影響智慧型行動電話第三方應用軟體廠商網絡連結對象決策之因素研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：64

、訪客IP：3.135.195.180

姓名

陳盈嘉(Ying-Jia Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

影響智慧型行動電話第三方應用軟體廠商網絡連結對象決策之因素研究
(A Study of Influential Factors on Smartphone Third Party Application Developers’ Decisions of Preferential Linkage)

相關論文

★ 台灣企業經營模式研究-以個案公司為例	★ 組織文化對企業永續經營之影響---以某外商為例之個案研究
★ 專案管理運用於軍售作業之探討	★ 合資企業組織變革與組織學習對組織績效之影響 ---以國內某合資氣體公司為例
★ 探討在分散型產業,如何利用策略性委外執行低成本與差異化-以Supermicro公司為例	★ 企業投資中國的成長策略之探討-以台灣艾華電子公司為例
★ 從全球定位系統(GPS)設計代工個案探討其競爭優勢	★ 創投公司投資網際網路產業之先佔者優勢探討
★ 以資料包絡分析法評估電資通光領域之科技研究發展專案計畫相對效率	★ 車廠中頻直流（MFDC）點焊之品質管理制度的建立 — 以C公司為例
★ 運用六個標準差降低液晶製程中半成品耗損 — 以A公司為例	★ 以財務指標探討連接器產業之經營策略-以A公司為例
★ 台灣半導體通路商經營績效分析之研究-以資料包絡分析法評估	★ 自行車安全帽行業自創品牌進入中國市場之行銷策略－以廠商F公司為例
★ 化粧品零售業之電子商務商業模式-以S企業集團直營網站經營為例	★ 台灣網版印刷中小企業競爭策略分析-以E公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

3G時代的到來使得行動通訊產業產生劇烈的變動，過去上下游緊密連結的垂直體系日趨模糊，逐漸形成所謂的資訊通訊科技(Information and Communication Technology；ICT)產業，廠商間的網絡關係錯綜複雜，具有整合性概念的智慧型行動電話於此崛起，其系統的開放性也為第三方應用軟體廠商(Third Party Application)提供了一個發揮的舞台。是以本研究目的在於釐清智慧型行動電話整體產業之網絡關係，並自第三方應用軟體廠商的角度出發，探討影響其進行網絡連結對象決策之因素，亦即如何決定發行適用於何種作業系統的應用軟體。
本研究以便利抽樣選取美國地區的五十家第三方應用軟體廠商，蒐集其自2004年11月至2007年1月所發行之800筆應用軟體為樣本，以條件式邏輯特模型(Conditional Logit Model)進行實證分析，探討網絡關係之結構特性(鑲嵌程度)以及作業系統之特性(網路效果與市場新穎程度)對於第三方應用軟體廠商之網絡連結對象決策的影響。
而本研究結果如下：
一、鑲嵌程度對於第三方應用軟體廠商之網絡連結對象決策呈現顯著的負向影響，與假說相符。第三方應用軟體廠商於發行應用軟體時，不傾向選擇開發適用於鑲嵌程度高的智慧型行動電話作業系統。
二、網路效果對於第三方應用軟體廠商之網絡連結對象決策呈現顯著的正向影響，與假說相符。第三方應用軟體廠商於發行應用軟體時，傾向研發選擇適用於網路效果高的智慧型行動電話作業系統。
三、市場新穎程度對於第三方應用軟體廠商之網絡連結對象決策呈現顯著的正向影響，與假說不符。

摘要(英)

