參考文獻 |
中文部份(依編、著者姓氏筆劃順序)
一、書籍
1.王文宇,公司法論,元照出版有限公司,2005年。
2.夏荷立譯,John Micklethwait & Adrian Wooldridge原著,公司的歷史,左岸文化出版,2005年。
3.徐愛婷譯,Patricia Aburdene原著,2010大趨勢-自覺資本主義的興起,智庫出版社,2005年。
二、學位論文
1.吳碧雲,董事的注意義務,中原大學財經法律學系碩士學位論文,94年。
2.黃素莉,台灣TFTLCD廠商對關鍵零組件之統治結構,中原大學企管碩士論文,92年。
三、報章雜誌
1.王文宇,從股權結構論公司治理法制,月旦民商法雜誌,第十期。
2.王志誠,股東會之權限與議事原理,月旦法學教室,第27期。
3.官如玉,社會責任最in的企業DNA,經濟日報2006年2月8日企業副刊。
4.吳怡靜,私募當道併購全球企業,天下雜誌,95年3月刊。
5.高安德,獨立董事會-新興市場企業發展之鑰,商業週刊,2006年3月6日。
6.楊少強,經濟越繁榮 人民越有道德?,商業周刊,2006年2月13日。
四、電子文章
1. 劉坤億,英國柴契爾政府改革背景與理念的探索,http://www.ntpu.edu.tw/pa/Paper/3603.pdf,最後瀏覽日,94年10月20日。
3.黑色星期一,行政院金融監督管理委員會銀行局金融小百科,http://www.boma.gov.tw/,最後瀏覽日,94年12月14日。
4.垃圾債券,http://www.104sense.com.tw/cfdocs/jobsense/sense/isee.cfm?tit=%A9U%A7%A3%B6%C5%A8%E9&sr=1109_3849257&so=j,最後瀏覽日,95年1月2日。
5.「公開收購說明書應行記載事項準則」,行政院金融監督管理委員會證券期貨局, http://www.selaw.com.tw/Scripts/Query4A.asp?FullDoc=all&Fcode=G0100281,最後瀏覽日,95年3月23日。
6.經濟部95年6月5日經商字第09502078550號函釋,http://gcis.nat.gov.tw/elaw/query/index.htm,最後瀏覽日,95年10月12日。
英文部分
Books
1.Adolf A. Berle Jr. & Gardiner C. Means, The Modern Corporation and Private Property(rev. ed. 1991)。
2.Alfred D. Chandler, Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business(1977)。
3.Frank H. Easterbrook & Daniel R. Fischel, The Economic Structure of Corporate Law(1991)。
4.Kenneth J. Arrow, The Limited of Organization(1974)。
5.Oliver E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism(1985)。
6.Milton Friedman, The Methodology of Positive Economics, in Essays in Positive Economics(Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1966)。
7.Paul Milgrom & John Roberts, Economics, Organization & Management (Prentice Hall 1992)。
8.R. Edward Freeman, Strategic Planning: A Stakeholder Approach(Pitman Publishing 1984)。
9.Stephen M. Bainbridge, Corporation Law and Economics, University Textbook Series(Foundation Press 2002)。
Articles
1.Adolf A. Berle, Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust, 44 Harv. L. Rev. 1049(1931)。
2.Alan J. Meese, The Team Production Theory of Corporate Law: A Critical Assessment, 43 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1629(2002)。
3.Armen A. Alchian & Harold Demsetz, Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization, 62 Am. Econ. Rev. 777(1972)。
4.Benedict Sheehy, The Importance of Corporate Models: Economic and Jurisprudential Values and The Future of Corporate Law, 2 DePaul Bus. & Comm. L.J. 463(2004)。
5.C.A. Harwell Wells, The Cycles of Corporate Social Responsibility: An Historical Retrospective for The Twenty-First Century, 51 Kan. L. Rev. 77(2002)。
6.Diane K. Denis & John J. McConnell, International Corporate Governance, ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance No. 05/2003(2003)。
7.D. Gordon Smith, The Shareholder Primacy Norm, The Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 23, No. 2, University of Iowa(1998)。
8.Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 170 N.W. 668(Mich. 1919)。
9.E. Merrick Dodd, For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees? 45 Harv. L. Rev. 1145 (1932)。
10.Elaine Sternberg, Corporate Governance: Accountability in The Marketplace (Institute of Economic Affairs 1998)。
11.Elaine Sternberg, The Stakeholder Concept: A Mistaken Doctrine(Foundation for Business Responsibilities (UK) 1999)。
12.Eugene F. Fama & Michael C. Jensen , Separation of Ownership and Control, 26 J.L. & Econ. 301(1983)。
