國家研發資源配置

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：87

、訪客IP：18.119.213.216

姓名

歐宜佩(Yi-Pey Ou) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所

論文名稱

國家研發資源配置
(Three Essays on Allocation of R＆D Resources)

相關論文

★ 期間利差與經濟衰退之預測模型-理性預期假設之驗證	★ 台灣、美國總經月數據與台股股價指數之關聯性
★ 台灣資訊電子產業異質性及利潤率之探討	★ 中小企業案件逾期放款之預測
★ 台灣半導體產業經營效率分析－三階段資料包絡分析法之應用	★ 台灣車輛產業經濟附加價值之研究－兼論影響信通交通器材公司經濟附加價值之因素
★ 外人直接投資與研發活動之關聯性-台灣電子相關產業之實證研究	★ 消費性信用貸款授信評量模式之研究
★ 二順位房貸產品風險預警分析	★ 新產品商業化流程之個案研究–以美商3M公司為例
★ 高淨值客戶風險屬性與共同基金投資報酬率之實證研究	★ 台灣加權指數與指數股票型基金風險值之歷史模擬法分析
★ 國際油價、匯率與利率之動態關聯—VECM與VECM-GARCH之應用	★ 主流記憶體之二十年價格模式研究與驗證
★ 以DEA模型分析桃園郵局之營運績效	★ 奢侈稅實施對都會地區房價之衝擊反應分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

研發活動於促進經濟成長與維繫永續成長上，扮演不可忽略之地位。各國政府均視推動研發活動之發展為首要目標。創新科技政策的著力點，除積極誘發更多資源投入外，亦可思考如何將有限的研發資源做妥善的配置，以強化研發活動之成效。目前，有些跨國組織之報告已意識到，OECD各國研發資源，在不同技術密集產業之間的配置，已有所差異，研發資源有集中於特定產業或技術領域之趨勢。基於上述的背景，本論文之目的將以一國『研發資源跨產業間的配置結構』為研究主軸，探究三個相關之議題。研究結果分別呈述如下：
議題一，鎖定於探究影響研發資源配置的因素。分析之觀點著重於一個國家整體研發資源之佈局考量。鎖定之焦點有兩個方面，一是檢視產業的未來需求面力量與過去創新經驗，是否牽動著一國的研發資源佈局。另一方面則是探究，驅動國家研發資源配置的力量是否與多國籍企業的海外研發佈局有關。本議題以17個OECD國家作為研究對象，資料期間涵蓋1982至2000年。因考量到研發活動投入與其配置之間的關係，本議題採用聯立方組，以三階段最小平方法(3SLS)進行估計。實證結果發現，產業內的市場需求之量的確能夠驅動資源投入於該產業，驅使資源呈現較集中之現象。但是，產業內過去創新經驗對於研發資源的吸引力效果卻不明顯，原因可能來自於各國錨定之新興產業政策有關，進而影響了技術拉力對於資源配置的影響。另外，實證結果亦支持多國籍企業的海外佈局會對研發資源配置的集中趨勢有正面影響。
議題二，採用追蹤資料的Granger因果檢定，論證一國研發資源配置態勢與其所得不均之間的關係。一國研發活動之配置主要係關注其研發資源投入在哪些產業。換言之，研發配置的形態可用分散或集中於某些產業來衡量。本議題檢視之問題有二，一是不同研發配置結構是否會影響所得不均。在考量研發分配之角色時，若一國的研發資源集中且偏向於特定產業，可能造成資源（如勞動與資本）有跨產業流動之現象，進而驅使所得不均現象之產生。另一問題則著重在反向關係，因為具所得不均現象的社會，可透過需求拉力或是人力資本累積機制，影響研發活動的配置態勢。本論文分別採用不同衡量研發配置指標、實證模型設定與資料（研發支出與專利）來檢視這個問題。以6個OECD國家（加拿大、芬蘭、英國、挪威、瑞典與美國）作為研究對象，資料期間涵蓋1987至2000年。實證結果發現，跨產業研發配置的改變對所得不均存在Granger的因果關係。反向因果關係之證據，則相對較微弱。
最後，議題三則聚焦於研發資源分配與生產力成長之關係。主要的問題在於什麼樣的國家研發政策有助於生產力成長？集中於少數產業，還是分散於較廣泛的產業呢？本議題以11個OECD國家作為研究對象，資料期間涵蓋1981至2000年。因考量國家本身之異質性、跨國之間的相依性與序列相關的問題，本議題採用固定效果且考量橫剖面相依性（cross-sectional dependence）之追蹤資料模型進行估計。此外，考量到研發活動性質之差異，本議題將研發活動分配區分為研究型（research-oriented）與應用型（development-oriented）配置。實證結果發現，集中的研發配置對生產力成長有正面的影響，但是集中程度太高時，反而會降低正面影響效益。另外，研發密集對生產力成長影響之正面效益，會隨著研發資源集中程度而改變。由上可知，適當將研發資源集中於少數特定產業內，能有助於生產力成長。此外，在分群樣本方面，實證結果支持集中資源之策略施行於發展型產業，對提昇生產力成長有較大之效益。而於研究型產業之效果則較低。

