社會價值導向與消費者出價行為之關係

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：40

、訪客IP：3.147.53.205

姓名

林鴻銘(Hung-Ming Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

社會價值導向與消費者出價行為之關係
(The Social Value Orientation and Consumer Behavior in Prices Setting)

相關論文

★ 網頁背景圖片對消費者產品偏好的影響	★ 組合商品的定價模式對消費者的滿意度與價值知覺
★ KTV消費型態與消費者類型之關聯	★ 蘋果沉浸度研究
★ 女性業務人員的配飾、妝容、上衣對業務職能特質知覺之影響	★ 男性業務人員服飾配件對職能特質知覺之影響
★ 個人辦公桌擺設對員工工作投入與專業職能知覺之影響	★ 飯店房間內擺設對消費者知覺與金錢價值之影響 --- 以人格特質為干擾變數
★ 療癒著色本對情緒轉換與風險偏好的影響	★ 名片設計對業務人員的職能特質與工作績效之知覺影響
★ 美語補習班的創新服務	★ 台灣工具機製造商之策略構面、組織構面及財務績效之關係研究：五大廠商之個案分析
★ 服務花朵的創新與競爭優勢:以五家牙科診所的個案分析	★ 反向策略之廣告效果研究
★ 不同性刺激形式所引發的性幻想程度對廣告效果之影響	★ 情緒在消費者決策行為中的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究主要目的是要探討個別差異對於消費者出價(賣價與買價)行為之影響，運用社會價值導向的概念加以探討此問題。社會價值導向是說明人們對於自己和他人之間報酬配置偏好的一種人格特質，可分成競爭型者、個人主義者與利他型者三種人，本研究主張消費者的出價行為亦是一種貨幣報酬配置的行為，賣方(買方)所決定的賣價(買價)，將決定賣方的貨幣獲得，亦決定了買方的貨幣損失，因此，透過社會價值導向的觀念，藉以瞭解個別差異對於消費者出價行為的影響。換言之，本研究主要目的是要檢視這三種人在出價行為上的差異。本篇論文共有六個研究假設，利用三個實驗設計加以檢驗。
實驗一透過3 (社會價值導向) × 2 (角色) 獨立因子變異數分析分析，結果指出，當身為賣方時，競爭型的賣價大於個人主義者，進而大於利他型者；但身為買方時，利他型者的買價比個人主義者還高，進而高於競爭型者，此研究結果一方面支持了個別差異會影響消費者決定賣價和買價的行為，另一方面也發現當面對損失(買方)時，這三者的報酬配置的偏好恰為相反；本實驗也利用其結果檢視稟賦效果，發現稟賦效果對於競爭型者最大，其次是個人主義者與利他主義者，因此，說明了社會價值導向對稟賦效果會產生干擾作用。
實驗二的目的在於瞭解當面對多重外部參考價格時，三種不同導向的人在決定賣價的差異，同時也將考慮賣方與買方的關係。結果顯示，不管哪種導向的人，如果買方是朋友時的賣價會比是陌生人時的賣價還低；此外，當面對多重參考價格時，競爭型者的賣價仍然高於個人主義者，進而高於利他型者，而分析結果也間接支持了競爭型者與個人主義者對於賣價的決定，最大的差異在於個人主義者比較會考慮到賣價的實現性。
實驗三的目的在於檢視不對稱資訊是否會影響不同價值導向者的賣價。結果指出，競爭型者與個人主義者會在自利動機的驅使下，使得在不對稱資訊下的賣價高於對稱資訊下的賣價，而利他型者，其賣價在不對稱與對稱資訊下則無差異。

摘要(英)

