金融變革與科技進步對銀行「企業放款」之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：61

、訪客IP：3.135.182.172

姓名

張晉銘(Chin-Ming Chang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

金融變革與科技進步對銀行「企業放款」之影響
(The Impact on Bank Loan Performance for Financial Reform and Technological Change)

相關論文

★ 金融機構不良債權處理機制之研究	★ 放款作業流程的滿意度調查研究 —以S銀行為例
★ 工業銀行持股公司多角化策略、董事會特性及經營績效之研究	★ 台灣企業的大陸經營模式、治理機制與盈餘管理之研究
★ 外資進入對本國問題銀行之影響	★ 銀行如何訂定建築業的授信政策
★ 台灣境外結構型商品的監理法規與行銷策略之研究	★ 問題放款的解決途徑及個案分析
★ 國家風險與信用評等制度之建立	★ 證券業及保險業資本適足率、公司治理與經營績效之比較
★ 商業銀行如何藉由風險中立評價法衡量放款部位的信用風險	★ 中小企業信保案件之違約機率、回收率與信用風險值的實證研究
★ 商業銀行如何建置符合新巴賽爾資本協定的信用評分制度	★ 資產減損與債務協商機制對台灣上市櫃公司之衝擊
★ 檢視Basu的盈餘不對稱時效性模型在台灣金融服務業的適用性	★ 商業銀行如何檢視淨值貸款與二胎房貸的地域效果

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

為瞭解本國銀行的小型企業放款有否較佳之經營績效，本研究乃以Carter-McNulty(2005)、Berger et al.(2005)提出的迴歸模型，檢測本國銀行的企業放款淨利率與銀行規模、企業的小型放款、法規、技術改變與所有權變化之間的關係，並以時間(TIME)作為法規鬆綁與技術進步之代理變數。基於穩健的原則，本文除了使用普通最小平方法外，同時採用隨機效果模型，並得到的一致的實證結果。由假設檢定可知，企業放款淨利率隨著法規逐步鬆綁(以時間當做代理變數)而下降、銀行規模效果不存在、放款規模呈現顯著的負相關；再者，沒有明顯的證據顯示，公營銀行的企業放款淨利率異於民營銀行；而1991 年所開放設立的新銀行，其企業放款淨利率則顯著優於其他銀行。
此外，本研究亦利用靜態、選擇與動態效果來衡量所有權改變後的放款績效。實證結果發現，民營銀行的放款績效優於公營銀行(靜態效果)；金控子銀行和外資併購或入股的銀行，其放款績效顯著高於公營銀行(選擇效果)；金控子銀行和外資併購或入股的銀行，其放款績效短期間雖然較差，但長期則可能會有反轉的趨勢(動態效果)。

摘要(英)

For analyzing the performance of small business lending in internal banking industry,we use the regression model of Carter and McNulty(2005)、Berger et al. (2005) to test the relationshipbetween risk-adjusted business yield, the size of banks, small business lending, and regulation-and-technology changes. Besides OLS, we also consider random effect model to acquire robust results. From both models, the consistent results are as follows. Fist, the returns to business lending have declined over the sample period. Second, size-of-bank effects do not exist and size-of-loan effects are negative related. Additionally, there is no significantstatistic that adjusted-risk business yields of public banks are different from privatebanks, but there is evidence showed that the business lending performance of the new banks in 1991 is significantly better than other banks.
Moreover, we jointly analyze the static, selection, and dynamic effects of domestic, state, and foreign ownership on bank performance. State-owned banks have poor long-term performance (static effect), financial holding banks and foreign banks have much better performance than state-owned banks (selection effect), and financial holding banks and foreign banks have poor performance in the short run, but it may reverse in the long run (dynamic effect).

