承銷關係對承銷商與發行公司利益影響之探討

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：48

、訪客IP：3.145.79.65

姓名

葉曉璇(Hsiao-Hsuan Yeh) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

承銷關係對承銷商與發行公司利益影響之探討
(On The Benefit of Underwriting Relationship for the UK Underwriters and Issuers)

相關論文

★ 使用信用卡循環信用持卡人特性之研究	★ 證券商分公司經營績效-以元大證券為例
★ 經濟變數對十年期公債殖利率影響之研究	★ 從股務代理機構之角度探討全面發行無實體有價證券作業
★ 以KMV 及Logistic 模型計算發行公司違約機率-台灣股市實證研究	★ 財務比率與股價報酬關聯性之研究--以全球汽車產業為例
★ 以完全複製不定期調整方式建構指數股票型基金之績效研究	★ 投資組合理論在財富管理上之應用
★ 以存活分析法預測通信貸款之還款期限	★ 匯率風險與亞洲金融風暴之研究
★ 消費者情緒對股價報酬的預測能力	★ 因子或特徵:全球觀點
★ 台灣加權指數波動率之實證研究	★ 從隨機優勢觀點探究全球價值-成長策略
★ 全球反向與動能策略	★ 套利訂價模型中未知因子之分析：全球實證研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本篇論文主旨在探討承銷商與發行公司間, 如果先前存在有承銷關係時, 對於承銷商及發行公司而言, 是否有利益。從我們的結果中發現, 對於承銷商而言, 如果先前與發行公司存在有承銷關係時,承銷商較容易取得未來的股票發行承銷權。然而, 投資人對於股票發行時是否存在承銷關係, 並不認為是一個好的訊息, 在股價的表現上, 具有承銷關係的股票發行與沒有承銷關係的股票發行間, 股價並無顯著差異; 只有當發行公司與承銷商間具有首次發行承銷關係時, 股價報酬有顯著為正。因此, 以股價的報酬的觀點來看, 只有首次發行承銷關係對於發行公司而言, 具有利益。

摘要(英)

This paper examines whether there are efficiencies that benefit underwriters and issuers when a financial intermediary has underwritten an issuer’s public securities offering before. Our results show that underwriters have more probability to winning the future public issuing business when there is an underwriting relationship before. However, the market reaction to the underwriting relationship does not significant and only exists the IPO specific. Investors do not consider the underwriting relationship as a good news for public equity issuing. Firms only derive a benefit from choosing banks with which they have IPO underwriting relationship.

關鍵字(中)

★ 股票公開發行
★ 首次公開發行
★ 承銷關係

關鍵字(英)

★ SEO
★ IPO
★ Underwriting Relationship

論文目次

1 Introduction 1
2 Data 4
2.1 Data On Equity Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Construction of Relationship Measures . . . . . 6
3 Methodology 8
3.1 Logit Model for Underwriting Relationship . . . . 8
3.2 Cumulative Abnormal Returns (CARs) . . . . . . . 10
3.3 Buy and Hold Abnormal Returns (BHARs) . . . . . . 11
3.4 Calendar-Time Abnormal Returns (CTARs) . . . . . 12
4 Empirical results 13
4.1 The Benefits of Relationship to Underwriters . . 13
4.2 The Benefits of Relationship to Firms . . . . . . 15
4.2.1 Cumulative Abnormal Returns (CARs) . . . . . . 15
4.2.2 Buy-and-Hold Abnormal Returns (BHARs) . . . . . 16
4.2.3 Calendar Time Abnormal Returns (CTARs). . . . . 17
5 Conclusion 19
Reference 23

參考文獻

Bharath, S., Dahiya, S., Saunders, A., and Sirinivasan, A. (2007), “So what do I get? the bank’s view of lending relationships”, Journal of Financial Economics,85, 368–419.
Brown, S.J. and Warnwe, J.B. (1985), “Using daily stock returns: the case of event studies”, The Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 3–31.
Burch, T.R., Nanda, V., and Warther, V.A. (2002), “Does it pay to be loyal? an empirical analysis of underwriting relationships and fees”, Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 673–699.
Carter, R.B., Dark, F.H., and Singh, A.K. (1998)“Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stocks”, Journal of Finance, 53,
285–311.
Dierkens, N. (1991), “Information asymmetry and equity issues”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26, 181–200.
Drucker, S. and Puri, M. (2005), “On the benefits of concurrent lending and underwriting”, Jouranl of Finance, 60, 2763–2799.
Eccles, R. and Crane, D. (1998), “Doing dealsinvestment banks at work”, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Eckbo, B.E. and Masulis, R.W. (1995), “Seasoned equity offerings: A survey”, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 9, Chapter 31.
Fama, E. F. and French, K.R. (1998), “Value versus growth: the international evidence”, The Journal of Financial Research, 53, 1975–1999.
Jaffe, J.F. (1974), “Special information and insider trading”, Journal of Business, 47, 410–428.
Kenji, k., Smith, J.K., and Smith, R.L. (2007), “Banking relationships and access to equity capital markets: Evidence from japans main bank system”, Journal of
Banking and Finance, 31, 335–360.
Krigman, L., Shaw, W.H., and Womack, K.L. (2001), “Why do firms switch underwriters?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 245–284.
Ljungqvist, A., Marston, F., and Wilhelm, W.J. (2002), “Competing for securities underwriting mandates: banking relationships and analysts recommendations”, Journal of Finance, 61, 301–340.
Loughran, T. and Ritter, J. (2000), “Uniformly least powerful tests of market efficiency”, Journal of Financial Economics, 55, 361–389.
Lyon, J.D., Barber, M.B., and Tsai, C.L. (1999), “Improved methods for tests of long-run abnormal stock returns”, The Journal of Financial Research, 54, 165–
201.
Mandelker, G. (1974), “Risk and return: the case of merging firms”, Journal of Financial Economics, 1, 303–336.
Nanda, V. and Warther, V.A. (1998), “The price of loyalty: An empirical analysis of underwriter relationships and fees”, Unpublished Working Paper, University of Chicago.
Raymar, S. (1993), “The financing and investment of a levered firm under asymmetric information”, The Journal of Financial Research, 16, 321–336.
Yasuhiro, A. and Hideaki, M. (2005), “Relationship banking and debt choice: Evidence from Japan”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13, 408–418.

指導教授

何耕宇(Ho Keng-Yu)

審核日期

2008-6-19

推文