博碩士論文 89425012 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:8 、訪客IP:3.21.154.139
姓名 陳一飛(Ei-Fei Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 財務金融學系
論文名稱 高階經理人認股選擇權條款之研究--重設條款,凍結期間
(The Clauses of Executive Stock Option--Resetting and Vesting Period)
相關論文
★ 最適指數複製法之自動化建置:以ETF50為例★ 台灣公債市場與台幣利率交換交易市場動態關聯性之研究
★ 企業貸款債權證券化--信用增強探討★ 停損點反向操作指標在台灣期貨市場實證
★ 投資型保單評價-富邦金吉利保本投資連結型遞延年金保險乙型(VANB5)★ 停損點反向操作指標在台灣債券市場實證
★ 匯率風險值衡量之實證研究-以新台幣、日圓、英鎊、歐元匯率為例★ 探討央行升息國內十年期指標公債未同步上升之原因
★ 信用風險模型評估—Merton模型之應用★ 資產管理公司購買不動產擔保不良債權評價之研究
★ 股票除息對期貨與現貨報酬之影響★ 主權基金的角色定位與未來影響力之研究
★ 我國公債期貨之研究分析★ 用事件研究法探討希臘主權債信危機-以美國及德國公債為例
★ 企業避險及財務操作之實例探討★ 台灣期貨市場之量價交易策略
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 摘要
根據先前學者們所做的研究,發現ESO合約的設計包含著許多條款,所以相當複雜。但根據我再進一步研究發現大多數的文獻都只是探討其中一項單獨條款的性質,卻甚少討論多種條款結合,這種討論模式與實際的合約設計出入頗大,因此我變嘗試著一次將兩個條款結合在一起討論,試圖探討期性質的交互影響與變化。另一方面我發現過去學者再討論ESO評價時,所採取的是固定無風險利率的假設,然而我們所觀察到的ESO都是相當的長期,因此在此一長期合約下假設固定無風險利率,似乎不太適合,因此我便引入一隨機利率,以求符合常理,同時觀看其變化。
根據模擬結果,我發現凍結期間條款只有在某些特定的情況下,才會有攸關,例如無股利模型,同時,我也發現風險偏好的假設對於ESO的評價是很重要的且攸關的。除此之外,我們也可以看到雖然引入隨機利率,並不會改變條款的基本性質,但卻對價值的衡量影響頗大,因此在設計如此長期的合約時,不得不考慮利率的影響,從激勵效果來看,我發現重設條款依然不具有額外的激勵效果,即使加入了凍結期間條款。
摘要(英) Abstract
According to previous published literatures, I have learned that the construction of ESO is very complicated which includes amounts of clauses. As I surveyed a number of literatures, I find that most of them discussed effects of single clause on ESO. It doesn’t meet the real construction of ESO, which consists of many clauses in practice. As a result I try to get two clauses, reset feature, vesting period, together to discuss their interactions with each other. In addition I find that the life of ESO is always long-term in practice. In spite of such characteristics, previous scholars still assumed constant interest rate along option life. I think the assumption may be not appropriate in such a long run period. In this way I try to employ a stochastic rate process in my work to see if what I get is different from what is in constant rate.
In reference to previous paragraphs, I have reached some interesting conclusions. Vesting period is relevant in certain cases. For example in non-dividend model under risk neutral vesting is useless but significant under risk averse. It implies that the risk preference of managers is relevant in designing ESO. In addition I try to impose stochastic rate process on valuation of ESO first ever. Although the characteristics of clauses are always the same under each condition, the estimated value of ESO is substantially different in constant rate and stochastic rate(Appendix). It is clear to say that assumption of interest rate could distort value of ESO substantially. Furthermore I find resetting has no extra incentive to stimulate enhancing stock price by means of delta ratio. This finding is consistent with literatures referring to resetting, however, it is still an important tool to restore incentives of management in downturn market. From now on we have learned that each clause has its own economic meanings to ESO contract. If we have many specific clauses in one contract, our analyses of such a contract should account for every possible situations to make the construction of ESO contract more attractive to management.
