台灣家族與非家族企業之公司治理：以總經理異動為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：31

、訪客IP：18.119.110.17

姓名

郭逸真(Yi-chen Kuo) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

台灣家族與非家族企業之公司治理：以總經理異動為例
(Corporate Governance and CEO Turnover in Taiwanese Family and Nonfamily Businesses)

相關論文

★ 台灣與大陸在ERP專案管理、專案成員向心力與離心力的不同之處	★ ERP專案成員離心力與向心力對代理問題之影響
★ 事業策略、人力資源管理與組織績效之實證研究	★ 商用飛機維修成本控制之研究-以某國籍航空公司為例
★ ERP系統更換關鍵成功因素研究-以Oracle系統導入為例	★ 中小企業自行開發ERP 系統關鍵成功因素研究- 以高科技產業為例
★ 文化創意產業產品策略選擇之影響因素-以國片為例	★ 專案管理風險對ERP專案成功之影響
★ 品質機能展開與多準則決策於設備開發應用	★ ERP導入品質因素對IFRS轉換專案之影響
★ ERP投資金額對服務品質及導入後IT治理目標之分析	★ ERP 導入問題對專案的影響
★ IFRS轉換對員工退休金計畫影響	★ IFRS轉換對企業績效評估的影響
★ IFRS轉換問題對IFRS效益的影響	★ ERP環境下企業集團自行編製合併報表能力對XBRL資訊透明度之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

台灣有許多家族企業，積極的創業精神與強烈的家族向心力是家族企業的關鍵成功因素，然而家族主義的許多特質也可能導致異於一般非家族企業的獨特公司治理環境，本研究於是藉由觀察總經理異動與公司治理變數之間的關聯性，檢定公司治理的效能。為觀察總經理異動行為藉以檢視公司治理之效能，本研究取樣台灣上市公司共計304家，其中包括63家家族控制公司，241家非家族控制公司。實證結果顯示：家族控制公司總經理異動顯著比非家族控制公司低。此外，家族控制公司總經理異動與公司績效呈現顯著負相關。然而，總經理所有權與董事會所有權則與家族企業總經理任期無關。此項發現隱含家族企業董事會足以有效置換總經理，即使所有權相對較低。因此，從所有權結構觀點，本研究建議代理理論適用於解釋台灣非家族控制公司的總經理異動行為，然而，並不適用於解釋台灣家族控制公司的總經理異動行為。

摘要(英)

Many businesses are family-controlled in Taiwan. The aggressive nature of entrepreneurship and strong cohesiveness of families are successful factors. Many aspects of familism also lead to the unique corporate governance in family businesses. This study tested the effectiveness of corporate governance by investigating the link between CEO turnover and corporate governance of family and nonfamily firms in Taiwan.
This study investigated the tenure of CEOs in a sample of 304 listed companies in Taiwan; 63 firms were family controlled and 241 were not. The results show that CEO turnover is significantly lower in family firms and its relationship to corporate performance is negative. CEO ownership and board ownership are not significant in explaining the length of family CEO tenure. These findings imply that family boards can still effectively replace the CEO despite relatively low ownership. From the ownership structure perspective, this study suggested that the agency theory is applicable for nonfamily firms in Taiwan, but unsuitable for family firms.

關鍵字(中)

★ 所有權結構
★ 公司績效
★ 總經理異動
★ 家族企業
★ 代理理論

關鍵字(英)

★ Ownership structure
★ Corporate performance
★ CEO turnover
★ Family firm
★ Agency theory

