創新擴散納入產品技術特徵變動考量之研究～以液晶電視為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：33

、訪客IP：3.129.253.214

姓名

陳建方(Chien-fang Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

創新擴散納入產品技術特徵變動考量之研究～以液晶電視為例
(The research of product innovation diffusion considers the changes in technical characteristics： the case of LCD TV)

相關論文

★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究	★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析	★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展	★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例	★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究	★ 製造業閒置資產轉售平台製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例	★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例	★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例
★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效	★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

網路時代的來臨，資訊透過網路無國界、無時差的散播，造就了無論是消費者偏好、市場環境，甚至是社會價值系統，快速且難以預測的變動，而在這樣的環境下正確地掌握顧客的需求以及預測產品市場銷售成長的趨勢，將有助於企業管理決策的制定，使其在這變動快速的環境下維持其競爭優勢。
競爭優勢(competitive advantage)不只是策略管理上的一個名詞，在實務上更是各個企業所追求的目標，因為不論在任何產業中，當企業擁有競爭優勢時，該企業的表現將會比其他企業傑出、而獲利會高於產業水準、並且享有高的市場評價，Porter(1991)指出競爭優勢是企業將資源或能力轉換成滿足顧客所需的效用，為顧客帶來相對於競爭者較好的價值。而企業的技術能力則為消費者價值來源的其中之一，因此當產品技術特徵改變，也將影響到消費者的價值轉換，進而影響其對於產品的採用狀況，這當中消費者採用狀況以及企業對其技術發展方向的評估皆會影響到企業的獲利能力以及競爭優勢，而產品擴散的檢測即在於探究產品的生命週期並預測產品的需求量，本研究以Bass擴散模型為基礎連結產品技術特徵作為影響產品市場潛量以及銷售量的變數，希望能藉由本研究理論模型的發展，尋找出產品技術特徵與消費者對創新採用之間的關係。
本研究以液晶電視2001年至2003年各月之銷售資料進行實證研究，研究結果發現，在模型建構方面，本研究所提出之理論模型無論在模型配適度或銷售預測上皆表現出良好的效果。而在實證分析方面，則是液晶電視的市場潛量與影響液晶電視影像品質的關鍵技術累積專利具有正向的相關性，以及消費者對於液晶電視的創新接受度低。

摘要(英)

With the advent of the Internet, information is through the Internet without borders and the spread of the time difference. It causes rapid and unpredictable change of the consumer preferences, market environment and even social value systems. In this environment, the enterprises make management decision and maintain their competitive advantage more smoothly by grasping the needs of customers and products forecast sales growth of the market trend correctly.
Competitive advantage is not only strategic management of a term but also enterprises are pursuing various goals in the practice. When an enterprise has competitive advantage, its performance and profit will be better than other enterprises and enjoy high market evaluation. Porter (1991) thought that recourses or abilities must be converted to customer value since competitive advantage often come from offering customers better value than competitors. And the technical ability of the enterprise is one of the sources of consumers’ value. It will result in the value of the consumers and the adoption of products change when the technical characteristics of product changes. In This situation, the adoption of products and the assessment of the development direction of the enterprise’s technologies will affect the profit ability and competitive advantage of the enterprises. In this study, we use Bass diffusion model and link a potential market of product sales volume with the product technology characteristics change in finding the relations between the product features and the adoption of the innovation.
We use the LCD TV sales data from 2001 to 2003 in the empirical section of this study. We find that the theoretical model whether the model of fitness or sales forecasts are shown good results and the LCD TV potential market is positively impacted by the quality of the LCD TV images and the key technology patents accumulated.

關鍵字(中)

★ 創新擴散
★ 貝斯模型
★ 產品技術特徵
★ 擴散模型

關鍵字(英)

