國家創新系統之相對效率分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：58

、訪客IP：3.142.171.111

姓名

何真鳳(Jean-Fone Ho) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

國家創新系統之相對效率分析
(The relative efficiency of national innovation systems)

相關論文

★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究	★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析	★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展	★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例	★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究	★ 製造業閒置資產轉售平台製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例	★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例	★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例
★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效	★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

系統為分析投入產出之間的關係，學者應用系統的概念解釋國家之經濟、技術發展而出現創新系統的理論。國家創新系統基於每個國家獨特的歷史及地理條件，產生獨特的創新發展模式，系統運作由多個成員、環境條件及成員之間連結所組成，亦即國家或產業之創新成果並非僅來自於單一企業或機構，而是一複合、系統性的機制所綜合得出的。衡量多重面向之國家創新系統並不容易，但是各國可藉由了解其在全球之相對效率為何，進而評估該國之優勢及劣勢，以擬定其未來政策之方針。系統效率若僅以單一指標進行評估，往往造成偏誤或失真，無法呈現完整訊息，因此本研究利用二階段資料包絡分析法概念，應用於2005年資料衡量全球30個主要國家之國家創新系統相對效率。透過二階段模型衡量各國國家創新系統促使新知識產生之「創新效率」，以及新知識產生後在系統中擴散並轉化為經濟成果之「經濟效率」，較傳統一階段分析多得到後半段經濟效率之資訊。研究結果發現，30個國家之創新效率表現較經濟效率佳，但創新效率表現優異之國家其經濟效率不見得表現較佳。就規模效率來說，在第一階段創新效率七成以上國家處於規模報酬遞增，宜增加資源投入擴大其規模，在第二階段經濟效率七成以上國家處於規模報酬遞減，應轉移投入資源重視科學期刊、專利的品質，以質的提昇來取代量的增加，來縮減其規模以達規模經濟。就區域別而言，北美創新效率較其他區域佳，歐洲經濟效率較其他區域佳，亞洲則創新效率及經濟效率都表現優異。最後，本研究以差額變數分析及敏感度分析作為績效改善之參考依據，結果發現影響30個樣本國家創新效率的重要因素為研發人員數，影響經濟效率的重要因素為科學期刊篇數。

摘要(英)

The concept of system is to analyze the relationship between the inputs and outputs. The scholars utilized the concept of system to explain the economy and technical development of the countries, which inspired innovation system theory. The national innovation system develops in its unique way to innovate based on each country’’s unique historical and geographical conditions. Systematic operation consists of many elements, environmental circumstances, and the linkage among elements. Namely, the innovative achievement of a country or industry does not come from a single enterprises or organization, but from a complex, systemic mechanism. To measure the multidimensional national innovation system is difficult. However, by understanding its global relative efficiency, a country can assess its strength and weakness in order to set the direction of future policies. System efficiency is often distorted when assessed by a single index, which is unable to present complete information. Therefore, this research utilized two-stage data envelopment analysis to measure the relative efficiency of the national innovation system of 30 main countries in the world in 2005. Through the two-stage model, this research measured the innovation efficiency of new knowledge production fostered by national innovation systems of various countries and the economic efficiency of economic achievements converted from the spread of new knowledge. We procured extra information about the economic efficiency over the traditional analysis through the two-stage model. From the study, the 30 countries displayed better innovation efficiency than economic efficiency, but countries with excellent innovation efficiency did not necessarily display superior economic efficiency. As to economies of scale, more than 70% of the countries retained increasing returns to scale at the first stage, so they should increase the input of resources to expand the scale. Nonetheless, more than 70% of the countries incurred decreasing returns to scale at the second stage. As a result, they are suggested to focus the use of resources on the quality of scientific journals and patents instead of on the increase in quantity in order to achieve economies of scale. With respect to area, North America had better innovation efficiency, and Europe had better economic efficiency, while Asia excelled in both. Finally, we found that for the 30 samples, an important factor of innovation efficiency is the number of researchers, while a major factor of economic efficiency is the number of scientific journal papers.

關鍵字(中)

★ 效率
★ 國家創新系統
★ 資料包絡分析法

關鍵字(英)

★ Efficiency
★ Data envelopment analysis
★ National innovation system

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 3
第二章文獻探討 4
第一節國家創新系統 4
第二節效率評估之概念 11
第三章研究方法 14
第一節資料包絡分析法 14
第二節資料包絡分析法之特性及使用程序 22
第三節研究對象 26
第四節研究變數 27
第五節資料來源 31
第六節研究架構 33
第四章實證結果與分析 34
第一節效率分析 34
第二節區域別之創新效率與經濟效率比較 48
第三節差額變數分析 54
第四節敏感度分析 57
第五章結論與建議 59
第一節研究結論 59
第二節研究限制 62
第三節研究建議 62
第六章參考文獻 63
第一節中文部份 63
第二節英文部份 64

