社會資本、知識獲取與知識探索關係之研究--以台灣科技廠商為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：6

、訪客IP：3.129.69.134

姓名

劉姿吟(Tzu-Yin Liu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

社會資本、知識獲取與知識探索關係之研究--以台灣科技廠商為例

相關論文

★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究	★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析	★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展	★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例	★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究	★ 製造業閒置資產轉售平台製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例	★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例	★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例
★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效	★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

面對知識經濟時代的來臨，帶動整體競爭環境的改變，企業必須以快速的步調完成創新，而知識在此成為一重要的關鍵，唯有能快速取得知識、管理知識、使用知識並且轉知識為成功的新產品與技術的企業，才能夠在知識經濟下競爭生存。社會資本正是一個獲取知識的最佳管道；一方面，企業可透過與顧客、供應商與競爭者等所形成之事業網絡作為立基點，與關係網絡中的廠商建立頻繁的互動、共同的目標與信任關係，來藉此累積社會資本，並獲取豐碩的知識；另一方面，藉由不斷地累積知識的基礎，進而提高自身進行知識探索的能力，並運用這些知識基礎轉化成新的產品與技術，增加企業創新的能力。
　　本研究站在知識獲取者的角色上，以企業與供應商、顧客和競爭者間形成的事業網絡為基礎，來探討企業如何從此關係網絡中，藉由社會互動、關係品質與關係網絡廠商的網絡連結度三大構面來累積社會資本，增加對於知識的獲取，並且運用這些知識來促進知識探索活動的進行。在研究對象上，本研究選定具備高度知識含量的科技產業，並以台灣具代表性的資訊與半導體產業為樣本來進行研究，運用問卷調查法共回收100份有效問卷。研究方法方面，為避免變數間的共線性與檢驗中介變數的效果，故採用線性結構方程式來進行假設的驗證，同時更進行多個模型優劣性的比較，並以此檢驗知識獲取是否為社會資本與知識探索間的中介因素。
　　根據實證結果發現，企業確實可將社會資本作為獲取知識的來源，因此必須妥善管理與運用，並利用槓桿效應將由關係網絡所得之知識的效益發揮到極致，此外更可透過這些知識的累積以提升新產品的發展，建立技術特色，並在面對高度不確定的環境下，掌握環境中的技術機會，以成為知識經濟贏者圈的一員。

摘要(英)

In a Knowledge Economic Era, firms have to face the challenge of the ever-changing competitive environment. Whoever can get knowledge quickly, manage, assimilate and turn into new products and technologies will become the winners. Social capital has been the best channel to acquire knowledge. On one hand, the firms can accumulate social capital and obtain knowledge from the network. On the other hand, with the increase of the knowledge base, firms will be able to improve their ability of knowledge exploitation to set technology distinctiveness as well as to have better new product developments.
This research investigated the relationship of social capital, knowledge acquisition and knowledge exploitation in information technology (IT) industries. The influences of knowledge receiver of the research, and the network of customers, suppliers, and competitor were also studied. The results of this study suggest that (1) social capital is exactly the effective channel of getting knowledge. (2) knowledge is positive to knowledge exploitation that can facilitate new product development and set technology distinctiveness.(3) knowledge acquisition is the moderator of social capital and knowledge exploitation.

關鍵字(中)

★ 社會資本
★ 知識獲取
★ 知識探索

關鍵字(英)