With the coming of 3G era, the mobile communication industry has been undergoing a fierce vibration, the former tightly-connected vertical system blurring, and gradually becoming the so-called information and communication technology industry. The integral conception-bearing smartphone sprang up from the complexity of network relationship, and the openness of its operating system offered third party application developers a stage to compete on. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the network relationship of the smartphone industry, and explore influential factors on the decision of preferential linkage from third party application developers’ perspectives, that is to say, to explain third party application developers’ decisions to launch new applications for specific operating systems.
This study chose 50 third party application developers in the United States by convenience sampling, and collected as the sample 800 applications launched from November 2004 to January 2007. Conditional logit model was used to empirically analyze the data, to investigate the effects of the structural attribute of network relationship (embeddedness) and attributes of operating systems (network effect and newness) on third party application developers’ decisions of preferential linkage.
The results of this study are as following：
1. Embeddedness has a significant negative effect on third party application developers’ decisions of preferential linkage, which supports the hypothesis. Third party application developers do not tend to launch applications for smartphone operating systems which possess high embeddedness.
2. Network effect has a significant positive effect on third party application developers’ decisions of preferential linkage, which supports the hypothesis. Third party application developers tend to launch applications for smartphone operating systems which possess high network effects.
3. Newness has a significant positive effect on third party application developers’ decisions of preferential linkage, which does not support the hypothesis.

關鍵字(中)

★ 條件式邏輯特模型
★ 網絡關係
★ 市場新穎程度
★ 網路效果
★ 智慧型行動電話
★ 第三方應用軟體廠商
★ 鑲嵌程度

關鍵字(英)

★ third party application developers
★ conditional logit model
★ newness
★ smartphone
★ network relationship
★ network effect
★ embeddedness

論文目次

中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
目錄 IV
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VI
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 5
第三節研究流程 6
第二章智慧型行動電話產業概況 7
第一節智慧型行動電話之定義 7
第二節智慧型行動電話產業概況 12
第三節智慧型行動電話作業系統及發展概況 18
第三章文獻探討 26
第一節鑲嵌 26
第二節網路效果 34
第三節技術創新 38
第四章研究方法 41
第一節研究架構 41
第二節研究對象與範圍 42
第三節研究變數 43
第四節研究方法 46
第五章實證分析 48
第一節樣本分析之敘述性統計 48
第二節條件式邏輯特模型之實證結果 51
第六章結論與建議 53
第一節研究結論 53
第二節研究限制 56
第三節後續研究建議 57
參考文獻 58
一、中文部份 58
二、英文部份 60

