探討電腦自我效能對於ERP系統成功之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：23

、訪客IP：18.118.30.8

姓名

莊芷瑄(Chih-Hsuan Chuang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

探討電腦自我效能對於ERP系統成功之影響
(The analysis of the effect of computer self-efficacy on ERP success)

相關論文

★ 在社群網站上作互動推薦及研究使用者行為對其效果之影響	★ 以AHP法探討伺服器品牌大廠的供應商遴選指標的權重決定分析
★ 以AHP法探討智慧型手機產業營運中心區位選擇考量關鍵因素之研究	★ 太陽能光電產業經營績效評估－應用資料包絡分析法
★ 建構國家太陽能電池產業競爭力比較模式之研究	★ 以序列採礦方法探討景氣指標與進出口值的關聯
★ ERP專案成員組合對績效影響之研究	★ 推薦期刊文章至適合學科類別之研究
★ 品牌故事分析與比較-以古早味美食產業為例	★ 以方法目的鏈比較Starbucks與Cama吸引消費者購買因素
★ 探討創意店家創業價值之研究- 以赤峰街、民生社區為例	★ 以領先指標預測企業長短期借款變化之研究
★ 應用層級分析法遴選電競筆記型電腦鍵盤供應商之關鍵因子探討	★ 以互惠及利他行為探討信任關係對知識分享之影響
★ 結合人格特質與海報主色以類神經網路推薦電影之研究	★ 資料視覺化圖表與議題之關聯

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

隨著資訊科技日益進步，企業使用資訊系統來輔助企業流程及幫助決策的情形已非常普遍，ERP系統提供一個企業內標準、商業流程導向的觀點，ERP系統最重要的的屬性是自動化以及整合企業流程的能力，分享企業內共同及常規性資料，以及時產生與獲得資訊，而ERP之使用在國內也日漸廣泛，但亦有企業導入失敗之案例，因而使資訊系統成功是廣受關心的課題。本研究結合在觀察人類行為及認知重要之自我效能理論，以及已經廣受應用與驗證的DeLone and McLean（2003）資訊系統成功模型，試圖探討使用者之自我效能是否會影響ERP資訊系統之成功。
而本研究利用結構方程模式分析結果，使用者之「電腦自我效能」對於系統、資訊、資訊部門服務之品質都有正向顯著之影響，進而正向影響「使用者滿意度」、「個人影響」而後「組織影響」；因而企業在導入ERP系統時，應重視使用者電腦自我效能之因素；有效提升使用者之電腦自我效能，將有助於幫助組織導入新的資訊系統之成功。

摘要(英)

With the advance in information technology, it is common that enterprises use the information systems to support the business processes and help people to make the decisions. The characters of ERP system are the automation and integration of business processes, sharing common and routine information in the enterprise, and producing the available information immediately. The use of ERP in Taiwan is increasingly widespread, but the cases of failure are also a lot. Therefore, the success of the ERP system is an important topic to concern.
This study combined the DeLone and McLean information system success model (2003) which has been widely applied and verified, and self-efficacy theory which has been used in the observation of human behavior and cognition. The study attempts to research if the user’s self-efficacy has the effect on the ERP success and uses the structure equation model to analyze the effect. The research results show that user’s computer self-efficacy has the positive effect on the perceived quality of system, information, and service. The perceived quality will have the positive effect on the user satisfaction, individual, and organization. Therefore, the study suggests that enterprises need to take account of and effectively upgrade users’ computer self-efficacy to make the ERP implementation more successful.

關鍵字(中)

★ 資訊部門服務品質
★ 資訊品質
★ 系統品質
★ DeLone and McLean 資訊系統成功模型
★ 電腦自我效能
★ 企業資源規劃
★ 使用者滿意度
★ 個人影響
★ 組織影響

關鍵字(英)

★ information quality
★ service quality
★ system quality
★ organization impact
★ individual impact
★ DeLone and McLean information system success mod
★ Computer self-efficacy
★ Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP)
★ user satisfaction