★ Social capital
★ Knowledge exploitation
★ Knowledge acqusition

論文目次

第一章導論 1
第一節研究動機與背景 1
第二節研究目的與問題 6
第三節研究流程 7
第二章文獻回顧 8
第一節　知識流通 8
一、知識的定義與分類 8
二、知識的移轉與獲取 9
第二節　　社會資本理論 13
一、網絡 13
二、社會資本 16
三、網絡與社會資本的關係 21
四、社會資本影響知識的移轉與獲取 23
第三節知識探索 28
ㄧ、知識探索活動 28
二、知識對於組織績效的影響 30
三、組織的學習 32
第三章研究方法 34
第一節研究架構 34
第二節研究假設 35
一、社會資本與知識獲取 35
二、知識獲取與知識探索 40
三、社會資本、知識獲取與知識探索 44
第三節研究變項操作型定義與衡量 46
一、社會資本 46
二、知識獲取 48
三、知識探索 49
第四節資料蒐集與樣本回收 52
一、資料蒐集對象與樣本回收 52
二、問卷設計 54
第五節研究方法 54
第四章資料分析與結果 57
第一節　樣本結構分析 57
第二節　信度與效度檢測 59
第三節線性結構方程式分析 64
一、結構方程式模型架構 64
二、模型適合度(Model Fit)檢定 68
第五章結論與建議 77
第一節　研究結論 77
一、社會資本對於知識獲取的影響 77
二、知識獲取與知識探索 79
三、社會資本、知識獲取與知識探索 79
第二節學術與管理意涵 80
第三節研究限制與後續建議 81
一、研究限制 81
二、未來建議 83
參考文獻 85
中文文獻： 85
英文文獻： 86
附錄：問卷 95

