博碩士論文 89425010 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:74 、訪客IP:3.145.60.4
姓名 謝佩芳(Pei-Fang Hsieh)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 財務金融學系
論文名稱 銀行合併之價值評估
(Pricing the value of bank consolidation)
相關論文
★ 最適指數複製法之自動化建置:以ETF50為例★ 台灣公債市場與台幣利率交換交易市場動態關聯性之研究
★ 企業貸款債權證券化--信用增強探討★ 停損點反向操作指標在台灣期貨市場實證
★ 投資型保單評價-富邦金吉利保本投資連結型遞延年金保險乙型(VANB5)★ 停損點反向操作指標在台灣債券市場實證
★ 匯率風險值衡量之實證研究-以新台幣、日圓、英鎊、歐元匯率為例★ 探討央行升息國內十年期指標公債未同步上升之原因
★ 信用風險模型評估—Merton模型之應用★ 資產管理公司購買不動產擔保不良債權評價之研究
★ 股票除息對期貨與現貨報酬之影響★ 主權基金的角色定位與未來影響力之研究
★ 我國公債期貨之研究分析★ 用事件研究法探討希臘主權債信危機-以美國及德國公債為例
★ 企業避險及財務操作之實例探討★ 台灣期貨市場之量價交易策略
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 金融控股法通過後,銀行間掀起一股合併的風潮,銀行合併可透過成本節省或收入增加達成合併銀行整體價值增加之目的。收入增加可透過金融服務的多樣化及金融商品跨售達成;成本節省可透過關閉分行或減少員工數目達成。
大多數的文獻討論金融機構合併之動機使用事後分析法,收集合併後存續銀行之財務資料,使用實證分析討論合併之成效及動機。較少文獻以合併之事前觀點討論銀行合併之預期價值增加率。因此,本文參考Schwartz and Moon’s (2000) 提出之連續時間模型,嘗試建立可供銀行合併價值計算之模型。
為了瞭解模型之可行性,本文使用台新銀行與大安銀行合併之個案進行討論。模擬結果台新銀行合併前之整體價值為NT$ 338,358,299(單位為千);大安銀行為NT$315,542,557(單位為千)。 合併後之整體價值為NT$868,031,438(單位為千),價值增加率約為32.75%。
最後針對模型中之重要參數進行敏感度分析,發現合併銀行之成本節省來源中,變動成本節省相較於固定成本節省對銀行價值增加有較大之貢獻。
摘要(英) No one can deny that there is a trend in financial consolidation, including domestic and international banks, around the world for the prevalent perception of large organizations to be “too big to fall”.
Bank mergers can increase value by reducing costs and/or increasing revenues. Revenue grows for diversification or cross-selling of bank service. Cost-down is from eliminating redundant facilities, staffs or even a department.
However, most of the existing literatures examine the behavior of bank consolidation in the way of collecting financial data after banks consolidated and then try to figure out what the motives of the participating banks seeking for and what merger benefits for different stakeholders. On the important M&A topic, there is few paper to explore the merger gain in the ex ante viewpoint. That is, before the event of bank consolidation, what impact will be occurred for each independent bank or what benefit will be achieved for shareholders if the decision of M&A is made is analyzed in advance. This paper combines the concepts of real-option and capital budgeting to view the synergy of bank consolidation. We modify Schwartz and Moon’s (2000) model to price the transaction value of bank and calculate the merger-related gain as the value created from the merger activity.
We implement the procedure to value the merger of two commercial banks in Taiwan- Taishin Bank and Dah An Bank. After estimating the model parameters by historical financial reports, and solving by simulation, the value of the Taishin Bank is NT$ 338,358,299 thousands and the Dah An Bank is NT$315,542,557 thousands.
The consolidation value is NT$868,031,438 thousands, and the increased bank value ratio is 32.75%. We perform sensitivity analysis to figure out the important parameters that impact on the value of the consolidation bank. We find the cost saving in variable cost is more obvious than cost saving in fixed cost in bank value created.