The major purpose of this dissertation is to explore the impact of individual difference on the consumer behavior in selling prices and buying prices. We em-ploy the concept of social value orientation to probe this issue. Social value orien-tation is a relatively stable personality trait, which is distinct from people’s specific and variable preferences for outcome distributions. In the current research, we fo-cus on an empirically established typology that distinguishes among three orienta-tions: competitive, individualistic and prosocial. We argue that consumer behavior in prices setting is a kind of monetary outcomes setting. Sellers’ selling prices (Buyers’ buying prices) determine how much they could get (should loss), and how much prospective buyers (sellers) should pay (could get). Thus, the principle of this dissertation is to explore the varieties of decisions in selling prices and buying prices among competitors, individualists and prosocials.
A 3 (social value orientation) × 2 (role: seller vs. buyer) analysis of variance is employed in the STDUY 1. The results indicate that competitors charge higher prices than individualists, whose selling prices in turn are higher than those of pro-socials. In the self-as-buyer condition, prosocials are more willing to pay higher prices than individualists, whose buying prices in turn are higher than those of competitors. The findings support that individual difference affects consumer de-cisions on the selling prices and buying prices. And, in the loss condition, the preference for outcome distributions among three orientations is reversed. The STUDY 1 is also to examine the role of social value orientation on the endowment effect. The results also indicate that the magnitude of endowment effect is greater for competitors than that for individualists, whose magnitude in turn is greater than that for prosocials.
The purpose of the STUDY 2 is to probe the decisions in selling prices among three orientations when individuals face the multiple reference prices. The results show that individuals charge significantly lower price if the buyer is a friend rather than an unknown person for each orientation. And, competitors’’ selling prices is higher than those of individualists, and whose asking prices in turn is higher than those of prosocials, when they face the multiple reference prices. In addition, the indirect evidence support that individualists are more concern the realization of out-comes than competitors.
The principle of STUDY 3 is to examine the influence of asymmetric infor-mation on the selling prices. The findings illustrate that the self-interest motiva-tion derive competitors and individualists to decide higher selling prices under asymmetric information condition. Participants with prosocial orientation are not affected by the manipulation of information.

關鍵字(中)

★ 社會價值導向
★ 出價行為
★ 稟賦效果
★ 參考價格
★ 不對稱資訊

關鍵字(英)

★ Social Value Orientation
★ Prices Setting
★ Endowment Effect
★ Reference Price
★ Asymmetric Information

論文目次

ASTRACT i
ACKNOWLEDGE v
TABLE OF CONTENTS vi
LIST OF FIGURES viii
LIST OF TABLES ix
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Motivation 1
1.2 Research Propositions 5
1.3 Thesis Structure 8
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND HYPOTHESES 9
2.1 Social Value Orientation: An Overview 9
2.2 Prices Setting 18
2.3 Endowment Effect: An Overview 23
2.4 Reference Prices 30
2.5 Asymmetric Information 34
CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 37
3.1 STUDY 1 38
3.1.1 Method 38
3.1.2 Results 41
3.1.3 Discussion 44
3.2 STUDY 2 46
3.2.1 Method 46
3.2.2 Results 49
3.2.3 Discussion 57
3.3 STUDY 3 59
3.3.1 Method 59
3.3.2 Results 61
3.3.3 Discussion 63
CHAPTER 4 GENERAL DISCUSSION 64
4.1 Summary 64
4.2 Theoretical Contributions 65
4.3 Implications for Market Segmentation 67
4.4 Study Limitations and Future Research 68
REFERENCES 70
APPENDIX A Questionnaires of Social Value Orientation 78
APPENDIX B Questionnaires of STUDY 1 80
APPENDIX C Questionnaires of STUDY 2 81
APPENDIX D Questionnaires of STUDY 3 84