參考文獻

中文文獻：
1. 朱雲鵬、吳敬泰(民89年)：「知識經濟時代的傳統產業提升」，高希均、李誠主
編，天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
2. 司徒達賢（民90），策略管理新論－觀念架構與分析方法，智勝出版。
3. 吳思華（民87），知識流通對產業創新之影響，第七屆產業管理研討會論文集
4. 蔡宏明(民85)，我國新興產業之內涵與檢討，經濟情勢冀評論季刊，2卷，1期
5. 邱秋瑩(民90)，知識經濟之意義、內涵與發展策略，行政院經濟建設委員會發行
自由中國之工業，第91卷第6期
6. 高希均（2000）, 「知識經濟的核心理念」，錄於高希均，李誠主編知識經濟
時代的經濟政策。
7. 經濟部工業局（http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/idy/index1.jsp）
8. 『產業技術白皮書』，1996年，經濟部工業局。
9. 陳順宇，多變量分析，第三版，2004年，華泰書局出版。
英文文獻：
1. Alder, P.S. & Keok, S.W. (2000).Social capital: the good, the bad, and the ugly, in Lesser E. L.（ed.）”, Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications, pp89-115. Oxford: Butterworth - Heinemann press.
2. Adler, P.S. & Kwon, S. (2002). ”Social capital;Prospects for a new concept”, Academy of Management Review, 27, pp17-40.
3. Anand, B.N. & Khanna, T. (2000). ” Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliance”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp295–315.
4. Anderson, J. & Narus, J.A. (1990). “A model of distributor firms and manufacturer firm working partnerships”, Journal of Marketing, 54 (January), pp42-58.
5. Anderson, P. & Tushman, M.L. (1990). “Technological discontinuities and dominant designs：a cyclical model of technological change”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp 604-633
6. Andrews, K.M. & Delahay, B.L. (2000). ”Influence on knowledge process in organizational learning;The psychosocial filter”, Journal of Management stud, 37, pp797-810
7. Autio, E. , Sapienza, H.J. & Almeida, J. (2000). ” Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity and imitability on international growth”, Academy of Management Journal, 43, pp 909-924
8. Baum, J.A. , Calabrese, C.T. & Silverman, B.S. (2000), ”Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology”, Strategic Management journal, 21, pp267-294
9. Bolino, M.C. , Turnley, W.H. & Bloodgood, J.M. (2002), ”Citixenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 27, pp 204-221.
10. Bourdieu, P. (1986), ”The forms of capital .InJ.G.Richardson(Ed.), Handbook fo theory and research for the sociology of education, pp241-258.New York :Greenwood
11. Bueno, E. (2002b), ”El Capital Social en el nuevo enfoque del Capital Intelectual de las organizations”, in Morcillo,P.(Ed)”, Nuevas claves para la Direccion Extrategica de la Empresa, Ariel, Barcelona.
12. Bueno, E. & Salmador, M. (2004), ”The role of social capital in Today’s economy:Empirical evidence and proposal of a new model of intellectual capital”,Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 4, pp556-574
13. Burt, R.L.(1992), “Structural Holes”, Harvard University Press：Cambridge, MA
14. Burt, R.S. (1992), ” The Social Structure of Competition”, In N. Nohria & R.G. Eccles（Eds.）, Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, pp57-91. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
15. Burt, R.S. (1997), “The Contingent Value of Social Capital”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp339-365.
16. Camagni, R. (1995), ”Globa network and local milieu:Towards a theory of economic space,In S.Conti, E.J.Malecki,&P.Oinas(Eds.)”, The industrial enterprise and its environment: Spatial perspectives, pp195-214. Aldershot,UK:Avebury.
17. Chen, H.F. and Wang, I.C. (2001), “The Determinants and Effects of Embeddedness on MNC’s Subsidiaries”, International Conference on Ttrade, Investment, and Industrial Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, Taipei:Soochow University, pp283-303.
18. Christensen, C.M. (1997), The innovator’s dilemma, Harvard Business School Press:Boston, MA.
19. Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal, D.A. (1990), “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp128-152.
20. Davenport, S. , Davies, J. & Grimes, C. (1999), ” Collaborative research programmes: Building trust from difference”, Technovation, 19(1), pp31-40.
21. Dyer, J.H. & Singh, H. (1998), ”The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 23, pp 660-679.
22. Eurostat (2000), ”EPROS-The European Plan for Research in Official Satistics”, EU, Brussels.
23. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F. (1981), ”Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp 39-50
24. Fountain and Atkinson (1998), ”Innovation, Social Capital, and the New Economy”, Democratic Leadership Council and Progressive Policy Institute, July 1.
25. Garud, R. and Nayyar, P.R. (1994), ”Transformative capacity continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer”, Strategic Management journal, 15(5), pp365-385.
26. Ghoshal, S. & Moran, P. (1996), ”Bad for practice：a critique of the transaction cost theory”, Academy of Management Review, 21, pp 31-47.
27. Gordon, M.E. and Purvis, J.E. (1991), ”Journal publications as a measure fo performance in industrial relations”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, pp194-201.
28. Granovetter, M.S. (1973), ”The strength of weak ties”, American Journal of Sociology, 78, pp1360-1380.
29. Granovetter, M.S. (1992), ” Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles(Eds.)”, Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, pp25-26. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
30. Grant, R.M. (1996), ”Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Winter,Special Issue,17, pp109-122.