關鍵字(中)

★ 隨機效果
★ 銀行所有權
★ 企業放款

關鍵字(英)

★ bank ownership
★ random effect
★ business loan

論文目次

中文摘要Ⅰ
英文摘要Ⅱ
目錄Ⅲ
表目錄Ⅳ
第一章緒論1
第一節研究背景與動機1
第二節研究目的4
第三節論文架構5
第二章文獻回顧6
第一節小銀行的優勢6
第二節法規鬆綁與科技進步8
第三章研究方法11
第一節選樣設計11
第二節模型設定與假設12
第三節計量分析方法24
第四章實證結果分析31
第一節規模年度與銀行特質之統計結33
第二節排除公營銀行的結果39
第三節迴歸結果與分析42
第五章結論60
參考文獻62
附錄一66
附錄二69
附錄三71

參考文獻

何俊德(1998)，金融自由化與經濟成長-臺灣實證研究，國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。
李豐良(2001)，「電子商務對銀行業電子化之影響分析」，2001年科技與管理學術研討會論文集。
李紀珠(2002)，台灣開放民營銀行設立之經驗與展望，國改研究報告，財金(研) 091-063號。
_____ (2007)，加入WTO後台灣金融業的發展，國改研究報告，財金(研) 096-006號。
林寶安(2002)，「台灣消費金融的演變及其社會經濟意義」，台灣社會學刊，27卷，107-162。
林寶安(2002)，「台灣1990年代的金融擠兌、合併與金融秩序」，2002年臺灣社會學年會「重訪東亞：全球、區域、國家、公民」研討會。
林銘鈺，台灣地區公營銀行民營化經營效率之研究—ＤＥＡ方法之應用，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
吳孟紋(2008)，公司治理及資產規模，外資進入對銀行經營績效的影響，政治大學金融研究所博士論文。
邱靜玉與唐正儀(2002)，金融改革與銀行業發展，國改研究報告，財金(研)091-029號。
許振明與唐正儀(2002)，公營銀行民營化問題，國改研究報告，財金(研)091-063號。
黃達業、歐進士與吳坤明(1997)，「開放新銀行對我國銀行規模經濟影響之實證研究」，中山管理評論，5卷，639-656。
Akhigbe, A. and J. E. McNulty (2003), “The Profit Efficiency of Small US Commercial Banks,” Journal of Banking and Finance 27, pp. 307-325.
Aliber, R. (1984), “International Banking: A Survey,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 16, Part 2, pp. 661–678.
Beck, T., J. M. Crivelli and W. Summerhill (2005a), “State Bank Transformation in Brazil-choices and Consequences,” Journal of Banking and Finance 29, pp. 22-51.
_____ (2005b), “Bank Privatization and Performance: Evidence from Transition Countries,” Journal of Banking and Finance 29, pp. 102-132.
Berger, A. N., K. K. Anil and M. S. Joseph (1995), “The Transformation of the U.S. Banking Industry: What a Long, Strange Trip It's Been,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, pp. 55-201.
_____, A. Saunders, J. M. Scalise and G. F. Udell (1998), “The Effects of Mergers and Acquisitions on Small Business Lending,” Journal of Financial Economics 50, pp.187-229.
_____, R. DeYoung, H. Genay and G. F. Udell (2000), “The Globalization of Financial Institutions: Evidence from Cross-border Banking Performance,” Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services 3, pp. 23-58.
_____, N. H. Miller, M. A. Petersen, R. G. Rajan and J. C. Stein (2001), “Does Fuction Follow Organizational Form? Evidence from the Lending Practices of Large and Small Banks,” NBER Working Paper Series 8752, pp. 1-51.
_____, L. F. Klapper and G. F. Udell (2001), “The Ability of Banks to Lend to Informationally Opaque Small Business,” Journal of Banking and Finance 25, pp.2127-2167.
_____ and G. F. Udell (2002), “Small Business Credit Availability and Relationship Lending: The Importance of Bank Organization Structure,” Economic Journal 112, pp. 32-53.
_____, R. J. Rosen and G. F. Udell (2005), “Does Market Size Structure Affect Competition? The Case of Small Business Lending,” Journal of Banking & Finance 31, pp 11-33.
Bonin, J. P., I. Hasan and P. Wachtel (2005a), “Bank Performance, Efficiency and Ownership in Transition Countries,” Journal of Banking and Finance 29, pp. 31–54.
Carter, D. A., J. E. McNulty and A.V. James (2005), “Do Small Banks Have an Advantage in Lending? An Examination Risk-Adjusted Yields on Business Loan at Large and Small Banks,” Journal of Financial Services Research 25, pp. 233-252.