參考文獻

Bennett, Peter D. (1995), American Marketing Association Dictionary of Marketing Terms, Lincolnville, IL: NTC Publishing Group.
Bar-Hillel, Maya and Efrat Neter (1996), “Why Are People Reluctant to Exchange Lottery Ticket?,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (January), 17-27.
Carmon, Ziv and Dan Ariely (2000), “Focusing on the Foregone: How Value Can Appear so Different to Buyers and Sellers,” Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (December), 360-70.
Carnevale, Peter J. and Tahira M. Probst (1996), “Motivational Orientation and Cognitive Bias in Negotiation,” Paper presented at the Academy of Manage-ment Congress, Cincinnati (OH), August 9-13.
Carnevale, Peter J. and Tahira M. Probst (1997), Using Conflict in Organizations, London: Sage.
Chandrashekaran, R. (2001), “The Implications of Individual Differences in Refer-ence Price Utilization for Designing Effective Price Communications,” Jour-nal of Business Research, 53 (August), 85-91.
Ciarrochi, Joseph and Joseph P. Forgas (2000), “The Pleasure of Possessions: Af-fective Influences and Personality in the Evaluation of Consumer Items,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 30 (September), 631–49.
De Dreu, Carsten K.W. and Terry L. Boles (1998), “Share and Share Alike or Win-ner Take All?: The Influence of Social Value Orientation upon Choice and Recall of Negotiation Heuristics,” Organizational Behavior and Human De-cision Processes, 76 (December), 253-76.
De Dreu, Carsten K.W. and Christopher McCusker (1997), “Gain-Loss Frames and Cooperation in Two-Person Social Dilemmas: A Transformational Analysis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 (May), 1093-1106.
De Dreu, Carsten K.W. and Paul A. M. Van Lange (1995), “Impact of Social Value Orientation on Negotiator Cognition and Behavior,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (September), 1177-88.
Dubourg, W. R., M.W. Jones-Lee, and Graham Loomes (1994), “Imprecise Prefer-ences and the WTP-WTA Disparity,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9 (October), 115-33.
Frisch, Deborah (1993), “Reasons for Framing Effects,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54 (April), 399–429.
G?rling, Tommy, Satoshi Fujii, Anita G?rling, and Ceilia Jakobsson (2003), “Mod-erating Effects of Social Value Orientation on the Determinants of Proenvi-ronmental Behavior Intention,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23 (March), 1-9.
Hartman, Raymond S., Michael J. Doane, and Chi-Keung Woo (1991), “Consumer Rationality and the Status Quo,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106 (Feb-ruary), 141-62.
Horowitz, John K. and Kenneth E. McConnell (2002), “A Review of WTA/WTP Studies,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44 (No-vember), 426-47.
Kahneman, Daniel (1992), “Reference Points, Anchors, Norms, and Mixed Feel-ings,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51 (March), 296-312.
Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L. Knetsch, and Richard H. Thaler (1990), “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem,” Journal of Political Economy, 98 (December), 1325-48.
Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 47 (January), 263–91.
Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1984), “Choices, Values and Frames,” American Psychologist, 39 (March), 341-50.
Kelley, Harold H. and Anthony J. Stahelski (1970), “Social Interaction Basis of Cooperators’ and Competitors’ Beliefs about Others,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16 (January), 66-91.
Kelley, Harold H. and John W. Thibaut (1978), Interpersonal Relationships: A The-ory of Interdependence, New York: Wiley.
Knetsch, Jack L. (1989), “The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves,” American Economic Review, 79 (December), 1277–84.
Knetsch, Jack L. and J. A. Sinden (1984), “Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99 (August), 507-21.
Knetsch, Jack L. and J. A. Sinden (1987), “The Persistence of Evaluation Dispari-ties,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102 (August), 691-95.
Kuhlman, Michael D. and Alfred F. J. Marshello (1975), “Individual Differences in Game Motivation as Moderators of Preprogrammed Strategic Effects in Pris-oner’s Dilemma,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 (No-vember), 922-31.