31. Grant, R.M. and Baden, F.C. (1995), ”A knowledge-based theory of inter-firm collaboration”, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, pp17-21.
32. Gulati, R.M. (1994), ” Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances”, Academy of Management Journal, 38, pp 85-112.
33. Gulati, R.M. (1998), ”Alliance and networks”, Strategic Management Journal, 19, pp 293-317.
34. Gulati, R.M. (1999), ”Network location and learning: The influence of network resource and firm capabilities on alliance formation”, Strategic Management Journal, 2, pp397-420.
35. Gulati, R.M. , Nohria, N & Zaheer, A.(2000), ”Strategic networks”, Strategic Management Journal, 21,Special Issue, pp 203-215.
36. Gupta, A.K. & Govindarajan, V.(2000), ” Knowledge flows within multinational Corporations”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp 473-496.
37. Hamel, G. (1991), ” Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances”, Strategic management journal, 12 (special issue), pp83-103.
38. Hansen, M.T. (1999), ”The search-transfer problem; The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, pp82-111.
39. Hansen, M.T. (2002), ”Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies”, Organization Science, 13, pp232–248.
40. Hitt, M.A. , Dacin, M.T. , Levitas, E. , Arregle, J.L. & Borza, A. (2000), ”Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts：resource-based and organizational learning perspectives”, Academy of Management Review, 43, pp449-467
41. Huber, G.P. (1991), ” Organizational learning：the contributing processes and the literatures”, Organization Science, 2(1), pp88-115.
42. Inkpen, A.C.(2000), ”A note on the dynamics of learning alliance: Competition,cooperation, and relative scope”, Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), pp 775-779.
43. Inkpen, A.C. & Tsang, W.K. (2005), ”Social capital,networks,and knowledge transfer”, Academy of Management review, 30, pp146-165.
44. Joreskog, K.G. & Dag, S. (1993), LISREL 8, ”Structural Equation Modeling with the Simplis Command Language “, Chicago: SSI, Inc.
45. Kale, P. , Singh, H. & Perlmutter, H.(2000), ”Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp 217-237.
46. Kliksberg, B. (2000), ”Capital Social y Cultura Claves olvidadas del desarrollo”, Doc.7,June, Instituto Interamericano para el Desarrollo Social, pp1-37. 　
47. Kogut, B. (1988), “Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives”,
Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp319–332.
48. Kogut, B. , Zander, U. (1992), ”Knowledge of the firm,combinative capability, and the replication of technology”, Organization Science, 3, pp383-397
49. Kogut, B. , Zander, U. (1996), ”What firms do?Coordination, identity, and learning”, Organization Science, 7, pp502-518
50. Koh, J. & Venkatraman, N. (1991), ”Joint venture formations and stock market reactions:An assessment in the information technology sector”, Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp869-892..
51. Koka, B.R. & Prescott, J.E. (2002), “Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view”, Strategic Management Journal, 23(9), pp 794–816.
52. Lane, P.J. & Lubatkin, M. (1998), “Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning”, Strategic Management Journal,9, pp461-477.
53. Larson, A. (1992), ” Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange relationships”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, pp76-104.
54. Larson, A. & Jennifer, S. (1992), ”A network model of organization formation”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,17(1) (in press)
55. Lesser, E. (2000), ”knowledge and Social Capital”. Butterworth- Heinemann , Boston,MA
56. March, J.and Simon, H. (1958), ”Organization”, John Wiley, New York
57. McEvily, B & Zaheer, A. (1999), ”Bridging ties：a Sourceof Firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities”, Strategic Management Journal,20(12), pp1133-1156
58. Moran, P. & Ghoshal, S. (1996), ”Theories of economic organizations:the case for relism and balance”, Academy of Management Review, 21, pp58-72.
59. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1997), ”Social capital, intellectual capital and the creation of value in firms”, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, pp35-39.
60. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998), ”Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 23, pp242-266.
61. Nooteboom, B. , Berger, H. & Noorderhaven, N. (1997), “Effect of trust and governance on relational risk”, Academy of Management Journal, 40, pp308-338.
62. OECD (1996a), “Science, Technology and Industry Outlook”, Paris.
63. OECD (1999), OECD Science, Technology, and Industry Scoreboard 1999: Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies, Paris.
64. OECD (2001a), The New Economy: Beyond The Hype, Paris.
65. OECD (2001b), Understanding the Digital Divide, Paris.
66. OECD (2002), “Science, Technology and Industry Outlook”, Paris.
67. OECD (2003), Main Economic Indicators database, Paris.
68. Parkhe, A. (1991), ”Interfirm diversity, organizational learning,and longevity in global strategic alliances”, Journal of International Business Studies, 22, pp579–601.
69. Parkhe, A. (1993), “Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation”, Academy of Management Journal, 36, pp794–829.
70. Penrose, E. (1959), ”The Theory of the Growth of the firm”, Blackwell：Oxford ,UK
