供應鏈關係品質、績效與競爭環境關係之研究-以台灣製造業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：45

、訪客IP：18.226.180.82

姓名

雷德耀(Te-yao Lei) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

供應鏈關係品質、績效與競爭環境關係之研究-以台灣製造業為例
(Supply Chain Relayionship Quality, Supply Chain Performance, and Competitive Environment-An Empirical Study of Taiwan Manufacturing Industry)

相關論文

★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究	★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析	★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展	★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例	★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究	★ 製造業閒置資產轉售平台製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例	★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例	★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例
★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效	★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在現代的商業環境中，供應鏈的競爭取代了企業與企業之間的單打獨鬥。製造商學會與顧客合作，建立夥伴關係，而這樣的供應鏈關係能夠幫助企業運作得更有效率，並且達到雙贏的目標。供應鏈的發展型態、範圍長度、管理技術等成為學者研究的重要議題，但是上下游廠商之間供應鏈關係的品質卻較少受到重視。本研究採用Naude and Buttle（2000）提出的供應鏈關係品質代表構面：信任、調適、溝通、合作等，以台灣製造業為研究對象，以問卷方式蒐集資料，衡量台灣製造廠商與最主要顧客之間供應鏈關係品質之各構面的表現，是否對其供應鏈之績效表現產生正面的影響。實證結果顯示，廠商在包括信任、溝通與合作等構面與績效之間都有顯著的正向關係。此外，本研究試圖探討產業的環境因素對供應鏈關係品質與供應鏈績效之間的關係是否產生干擾。而實證結果證明，在產業競爭程度較激烈的環境下，製造商與顧客之關係品質與績效間的正向連結將更為明顯強烈。

摘要(英)

The competition in business nowadays appears to be supply chain versus supply chain, but not company versus company. Manufacturers learn to build their association by cooperating with customers, and such supply chain relationships help enterprises not only operate more efficiently, but achieve the win-win target. The pattern of development, scope and length, as well as management of supply chains have become important topics in academic research, however, few studies have focused on the relationship quality of supply chains between upstream and downstream enterprises. This research adopted Naude and Buttle’s relationship quality of supply chain as dimensions, including trust, adaptation, communication, cooperation, and so on. The subject of study was the manufacturing industry in Taiwan, and the data were collected by questionnaires to examine whether Taiwan manufacturing companies’ relationship qualities in each dimension of supply chain with their major customers have positive effects on the performance of their supply chains. The empirical results reveal that dimensions including trust, communication, cooperation, etc. all have significant positive relationships with the performance. Besides, this research attempted to investigate whether industrial environmental factors interfere with the relationship between relationship qualities and the performance of supply chain. And the empirical results prove that in the fiercer competitive environment, the positive linkage between relationship qualities and the performance becomes stronger.

關鍵字(中)

★ 供應鏈關係品質
★ 競爭強度
★ 溝通
★ 合作
★ 調適
★ 信任
★ 技術干擾

關鍵字(英)

★ cooperation
★ adaptation
★ supply chain relationship quality
★ communication
★ trust
★ competitive intensity
★ technological turbulence

論文目次

中文摘要..................................................I
英文摘要.................................................II
目錄....................................................III
圖目錄...................................................IV
表目錄................................................... V
第一章緒論...............................................1
第一節研究背景...........................................1
第二節研究動機...........................................3
第三節研究目的...........................................5
第四節研究流程...........................................6
第二章文獻探討...........................................7
第一節供應鏈關係品質.....................................7
第二節供應鏈績效........................................15
第三節競爭環境..........................................19
第三章研究設計..........................................21
第一節研究架構..........................................21
第二節研究變數之操作定義與衡量..........................22
第三節研究假設..........................................28
第四節研究對象與問卷回收................................31
第五節資料分析方法......................................32
第四章實證結果..........................................34
第一節樣本基本資料......................................34
第二節研究變數結果整理..................................36
第三節驗證型因素分析....................................39
第四節研究變數因果模型分析..............................41
第五節干擾效果分析......................................51
第五章結論與建議........................................62
第一節研究結論..........................................62
第二節管理意涵..........................................66
第三節研究限制..........................................67
第四節未來研究建議......................................68
參考文獻.................................................69
附錄：研究問卷...........................................77

