以資料包絡分析法比較二十個國家科技
競爭效率之評估

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：43

、訪客IP：3.14.253.221

姓名

李健瑞(Robert Li) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所

論文名稱

以資料包絡分析法比較二十個國家科技競爭效率之評估
(Data Envelopment Analysis Approach for Evaluatingthe National Technology Competitiveness ComparingTwenty Countries )

相關論文

★ 從電子商務演進-探討銀行電子金融服務創新	★ 財富管理業務之探討─以花旗銀行及合作金庫商業銀行為例
★ 數位相機產業市場結構、行為與績效之研究	★ 企業危機處理策略之探討─以台灣非酒精飲料業為例
★ 以軟硬整合思維重新探討智慧型手機商業模式	★ 企業之開放式創新行為探討-以光寶科技為例
★ 再生能源產業發展政策研究-以市場失靈觀點	★ 全球太陽能產業分析-以德國發展為例
★ 國際貨櫃物流港區政策之研究：以鹿特丹港口計畫為核心	★ 美妝產業之開放式創新─以L’Oréal與P&G公司為例
★ 快速時尚管理-找出台灣的下一個ZARA	★ 台灣新藥開發T公司個案研究：開放式創新商業模式視角
★ 創投決策與高科技廠商研發行為之研究—以新竹科學園區上市上櫃公司為例	★ 台灣積體電路產業人際關係網絡之分析
★ 政府研發獎助與中小企業研發創新關係之研究 ----以新竹科學園區廠商為例	★ 創業育成中心之育成績效評估-以工業技術研究院創業育成中心為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在知識經濟時代，科技創新競爭力，將是國家經濟發展最重要的成功關鍵因
素之一。而科技發展策略的擬定與執行，前後有相當程度的時間落差，且對未來
影響深遠，在瞬息萬變的市場競爭下，由於無法認知環境變遷要素為動態之變動
狀態，使科技發展策略之決策與動態環境變動狀態間出現時間落差，或難以預
測，導致原科技發展策略無法適時對應、效能降低。因此，本研究之目的，為分
析20 個主要先進國家跨期科技相對效率之比較，以了解它們各國科技政策與績
效。首先，採用瑞士洛桑國際管理學院(International Institute for Management
Development of Lausanne, Swiss, 簡稱IMD)所提出的指標，作為本研究考量的基
準，再以最適合的資料包絡分析(Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA )模式，建構科
技發展策略投入產出效率之分析模型，並針對台灣科技發展策略執行效率加以分
析;其結果，以此作為政府資源運用與政策研擬之參考。

摘要(英)

Decision making and practice of S&T policy are crucially for both government
and private sectors, but they usually suffer from high volatility in dynamic
environment of international competition. The first objective of this research is to
propose the Data Enve lopment Analysis model for efficiency measuring of Taiwan
S&T policy.
The second objective of this research is to develop an empirically based framework for
formulating and selecting Innovation Policy. The government is usually facing complex
decision scenarios. Traditional decision making methods are failed to satisfy the government’s
need in this regard. Thus, a hierarchy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method for
evaluating the Innovation Policy is proposed in this study. Finally, in order to show the
practicality and usefulness of this model, an empirical study of national innovation systems
are demonstrated.

關鍵字(中)

★ 科技發展策略
★ 國家創新系統
★ 創新政策
★ 資料包絡分析
★ 競爭力

關鍵字(英)

