102.
14. Kim,Namwoon, and PhilipM. Parker. (1999). “CollusiveConduct in Private LabelMarkets,” International Journal of Research in Marketing 16(2), 143–155.
15. Lal, Rajiv. (1990). “Price Promotions: Limiting Competitive Encroachment,” Marketing Science, Vol. 9, Summer, pp. 247–262.
16. McGuire, Timothy W.; Staelin, Richard. (1983). “An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration,” Marketing Science, Vol. 2, pp. 161–191.
17. Mills, David E. (1999). “Private Labels and Manufacturer Counterstrategies,” European review of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 125–145.
18. Marketing week. (2000). “Private Labels on Parade,” Vol. 23, No. 27, pp. 46.
19. Narasimhan, Chakravarthi and Ronald T. Wilcox. (1998). “Private Label and the Channel Relationship: A Cross-Category Analysis,” Journal of Business, Vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 573–600.
20. Obina, J., Rubio, N. and Yague, J. M. (2006). “Relationship of retail brand manufacturers with retailers, International Review of Retail,” Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 257–275.
21. Pauwels, K., and S. Srinivasan. (2004). ”Who Benefits from Store Brand Entry?” Marketing Science, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 364-390.
22. Quelch John A. and David Harding. (1996). “Brands Versus Private Labels: Fight to Win,” Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb, pp. 99–109.
23. Rao, Ram C. (1991). “Pricing and Promotions in Asymmetric Duopolies,” Marketing Science, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 131–144.
24. Raju, J.S., Sethuraman, R., Dhar, S.K., (1995). “The introduction and performance of store brands,” Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 957–978.
25. Sayman, Serdar, Stephen J.Hoch, and Jagmohan S.Raju. (2002). “Positioning of StoreBrands,”Marketing Science, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 378–397.
26. Sethi, Suresh P.; Yan, Houmin; Zhang, Hanqin. (2005). “Analysis of a Duopoly Supply Chain and its Application in Electricity Spot Markets,” Annals of Operations Research, Volume, Vol. 135, pp. 239-259.
27. Trivedi, Minakshi. (1998). “Distribution channels: An extension of exclusive retailership,” Management Science, Vol. 44, pp. 896-910.
28. Winningham, Bruce. (1999). “Private Label Grows Up,” Discount Merchandiser, Vol. 39, No. 11, pp. 109–112.

指導教授

曾富祥(Fu-Shiang Tseng)

審核日期

2009-7-8

推文