參考文獻

一、中文部份
1. 吳思華，「合作競爭大未來推薦序」，麥格羅希爾出版社，民國86年。
2. 陳順宇，「多變量分析」，台北市：華泰，民國87年。
3. 蘇義雄，物流整合架構與管理趨勢，海峽兩岸都市交通學術研討會論文集，臺北市交通安全促進會，民國89年。
二、英文部分
1. Abe, M. and Nelson, J., Control Mechanisms, Supplier Performance, and Relationship Quality in an Electronics Supply Chain. American Marketing Association, 2002, 13, 289.
2. Ambler, T. and Styles, C., The Future of Relational Research in International Marketing: Constructs and Conduits. International Marketing Review, 2000, 17, 492.
3. Anderson, D.L., Britt, F.F. and Favre, D.J., The Best of Supply Chain Management Review: The 7 Principles of Supply Chain Management. Supply Chain Management Review, 2007, 11, 57.
4. Anderson, E. and Weitz, B., Industrial Purchasing: An Empirical Exploration of the Buyclass Framework. Journal of Marketing. 1987, 51, 71.
5. Anderson, E., Lodish, L. and Weitz, B., Resource Allocation Behavior in Conventional Channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 1987, 24, 85-97
6. Anderson, J.C. and Narus, J.A., A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 1990, 54, 42–58.
7. Anderson, M.G. and Katz, P.B., Strategic Sourcing. International Journal of Logistics Management, 1998, 1-13.
8. Breyfogle, F.W., Cupello, J.M. and Meadows, B., Managing Six Sigma. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.
9. Carbone, J., Midmarket EMS Provider Offers Custom Supply Chain Solutions to OEMs. Purchasing, 2007, 136, 44.
10. Carr, A.S. and Pearson, J.N., Strategically Managed Buyer-Supplier Relationships and Performance Outcomes. Journal of Operations Management. 1999, 17, 497.
11. Carter, J.R., and Ellram, L.M. The Impact of Interorganizational Alliances in Improving Supplier Quality. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 1994, 24, 15.
12. Chen, I.J. and Paulraj, A., Towards a Theory of Supply Chain Management: The Construct and Measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 2004, b, 119-150.
13. Chen, I.J. and Paulraj, A., Strategic Buyer-Supplier Relationships, Information Technology and External Logistics Integration. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2007, 43, 2.
14. Choi, T.Y. and Eboch, K., The TQM Paradox: Relations among TQM Practices, Plant Performance, and Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 1998, 17, 59–75.
15. Cox, Jr., T., Toward the Measurement of Manufacturing Flexibility. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 1989, First Quarter, 68-72.
16. Crosby, L.A., Evans, K.R. and Cowles, D., Relationship Quality in Services Selling: An Interpersonal Influence Perspective. Journal of Marketing. 1990, 54, 68.
17. Cummings, T., Transorganizational Development. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1984, 6,367-422.
18. Das, A., Handfield, R.B., Calantone, R.J. and Ghosh, S., A Contingent View of Quality Management--The Impact of International Competition on Quality. Decision Sciences, 2000, 31, 649.
19. Devlin, G. and Bleackley, M., Strategic Alliances—Guidelines for Success. Long Range Planning, 1988, 21, 18-23
20. Dixon, J.R., Measuring Manufacturing Flexibility: An Empirical Investigation. European Journal of Operational Research, 1992, 60, 131-143.
21. Driscoll, J., Trust and Participation in Organizational Decision Making as Predictors of Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 1978, 21, 44-56.
22. Evans, J.R. and Dean, J.W., Excellence Making Quality Work in Your Company. South-Western College Publishing, 2000, 14, 122.
23. Fisher, M.L., What Is The Right Supply Chain for Your Product? Harvard Business Review,1997, March/April, 105–116.
24. Fynes, B. and Voss, C., A Path Analytic Model of Quality Practices, Quality Performance and Business Performance. Production and Operations Management, 2001, 10, 494–513.
25. Gabarino, E. and Johnson, M.S. The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust and Commitment in Customer Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 1999, 63, 70-87.
26. Ganesan, S., Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58, 1.
Kumar, N., and Scheer, L.K. and Steenkamp, J.E.M., The Effects of Supplier Fairness on Vulnerable Resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 1995, 32, 54.
27. Gatignon, H., Competition as a Moderator of the Effect of Advertising on Sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 1984, 21, 387.
28. Grewal, R. and Tansuhaj, P., Building Organizational Capabilities for Managing Economic Crisis: The Role of Market Orientation and Strategic Flexibility. Journal of Marketing, 2001, 65, 67.
29. Guetzkow, H., Communications in Organizations. Handbook of Organizations, 1997, 534-573.
30. Guiffrida, A.L. and Nagi, R., Economics of Managerial Neglect in Supply Chain Delivery Performance. The Engineering Economist. 2006, 51, 1.
31. Guimaraes, T., Cook, D. and Natarajan, N., Exploring the Importance of Business Clockspeed as a Moderator for Determinants of Supplier Network Performance. Decision Sciences, 2002, 33, 629.
32. Gummesson, E., The New Marketing—Developing Long-Term Interactive Relationships. Long Rang Planning, 1987, 20, 10
33. Gunasekaren, A.C., Patel, C. and Tirtiroglu, E., Performance Measures and Metrics in the Supply Chain Environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 2001, 21, 71-87.
34. Gunasekaran, A. and Ngai, E.W.T., Knowledge Management in 21st Century Manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 2007, 45, 2391.
35. Gupta, A.K. and Govindrajan, V., Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control within Multinational Corporations. Acad. Manage. Rev, 1991, 16, 768–792.