論文目次

論文摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝 III
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的1
1.3 研究流程 2
第二章文獻探討 4
2.1 電腦自我效能 4
2.1.1 理論基礎：社會認知理論（Social Cognitive Theory）4
2.1.2 自我效能的定義 5
2.1.3 電腦自我效能 6
2.2 系統品質 7
2.3 資訊品質 9
2.4 服務品質 10
2.5 使用者滿意度 13
2.6 個人影響 15
2.7 組織影響 16
第三章研究方法 18
3.1 概念形成與研究架構 18
3.2 研究假說 19
3.2.1 使用者電腦自我效能與系統品質 20
3.2.2 使用者電腦自我效能與資訊品質 20
3.2.3 使用者電腦自我效能與服務品質 21
3.2.4 系統、資訊、服務品質與使用者滿意度；使用者滿意度與個人影響；個人影響與組織影響 22
3.3 研究變項的定義 25
3.4 研究設計 28
3.4.1 抽樣方法 28
3.4.2 問卷設計 28
3.4.3 問卷結構與問卷內容 29
3.5 資料分析方法 31
3.5.1 敘述性統計分析 31
3.5.2 相關分析 32
3.5.3 信度、效度分析 32
3.5.4 結構方程模式分析 33
第四章研究結果與分析 37
4.1 敘述性統計分析 37
4.1.1 樣本基本資料 37
4.1.2 研究變項初步分析 41
4.1.3 樣本無回應偏差 43
4.1.4 皮爾森（Pearson）相關分析 44
4.2 測量模式（Measurement model）分析 46
4.2.1 模式基本適配度 46
4.2.2 信效度分析 48
4.2.3 模式契合度分析 51
4.3 LISREL結構模式分析 51
4.3.1 結構模式建立 52
4.3.2 模式契合度分析 55
4.3.3 整體模式之結構關係 55
4.3.4 影響效果與解釋力分析 57
第五章結論與建議 61
5.1 研究結果說明 61
5.2 結論與建議 62
5.3 研究限制 64
5.4 未來研究建議 65
參考文獻 67
附錄：研究問卷 76

