亞太高科技國家外部技術獲取模式之研究－資源基礎角度

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：34

、訪客IP：18.219.207.11

姓名

唐瑞宏(Jui-Hung Tang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

亞太高科技國家外部技術獲取模式之研究－資源基礎角度
(A study of external technology acquisition mode in Asia Pacific Hi-Tech country: a resourced-based view)

相關論文

★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究	★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析	★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展	★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例	★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究	★ 製造業閒置資產轉售平台製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例	★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例	★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例
★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效	★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

在高科技產業中，技術儼然成為競爭優勢的重要因素之一，但在全球化的趨勢下，產業內之競爭越趨激烈，技術發展亦不斷加速，企業研發新技術之成本與風險逐漸提高，因此在此背景下藉由外部技術取得方式快速獲取技術更顯重要。而在台灣在高科技產業的發展過程中，一直扮演著快速技術追隨者的角色，如何利用有限資源取得有效技術便是一個重要的研究議題。Cohen and Levinthal（1990）提出了吸收能力（Absorptive Capacity），認為企業在研發上之投入，不僅是為了創新，亦是為了發展與維持能力，以利企業去辨認、吸收與使用外部環境的知識，因此當企業自身研發能力越高時，其越容易吸收外部環境之知識與技術，本研究便根據吸收能力的基礎，從資源基礎的觀點出發，進一步探討企業之資源與技術能力多寡，對於外部技術獲取模式選擇上之影響。
本研究以台灣、南韓與日本三國1985年至2004年間電子產業進行技術獲取事件為樣本，利用USPTO（美國商標暨專利局）之專利資料庫與SDC Platinum之策略聯盟資料庫作為本研究之數據組合，研究從技術接收者的技術能力、企業規模、過去技術獲取經驗以及核心技術相關性四構面對於技術授權、研發合作與合資協議三種外部技術獲取模式上產生何種影響。
本研究樣本組合共有240筆資料.，使用三組Logit regression判斷技術授權與研發合作之差異、研發合作與合資協議之差異以及技術授權與合資協議之差異。研究最後發現，企業之技術能力與過去技術獲取經驗對於決定使用技術授權抑或研發合作上產生顯著差異，但對於研發合作與合資判斷上，則是企業規模與雙方核心技術相關性有顯著差異，此外技術授權與合資協議的判斷上，則是技術能力呈現顯著水準。藉由實證結果可知企業本身所擁有之技術能力高低確實對於技術獲取模式選擇上產生影響，當技術能力越高時，不需要技術提供者協助下，僅以授權方式便可達到技術獲取之目的。由此可知企業在進行技術獲取決策時，衡量自身能力乃為選擇不同技術獲取模式之基礎。

摘要(英)

Technology has become one of the important factors affecting the competitive advantages of the high-tech firms. Enterprises are facing ever increasing competitive pressures. They need to gain new market information and knowledge to remain competitive. A commonly adopted strategy is to develop networks with other enterprises and utilize the external resources. Cohen and Levinthal (1990) has proposed the concept of “Absorptive Capacity”, who consider the input of enterprises in R&D are not merely to innovate, but also to develop and maintain the ability of absorbing and utilizing the knowledge from external resources. This research is to investigate, based on the “absorb capacity” concept, how the resources and technological abilities of the enterprises influence the options of the enterprises’ external knowledge acquisition.
This paper studied the incidents of the technology acquisition in the electronic industry of Taiwan, South Korea and Japan from 1985 to 2004. Two databases, the strategic alliance of SDC Platinum and the patent database of USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) were used in this study. This research discussed the relationship between the mode of external technology acquisition and the enterprise’s resources.
The analysis in this study suggested that the enterprises’ technology ability and the experiences of technology acquisition had significant effects on technology licensing and R&D cooperative. It was also found that the level of enterprises’ technological ability really influenced the choice of technology acquisition mode. The more technological ability a enterprise has, the easier it absorb the external technology, such as technology licensing, under the condition of that it does not need technology provider to help. Finally, the results of study suggest that enterprises should determine the acquisition mode based on their own resources and technological abilities.

關鍵字(中)

★ 技術獲取
★ 資源基礎
★ 專利

關鍵字(英)

★ Patent
★ Resource-based view
★ Technology acquisition

論文目次

目錄
第一章導論 1
第一節研究動機與背景 1
第二節研究目的與問題 2
第三節研究流程 3
第二章文獻探討 4
第一節資源基礎論 4
第二節專利指標 12
第三節技術獲取 17
第四節資源基礎角度探討技術獲取模式 29
第三章研究方法 32
第一節研究架構 33
第二節研究假設 34
第三節操作定義 38
第四節資料來源與分析方法 44
第四章?資料分析與結果 48
第一節?禤尷R 48
第二節?膍s結果 53
第三節影響因子分析 59
第五章結論與建議 67
第一節研究結論 67
第二節學術與管理意涵 69
第三節研究限制與後續建議 70
參考文獻 71
附錄一：相關係數與共線性 76
附錄二：M利數與企業規模關係 78
附錄三：國家別比較 79