36. Gupta, Y.P. and Somers, T.M., Business Strategy, Manufacturing Flexibility, and Organizational Performance Relationships: A Path Analysis Approach. Production and Operation Management, 1996, 5, 204-233.
37. Heide, J.B. and John, G., Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships? Journal of Marketing , 1992, 58, 32–44.
38. Heide, J.B. and John, G., The Role of Dependence Balancing in Safeguarding Transaction-Specific Assets in Conventional Channels. Journal of Marketing, 1988, 52, 20–35.
39. Heide, J.B. and John, G.., Alliances In Industrial Purchasing: The Determinants Of Joint Action in Buyer-Supplier Relationships. Journal of Marketing Research. 1990, 27, 24.
40. Hennig-Thurau, T. and Klee, A., The Impact of Customer Satisfaction and Relationship Quality on Customer Retention: A Critical Reassessment and Model Development. Psychology & Marketing. 1997, 14, 737.
41. Hoyt, J. and Huq, F., From Arms-Length to Collaborative Relationships in the Supply Chain: An Evolutionary Process. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2000, 30, 750.
42. Jaworski, B.J. and Kohli, A.K., Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, 1993, 57, 53.
43. Kim, S.W., Effects of Supply Chain Management Practices, Integration and Competition Capability on Performance. Supply Chain Management, 2006, 11, 24.
44. Kumar, K., Subramanian, R. and Yauger, C., Examining the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship: A Context-Specific Study. Journal of Management, 1998, 24, 201.
45. Kwaku, A., Adoption of New Products by the Sales Force: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1997, 14, 498.
46. Lagace, R.R., Dahlstrom, R. and Gassenheimer, J.B., The Relevance of Ethical Salesperson Behaviour on Relationship Quality: The Pharmaceutical Industry. Journalof Personal Selling and Sales Management, 1991, 11, 39-47.
47. Landeros, R. and Monczka, R.M., Cooperative Buyer/Seller Relationships and a Firm's Competitive Posture. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 1989, 25, 9.
48. Larzelere, R.E. and Huston, T.L., The Dyadic Trust Scale: Towards Understanding Interpersonal Trust in Close Relationships. J. Marriage and the Family, 1980, 42, 595–604.
49. Leuthesser, L., Supplier Relational Behavior: An Empirical Sssessment. Industrial Marketing Management. 1997, 26, 245.
50. Levitt, T., The Marketing Imagination, New expanded edition, the free press, New York, NY, 1986.
51. Li, T. and Calantone, R.J., The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing, 1998, 62, 13.
52. MacNeil, I., Economic Analysis of Contractual Relations: Its Shortfalls and the Need for a Rich Classificatory Apparatus. Northwestern University Law Review, 75, 1018-1063.
53. Mohr, J. and Spekman, R., Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior and Conflict Resolution Techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15, 135-152.
54. Moorman, C. and Miner, A.S., The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity. Journal of Marketing Research. 1997, 34, 91.
55. Moorman, C., Deshpande, R. and Zaltman, G.., Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 1993, 57, 81.
56. Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D., The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58, 20–38.
57. Narasimhan, R. and Jayaram, J., An Empirical Investigation of the Antecedents and Consequences of Manufacturing Goal Achievement in North American, European and Pan Pacific Firms. Journal of Operations Management. 1998, 16, 159.
58. Narver, J.C. and Slater, S.F., The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 1990, 54, 20.
59. Naude, P. and Buttle, F., Assessing Relationship Quality. Industrial Marketing Management. 2000, 29, 351.
60. Negandhi, A.R. and Reimann, B.C., A Contingency Theory of Organization Re-examined in the Context of a Developing Country. Academy of Management Journal, 1972, 15, 137.
61. Norek, C.D. and Pohlen, T.L., Cost Knowledge: A Foundation for Improving Supply Chain Relationships. International Journal of Logistics Management, 2001, 12, 37.
62. Riggs, D.A. and Robbins, S.L. The Executive’s Guide to Supply Management Strategies, Building Supply Chain Thinking into all Business Process. Amacom, New York, NY, 83.
63. Salvador, F., Forza, C., Rungtusanatham, M. and Choi., T.Y., Supply Chain interactions and Time-Related Performances: An Operations Management Perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2001, 21, 461.
64. Schuler, R., A Role Perception Transactional Process Model for Organizational Communication-Outcome Relationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1979, 23, 268-291.
65. Slater, S.F. and Narver, J.C., Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship? Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58, 46.
66. Smith, B., Buyer-Seller Relationships: Bonds, Relationship Management, and Sex-Type. Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration. 1998, 15, 76.
67. Storbacka, K., Strandvik, T. and Gronroos, C., Managing Customer Relationships for Profit: The Dynamics of Relationship Quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 1994, 5, 21.
68. Voss, C. and Blackmon, K., Total Quality Management and ISO 9000: a European Study. Centre for Operations Management Working Paper, 1994. London Business School, UK.
69. Wilson, D. and Jantrania, S., Understanding The Value of a Relationship. Asia-Australia Marketing Journal, 1996, 2, 55-66.

指導教授

洪秀婉(Shiu-Wan Hung)

審核日期

2007-7-11

推文