參考文獻

1. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402.
2. Babakus, E., & Boller, G. W. (1992). An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Business Research, 24(3), 253-268.
3. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
4. Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530-545.
5. Baldwin, A., & Sohal, A. (2003). Service quality factors and outcomes in dental care. Managing Service Quality, 13(3), 207-216.
6. Ballou, D. P., & Pazer, H. L. (1985). Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems. Management Science, 31(2), 150-162.
7. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory.
8. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
9. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive TheoryPrentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
10. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentince-Hall,
11. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
12. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184.
13. Baroudi, J. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1988). A short-form measure of user information satisfaction: a psychometric evaluation and notes on use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 4(4), 44-59.
14. Baroudi, J., & Olson, M. Ives; B.(1986). An Empirical Study of the Impact of user Involvement on System Usage and Information Satisfaction. Communication of the ACM, 29, 231-238.
15. BARRETT, G., CABE, P., & THORNTON, C. (1968). Human factors evaluation of a computer based information storage and retrieval system(Human factors evaluation of computer based information storage and retrieval system using questionnaire and interview techniques). Human factors, 10, 431-436.
16. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88, 588406.
17. Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158.
18. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
19. Crawford Jr, A. (1982). Corporate Electronic Mail-A Communication-Intensive Application of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 6(3), 1-13.
20. Cronin Jr, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
21. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavior Theory of the Firm,
22. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
23. De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Kleijnen, G. (2001). Customer adoption of e-service: an experimental study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(2), 184-207.
24. DeBrander, B., & Thiers, G. (1984). Successful Information Systems Development in Relation to Situational Factors Which Affect Effective Communication Between MIS-Users and EDP-Specialists. Management Science, 30(2), 137-155.
25. DeLone, W. H. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
26. DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information & Management, 3, 60-95.
27. Dillon, C. (1999). Stretching: towards enterprise flexibility with ERP; APICS–the performance advantage,
28. Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259-274.
29. Ein-Dor, P., & Segev, E. (1978). Organizational Context and the Success of Management Information Systems. Management Science, 24(10), 1064-1077.
30. Etezadi-Amoli, J., & Farhoomand, A. F. (1996). A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance. Information and Management, 30(2), 65-73.
31. Fogg, B., & Tseng, H. (1999). The elements of computer credibility. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, , 80-87.
32. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
33. Galletta, D. F., & Lederer, A. L. (1989). Some Cautions on the Measurement of User Information Satisfaction. Decision Sciences, 20(3), 419-438.
34. Gelderman, M. (1998). The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance. Information & Management, 34(1), 11-18.
35. Gelle, E., & Karhu, K. (2003). Information quality for strategic technology planning. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 103(8), 633-643.
36. Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-Efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. The Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472-485.
37. Hair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Multivariate Data Analysis,
38. Hair, J. F. (1998). Multivariate data analysisPrentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
39. Hampton-Sosa, W., & Koufaris, M. (2005). The Effect of Web Site Perceptions on Initial Trust in the Owner Company. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 55-81.
40. Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural Equation Modeling with LISRELJohns Hopkins University Press Baltimore.
41. Hayduk, L. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: essentials and advancesJohns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA.
42. Hilton, R., & Swieringa, R. (1982). Decision flexibility and perceived information value. Decision Sciences, 13, 357-379.
43. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), p1-55.
44. Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587-605.
45. Igbaria, M., & Tan, M. (1997). The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance. Information & Management, 32(3), 113-121.
46. Iivari, J. (2005). An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success. ACM SIGMIS Database, 36(2), 8-27.
47. Iivari, J., & Ervasti, I. (1994). User information satisfaction: IS implementability and effectiveness. Information and Management, 27(4), 205-220.
48. Ives, B., Olson, M. H., & Baroudi, J. J. (1983). The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 26(10), 785-793.
49. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1), 45-71.
50. Jiang, J., Klein, G., & Discenza, R. (2001). Information system success as impacted by risks and developmentstrategies. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 48(1), 46-55.
51. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and ApplicationsSPSS Chicago, Illinois.
52. Kandampully, J., & Butler, L. (2001). Service guarantees: a strategic mechanism to minimise customers’ perceived risk in service organisations. Managing Service Quality, 11(2), 112-121.
53. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2005). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive PerformanceHarvard Business Review.
54. Kennerley, M., & Neely, A. (2001). Enterprise resource planning: analysing the impact. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 12(2), 103-113.
55. Kettinger, W. J., & Lee, C. C. (1994). Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function. Decision Sciences, 25(5), 6.
56. Khalil, O., & Elkordy, M. EIS Information: Use and Quality Determinants. Information Resources Management Journal, 18(2)
57. Kim, Y. H., & Kim, D. J. (2005). A Study of Online Transaction Self-Efficacy, Consumer Trust, and Uncertainty Reduction in Electronic Commerce Transaction. System Sciences, 2005.HICSS'05.Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on, , 170c-170c.