關鍵字(中) ★ 銀行
★ 商品
★ 金融
★ 模型
★ 選擇權
★ 合併
★ 台新
關鍵字(英) ★ bank
★ consolidation
★ international
★ option
★ model
★ real option
論文目次 Contents
Abstract I
Contents III
List of Figures IV
List of Table V
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
Chapter 2. The Model 5
2-1 Continuous-Time Model 5
2-1-1 The model of each bank 5
2-1-2 The model of existing bank after consolidation 10
2-2 Discrete Version of the Model 14
Chapter 3. Case Study 17
3-1 The case introduction 17
3-2 Estimation of the Parameters 18
3-2-1 The parameters of each bank 18
3-2-2 The parameters of existing bank after consolidation 21
Chapter 4. Results 33
4-1 The transaction value of each bank 33
4-2 The value of existing bank after consolidation 35
4-3 The sensitivity analysis 36
Chapter 5. Conclusions 46
Reference 47
List of Figures
Figure 3.1 Taishin and Dah An banks’ growth rate in loans, Q1 1997-Q3 2001 ………………………………………………. 30
Figure 3.2 Taishin and Dah An banks’ growth rate in deposits, Q1 1997-Q3 2001 …………………………………….. 30
Figure 3.3 Loan Growth YoY vs. Consumer Price Index YoY, 1991-2002E……………………………………….. 31
Figure 3.4 Nominal GDP Growth vs. Loan Growth YoY, 1991-2002E……………………………………….. 31
Figure 4.1 The comparison of Taishin 0Banks’ simulation results and its book value…………………………………………. 44
Figure 4.2 The comparison of Taishin Banks’ simulation results and its market value………………………………………... 44
Figure 4.3 The comparison of Dah An Banks’ simulation results and its book value………………………………………….. 45
Figure 4.4 The comparison of Dah An Banks’ simulation results and its market value………………………………………... 45
參考文獻 Berger, Allen N. and Demsetz, Rebecca S. and Strahan, P. E. 1999. “The Consolidation of the financial services industry: Causes, consequences, and implications for the future.” Journal of Banking & Finance 23,p.135-194.
Boyie, P., 1997. “Options: A Monte Carlo Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 4, p.323-338.
Calomiris, Charles W. 1999. “Gauging the efficiency of bank consolidation during a merger wave.” Journal of Banking & Finance 23, p.615-621.
Chen, R. and R. Scott. 1992. “Pricing Interest Rate Options in a Two Factor Cox-Ingersoll-Ross Model of Term Structure.” Review of Financial Studies, p.1209-1227.
Choi, Lily and Brown, Andrew. “Taiwan Financial Services Research.” Morgan Stanley Asia Equity Research, March 26, 2002.
Dwight Grant, Gautam Vora, and David D. Weeks. 1996. “Simulation and the Early-Exercise Option Problem.” The Journal of Financial Engineering, vol. 5, No 3 ,p.211-227.
Hull, J. and White A. 1990. “Valuing Derivative Securities Using the Explicit Finite Difference Method.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 25, No. 1(March), p.87-100.
Kester, C. 1984. “Today’s Option for Tomorrow’s Growth.” Harvard Business Review, vol. 62 (March/April), p.153-160.
L. Trigeorgis. 1993. “Real Options and Interactions With Financial Flexibility.” Financial Management (Autumn). p.202-224.
L. Trigeorgis.1993. “The Nature of Option Interactions and the Valuation of Investments with Multiple Real Options.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 28, No.1 (March), p.1-20.
Longstaff, Francis A. and Schwartz, E. 2001. “Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach.” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 14, No. 1, p.113-147.
Panayi, Sylvia and Trigeorgis, Lenos, 1998. “Multi-stage Real Options: The Cases of Information Technology Infrastructure and International Bank Expansion.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol.38. Special Issue, p.675-692.
Rhoades, Stephen A. 1993. “Efficiency effects of horizontal (in-market) bank mergers.” Journal of Banking and Finance 17, p.411-422.
Rhoades, Stephen A. 1998. “The efficiency effects of bank mergers: An overview of case studies of nine mergers,” Journal of Banking & Finance 22, p.273-291.
Ryngaert, Michael D. and Houston, Joel F. 1994. “The overall gains from large bank mergers.” Journal of Banking & Finance 18, p.1155-1176.
Tzeng Larry Y. and Wang Jennifer L. 2000. “Surplus Management Under A Stochastic Process.” Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 67, No.3, p.451-462.
Schwartz E., and M. Moon. 2000. “Rational Pricing of Internet Companies.” Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 56 (May/June), p.62-75.
Schwartz E., and M. Moon. 2000. “Rational Pricing of Internet Companies Revisited.” University of California at Los Angeles. (Revised September 2000)
Schwartz E., and M. Moon. 2000. “Rational Pricing of Internet Companies Revisited.” University of California at Los Angeles. (Revised April 2001)
指導教授 張傳章(Chuang-Chang Chang) 審核日期 2002-7-15
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明