71. Podolny, J.M. & Page, K.L. (1998), ” Network forms of organization”, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, pp57–76.
72. Porter, M.E. & Fuller, M.B. (1987), ”Goalitions and Global Strategy. In Porter, M.E.(Ed.), Competition In Global Industries”, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press, pp315-344
73. Portes, A. (1998), “Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology”, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, pp:1–24.
74. Powell, W. W. (1990), “Neither markets nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, pp 295–336.
75. Powell, W. W. , Koput K. W. & Smith-Doerr L. (1996), ”Interorganizational
collaboration and the locus of innovation:Networks of learning in biotechnology “, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, pp 116–145.
76. Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990), ”The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Busniess Review, 68(3), pp71-91
77. Ring, P.S. & Van de Ven A.H. (1992), ”Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations”, Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp 483-498.
78. Ring, P.S. & Van de Ven A.H. (1994), ”Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationship”, Academy of Management Review, 19, pp 90-118.
79. Rosenberg, N. (1982), ”Inside the Black Box：Technology and Economics”, Cambridge University Press：Cambridge , UK
80. Rowley, T. , Behrens, D. & Krackhardt, D. ( 2000), ” Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries”, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp369–386.
81. Schulz, M. (2001), “The uncertain relevance of newness; Organizational learning and knowledge flows”, Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp661-682
82. Schumpeter, J. (1934), ”The theory of Economic Development”, Harvard University Press：Cambridge, MA.
83. Schumpeter, J.A. (1947), ” The creative response in economic history”, Journal of Economic History, 7, pp149-159.
84. Sgane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000), ”The promise of entreneurship as a field of research”, Academy of Management Review, 25, pp217-226
85. Shan, W. , Walker, G. & Kogut, B. (1994), ”Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation In the biotechnology industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), pp387-394
86. Simonin, B. (1999), ”Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliance”, Strategic Management Journal, 20, pp595-623
87. Spender, J.C. (1996), ”Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue,17, pp45-62
88. Steensma, H.K. (1996), ”Acquiring technological competencies through inter-organizational collaboration：an organizational learning perspective”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12, pp267-286.
89. Teece, D.J. (1986), ”Profiting from technological innovation：implications for integration,collaboration,licensing and public policy”, Research Policy, 15, pp285-305
90. Teece, D. and Pisano, G. (1994), ”The dynamic capabilities of firms:An introduction “ ,Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), pp537-556
91. Thompson, J.D. (1967), ”Organization in Action”.New York:Mcgraw-Hill.
92. Thorelli, H.B. (1986), ” Networks: Between markets and hierarchies”,
Strategic Management Journal,7, pp 37–51.
93. Tsai, W. & Ghoshal. (1998), ” Social capital and value creation : an empirical study of intra-firm networks”, Academy of Management Journal, 41, pp 464-476.
94. Tsai, W. (2001), ” Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 44（5, pp 996-1004.
95. Tsai, W. (2002), ”Social structure of “cooperation” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing”, Organization Science, 13, pp179–190.
96. Uzzi, B. (1996), ”The sources and conseque nces of embededness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect”, American Sociological Review, 61, pp 674-698.
97. Uzzi, B. (1997), ”Social structure and competition in interfirm networks:the paradox of embeddedness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42,pp35-67
98. Uzzi, B. & Gillespie J.J. (2002), ” Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: Embeddedness and the firm’s debt performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp 595–618.
99. Venkataraman, S. , Van de Ven A.H. , Buckeye, J. & Hudson, R. (1990), ”Starting up in a turbulent environment :a process model of failure among firms with high customer dependence”, Journal of Business Venturing , 5, pp277-295
100. Von Hippel E. (1988), “The Sources of Innovation”, Oxford University Press:New York
101. Yli-renko, H. , Autio, E. & Sapienza, H.J. (2001), ”Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms”, Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp587-613.
102. Zahra, S.A., Ireland, R.D. & Hitt, M.A. (2000), ”International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning and performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), pp 925-950.
103. Zahra, S.A., Jennings, D.F. & Kuratko, D.F. (1999), “The antecedent and consequences of firm- level entrepreneurship: The state of the field”, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, winter, 24(2), pp 45-64.
104. Zander, U. & Kogut, B. (1995), ”Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities ; an empirical test”, Organization Science, 6, pp76-92

指導教授

洪秀婉(Shiu-Wan Hung)

審核日期

2005-7-17

推文