參考文獻

一、中文部份
1. 尤克熙（2002），『Smart Phone 發展現況與趨勢分析』，2002年12月1日，資策會MIC報告。
2. 王英裕，行動通訊系統技術發展藍圖，2004年3月，工研院IEK-ITIS計畫。
3. 王英裕，智慧型行動電話技術發展藍圖，2004年12月，工研院。
4. 丘佩華譯，『生態學淺說』，1975年，台北，今日世界社。
5. 李欣岳， 10家PC廠，同時搶攻智慧型手機，2005年11月，e天下雜誌，第59期，122頁。
6. 張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏，經濟學：理論與實際，1987年9月，翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。
7. 陳瓊琪，從台灣智慧型手機設計代工個案探討其競爭優勢，2004年9月，國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班論文。
8. 楊佳憲，網路外部性與競爭規範--微軟之反托拉斯案件研究，2000年6月，國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
9. 楊惠安，『行動通訊終端設備開放式作業系統發展分析』，2005年7月29日，資策會MIC報告。
10. 楊惠安、林育烽，『從PDA應用處理器大廠策略轉折看智慧型手持式行動裝置發展』，2004年3月30日，資策會MIC報告。
11. 蔡佳如，從「區位理論」探討網路電子報對台灣新聞媒體產業之影響─由閱聽人資源角度分析之，1999年，國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
12. 簡文強（2002），『從行動電話新興應用，掌握相關IC元件之發展脈絡』，2002年12月24日，資策會MIC報告。
13. 龔繼衛，數位(科技)匯流之趨勢探討，2004年4月，財團法人國家政策研究基金會國政研究報告。
二、英文部份
1. Adler, P. S. & Kwon, S. (2002). Social Capital：Prospects for a New Concept, Academy of Management Review, 27：17-40.
2. Afuah, A. (1998). Innovation Management：Strategies, Implementation, and Profits. New York：Oxford University Press.
3. Afuah, A. N. (2000). How Much Do Your Co-opetitors’ Capabilities Matter in the Face of Technological Change？, Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 21, pp. 387-404.
4. Arthur, B. (1996). Increasing Returns and the New World of Business, Harvard Business Review, July-August.
5. Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Small Events, Economic Journal, 99：116-131.
6. Arthur, W. B., Durlauf, S. N. & Lane, D. A. (1997). The Economy as a Complex Evolving System, II., Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity, Proceedings, Vol. 27. Reading, MA：Addison-Wesley.
7. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 99-120.
8. Bettis, R. & Hitt, M. (1995). The New Competitive Landscape, Strategic Management Journal, 11, 7-19.
9. Betz, F. (1993). Managing Technology Competing Through New Ventures, Innovation, and Corporate Research. Prentice Hall, N. J.
10. Botkin, J. (1994). The Commercialization of Public Sector Technology, From Lab to Market：Commercialization of Public Sector Technology. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 225-231.
11. Brown, R. (1992). Managing the “S” Curves of Innovation, The Journal of Consumer Marketing, pp. 61-72.
12. Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The Art of Continuous Change：Linking Complexity Theory and Time-paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42：1-34.
13. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes：the Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press.
14. Chen H. F. & Wang I. C. (2001). The Determinants and Effects of Embeddedness on MNC’s Subsidiaries. International Conference on Trade, Investment, and Industrial Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region, Taipei：Soochow University：283-303.
15. Chou, C. & Shy, O. (1990). Network Effects without Network Externalities, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 8, pp. 259-270.
16. Clegg, S. R. (1990). Modern Organizations：Organization Studies in the Postmodern World , London, Newbury Park, Calif.：Sage Publications.
17. Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm, in Readings in Price Theory. Edited by G. J. Stgler & K. E. Boulding, Homewood, I11：Irwin.
18. Coleman, J. S. (1998). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, American journal of Sociology, 94, pp. 95-120.
19. Collins, D.J., Bane, W., & Bradley, S.P. (1997). Industry Structure in the Converging World of Telecommunications, Computing and Entertainment. In D.B. Yoffie (Ed.), Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence (P. 159-201), Boston：Harvard Business School Press.
20. Dore, R. (1983). Goodwill & the Spirit of Market Capitalism, British Journal of Sociology, 34, pp. 459-482.
21. Drucker, P. F. (1974). Management Tasks, Responsibilities, and Practices. Heineman, London.
22. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York：Harper & Row.
23. Dyer, J. H. & Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View：Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23(4), pp. 660-679.
24. Economides, N. (1996). The Economics of Networks, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 673-699.
25. Fabio A. & Venkatesh S. (2003). Case Study: Symbian: Customer interaction through collaboration and competition in a convergent industry, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Winter, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, P. 56
26. Farrell, J. & Saloner, G. (1985). Standardization, Compatibility and Innovation, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 16, pp. 70-83.
27. Frankel, E. G. (1990). Management of Technological Change. Kluwer Academic.
28. Gerrit, B., Werner, R., Robert, S. & Tazelaar, F. (2000). How Inter-firm Co-operation Depends on Social Embeddedness：A Vignette Study, Acta Sociologica, Vol. 43, Issue 2, pp.123.
29. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure：The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), pp. 481-510.
30. Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology. In Nohria, N. & Robert, G. E., Networks and Organizations：Structure, Form, and Action, pp. 25-56, Boston：Harvard Business School Press.
31. Gulati, R. & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come from？, American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), pp. 1439-1493.
32. Gulati, R. (1995). Does Familiarity Breed Trust？ The implication of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances, Academy of Management of Journal, 38, pp. 85-112.
33. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances & Networks？, Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), pp. 293-317.
34. Gulati, R., Nohria, N. & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic Networks, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 203-215.
35. Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S. & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A General Theory of Network Governance：Exchanger Conditions and Social Mechanisms, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 918.
36. Kale, P., Singh, H. & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Alliance：Building Relational Capital, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 217-237.
37. Katz, M. L. & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility, American Economic Review, Vol. 75(3), pp. 424-440.
38. Katz, M. L. & Shapiro, C. (1986). Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, pp. 822-841.
39. Katz, M. L. & Shapiro, C. (1994). Systems Competition and Network Effects, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8：93-105.
40. Liebowitz, S. J. & Margolis, S. E. (1994). Network Externalities：An Uncommon Strategy, Journal of Economics Perspectives, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 133.
41. Liebowitz, S. J. & Margolis, S. E. (2001). Winners, Losers and Microsoft：Competition and Antitrust in High Technology. Oakland, Calif：Independent Institute.
42. Madhok, A., (1995). Revisiting Multinational Firm’s Tolerance for Joint Ventures：A Trust Based Approach, Journal of International Business Studies, pp. 117-137.
43. Mansfield, E. (1995). Innovation, Technology and the Economy, The Selected Essays of dwin Mansfield, Volume II, Aldershot：Edward Elgar.
44. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In Zarembka, P. (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics：105-142. New York：Academic.
45. Moorman, C., Zaltman, G. & deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships Between Provider and Users of Market Research：The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29(August), pp. 314-328.
46. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23, pp. 242-266.
47. OECD (1991). The Nature of Innovation and Evolution of the Productive System, Technology and Productivity-the Challenge for Economics Policy. pp. 303, Paris.
48. OECD (1997). Oslo Manual. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data (second edition), Paris.
49. Polanyi, M. (1944). The Great Transformation, New York：Farra.
50. Porter, E. M. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York：The Free Press.
51. Portes, A. & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and Immigration：Notes on the Social Determinates of Economic Action, American Journal of Sociology, 98, pp. 320-350.
52. Raub, W. & Weesie, J. (1991). The Management of Matches：Decentralized Mechanisms for Cooperative Relations with Applications to Organizations and Households, ISCORE-paper No. 1, Utrecht：Utrecht University.
53. Rindfleisch, A. & Moorman, C. (2001). The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances：A Strength-of-ties Perspective, Journal of Marketing, 65, pp. 1-18.
54. Rohlfs, J. (1974). A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communications Service, Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 16-37.
55. Romo, F. P. & Schwartz, M. (1995). Structural Embeddedness of Business Decisions： A Sociological Assessment of the Migration Behavior of Plants in New York State between 1960 and 1985, American Sociological Review, 60, pp. 874-907.
56. Rowley, T. d., Behrens, D. & Kracjhardt, D. (2000). Redundant Governance Structures：An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 369-386.
57. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Economic Studies.
58. Shy, O. (1996). Industrial Organization. The MIT Press.
59. Shy, O. (2001). The Economics of Network Industries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge：UK.
60. Uzzi, B. & Gillespie, J. J. (2002). Knowledge Spillover in Corporate Financing Networks：Embeddedness and the Firm’s Debt Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp. 595-618.
61. Uzzi, B. (1996). The Resources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations：The Network Effect, American Sociological Review, 61：674-698.
62. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social Structure & Competition in Interfirm Network：the Paradox of Embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp. 35-67.
63. Venkatraman, N. & Lee, C. (2004). Preferential Linkage and Network Evolution：A Conceptual Model and Empirical Test in the U.S. Video Game Sector, Academy of Management Journal, 47：876-892.
64. Wulf, K. D., Odekeren-Schroder, G. & Lacobucci, D. (2001). Investments in Consumer Relationships：A Cross-country and Cross-industry Exploration, Journal of Marketing, Oct., pp. 335-345.
65. Zukin, S. & Dimaggio, P. (1990). Structures of Capital：the Social Organization of the Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
66. http://www.canalys.com; (February 2007), 64 million smart phones shipped worldwide in 2006, and more than 20 million converged devices sold in final quarter of year
67. http://www.idc.com; (April 2004), Worldwide Smart Handheld Device 2004-2008 Forecast and Analysis
68. http://www.idc.com; (February 2007), Western European Mobile Phone Market Growth in 4Q06 Drives Shipments of 185 Million Units for 2006 but Points to Slowdown in 2007
69. http://www.juniperresearch.com; (July 2006), Mobile TV The Opportunity for Streamed & Broadcast Services, 2006-2011 (Second Edition)

指導教授

洪德俊(De-Jiun Horng)

審核日期

2007-6-23

推文