58. Lai, J. Y. (2006). Assessment of employees’ perceptions of service quality and satisfaction with e-business. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), 926-938.
59. Lambert, D. M., & Harrington, T. C. (1988). Measuring Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveyss. n.
60. Landrum, H., & Prybutok, V. R. (2004). A service quality and success model for the information service industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(3), 628-642.
61. Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Information and Management, 40(2), 133-146.
62. Li, E. Y. (1997). Perceived importance of information system success factors: a meta analysis of group differences. Information and Management, 32(1), 15-28.
63. Lin, H. H., & Wang, Y. S. (2005). Predicting consumer intention to use mobile commerce in Taiwan. Mobile Business, 2005.ICMB 2005.International Conference on, , 406-412.
64. Lucas, H. C. (1976). The Implementation of Computer-based ModelsNational Association of Accountants.
65. Mager, R. F. (1992). No Self-Efficacy, No Performance. Training, 29(4), 32-36.
66. Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and An Integrative Framework for Research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163.
67. Martocchio, J. J., & Webster, J. (1992). Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 553-578.
68. Mason, R. O. (1978). Measuring Information Output: A Communication Systems Approach. Information & Management, 1(5), 219-234.
69. Matlin, G., & O'Lakes Inc, L. (1979). What Is the Value of Investment in Information Systems? MIS Quarterly, 3(3), 5-34.
70. McCollough, M. A., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). A conceptual model and empirical examination of the effect of service guarantees on post-purchase consumption evaluations. Managing Service Quality, 14(1), 58-74.
71. McKnight, H., & Kacmar, C. (2006). Factors of Information Credibility for an Internet Advice Site. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-Volume 06,
72. Melone, N. P. (1990). A Theoretical Assessment of the User-Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research. Management Science, 36(1), 76-91.
73. Millman, Z., & Hartwick, J. (1987). The Impact of Automated Office Systems on Middle Managers and Their Work. MIS Quarterly, 11(4), 479-491.
74. Norton, D., & Kaplan, R. (1992). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard business review, 70(1)
75. Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Attitudes and Attitude Change. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 117-154.
76. our FAQ, C., & Zone, R. (2006). The effect of computer self-efficacy on enterprise resource planning usage. Behaviour and Information Technology, 25(5), 407-411.
77. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
78. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1986). Servqual: A Multiple-item Scale for Measuring Customer Perceptions of Service QualityMarketing Science Institute.
79. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
80. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implications for Further Research. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 111-124.
81. Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609-647.
82. Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., & Kavan, C. B. (1995). Service Quality: A Measure of Information Systems Effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173-187.
83. Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Testand Theoretical Analysis. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 50-69.
84. Rivard, S., & Huff, S. L. (1984). User Developed Applications: Evaluation of Success from the DP Department Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 8(1), 39-50.
85. Robert, S., & David, P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard-measures that Drive Performance. Harvard business review, 70(1), 71-79.
86. Ronen, J., & Falk, G. (1973). Accounting Aggregation and the Entropy Measure: An Experimental Approach. The Accounting Review, 48(4), 696-717.
87. Rosemann, M., & Wiese, J. (1999). Measuring the performance of ERP software: a Balanced scorecard approach. Proceedings from the 10th Australasian Conference of Information Systems (ACIS), , 773–784.
88. Saks, A. M. (1995). Longitudinal field investigation of the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy on the relationship between training and newcomer adjustment. The Journal of applied psychology, 80(2), 211-225.
89. Seddon, P., & Kiew, M. (1994). A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. JI DeGross, SL Huff and MC Munro. Proceeding of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems, , 99-110.
90. Shankarnarayanan, S. (1999). ERP Systems-Using IT to gain a competitive advantage. Cited in Teltumbde, A.(2000)‘A framework for evaluating ERP projects’, International Journal of Production Research, 38(17), 4509.
91. Shih, Y. Y. (2006). The effect of computer self-efficacy on enterprise resource planning usage. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(5), 407-411.
92. Shin, H., & Lee, J. (1996). A process model of application software package acquisition and implementation. The Journal of Systems & Software, 32(1), 57-64.
93. Shivers-Blackwell, S. L., & Charles, A. C. (2006). Ready, set, go: examining student readiness to use ERP technology. Journal of Management Development, 25(8), 795-805.
94. Teo, T., & Wong, P. (1998). An empirical study of the performance impact of computerization in the retail industry. Omega, 26(5), 611-621.
95. TORKZADEH, R. (1999). Computer self-efficacy, training effectiveness and user attitudes: an empirical study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18(4), 299-309.
96. Umble, E. J., Haft, R. R., & Umble, M. M. (2003). Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2), 241-257.
97. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
98. Wang, E. T. G., & Chen, J. H. F. (2006). Effects of internal support and consultant quality on the consulting process and ERP system quality*. Decision Support Systems, 42(2), 1029.
99. Wang, E. T. G., Klein, G., & Jiang, J. J. (2006). ERP Misfit: Country of Origin and Organizational Factors. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(1), 263.
100. WILFONG, J. D. (2006). Computer anxiety and anger: the impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1001-1011.
101. Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 17-41.
102. Xu, H. (2002). Data quality issues in implementing an ERP Hongjiang Xu, Jeretta Horn Nord, Noel Brown, G. Daryl Nord The Authors. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(1), 47-58.
103. Yoon, S., & Suh, H. (2004). Ensuring IT Consulting SERVQUAL and User Satisfaction: A Modified Measurement Tool. Information Systems Frontiers, 6(4), 341-351.
104. Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-Motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676.

指導教授

許秉瑜(Ping-Yu Hsu)

審核日期

2007-7-18

推文