★ S&
★ T policy
★ Data
★ Innovation Policy
★ National Innovation Systems

論文目次

第一章緒論… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 1
1.1 研究背景與動機… … … … … … … … … … … .… … 1
1.2 研究問題及目的… … … … … … … … .… … … … … 3
1.3 理論架構與研究方法… … … … … … … .… … … .... 4
1.4 研究內容… … … … … … … … … … … … … .… … 5
第二章國家科技政策之關鍵要因及其評估… … … .… … … ….6
2.1 國家競爭力介紹… … … … … … … … … … .… … … 6
2.2 國家科技競爭力之關鍵要因… … … … … … … … .… 11
2.2.1 國家創新系統… … … … … … … … … … .… … 11
2.2.2 創新政策… … … … … … … … … … … … … 13
第三章DEA 評估模式之構建… … … … … … … … … .… …14
3.1 理論緣起… … … … … … … … … … … … … … 16
3.2 基本概念… … … … … … … … … … … … … … ...18
3.3 使用程序… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 19
3.4 模式發展… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 21
3.5 CCR 模式… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 23
3.6 跨期效率分析MALMQUIST 指標分析… … … … … 27
第四章實證分析:以二十個主要國家科技政策為例… … .… .… 30
4.1 國際競爭環境的轉變… … … … … … … … … … … 30
4.2 評估資料之蒐集與說明… … … … … … .… .… … .… 31
4.3 DEA 評估模式之應用與結果分析… … ..… ..… .… 38
第五章提昇台灣科技競爭效率之因應對策… … … … … … 51
5.1 當今的課題與挑戰… … … … … … … … … … … .… 51
5.1.1 全球競賽的挑戰… … … … … … … … ...… ...… 51
5.1.2 大陸磁吸效應的衝擊… … … … … … ..… … … … 51
5.1.3 沉重的歷史包袱亟待改革… … … … … ..… … … .…52
5.2 綠色矽島之路… … ..… … … … … … … … … … … 52
5.3 結論與討論建議… … … … … ...… … … … … … 53
參考文獻… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … 56
附錄… … … … … … … ...… … … … … … … … ..… 63
圖目錄
頁次
圖1 國家創新系統之構面… … … … … … … … … .… … 13
圖2 技術效率與價格效率圖… … … … … … ..… … .… ...18
圖3 DEA 與迴歸分析的比較圖… … … … … … .… … … … 19
圖4 DEA 理論的使用程序圖… … … … … … … .… … … 20
圖5 依規模報酬與導向區分的DEA 模式圖… … .… … … … . 21
圖6 Malmquist Productivity Index… … … … … … ....… 28
圖7 1994 年至2002 年的跨期DEA 圖表… … … … .… … ..…50
表目錄
頁次
表1 政府創新政策工具分類… … … … … … … … … .… …15
表2 DEA理論之主要文獻… … … … … … … … … … … … 22
表3 投入產出項… … … … … … … … … … … … … … 33
表4 1994 年分析的資料… … … … … … … … … … … … 34
表5 1994 年資料的統計量… … … … … … … … … … … .35
表6 2002 年的分析資料… … … … … … … … … … … … 36
表7 2002 年資料的統計量… … … … … … … … … … … 37
表8 1994年和2002 年相對效率值的比較… … … … … … … 39
表9 相同投入項不同產出項的效率分析(1994)… … … … … 40
表10 相同投入項不同產出項的效率分析(2002)… … … … ..…41
表11 二十個主要國家相對競爭效率值(2000 年)… … … ....…40
表12 二十個主要國家相對競爭效率值(1994 年)… ..… … … .43
表13 偏差值表列(1994 年)… … ..… … … … … … … ..…45
表14 偏差值表列(2002 年)… … … … … … … … … … … 46
表15 1994 年至2002 年的跨期DEA MALMQUIST 指標圖..… ..49