Kulkarni, Subodh P. (2000), “The Influence of Information Technology on Informa-tion Asymmetry in Product Markets,” Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 6 (Spring), 55-68.
Lichtenstein, Donald R. and William O. Bearden (1989), “Contextual Influences on Perceptions of Merchant-Supplied Reference Prices,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (June), 55-66.
Liebrand, Wim B. G. and Charles G. McClintock (1988), “The Ring Measure of So-cial Values: A Computerized Procedure for Assessing Individual Differences in Information Processing and Social Value Orientation,” European Journal of Personality, 2 (September), 217-30.
Liebrand, Wim B. G. and Godfried J. Van Run (1985), “The Effects of Social Mo-tives across Two Cultures on Behavior in Social Dilemmas,” Journal of Ex-perimental Social Psychology, 21 (January), 86-102.
Loewenstein, George and Samuel Issacharoff (1994), “Source Dependence in the Valuation of Objects,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7 (April), 151-59.
Lurie, Stephen (1987), “A Parametric Model of Utility for Two-Person Distribu-tions,” Psychological Review, 94 (January), 42-60.
Mandel, David R. (2002), “Beyond Mere Ownership: Transaction Demand as a Moderator of the Endowment Effect,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88 (July), 737-47.
Mayhew, Glenn E. and Russell S. Winer (1992), “An Empirical Analysis of Internal and External Reference Prices Using Scanner Data,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (June), 62-70.
Marks, Gary and Norman Miller (1987), “Ten Years of Research on the False-Consensus Effect: An Empirical and Theoretical Review,” Psychology Bulletin, 102 (July), 72-90.
Messick, David M. and Charles G. McCkintock (1968), “Motivational Basis of Choice in Experimental Games,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4 (January), 1-25.
McClintock, Charles G. (1972), “Social Motivation – A Set of Propositions,” Be-havioral Science, 17 (September), 438-54.
McClintock, Charles C. and Wim B. G. Liebrand (1988), “Role of Interdependence Structure, Individual Value Orientation, and Another’s Strategy in Social De-cision Making: A Transformation Analysis,” Journal of Personality and So-cial Psychology, 55 (September), 396-409.
Monroe, Kent B. (2003), Pricing: Making profitable decisions, 3d ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
Monga, Ashwani and Rui Zhu (2005), “Buyers Versus Sellers: How They Differ in Their Responses to Framed Outcomes,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15 (4), 325-33.
Nauta, Aukje, Carsten K. W. De Dreu, and Taco Van Der Vaart (2002), “Social Value Orientation, Organizational Goal Concerns and Interdepartmental Prob-lem-Solving Behavior,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23 (May), 199-213.
Nayakankuppam, Dhananjay and Himanshu Mishra (2005). “The Endowment Ef-fect: Rose-Tinted and Dar-Tinted Glasses,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (December), 390-395.
Neale, Margaret A. and Max H. Bazerman (1991), Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation, New York: Freeman Press.
Olekalns, Mara, Philip L. Smith, and Rachael Kibby (1996), “Social Value Orienta-tions and Negotiator Outcomes,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 26 (March/April), 299-313.
Peters, Ellen, Paul Slovic, and Robin Gregory (2003), “The Role of Affect in the WTA/WTP Disparity,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16 (October), 309-30.
Poppe, Matthijs and Huib Valkenberg (2003), Effects of Gain Versus Loss and Cer-tain Versus Probable Outcomes on Social Value Orientations,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 33 (May), 331-37.
Rowe, Robert D., Ralph C. d'Arge, and David S. Brookshire (1980), “An Experi-ment on the Economic Value of Visibility,” Journal of Environmental Eco-nomics and Management, 7 (March), 1-19.
Rusbult, Caryl E. and Paul A. M. Van Lange (1996), “Interdependence Processes,” in Social Psychology: Hand Book of Basic Principles, ed. Tory Higgins, New York: Guilford Press, 564-96.
Samuelson, William and Richard Zeckhauser (1988), “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1 (March), 7-59.
Sattler, David N. and Norbert L. Kerr (1991), “Might Versus Morality Explored: Motivational and Cognitive Bases for Social Motives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (May), 756-65.
Shogren, Jason F., Seung Y. Shin, Dermot J. Hayes, and James B. Kliebenstein (1994), “Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Ac-cept,” American Economic Review, 84 (March), 255-70.
