指數變動及星期效應對隱含波動度變化之影響－以台指選擇權為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：15

、訪客IP：3.146.178.220

姓名

謝志輝(Hsieh-Chih Hui) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

指數變動及星期效應對隱含波動度變化之影響－以台指選擇權為例

相關論文

★ 選擇權之隱含波動度加權平均問題之探討

★ 台灣地區個股認購權證發行對標的股票之價格及數量效果

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

波動度對於財務市場來說，是一個非常重要的變數，而對於未來波動度的預測上，隱含波動度扮演著重要的角色，在國外的文獻中，一般認為，隱含波動度變化與同時期的價格變化具有反向及不對稱的關係存在，且具有明顯的星期效應。台指選擇權從2001年底開始交易至今，僅短短三年多之時間，有別於國外各成熟市場，本文的用意即在檢驗是否在台指選擇權市場上會有相同的現象發現，本文將台指買權及賣權之日資料，以到期月份和各個價性分類，首先檢驗台指選擇權隱含波動度變化與同時期大盤指數變化的關係，還有觀察隱含波動度改變的週內形態，結果發現，台指選擇權契約的隱含波動度變化與大盤指數變化普遍存在反向及不對稱關係，而且在近月到期契約中較為顯著，在探索其原因時，則發現兩個不一樣的結果，在近月到期契約中，槓桿效應理論較能解釋其反向及不對稱關係，而時間變異風險溢酬理論則是遠月到期契約的較佳解釋。在星期效應檢驗中，則發現日期對台指選擇權隱含波動度變化的解釋能力不高，沒有明顯之星期效應。

關鍵字(中)

★ 時間變異風險溢酬理論
★ 星期效應
★ 隱含波動度
★ 反向及不對稱關係
★ 槓桿效應理論

關鍵字(英)

★ weekday effect
★ Implied volatiliy
★ inverse and asymmetric relation
★ The Time-varying Risk Premium Theory
★ The Leverage Effect Theor

論文目次

第一章　緒論.....................................1
第二章　背景理論及模型假設.......................3
第一節背景理論...............................3
第二節模型假設...............................7
第三章　實証資料................................10
第一節資料整理..............................10
第二節敘述統計..............................13
第四章　檢定結果................................18
第五章　結論....................................29
參考文獻........................................30

參考文獻

1. Bates, D.S., 1991. The crash of `87: Was it expected? The evidence from options markets. Journal of Finance 46, 1009-1044.
2. Bates, D.S., 2000. Post-87 crash fears in the S&P 500 futures options market. Journal of Econometrics 94 (1), 181-190.
3. Bekaert, G., Wu, G., 2000. Asymmetric volatility and risk in equity markets. Review of Financial Studies 13, 1-42.
4. Black, F., 1976a. Stuedies of stock price volatility changes. Proceedings of the Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economics Section, Chicago, 177-181.
5. Black,F., 1976b. The pricing of commodity contracts. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 167-179.
6. Black, F., Scholes, M.,1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81, 637-659.
7. Bollen, N.P.B., Whaley, R., 2003. Does net buying pressure affect the shape of implied volatility functions? Journal of Finance 59, 711-753.
8. Canina, L., Figlewski, S., 1993. The information content of implied volatility. Review of Financial Studies 6, 659-681.
9. Chan, K.C., Cheng, L.T.W., Lung, P.P., 2003. Moneyness and the response of the implied volatilities to price changes: The empirical evidence from HIS options. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 11, 527-553.
10. Christensen, B.J., Prabhala, N.R., 1998. The relation between implied and realized volatility. Journal of Financial Economics 50, 125-150.
11. Christie, A.A., 1982. The stochastic behavior of common stock variances: value, leverage and interest rate effects. Journal of Financial Economics 10 (4), 407-732
12. Davidson, W.N., Kim, J.K., Ors,.E., Szakmary, A., 2001. Using implied volatility on options to measure the relation between assert returns and variability. Journal of Banking and Finance 25, 1245-1269.
13. Day, T.E.., Lewis, C.M., 1992. Stock market volatility and the information content of stock index options. Journal of Econometrics 52, 267-287.
14. Ederington, L.H., Lee, J.H., 1996. The creation and resolution of market uncertainty: the impact of information releases on implied volatility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31 (4), 513-539.
15. Fleming, J., Ostdiek, B., Whaley, R.E., 1995. Predicting stock market volatility: a new measure. Journal of Futures Markets 15, 265-302.
16. French, K.R., Schwert, G.W., Stambaugh, R.F., 1987. Expected stock returns and volatility. Journal of Financial Economics 19, 3-29.
17. Harvey, C.R., Whaley, R.E., 1992. Market volatility prediction and the efficiency of the S&P 100 index option market. Journal of Financial Economics 31, 43-73.
18. Kim, M., Kim, M., 2003. Implied volatility dynamics in the foreign exchange markets. Journal of International Money and Finance 22, 511-528
19. Pindyck, R.S., 1984. Risk, inflation, and the stock market. American Economic Rieview 74, 334-351.
20. Schwert, W.G., 1989. Why does stock market volatility change over time? Journal of Finance 44(5), 28-66.
21. Schwert, W.G., 1990. Stock volatility and the crash of `87. Review of Financial Studies 3(1), 77-102.
22. Simon, D.P., 1997. Implied volatility asymmetries in treasury bond futures options. Journal of Futures Markets 17(8), 873-885.

指導教授

林純瓊(Eva C Yen)

審核日期

2005-7-4

推文