參考文獻

參考文獻
中文部分
1.陳順宇，第一版，1999，Statistica手冊(I)，華泰書局
2.陳順宇，第三版，2000，迴歸分析，華泰書局
3.陳順宇，第三版，2004，多變量分析，華泰書局
4.黃達仁、黃慕萱，第二版，2003，專利資訊與專利索引，文華圖書管理資訊股份有限公司。
英文部分
1.Albert, M., Avery, D., Narin, F., McAllister, P., 1990. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patterns. Research Policy 20, 3, 251-259.
2.Ayres, R., 1988. “Barriers and breakthroughs: an ‘expanding frontiers’ model of the technology-industry life cycle,” Technovation, 7, 87–115.
3.Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. H., 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14, 1, 33-46.
4.Barney, J., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17, 1, 99-120.
5.Betz, F., 2003. Managing technological innovation: competitive advantage from change, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
6.Bozeman, B., 2000. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy 29, 4/5, 627-655.
7.Cho, D.-H. and Yu, P.-I., 2000. Influential factors in the choice of technology acquisition mode: an empirical analysis of small and medium size firms in Korean telecommunication industry. Technovation 20, 2, 691-704.
8.Chuang, C.-M., Chang, T.-L., 1993. Factors influencing technology acquisition decisions of recipient pharmaceutical firms in Taiwan. American Asian Review 11, 88-111.
9.Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128-152.
10.Davidson, W. H., McFetridge, D. G., 1985. Key characteristics in the choice of international technology transfer. Journal of International Business Studies 16, 2, 5-21.
11.Dessyllas, P., Hughes, A., 2005. R&D and patenting activity and the propensity to acquire in high technology industries. ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge Working Paper.
12.Durrani, T. S., Forbes, S. M., Broadfoot, C., 1999. An integrated approach to technology acquisition management. International Journal of Technology Management 17, 6, 597-617.
13.Dussauge, P., Hart, S., Ramanantsoa, B., 1992. Strategic technology management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
14.Ernst, H., 2001. Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: Evidence from time-series cross-section analysis on the firm level. Research Policy, 30, 1, 143-157.
15.Ford, D., Ryan, C., 1981. Taking technology to market. Harvard Business Review 59, 2, 117-126.
16.Gopalakrishnan, S., Santoro, M. D., 2004. Distinguishing between knowledge transfer and technology transfer activities: the role of key organizational factors. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51, 1, 57-69.
17.Grant, R. M., 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33, 3, 114-135.
18.Grant, R. M., 2002. Contemporary strategic analysis, 4th ed. Blackwell Publishers Limited, Oxford.
19.Hagedoorm, J., Cloodt, M., 2003. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy 32, 8, 1365-1379.
20.Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W.C., Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice-Hall, 1998.
21.Hart, S. L., 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20, 4, 986-1014.
22.Hill, C. W., Hwang, P., Kim, W. C., 1990. An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 2, 117-128.
23.Jones, G. K., Lanctot, A., Teegen, H. J., 2001. Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition. Journal of Business Venturing 16, 3, 255-283.
24.Kayal, A. A. and Waters, R. C., 1999. An Empirical Evaluation of the technology cycle time indicator as a measure of pace of technological progress in superconductor technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 46, 2, 127-131.
25.Killing, P., 1980. Technology acquisition: license agreement or joint venture. Columbia Journal of World Business 15, 3, 38-46.
26.Kogut, B., Zander, U., 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24, 4, 625-645.
27.Kurokawa, S., 1997. Make-or-buy decisions in R&D: small technology based firms in the United States and Japan. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 44, 2, 124-134.
28.Lin, B.-W., Chen, J.-S., 2005. Corporate technology portfolios and R&D performance measures: a study of technology intensive firms. R&D Management 35, 2, 157-170.
29.Megna, P. and Klock, M. (1993) The impact of intangible capital on Tobin’s q in the semiconductor industry. American Economic Association Papers and Proceeding, 83, 3, 265-269.
30.Moon, C. W., 1998. Technological capacity as a determinant of governance form in international strategic combinations. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 9, 1, 35-53.
31.Narula, R., Hagedoorn, J., 1999. Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements. Technovation 19, 283-294.
32.Peteraf, M. A., 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14, 3, 179-191.
33.Pilkington, A., 2004. Technology portfolio alignment as an indicator of commercialisation: an investigation of fuel cell patenting. Technovation 24, 10, 761-771.
34.Ranft, A. and Lord, M. D., 2002. Acquiring new technologies and capabilities: a grounded model of acquisition implementation. Organization Science 13, 4, 420-441.
35.Reisman, A., 2005. Transfer of technologies: a cross-disciplinary taxonomy. Omega, The International Journal of Management Science 33, 3, 189-202.
36.Scherer, F. M., 1965. Firm size, marker structure, opportunity and the output of patented inventions. American Economic Review, 55, 5, 1097-1125.
37.Shanthi, G.. and Santore, M. D., 2004. Distinguishing between knowledge transfer and technology transfer activities: the role of key organizational factors. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51, 1, 57-69.
38.Teece, D. J., 1977. Technology transfer by multinational firms: the resource cost of transferring technological know-how. The Economic Journal 87, 346, 242-261.
39.Thomas, P. and McMillan, G. S., 2001. Using science and technology indicators to manage R&D as a business. Engineering Management Journal 13, 3, 9-14.
40.Tsang, E. W. K., 1997. Choice of international technology transfer mode: a resource-based view. Management International Review 37, 2, 151-168.
41.Tsang, E. W. K., 1998. Motivates for strategic alliance: a resource-based perspective. Scand Journal Management 14, 3, 207-221.
42.Veugelers, R., 1997. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy 26, 3, 303-315.
43.Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A resource-based view of firm. Strategic Management Journal 5, 2, 171-180.
44.Yasuda, H., 2005. Formation of strategic alliances in high-technology industries: comparative study of the resource-based theory and the transaction-cost theory. Technovation 25, 7, 763-770.
45.Yoshikawa, T., 2003. Technology development and acquisition strategy. International Journal of Technology Management 25, 6/7, 666-674.

指導教授

洪秀婉(Shiu-Wan Hung)

審核日期

2006-1-9

推文