參考文獻

Adam Smith (1776), “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of
Nations”.
Adolphson, D.L., Cornia, G.C. and Walters, L.C. (1989), “Railroad Property Valuation
Using Data Envelopment Analysis,” Interface, Vol. 19, No.1, 18-26.
Ali, A.L., Cook, W.D. and Seiford, L.M. (1991), “Strict vs. Weak Ordinal Relations
for Multipliers in Data Envelopment Analysis” Management Sciences, Vol. 37, No.
6, 733-738.
Andersen, P. and Petersen, N.C. (1993), “A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in
Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, Vol. 39, No. 10, 1261-1264.
Banker, R.D., Conrad, R.F. and Strauss, R.P. (1986), “A Comparative Application of
DEA and Translog Methods: An Illustrative Study of Hospital Production,”
Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 1, 30-44.
Banker, R.D. (1984), “Estimating Most Productive Scale Size Using Data
Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 17, No. 1,
35-44.
Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984), “Some Models for Estimating
Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis” Management
Science, Vol. 30, No. 9, 1078-1092.
Banker, R.D. and Morey, R.C. (1986), “The Use of Categorical Variables in Data
Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 12, 1613-1627.
Banker, R.D. and Thrall, R.M. (1992), “Estimation of Returns to Scale Using Data
Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 62, No. 1,
74-84.
Barro, Robert, J., Sala- i-Martinand, and Xavier (1995), “Economic Growth, ”
Advanced Series in Economics. New York, London and Montreal: McGraw-Hill.
Bessent, A., Bessent, W., Kennington, J. and Regan, B. (1982), “An Application of
Mathematical Programming to Assess Productivity in the Houston Independent
School District,” Management Science, Vol. 28, No. 12, 1355-1367.
Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G. and Thanassoulis, E. (1991), “Applied Data
Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 52, No. 1,
1-15.
Bowlin, W.F., Charnes,A., Cooper, W.W. and Sherman H.D. (1985), “Data
Envelopment Analysis and Regression Approaches to Efficiency Estimation and
Evaluation,” Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 2, 113-138.
Brockett, P.L. and Golany, B. (1996), “Using Rank Statistics for Determining
Programmatric Efficiency Differency in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management
Science, Vol. 42, No. 3.
Carlsson, B. and Stankiewicz, R. (1995), “On the Nature, Function and Composition
of Technological System”, in Technological Systems and Economic Performance:
The Case of Factory Automation, Kluwer Acadmic Publishers.
Chang, K.P. and Kao, P.H. (1992), “The Relative Efficiency of Public versus Private
Municipal Bus Firms: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis,” The Journal
of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 3,No. 1, 67-84.
Chang, K.P. and Guh, Y.Y. (1991), “Linear Production Function and the Data
Envelopment Analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 52, No. 2,
215-223.
Charnes,A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984), “The Non-Archimedean CCR Ratio for
Efficiency Analysis: A Rejoinder Boyd and Fare,” European Journal of Operational
Research, Vol. 15, No. 3, 333-334.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y. and Seiford, L.M. (1997), Data Envelopment
Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Application, Third Printing, Massachusetts,
Kluwer Academic Publish.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978), “Measuring the Efficiency of
Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, No. 4,
429-444.
Charnes, A., Clark, T., Cooper, W.W. and Golany, B. (1985), “A Developmental Study
of Data Envelopment Analysis in Measuring the Efficiency of Maintenance Units
in the U.S. Air Forces,” Annals of Operation Research, Vol. 2, 95-112.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y., Morey R.C. and Rousseau, J. (1985),
“Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA,” Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 2,
No. 2, 139-156.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Seiford L.M. and Stutz, J. (1983), “Invariant
Multiplicative Efficiency and Piecewise Cobb-Douglas Envelopments,” Operations
Research Letters, Vol. 2, No. 3, 101-103.
Clarke, R.L. (1992), “Evaluating USAF Vehicle Maintenance Productivity Over
Time： An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis,” Decision Science, Vol. 23,
376-384.
Chu, X., Fielding, G.J. and Lamar, B.W. (1992), “Measuring Transit Performance
Using Data Envelopment Analysis,” Transportation Research, Vol. 26A, No. 3,
223-230.
Doryan and Enduardo, A. (1993), “An Institutional Perspective of Competitiveness
and Industrial Restructuring Policies in Developing Countries,” Journal of
Economic Issue, Vol 27, No. 2, 451-58.
Doyle, J. and Green, R. (1994), “Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA：Derivations,
Meanings and Uses,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 45, No. 5,
567-578.
Dyson, R.G. and Thanssoulis, E. (1988), “Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data
Envelopment Analysis,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 39, No.
6, 563-576.
Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B. and Ross P., “Productivity Changes in Swedish