論文目次

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT II
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS V
LIST OF FIGURES VII
LIST OF TABLES VIII
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CEO TURNOVER IN TAIWANESE FAMILY AND NONFAMILY BUSINESSES
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. MOTIVATION AND RESEARCH PURPOSE 1
1.2. RESULT PREVIEW 4
1.3. THESIS STRUCTURE 6
CHAPTER 2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 7
2.1. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN TAIWAN 7
2.2. SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FAMILY FIRMS 11
2.3. THE RESEARCH FRAMEWORK 14
2.4. THREE EFFECTS ON CEO TENURE AND TESTABLE HYPOTHESES 18
2.4.1. The Turnover-performance Relation 18
2.4.2. Turnover, Performance and the Effects of CEO Ownership 20
2.4.3. The Role of Board of Directors 21
CHAPTER 3 SAMPLE, DATA AND METHOD 23
3.1. SAMPLE 23
3.2. DEFINITIONS OF VARIABLES 24
3.3. EMPIRICAL MODEL 25
CHAPTER 4 EMPIRICAL RESULTS 29
4.1. DESCRIPTION OF CEO TURNOVER 29
4.2. COMPARISON OF FAMILY FIRMS AND NONFAMILY FIRMS 31
4.3. ESTIMATES OF COX PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL 34
CHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS TESTS 37
5.1. DIFFERENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 37
5.2. FORCED V. S. VOLUNTARY TURNOVERS 39
5.3. OTHER ANALYSIS METHODS 41
5.4. CONSIDER INTERACTION EFFECTS 45
5.5. CONSIDER INSIDE CEO SUCCESSIONS 47
CHAPTER 6 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 50
6.1. DISCUSSION 50
6.2. CONCLUSION 56
REFERENCES 59