★ diffusion model
★ bass model

論文目次

摘要...................................................i
目錄..................................................ii
表目錄...............................................iii
圖目錄................................................iv
第一章諸論..........................................1
第一節研究背景與動機................................1
第二節研究目的......................................3
第三節研究流程......................................4
第二章文獻探討......................................5
第一節產品生命週期..................................5
第二節 BASS基本擴散模型............................ 12
第三節 BASS擴散模型之修訂與擴展.................... 17
第四節專利與TFT-LCD關鍵技術簡介................... 23
一、專利.........................................23
二、 TFT-LCD關鍵技術簡介......................... 24
第三章研究設計.....................................28
第一節研究架構.....................................28
第二節研究模型.....................................29
第三節模型之評估準則...............................31
一、模型之配適能力...............................31
二、模型之預測能力...............................32
第四節資料來源.....................................33
第四章證實結果與分析...............................35
第一節研究模型之結果分析...........................35
一、模型之配適能力...............................35
二、模型之預測能力...............................37
第二節模型性質分析.................................39
第五章結論與建議...................................40
第一節結論與管理意涵...............................40
一、結論.........................................40
二、管理意涵與研究貢獻...........................41
第二節研究限制.....................................43
第三節後續研究建議.................................44
參考文獻..............................................45

參考文獻

中文部分
1.2004年第一季電視機、錄放影機製造業景氣動態報告，台灣經濟研究院產經資料庫。
2.2004年第三季電視機製造業景氣動態報告，台灣經濟研究院產經資料庫。
3.2004年平面顯示器年鑑，經濟部技術處。
4.2007年消費性電子業景氣趨勢調查報告，台灣經濟研究院產經資料庫。
5.2006年第二季大尺寸TFT-LCD景氣動態報告，台灣經濟研究院產經資料庫。
6.2006年工研院IEK-ITIS計畫。
7.石憶如，2001，個人數位助理(PDA)之創新擴散模型，私立中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所，碩士論文。
8.邱一哲，2006，以貝斯模型決定新產品的初始上市價格與上市期間長度，國立中央大學工業管理研究所，碩士論文。
9.邱繼緯，2006，技術發展對映特徵定價法之研究~以台灣3G行動通訊市場為例，國立中央大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文。
10.林建煌，再版，2005，行銷管理，智勝文化事業有限公司。
11.林郁文，2003，以產品生命週期為基礎之多世代產品競爭主動式雙贏定價模式，東海大學工業工程與經營資訊研究所，碩士論文。
12.胡同來, 1995， “產品生命週期之探討” 中國工商學報第17 卷, 頁347-353。
13.蕭淑惠，1998，創新擴散模型之研究─以數據機為例，國立交通大學經營管理研究所，碩士論文。
14.嚴文巧，2003，產品生命週期之決策模式研究，國立成功大學工業管理研究所，碩士論文。
英文部分
1.Ashton, W.B. and Sen, R. K. (1988). Using Patent Information in Technology. Business Planning-I, Research Technology Management, pp.42-46.
2.Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth model for consumer durable. Management Science, 15(January), pp.215-227.
3.Bayus, B. L. (1987). Forecasting sales of new contingent products: an application to the compact disc market. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, pp.243-255.
4.Campball, R. S. (1983). Patent Trends as a Technological Forecasting Tool. World Patent Information 3, pp. 137-143.
5.Chi T. and Liu J.(2001). Product life cycle, and market entry and exit decisions under uncertainty. IIE Transactions, 33(9), pp.695-704.
6.Christensen CM, Bower JL. (1996).Customer power, strategic investment and failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal 17(3), pp.197-218
7.Day, G. S. (1981). The product life cycle: analysis and applications issues. Journa l of Marketing,45, pp.60-67.
8.Dean, J.(1950). Pricing policies for new products. Harvard Business Review, 28(6), pp.45-53.
9.Dodson, J. A., ＆ Muller, E. (1978). Models of new product diffusion through advertising and word-of-mouth. Management Science,24, pp.1568-1578.
10.Ernst, H.(1997). The Use of Patent for Technological Forecasting: The Diffusion of CNC-Technology in the Machine Tool Industry. Small Business Economic 9, pp.361-381.
11.Gatignon, H., Eliashberg, J., ＆ Robertson, T. S. (1989). Modeling multinational diffusion patters: an efficient methodology. Marketing science, 8(3), pp.231-247.
12.Griliches, Z.(1971). Price Indexes and Quality Change：Studies in New Methods and Measurement. Harvard University Press：Cambridge, MA.
13.Horsky, D. C. (1990). The effects of income, price, and information on the diffusion of new consumer durables. Marketing Science, Fall, pp.342-365.
14.Horsky, D. C., ＆ Simon, L. S. (1983). Advertising and the diffusion of new products. Marketing Science, 1, pp.1-18.
15.Jain, D. C., ＆ Rao, R. C. (1990). Effect of price on the demand for durable: modeling, estimation and finding. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 8, pp.163-170.