關鍵字(中) ★ 實質選擇權
★ 重設條款
★ 凍結期間
★ 員工認股選擇權
★ 經理人認股選擇權
關鍵字(英) ★ ressting
★ vesting period
★ employee stock option
★ executive stock option
★ real option
論文目次 Abstract……………………………………………………………………...Ⅰ
Contents………………………………………………………………….…..Ⅲ
List of Figures…………………………………………………………….…Ⅴ
List of Tables……………………………………………………………..….Ⅵ
1、 Introduction……………………………………………………………....1
2、 Literature Review………………………………………………………...4
3、 Methodology……………………………………………………………...7
4、 Simulation Results Under Risk Neutral…………………………………10
4-1. Constant ate
4-1-1. Cash dividend Model……………………………………………………10
4-1-2. Non-dividend Model…………………………………………………….13
4-1-3. Stock dividend Model…………………………………………………...16
4-1-4. Delta Comparisons……………………………………………………...19
4-2 Stochastic Rate
4-2-1. Non-dividend Model…………………………………………………….22
4-2-2. Stock dividend Model…………………………………………………...23
4-2-3. Delta Comparisons……………………………………………………...26
5、 Simulation Results Under Risk Preference……………………………..28
5-1. Constant Rate
5-1-1. Non-dividend Model…………………………………………………….28
5-1-2. Stock dividend Model…………………………………………………...30
5-1-3. Delta Comparisons……………………………………………………...32
5-2. Stochastic Rate
5-2-1. Non-dividend Model…………………………………………………….34
5-2-2. Stock dividend Model…………………………………………………...35
5-2-3. Delta Comparisons……………………………………………………...36
6、 Conclusions………………………………………………………..……38
7、 Reference…………………………...…………………………………...39
8、 Appendix……………………………………………………..…………40
參考文獻 Acharya Viral V., John Kose,Sundaram Rangarajan K.,2000,〝On the optimality of resetting executive stock options〞,Journal of Financial Economics,June,Page 65~101.
Brenner, Menachem,Sundaram, Rangarajan K,Yermack, David,2000〝Altering the terms of executive stock options〞,Journal of Financial Economics,June,Page 103~128.
Chance, Don M.; Kumar, Raman; Todd, Rebecca B,2000,〝The `repricing’ of executive stock options〞,Journal of Financial Economics,June,Page 129~154.
Charles J. Corrado,Bradford D. Jordan,Thomas W. Miller Jr.,John J. Stansfield,2001,〝Repricing and employee stock option valuation〞,,Journal of Banking & Finance,June,Page 1059~1082.
Chen, R. and R. Scott ,1992, ’’Pricing Interest Rate Options in a Two-Factor Cox-Ingersoll-Ross Model of Term Structure,’’ Review of Financial Studies, 1209-1227.
Chung-Gee Lin,2001,〝Monte Carlo Simulation Approach: Applications for Pricing Financial Derivatives〞,National Central University.
Hsinan Hsu,Emily Ho,1999,〝The Valuation of Taiwanese Reset Warrants: A Monte Carlo Approach〞,National Cheng Kung University Tainan, Taiwan.
Harley E. Ryan Jr.,Roy A. Wiggins Ⅲ,2001,〝The influence of firm- and manager-specific characteristics on the structure of executive compensation〞,Journal of Corporate Finance,June,Page 101~123.
Mary Ellen Carter,Luann J. Lynch,2000,〝An Examination of Executive Stock Option Repricing〞,June.
Nalin Kulatilaka,Alan J. Marcus,1994,〝Valuing Employee Stock options〞, Financial Analysts Journal,November,Page 46~56.
Shane A. Johnson,Yisong S. Tian,2000,〝The value and incentive effects of nontraditional executive stock option plans〞, Journal of Financial Economics,June,Page 3~34.
指導教授 張傳章(Chuang-Chang Chang professor) 審核日期 2002-7-1
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明