13.Henry Hansmann & Reinier Kraakman, What is Corporate Law?, Yale Law School, Center for Law, Economics and Public Policy Research Paper No. 300(2004)。
14.Henry Hansmann & Reinier Kraakman, The End of History for Corporate Law, The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series(2000)。
15.Iwan Anabtawi, Some Skepticism about Increasing Shareholder Power, UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 05-16(2005)。
16.Katz v. Oak Indus., Inc., 508 A.2d 873(Del. Ch. 1989)。
17.Lynn A. Stout, Bad and Not-So-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy, 75 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1189(2002)。
18.Margaret M. Blair, Reforming Corporate Governance: What History Can Teach Us, Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 485663(2003)。
19.Margaret M. Blair & Lynn A. Stout, A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 85, No.2(1999)。
20.Michael J. Meurer, Law, Economics, and The Theory of The Firm, 52 Buffalo L. Rev. 727(2004)。
21.Michael C. Jensen & William H. Meckling, Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, 3 J. Fin. Econ. 305(1976)。
22.Milton Friedman, The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profit, N.Y. Times, Sept. 13 1970, 6(Magazine)。
23.Oliver E. Williamson, Comparative Economics Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structure Alternative, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1991)。
24.Paramount Communications Inc. v. Time, Inc., 571 A.2d 1140(Del. 1989)。
25.Patrick Bolton & David S. Scharfstein, Corporate Finance, The Theory of The Firm, and Organizations, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 4(1998)。
26.Randall S. Thomas & Catherine T. Dixon, Aranow & Einhorn on Proxy Contests for Corporate Control § 21.01 (3d Ed. 1998)。
27.Richard N. Langlois, The Capabilities of Industrial Capitalism, Critical Review Vol. 5, No. 4(1991)。
28.Roberta S. Karmel, Implications of The Stakeholder Model, 61 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1156(1993)。
29.Ronald E. Seavoy, The Origins of The American Business Corporation 1784-1855: Broadening The Concept of Public Service during Industrialization(Greenwood Press 1982)。
30.Ronald H. Coase, The Nature of The Firm (1937)。
31.Stephen M. Bainbridge, A Comment on The SEC Shareholder Access Proposal, UCLA School of Law, Law & Econ. Research Paper No. 03-22(2003)。
32.Stephen M. Bainbridge, Community and Statism: A Conservative Contractarian Critique of Progressive Corporate Law Scholarship(1997)。
33.Stephen M. Bainbridge, Constraints on Shareholder Activism in The Unites States and Slovenia(May 15, 2000)。
34.Stephen M. Bainbridge, In Defense of The Shareholder Wealth Maximization Norm: A Reply to Professor Green, 50 Washington and Lee Law Review 1423(1993)。
35.Stephen M. Bainbridge, Director Primacy: The Means and Ends of Corporate Governance, 97 Nw. U.L. 547(2003)。
36.Stephen M. Bainbridge, Director v. Shareholder Primacy in The Convergence Debate, UCLA, School of Law Research Paper No. 02-04, FN 24(Jan. 2002)。
37.Stephen M. Bainbridge, The Board of Directors As Nexus of Contracts, 88 Iowa L. Rev. 1(2002)。
38.Thomas S. Ulen, The Coasean Firm in Law and Economics, 18 J. Corp. L. 301(1993)。
39.William W. Bratton, Berle and Means Reconsidered at The Century’s Turn, George Washington University Law School, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper 011(2000)。
Digital Data
1.美國股東董事提名權,http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/34-48626.htm,最後瀏覽日,95年4月28日 |