Pharmacies 1980-1989: A Non-Parametric Malmquist Approach,” The Journal of
Productivity Analysis, Vol. 3, No.1, 1992, 85-101.
Farrell, M.J. (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, ” Journal of the
Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, Vol. 120, Part 3, 253-281.
Forsund, F.R. (1992), “A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Efficiency
Measures: The Case of Norwegian Ferries,” The Journal of Productivity Analysis,
Vol. 3, No. 1, 25-43.
Freeman, C. (1982), “The Economics of Industrial Innovation”, MIT Press.
Golany, B. and Roll, Y. (1989), “An Application Procedure for DEA,” OMEGA, Vol.
17, No. 3, 237-250.
Hines, R.D. (1982), “The Usefulness of Annual Reports: The Anomaly Between the
Efficient Markets Hypothesis and Share Holder Surveys,” Accounting and Business
Research, 296-309.
Jeffrey, D. and Hubbard, N.J., (1994) “A Model of Hotel Occupancy Performance for
Monitoring and Marketing,” Vol.13, No. 1, 57-71.
Kao, C. and Yang, Y.C. (1992), “Reorganization of Forest Districts Via Efficiency
Measurement,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 58, 356-362.
Kim, L. (1997), “Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological
Learning,” Harvard Business School Press.
Li, X.B. and Reeves, G.R. (1999), “A Multiple Criteria Approach to Data
Envelopment Anaylsis,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 115,
507-517.
Lim, Seok-Min (1996), “Round-the-world Service：The Rise of Evergreen and the
Fall of U.S. Lines,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.23, No.2, 119-144.
Lundvall, B.A. (1992), “National Systems of Innovations: Towards a Theory of
Innovation and Interactive Learning,” Pinter Publishers.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1867) “Capital Vols,” .Vol. 1.
Milliken, F.J. (1987) “Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty about the Environment:
State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty,” Academy of Management Review, Vol.12,
133-143.
Nasierowski, W. and Arcelus, F.J. “Interrelationships among the Elements of National
Innovation Systems: A Statistical Evaluation,” European Journal of Operational
Research, Vol. 119, 235-253.
Nelson, R.R. (1993), “National Innovation Systems- A Comparative Analysis,”
Oxford University Press, New York.
Porter, M.E. (1990), “The Competitive Advantage of Nations,” The Free Press New
York.
Ricardo, D. (1817), “On the principles of Political and Taxation,”.
Roll, Y. and Hayuth, Y. (1993), “Port Performance Comparison Applying Data
Envelopment Analysis(DEA),” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 20, No. 2,
153-161.
Roll, Y., Golany, B. and Seroussy, D. (1989), ”Measuring the Efficiency of
Maintenance Units in the Israeli Air Force,” European Journal of Operational
Research, Vol. 43, 136-142.
Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1981), “Industrial Innovation and Public Policy:
Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s”, London: Frances Printer.
Schefczyk, M. (1993), “Operational Performance of Airlines ：An Extension of
Traditional Measurement Paradigms,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14,
301-317.
Schive, C. (1988), “An Intra-firm Study of X-efficiency of Taiwan’s Sugar Industry,”
Developing Economics, Vol. 26, No.2 ,161-171.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1912), “Theory of Economic Development,”.
Solow, R.M. (1956), “A contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth,” Quarterly
Journal of Economics, Vol, 70, 65-94.
Solow, R.M. (1957), “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function,”
Review of Economics and Statistics 39:312-320.
Sueyoshi, T. (1997), “Measuring Efficiencies and Returns to Scale of Nippon
Telegraph & Telephone in Production and Cost Analyses,” Management Science,
Vol. 43, No. 6, 779-796.
Sueyoshi, T. (1999), “DEA-discriminant Analysis in the View of Goal Programming,”
European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 115, No. 2, 564-582.
Thompson, R.G., Langemeier, L.N., Lee C.T. and Thrall, R.M. (1990), “The Role of
Multiplier Bounds in Efficiency Analysis with Application to Kansas Farming,”
Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 46, 93-108.
Vassiloglou, M. and Giokas, D. (1990), “A Study of the Relative Efficiency of Bank
Branches：An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis,” Journal of Operational
Research Society, Vol. 41, 591-597.
Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986), “Measurement of Bus iness Performance
in Strategy Research：A Comparison of Approaches,” Academy of Management
Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, 801-814.
Yoffie and David, B. (1992), “Linking trade and technology policies :An International
Comparison of the Policies of Industrialized Nations,” Series on Prospering in a
Global Economy, 103-115, Washington, D.C. :National Academy Press.
江勁毅、曾國雄(2000)，「新的DEA 效率衡量方式：以模糊多目標規劃建立之效
率達成度」，管理學報，第17 卷，第2 期。
國科會(2001)，2001 年中華民國科技與技術統計要覽，國科會。
徐作聖(2000)，創新政策概論，華泰書局。
徐作聖(1999)，科技政策與國家創新系統，華泰書局。
徐作聖(1999)，國家創新系統與競爭力，聯經出版社。
陳敦基、蕭智文(1994)，「公路客運總體績效DEA 評估模式建立之研究」，運輸
計劃季刊，第23 卷，第1 期，頁11-40。
黃旭男、張元哲、林進財(1997)，「郵政總局分支機構經營效率及效率變動之評
估」，交大管理學報，第17 卷，第2 期，頁125-144。

指導教授

王弓、薛琦、曾國雄
(Kung Wang、Chi Shiue)

審核日期

2003-7-15

推文