![]() |
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數:30 、訪客IP:3.14.249.184
姓名 吳文婷(Wen-Ting Wu) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 企業管理學系 論文名稱 台灣製造業獲利力及市場力之比較研究
(A Comparative Study on Profitability and Marketability of Manufacturing Industry in Taiwan)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[Bibtex 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 台灣屬於海島型的經濟體系,地狹人稠,自然資源相當缺乏,在資源有限之情況下,台灣製造業如何將有限資源作最適當之配置,創造最大效益,因應外在環境的變化,提升企業國際競爭力,已是刻不容緩之課題。故本研究運用資料包絡分析法,以資源基礎角度對台灣製造業進行經營效率之評估,評估企業以所擁有的有限資源於獲利、股票市場及整體經營效率之表現,衡量出企業之獲利力及市場力,並深入探討製造業中高科技產業和傳統產業獲利力及市場力之差異,為企業在瞬息萬變的環境中提供未來發展方向之參考。
本研究利用資料包絡分析法中CCR模式及BCC模式衡量企業獲利效率、市場效率及整體經營效率的整體技術效率、純粹技術效率及規模效率,以求無效率之原因,並利用目標改善分析提出目標改善建議,以及運用敏感度分析探討投入項改變對效率值之影響,最後發展獲利力-市場力矩陣,探討獲利力與市場力關係,提供管理者更多管理方向及改善效率之資訊。研究結果發現製造業之整體技術效率分析中,並無任何一家公司在獲利效率、市場效率及整體經營效率皆達最佳效率;純粹技術效率分析中僅有聯發科一家公司在獲利效率、市場效率及整體經營效率皆達最佳效率值。且發現獲利力與市場力相關性不高。另外,製造業中高科技產業之獲利力雖然較傳統產業差,但市場力的表現卻優於傳統產業。故建議企業不應偏頗單一效率指標之追求,而忽略其他效率之達成,應同時兼顧獲利力及市場力的提昇,以研擬改善策略,有效地提昇企業經營效率,達成企業目標。摘要(英) This study basing on the resource-based view evaluates the operational efficiency of manufacturing industry in Taiwan, and investigates how the resources of the firms influence the activities generating more profit and market value. Basing on the nonparametric frontier method, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), with a sample of 367 manufacturing firms, this research reviews the aggregate technical efficiency, the pure technical efficiency and the scale efficiency of both profitability and marketability by using CCR and BCC model, and attempts to figure out the reasons for inefficiency. Besides, the purpose of this research not only surveys the correlation of profitability and marketability in these firms but also develops the Profitability-Marketability Matrix to classify these firms by both their profitability and marketability. Relying on that, this research attempts to distinguish the operational efficiency of both high technology firms and traditional firms, and offer the advice according to the located quadrant in Profitability-Marketability Matrix.
The research conclusion indicates that not all firms could have the best performance in both profitability and marketability, and there was no apparent correlation between both two. This study also provides evidence that current high technology firms acquire relatively lower level of profitability than traditional ones, but obtain relatively higher level of marketability. Finally, the analysis in this study suggests that the firms should improve both profitability and marketability.關鍵字(中) ★ 資料包絡分析
★ 獲利力
★ 市場力關鍵字(英) ★ Data envelopment analysis
★ Profitability
★ Marketability論文目次 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的………………………………………………………3
第三節 研究流程與內容………………………………………………4
第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………6
第一節 資源基礎論……………………………………………………6
第二節 效率評估之理論方法…………………………………………14
第三節 效率評估之資料包絡分析法…………………………………17
第三章 研究設計………………………………………………………42
第一節 研究方法………………………………………………………42
第二節 研究對象與資料來源…………………………………………43
第三節 研究變數………………………………………………………44
第四節 研究架構………………………………………………………47
第五節 研究資料之敘述統計…………………………………………48
第四章 研究分析與結果………………………………………………49
第一節 整體技術效率之分析…………………………………………49
第二節 純粹技術效率之分析…………………………………………58
第三節 目標改善分析…………………………………………………74
第四節 敏感度分析……………………………………………………78
第五節 獲利力─市場力矩陣…………………………………………79
第五章 研究結論與建議………………………………………………81
第一節 研究結論………………………………………………………81
第二節 研究建議………………………………………………………84
第三節 研究限制………………………………………………………85
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………86參考文獻 中文部分
ITIS專案辦公室,我國製造業現況與趨勢─回顧2005展2006,ITIS 專案辦公室,2006。
江勝榮,台灣高科技產業與傳統產業的獲利性及股票市場性比較─資料包絡分析法的應用,臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文,2001。
何建達,台灣上市電子營運效率及股票市場性之研究,產業論壇,第5卷,第3期,頁30-55,2003。
高強、黃旭男 & Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,管理績效評估資料包絡分析法,華泰文化事業公司,2003。
薄喬萍,績效評估之資料包絡分析法,五南圖書出版公司,2005。
韓慧林,臺灣地區半導體業績效評估,管理研究學報,第4卷,第1期,頁71-89,2004。
台灣經濟新報資料庫,網址www.tej.com.tw。
台灣證券交易所,網址www.tse.com.tw。
證券暨期貨管理委員會,網址www.sfc.gov.tw。
英文部分
Ali, A. & Seiford, L.M., Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis, Operations Research Letters, 9,403-405,1990.
Amit, R. & Schoemaker, P. J. H., Strategic assets and organizational rent, Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46, 1993.
Banker, R.D., Charnes A. & Cooper W.W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092, 1984.
Barney, J. B., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120, 1991.
Boston Consulting Group, Perspective on experience, Boston Consulting Group, 1970.
Charnes, A., Cooper W.W. & Rhodes E., Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2,429-444, 1978.
Chatterjee, S. & Wernerfelt, B., The link between resources and type of diversification: theory and evidence, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 33-48, 1991.
Collis & Montgomery, Competing on resource: strategy in the 1990s, Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 118-128, 1995.
Farrell, M. J., The Measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-281, 1957.
Golany, B. & Roll, Y., An application procedure for DEA, OMEGA:International Journal of Management Science, 17, 237-250, 1989.
Grant, R. M., The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135, 1991.
Grant, R. M., Contemporary strategic analysis, 4th ed, Blackwell Publishers Limited, Oxford, 2002.
Hofer, W. & Schendel, D., Strategy formulation: analytical concepts, West Publishing, 1978.
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A. & Ireland, R. D., Competing for advantage, South-Western, 2004.
Itami, H. & Roehl, T., Mobilizing invisible assets, Harvard University Press, 1987.
Luo, X., Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: an application of data envelopment analysis, Journal of Business Research, 56, 627-635, 2003.
Penrose, E. T., The theory of growth of the firm, Oxford University Press, 1959.
Seiford, L.M., Data envelopment analysis: the evolution of the state of the art (1978-1995), Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 99-137, 1996.
Seiford, L.M. & Zhu, J., Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks, Management Science, 45(9), 1270-1288, 1999.
Wernerfelt, B., A resource-based view of firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2), 171-180, 1984.
Zhu, J., Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies, European Journal of Operational Research, 123, 105-124, 2000.指導教授 洪秀婉(Shiu-Wan Hung) 審核日期 2006-7-10 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
myshare