_____ and J. E. McNulty (2005), “Deregulation, Technological Change, and the Business-Lending Performance of Large and Small Banks,” Journal of Banking & Finance 29, pp.1113-1130.
Claessens, S., A. Demirgüç-Kunt and H. Huizinga (2001), “How does foreign entry affect the domestic banking market?” Journal of Banking and Finance 25, pp.891–911.
Detragiache, E. and P. Gupta (2004), “Foreign Banks in Emerging Market Crises: Evidence from Malaysia,” IMF Working Paper No. 129.
DeYoung, R. and D. E. Nolle (1996), “Foreign-owned Banks in the US: Earning Market Share or Buying it?” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 28, pp. 622-636.
_____, W. C. Hunter and G. F. Udell (2004), “The Past, Present, and Probable Future for Community Banks,” Journal of Financial Service Research 25, pp. 85-133.
Goldberg, L.G. and A. Saunders (1981), “The Determinants of Foreign Banking Activity in the United States,” Journal of Banking and Finance 5, pp. 17-32.
Jayaratne, J. and P. Strahan (1996), “The Finance-Growth Nexus: Evidence from Bank Branch Deregulation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, no.3, pp. 639-70.
_____ (1998), “Entry Restrictions, Industry Evolution, and Dynamic Efficiency: Evidence from Commercial Banking,” Journal of Law and Economics 41, pp. 239-273.
Keeton, W. R. (1995), “Multi-Office Bank Lending to Small Businesses: Some New Evidence,” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review 80, pp.45-57.
Levonian M. E. and J. Soller (1995), “Small Banks, Small Loans and Small Business,” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (December).
McNulty J. E., A. O. Akhigbe and J. A. Verbrugge (2001), “Small Bank Loan Quality in a Deregulated Environment: The Information Advantage Hypothesis,” Journal of Economics and Business 53, pp. 325-339.
Meyer, L. H. (1998), “The present and future roles of banks in small business finance,” Journal of Banking & Finance 22, pp. 1109-1116.
Nakane, M. and D. Weintraub (2005), “Bank Privatization and Productivity: Evidence for Brazil,” Journal of Banking and Finance 29.
Nakamura (1994), “Small Borrowers and the Survival of the Small Bank: Is Mouse Band Mighty or Mickey?” Business Review, Nov/DEC, pp. 3-15.
Park, H. M. (2005), “Linear Regression Models for Panel Data Using SAS, STATA, LIMDEP, and SPSS.” Indiana University.
Peek, J. and E. S. Rosengren (1996), “Small Business Credit Availability: How Important is Size of Lender?” In: Saunders, A., Walter, I. (Eds.), Universal banking: Financial system design reconsidered. Irwin, Chicago, IL, pp. 628-655.
_____ (1998), “Bank Consolidation and Small Business Lending: It’s not Just Bank Size That Matters,” Journal of Banking and Finance 22, pp. 799-820.
Peterson, M. and R. Rajan (1994), “The Benefits of Small Business Lending: Evidence from Small Business Data,” Journal of Finance 49, pp. 3-37.
Rebel A. C. and W. Nicholas (1998), “Banking Consolidation and the Availability of Credit to Small Businesses,” MPRA Paper No. 4716, posted 07.
Stiroh, K. J. and P. E. Strahan (2003), “Competition dynamics of deregulation: Evidence from U.S. bankin,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 35, pp. 801-828.
Strahan, P. E. and W. James (1996), “Small Business Lending and Bank Consolidation: Is There Cause for Concern?” working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
_____ (1998), “Small business lending and changing structure of the banking industry,” Journal of Banking & Finance 22, pp. 821-845.

指導教授

陳錦村(Jing-Twen Chen)

審核日期

2009-6-30

推文