參考文獻

References
Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide. SAS Institute.
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1329.
Begley, T. M., & Tan, W. (2001). The socio-cultural environment for entrepreneurship: A comparison between East Asian and Anglo-Saxon countries. Journal of International Business Studies. 3, 537-553.
Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Family Firms. Journal of Finance. 58(5), 2167-2201.
Chami, R. (1999). What’s different about family business? Working paper series, file no. 98061505, Social Science Research Network, Internet.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics. 58, 81-112.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance. 57, 2741-2771.
Coughlan, A. T., & Schmidt, R. M. (1985). Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 7, 43-66.
Cox, D. R. & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of survival data. Chapman & Hall, Inc., London, U. K.
Daily, C. M., & Dollinger, M. J. (1992). An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms. Family Business Review. 5(2), 117-136.
Davis, J. F., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review. 22(1), 20-47.
Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Ownership structure and top executive turnover. Journal of Financial Economics. 45, 193-221.
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management. 16(1), 49-64.
Eisenhardt K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1985). Organizational forms and investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics. 14, 101-119.
Gabarro, J. J. (1987). The dynamics of taking charge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Gatfield, T., & Youseff, M. (2001). A critical examination of and reflection on the Chinese family business unit and the Chinese business clan. Family Business Review. 14(2), 153-158.
Geeraerts, G. (1984). The effect of ownership on the organization structure in small firms. Administrative Science Quarterly. 29, 232-237.
Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review. 21(1), 13-47.
Gibson, M. S. (2003). Is corporate governance ineffective in emerging markets? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 38, 231-250.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Makri, M. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled publicly traded corporations. Academy of Management Journal. 44(2), 226-237.
Gubitta, P., & Gianecchini, M. (2002). Governance and flexibility in family-owned SMEs. Family Business Review. 15(4), 277-297.
Hugh, M. (1986). Entrepreneurship and economic growth in Taiwan. Business Forum. Los Angeles: Fall 1986. 11(4), 35-39.
James, H. S. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business. 6, 41-56.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3, 305-360.
Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political economy. 98, 225-264.
Johnson, S., Boone, P., Breach, A., & Friedman, E. (2000). Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics. 58, 141-186.
Koiranen, M. (2003). Understanding the contesting ideologies of family business: challenge for leadership and professional services. Family Business Review. 16, 241-250.
Kang, J., & Shivdasani, A. (1995). Firm performance, corporate governance, and top executive turnover in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics. 38, 29-58.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance. 54(2), 471-517.
Lynall M. D., Golden, B. R., & Hillman, A. J. (2003). Board composition from adolescence to maturity: A multitheoretic view. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 416-431.
Lee, J., & Chan, J. (1998). Chinese entrepreneurship: A study in Singapore. The Journal of Management Development. 17(2),131-141.
Lemmon, M. L., & Lins, K. V. (2003). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Finance. 58, 1445-1468.
Lin, Y. F., Chu, T. S., & Hung, C. H. (2003). CEO turnover and firm performance: EVA approach. Presented at the Conference on Contemporary Issues on Finance, Taiwan.
Liu, L. S. (2001). Chinese characteristics compared: A legal and policy perspective of corporate finance and governance in Taiwan and China. Working paper series, file no. 273174, Social Science Research Network, Internet.
McConaughy, D. L., Walker, M. C., Henderson, G. V., & Mishra, C. S. (1998). Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency and value. Review of Financial Economics. 7(1), 1-19.
McConaughy, D. L. (2000). Family CEOs vs. nonfamily CEOs in the family-controlled firm: An examination of the level and sensitivity of pay to performance. Family Business Review. 13(2), 121-.131.
Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics. 20, 293-316.
Mustakallio, M., Autio, E., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Relational and contractual governance in family firms: Effects on strategic decision making. Family Business Review. 15(3), 205-221.
Ocasio, W. (1994). Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in U.S. industrial corporations, 1960-1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 285-312.
Pistrui, D., Huang, W., Oksoy, D., Jing, Z., & Welsch, H. (2001). Entrepreneurship in China: Characteristics, attributes, and family forces shaping the emerging private sector. Family Business Review. 14(2), 141-152.
Pollak, R. A. (1985). A transaction cost approach to families and households. Journal of Economic Literature. 23, 581-608.
Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. C., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science. 12(2), 99-116.
Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future. Family Business Review. 17(1), 1-36.
Shen, W., & Cannella, Jr, A. A. (2002a). Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impacts of successor type, postsuccession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. The Academy of Management Journal. 45(4), 717-733.
Shen, W., & Cannella, Jr, A. A. (2002b). Power dynamic within top management and their impacts on CEO dismissal followed by inside succession. The Academy of Management Journal. 45(6), 1195-1206.
Shen, W. (2003). The dynamics of the CEO-board relationship: An evolutionary perspective. The Academy of Management Review. 28(3), 466-476.
Solomon, J. F., Lin, S. W. & Norton, S. D. (2003). Corporate governance in Taiwan: empirical evidence from Taiwanese company directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 11, 235-248.
Stephens, W. N. (1963). The family in cross-cultural perspective. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Tan, W., & Fock, S. T. (2001). Coping with growth transitions: The case of Chinese family businesses in Singapore. Family Business Review. 14(2), 123-140.
Van den Berghe, L. A. A. & Carchon, S. (2002). Corporate governance practices in Flemish family businesses. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 10, 225-245.
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2004). How do family ownership, management, and control affect firm value? Working Paper.
Warner, J. B., Watts, R. L., & Wruck, K. H. (1988). Stock prices and top-management changes, Journal of Financial Economics. 20, 461-492.
Yeh, K. S., & Tsao, L. (1996). A network analysis of ownership succession in family owned business. Journal of Management. 13(2), 197-225.
Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., & Woidtke, T. (2001). Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of Finance. 2, 21-48.
Yen, G. F. (1994). A study on the problems of organizational growth of family business in Taiwan: Socio-cultural aspect and the phenomena of autonomous obstruction to size. Sun Yat-sen Management Review. 2(4), 55-68.
Yen, G. F. (1996). A research on cultural-structural relationship of Taiwan family enterprises: the dual-system model and some related managerial problems. Chung Yuan Journal. 24(4), 1-9.
Zapalska, A. M., & Edwards, W. (2001). Chinese entrepreneurship in a cultural and economic perspective. Journal of Small Business Management. 39(3), 286-292.

指導教授

蔡文賢(Wen-Hsien Tsai)

審核日期

2006-1-15

推文