事件研究法：母數、無母數與拔靴複製法之比較

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：103

、訪客IP：3.138.125.197

姓名

范懷文(Huan-Wei Fai ) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務管理研究所

論文名稱

事件研究法：母數、無母數與拔靴複製法之比較

相關論文

★ 避險基金之績效評估	★ 展望理論與共同基金績效
★ 生命週期基金 :行為財務學觀點	★ 行為特性與投資績效相關性之研究
★ 專業投資人行為特性探討	★ 中小型企業融資缺口與資訊不對稱之探討
★ 九型人格特質與理財偏誤行為之相關性研究	★ 銀行通路轉型策略個案研究
★ 銀行財富管理行銷策略分析-以兩家在台外商銀行為例	★ 羅盤玫瑰可預測型態之探討
★ 巢式與非巢式資產定價理論之比較與檢定	★ 投資者情緒與市場報酬
★ 資產定價模型樣本外績效之檢定	★ 規模效果和元月效應之微觀
★ 因子或特徵:全球觀點	★ 特徵與因子：日本證據

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

傳統的事件研究法假設事件期的報酬服從常態分配，但此一假設不甚合理，所以本論文的目的是利用母數方法、無母數方法及拔靴複製法，利用模擬的方式，以日本股市日資料為抽樣母體，公司家數為25及50家，同時進行雙尾、左尾及右尾的檢定，並以人為的方式將異常報酬率引入事件期間中，進而比較各種檢定方法的檢定績效及檢定力。
本研究之結果顯示，使用日本股市資料進行事件研究法時，在無事件日變異數增大之下，母數方法在公司家數為50家時，檢定績效比家數為25家時來得較佳，無母數方法則不受公司家數影響。拔靴複製法除了檢定力較傳統母數方法好之外，其檢定績效沒有較佳。而符號檢定的檢定分配有左偏的現象；橫斷面獨立法和原始相關調整法則有右偏的現象。在事件日變異數增大時，模擬結果顯示，一般化符號檢定的檢定績效較佳，且母數方法在經過事件日變異數增大調整之後，其檢定績效明顯有改善。拔靴複製法的檢定力同樣都比傳統母數方法高出一些。
綜合以上分析，拔靴複製法在事件研究法上，沒有明顯的貢獻性。而日本股市資料在事件研究法上的檢定可使用傳統母數方法經過變異數增大調整和一般化符號檢定兩種檢定方法。

關鍵字(中)

★ 事件研究法
★ 拔靴複製法
★ 無母數方法

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

第一章緒論1
第一節研究動機及目的1
第二節論文架構2
第二章文獻回顧3
第一節事件研究法之實證步驟4
第二節拔靴事件研究法11
第三節其他相關課題探討14
第四節模擬分析與事件研究法16
第三章實驗設計17
第一節資料來源18
第二節樣本建構18
第三節估計異常報酬率19
第四節檢定方法19
第四章模擬結果分析26
第一節日資料特性26
第二節檢定力分析28
第五章結論40
參考文獻42