Simonson, Itamar and Aimee Drolet (2004), “Anchoring Effects on Consumers’ Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Accept,” Journal of Consumer Re-search, 31 (December), 681-90.
Singh, Jagdip and Deepak Sirdeshmukh (2000), “Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Judgments,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (Winter), 150-67.
Stouten, Jeroen, David De Cremer, and Eric Van Dijk (2005), “All Is Well That Ends Well, At Least for Proselfs: Emotional Reactions to Equality Violation as a Function of Social Value Orientation,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 35 (November/December), 767-83.
Thaler, Richard E. (1980), “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice,” Jour-nal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1 (January), 39–60.
Thaler, Richard E. (1985), “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science, 4 (Summer), 199-214.
Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman (1991), “Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (No-vember), 1039–61.
Urbany, Joel. E., William O. Bearden, and Dan C. Weilbaker (1988), “The Effect of Plausible and Exaggerated Reference Prices on Consumer Perceptions and Price Search,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (June), 95-110.
Van Boven, Leaf, David Dunning, and George Loewenstein (2000), “Egocentric Empathy Gaps Between Owners and Buyers: Misperceptions of the Endow-ment Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (July), 66–76.
Van Dijk, Eric, David De Cremer, and Michel J. J. Handgraaf (2004), “Social Value Orientations and the Strategic Use of Fairness in Ultimatum Bargaining,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (April), 697-707.
Van Dijk, Eric and Daan van Knippenberg (1996), “Buying and Selling Exchange Goods: Loss Aversion and the Endowment Effect,” Journal of Economic Psy-chology, 17 (August), 517-24.
Van Dijk, Eric and Daan van Knippenberg (1998), “Trading Wine: On the Endow-ment Effect, Loss Aversion, and the Comparability of Consumer Goods,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 19 (August), 485-95.
Van Kleef, Gerben A. and Carsten K. W. De Dreu (2002), “Social Value Orientation and Impression Formation: A Test of Two Competing Hypotheses about In-formation Search in Negotiation,” The International Journal of Conflict Man-agement, 13 (1), 59-77.
Van Lange, Paul A. M. (1999), “The Pursuit of Joint Outcomes and Equality in Outcomes: An Integrative Model of Social Value Orientation,” Journal of Per sonality and Social Psychology, 77 (August), 337-49.
Van Lange, Paul A. M., Christopher R. Agnew, Fieke Harinck and Gemma E. M. Steemers (1997a), “From Game Theory to Real Life: How Social Value Ori-entation Affects Willingness to Sacrifice in Ongoing Close Relationships,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (December), 1330-44.
Van Lange, Paul A. M. and Michael D. Kuhlman (1994), “Social Value Orientations and Impressions of Partner’s Honesty and Intelligence: A Test of the Might versus Morality Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (July), 126-41.
Van Lange, Paul A. M. and Wim B. G. Liebrand (1991), “Social Value Orientation and Intelligence: A Test of the Goal-Prescribes-Rationality Principle,” Euro-pean Journal of Social Psychology, 21 (July), 273-92.
Van Lange, Paul A. M., Wilma Otten, Ellen M. N. De Bruin and Jeffery A. Joireman (1997b), “Development of Prosocial, Individualistic, and Competitive Orien-tations: Theory and Preliminary Evidence,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (October), 733-46.
White, Sally Blount, Kathleen L. Valley, Max H Bazerman, Margaret A. Neale, and Sharon R. Peck (1994), “Alternative Models of Price Behavior in Dyadic Negotiation: Market Prices, Reservation Prices, and Negotiator Aspirations,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57 (March), 430-47.
Winer, Russell S. (1986), “A Reference Price Model of Brand Choice for Frequently Purchased Product,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (September), 250-57.
Winer, Russell S. (1988), “Behavioral Perspective on Pricing: Buyers’ Subjective Perceptions of Price Revisited,” in Issues in Pricing: Theory and Research, ed. Timothy M. Devinney, Lexington, MA: Lexington, 33-57.

指導教授

林建煌(Chien-Huang Lin)

審核日期

2006-6-4

推文