參考文獻

Alcorta, L., and Peres, W. , “Innovation systems and technological specialization in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Research Policy, 26(7-8), 857-881, 1998
Balzat, M., and Hanusch, H. , “Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(2), 197-210, 2004
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W. , “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis.” Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092, 1984
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. , “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.” European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444, 1978
Eichhorst, W., Profit, S., and Thode, E., Benchmarking deutschland: Arbeitsmarkt und beschäftigung: Bericht der arbeitsgruppe benchmarking und der bertelsmann stiftung. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2001
Farrell, M. J., “The measurement of productive efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-281, 1975
Freeman, C., Economics of industrial innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1982
Freeman, C., Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter, London, 1987
Freeman, C., “The national system of innovation in historical perspective.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24, 1995a
Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., and Stern, S., “The determinants of national innovative capacity.” Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933, 2002
Golany, B., and Roll, Y., An application procedure for DEA. Omega, 17(3), 237-250, 1989
Hsien-che Lai, Joseph Z. Shyu, “Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate performance of national innovation systems: The case of major OECD member.” 中原企管評論, 1(2), 221-238, 2003
IMD International, IMD world competitiveness yearbook 2005, IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2005
IMD International, IMD world competitiveness yearbook 2006, IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2006
IMD International, IMD world competitiveness yearbook 2007, IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2007
Liu, X., and White, S., “Comparing innovation systems: A framework and application to China’s transitional context.” Research Policy, 30(7), 1091-1114, 2001
Lundvall, B. Å., National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London and New York, 1992
Nasierowski, W., and Arcelus, F., “Interrelationships among the elements of national innovation systems: A statistical evaluation.” European Journal of Operational Research, 119(2), 235-253, 1999
Nasierowski, W., and Arcelus, F., “On the efficiency of national innovation systems.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 37(3), 215-234, 2003
Nelson, R. R., National systems of innovation: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993
Nelson, R. R., and Nelson, K., “Technology, institutions, and innovation systems.” Research Policy, 31(2), 265-272, 2002
Niosi, J., “National systems of innovations are ”x-efficient.” (and x-effective) Why some are slow learners.” Research Policy, 31(2), 291-302, 2002
Norman, M., and Stoker, B., Data envelopment analysis: The assessment of performance. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1991
OECD, Productivity and job creation: Best policy practices., OECD, Paris, 1998
OECD.stat, Retrieved on Feb. 19, 2008, from http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/Index.aspx?usercontext=sourceoecd
Oxford English Dictionary Online, Retrieved on Jun. 18, 2008, from http://dictionary.oed.com/
Polt, W., Rammer, C., Gassler, H., Schibany, A., and Schartinger, D. “Benchmarking industry-science relations: The role of framework conditions. “ Science and Public Policy, 28(4), 247-258, 2001
Porter, M. E., and Stern, S., National innovative capacity in: World economic forum. The global competitiveness report 2001-2002. Oxford University Press, New York, 2002
Seiford, L. M., and Zhu, J., “Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks.” Management Science, 45(9), 1270-1288, 1999
Viotti, E., “National learning systems: A new approach on technical change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea.“ Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 69 (7), 653-680, 2002
Web of Science, Retrieved on Mar. 2, 2008, from http://apps.isiknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=U2bC8J2GfM4EEoCOBc3&preferencesSaved=&highlighted_tab=WOS
WIPO, Retrieved on Mar. 5, 2008, from http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/patents/
王惟貞、林品華：南韓科技新思維與措舉。2008年6月16日。取自http://thinktank.stpi.org.tw/eip/index/techdoc_content.jsp?doc_id=1198657108232&ver_id=4
行政院國家科學委員會，中國民國科學技術白皮書(民國九十六年至九十九年)，行政院國家科學委員會，台北市，2005。
佛里曼(Thomas Friedman)著，世界是平的，楊振富、潘勛譯，雅言文化，台北市，2005。
李健瑞，「以資料包絡分析法比較二十個國家科技競爭效率之評估」，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所，碩士論文，2003。
林秀英，林欣吾，「台灣創新系統之競爭力與成長挑戰」，2005產業科技創新：新價值創造的年代國際研討會，6-1~6-33頁，台北市，2005年8月。
邱皓政，量化研究與統計分析，三版，五南，台北市，2006。
高強、黃旭男、 Sueyoshi, T.，管理績效評估-資料包絡分析法，華泰文化，台北市，2003。
經濟部中小企業處，2007中小企業白皮書，經濟部，台北市，2007。
薄喬萍，績效評估之資料包絡分析法，五南，台北市， 2005。

指導教授

洪秀婉(Shiu-Wan Hung)

審核日期

2008-7-8

推文