參考文獻

[1]Ashley, J. W., 1962, Stock prices and changes in earnings and dividends: Some empirical results, Journal of Political Economics 70, 82-85.
[2]Baker, C. A., 1956, Effective stock splits, Harvard Business Review 34, 101-106.
[3]Beaver, W. H., 1968, The information content of annual earnings announcements, Journal of Accounting Research (supplement) 66, 67-92.
[4]Boehmer. E., J. Musumeci and A. B. Poulsen, 1991, Event-study methodology under condition of event-induced variance, Journal of Financial Economics 30, 253-272.
[5]Brown, S.J. and J.B. Warner, 1980, Measuring security price performance, Journal of Financial Economics 8, 205-258.
[6]Brown, S.J. and J. B. Warner, 1985, Using daily stock return: The case of event studies, Journal of Financial Economics 14, 3-31.
[7]Burnett J. E., Carroll, C., Thistle P., 1995, Implications of multiple structural changes in event studies, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 35, No. 4,Fall, 467-480.
[8]Campbell, C.J. and C. E. Wasley, 1993, Measuring security price performance using daily NASDAQ returns, Journal of Financial Economics 33, 1993, 73-92.
[9]Chou, P. —H., 1999, Bootstrap Tests for Multivariate Event Studies, working paper, National Central University.
[10]Chou, P. —H., and Wang, H. —H., 1999, Alternative tests for event studies: A bootstrap approach, working paper, National Central University.
[11]Collins, D. W. and W. T. Dent, 1984, A comparison of alternative testing methodologies used in capital market research, Journal of Accounting Research 22, 48-84.
[12]Corhay, A., Rad, A. T., 1996, Conditional heteroskedasticity adjusted market model and an event study, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 36, No. 4, Winter, 529-538.
[13]Corrado, C.J., 1989, A nonparametric test for abnormal security-price performance in event study, Journal of Financial Economics 23, 385-395.
[14]Coutts, J. A., Mills T. C., Roberts, J., 1995, Misspecification of the market model: the implications for event studies, Applied Economics Letters, 2, 163-165.
[15]Cowan, A. R. and A.M.A. Sergeat, 1996, trading frequency and event study test specification, Journal of Banking & Finance 20, 1731-1757.
[16]Dann, L. Y. and W. H. Mikkelson, 1984, Convertible debt issuance, capital structure change and financing-related information, Journal of Financial Economics 13, 157-186.
[17]Dodd, P. and R. Leftwich, 1980, The market for corporate charter: Unhealthy competition versus federal regulation, Journal of Business 53, 259-283.
[18]Dyckman, T., D. Philbrick and J. Stephan, 1984, A comparison of event study methodologies using daily stock returns: A simulation approach, Journal of Accounting Research (supplement)22, 1-33.
[19]Fama E. F., L. Fisher, M. C. Jensen and R. Roll, 1969, The adjustment of stock prices to new information, International Economic Review 10,1-21.
[20]Jong F. D., Kemna A., Kloek T., 1992, A contribution to event study methodology with an application to the Dutch stock market, Journal of Banking and Finance 16 11-36.
[21]Kalaym, A. and U. Loewenstein, 1985, Predictable events and excess returns, Journal of Financial Economics 14, 423-450.
[22]Karafiath I., 1988, Using dummy variable in event methodology, The Financial review 23, 351-357.
[23]Karafiath I., 1994, On the Efficiency of Least Squares Regression with Security Abnormal Returns as the Dependent Variable, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 29, 279-300.
[24]Karathanassis, G., and Patsos, C., 1993, Evidence of heteroscedasticity and mis-specification issues in the market model: results from the Athens Stock Exchange, Applied Economics, 25, 1423-1438.
[25]Kramer, L., 1996, The bootstrap in event studies, working paper, Univesity of British Columbia.
[26]Patell, J. and M. Wolfson, 1979, Anticipated information releases reflected in call option prices, Journal of Accounting and Economics 1, 117-140.
[27]Mackinlay, A. C., 1997, Event studies in economics and finance, Journal of Economic Literature 24, 13-39.
[28]Mikkelson, W. H. and M. M. Partch, 1986, Valuation effects of security offerings and issuance process, Journal of Financial Economics 15, 31-60.
[29]Mills, T. C., Coutts J. A., Roberts, J., 1996, Misspecification testing and robust estimation of the market model and their implications for event studies, Applied Economics, 28, 559-566.
[30]Myers J. H. and A. J. Bakay, 1948, Influence of Stock Split-Ups on Market Price, Harvard Business Review 26, 251-255.
[31]Scholes, M. and J. Williams, 1977, Estimating betas form nonsynchronous data, Journal of Financial Economics 5, 309-328.
[32]周賓凰與蔡坤芳, 1996, 台灣股市日資料特性與事件研究法, 證券市場發展季刊第九卷第二期, 1-28.

指導教授

周賓凰(Pin-Huang Chou)

審核日期

2001-6-20

推文