16.Jain, D. C., Mahajan, V., ＆ Muller, E. (1991). Innovation diffusion in the presence of supply restriction. Marketing Science, 10(1), pp.83-90.
17.Jones, J. M., ＆ Ritz, C. J. (1991). Incorporating distribution into new product diffusion models. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8, pp.91-112.
18.Kalish, S. (1983). Monopolist pricing with dynamic demand and production cost. Management Science, 12, pp.135-160.
19.Kalish, S. (1985). A new product adoption model with pricing advertising and uncertainty. Management science, 31, pp.1569-1585.
20.Kalish, S. and Lilian, G. L. (1986). A market entry timing model for new technologies. Management Science, 2, pp.194-205.
21.Kamakura, W. A., ＆ Balasubramanian, S. K. (1987). Long-term forecasting with innovation diffusion models: the impact of replacement purchase. Journal of forecasting, 6(1), pp.1-19.
22.Kolter, P.(1991)Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control. 7th ed, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
23.Lilien, G. L., Rao, A. G., ＆ Kalish, S. (1981). Bayesian estimation and control detailing effort in a repeat purchase diffusion environment. Management Science, 27, pp.493-506.
24.Mahajan, V., ＆ Peterson, R. A. (1979). Integrating time and space in technological substitution models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 14, pp.231-241.
25.Mahajan, V., Muller, E., ＆ Bass, F. M. (1990). New products diffusion models in marketing: a review and direction for research. Journal of Marketing, 54, pp.1-26.
26.Mahajan, V., ＆ Peterson, R. A. (1979). Integrating time and space in technological substitution models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 14, pp.231-241.
27.Mahajan, V., Muller, E. ＆ Kerin, R. A. (1984). Introduction strategy for new products with positive and negative word-of-mouth. Management Science, 30, pp.1389-1404.
28.Mahajan, V., Muller, E., ＆ Srivastava, R. K. (1990). Determination of adopter categories by using innovation diffusion models. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, pp.37-50.
29.Mahajan, V., Wind, Y., ＆ Sharma, S. (1983). An adoption to repeat purchase diffusion models. AMA Proceeding, Series 49, Patrick E. Murphy et al. eds. Chicago: American Marketing association, pp.442-446.
30.Midgley, D. F. (1976). A simple mathematical theory of innovative behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, pp.31-41.
31.Narin, F., E. Noma and R. Perry. (1987). “Patents as Indictors of Corporate Technological Strength,” Research Policy 16, pp.143-155.
32.Norton, J. A., ＆ Bass, F. M. (1987). A diffusion theory of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high technology
33.Olson, J. A., ＆ Choi, S. (1985). A product diffusion model incorporating repeat purchase. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 27, pp.385-397.
34.Pakes A.Z. Grilliches, (1980). Patents and RandD at the Firm Level: A First Look. Economic Letters 5, pp. 377-378.
35.Porter,A. L., et al.(1991). Forecasting and Management of Management of Technology. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc
36.Rink, D.R. and Swan, J.E.(1979). Product life cycle research：a literature review.Journal of Business Research, 78(September), pp.219-242.
37.Robinson, B., ＆ Lakhani, C. (1975). Dynamic price models for new product planning. Management Science, 10, pp.1113-1122.
38.Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovation. New York: Free Press.
39.Rink, D.R. and Swan, J.E.(1982). Fitting marketing strategy to varying product life cycle. Business Horizon, pp.72-76.
40.Sharif, M. N., ＆ Ramanathan, K. (1981). Binomial innovation diffusion models with dynamic potential adopter population. Technological forecasting and Social Change, 20, pp.63-87.
41.Sharif, M. N., ＆ Ramanathan, K. (1982). Polynomial innovation diffusion models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 21, pp.301-323.
42.Simon, H., ＆ Sebastian, K. H. (1987). Diffusion and advertising: the german telephone company. Management Science, 33, pp.451-466.
43.Tornatzky, L. G. and Klein, R. J. (1982). Innovation characteristic and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM(29), pp.28-45.
44.Tellis, G.J. and Grawford, C.M. ( 1981). An evolutionary approach to product grow theory. Journal of Marketing, pp.125-134.

指導教授

洪秀婉(Shiu-wan Hung)

審核日期

2007-7-3

推文