摘要(英)

There is a growing awareness tendency concerning the differences in the allotment of R&D resources to different industries in Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. The phenomenon of more and more R&D investment being concentrated in only few industries has been noted. In addition to promoting the increases in the overall R&D activities, drawing up a scheme for the appropriate and effective allocation of these resources may be regarded as to a useful tool for propelling the development of R&D activities nationwide. With this background in view, the objective of the dissertation concerns three issues relating to allocation of R&D resources.
In first issue, this paper is to investigate on two aspects affecting the allocation of R&D resources across industries, that is, market-pull and technology-push forces of industry and internationalization. By using a panel data on 17 OECD countries over the period 1982-2000, this paper constructs a recursive simultaneous equation model and then estimate by three-stage least squares (3SLS). The findings support that R&D decisions with the consideration of targeting unmet needs of markets can drive to increase R&D inequality. However, the effect sourced from technology-push force on allocation of R&D investment is relative weak. There is a possibility that some innovation policy aiming at the development of newly emerging or niches industries in R&D activities is a cause of this result. In addition, the empirical evidence indicates that MNCs’ oversea R&D activities can influence the extent of R&D specialization in certain industries in host countries.
In the second issue, this study applies a panel Granger causality test in heterogonous panel data models to investigate the relationship between R&D inequality and income distribution in six OECD countries (Canada, Finland, the United Kingdom, Norway, Sweden, and the United States) over the period 1987-2000. We are paying more attention to the role of the composition of R&D activity within a country so as to reflect the differences in R&D inequality across countries. In addition, this study also checks the robustness of the results by using different measurements for R&D inequality, the lag-order of the specification model, and datasets. The empirical results found that changes in the inequalities of R&D resources across industries in a country Granger cause changes in income inequality within that country. The results are found to be robust, and give support to the widely suspected, still ongoing trend in recent years that the advent of the knowledge economy in the form of greater R&D spending may contribute to rising income inequalities if such spending is concentrated in a few industries. It is also found that the reverse direction is relatively weak and not robust.
Finally, this study is intended to underline the important role played by the cross-industry allocation of R&D resources, as indicated by several indices measuring R&D inequality, within the manufacturing industries of each country, and how it determines cross-country productivity growth. In other words, the main issue is whether national R&D policies for promoting productivity growth should be narrowly focused or spread across a wide range of industries. The allocation modes of R&D resources are divided according whether they are research-oriented or development-oriented in type. This is done to highlight the role played by differences in the properties of R&D activities for a particular industry. In the estimation process, the phenomena of group-wise heterogeneities, serial correlations, and the correlation between pair-wise country comparisons in the sample are taken into account. The fixed-effect panel data model with cross-sectional dependence is employed on panel data drawn from 11 OECD countries for the period from 1981-2000. When the other variables are controlled, we find that the effect of R&D inequality on productivity growth is significantly positive and the coefficient of its squared term is negative. Moreover, the impact of R&D intensity depends on the degree of inequality. This lends support to the notion that concentrating R&D spending on a few suitable industries is an important factor in encouraging cross-country productivity growth. Specialization of R&D activities in certain relevant industries creates better opportunities for promoting productivity performance, because of reaching sufficient levels of scale and allowing for accumulation of experience. Furthermore, the results reflect the fact that development-oriented manufacturing industries enjoy higher productivity growth as a result of this specification policy. However, the case for research-oriented industries is relatively weak.

關鍵字(中)

★ Allocation of R＆D Resources
★ productivity growth
★ innovation policy
★ income distribution

關鍵字(英)

★ 創新政策
★ 所得不均
★ 生產力成長
★ 研發資源配置

論文目次

Chapter 1 Introduction of the Dissertation 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Frameworks, Motivations and Objectives 2
1.3 Main Data Sources for Measurement of R&D Inequality 5
References 8
Chapter 2 The Determinants of R&D Resources Allocation in the OECD Manufacturing 9
2.1 Introduction 9
2.2 Literature Review 13
2.2.1 Industry Structure: Technology-push and Market-pull forces 13
2.2.2 Internationalization 15
2.3 Data Sources and Measurement of R&D Resources Allocation 16
2.3.1 Data Sources 16
2.3.2 Measurement of R&D Resources Allocation 19
2.4 Empirical Model 25
2.5 Empirical Results 33
2.6 Concluding Remarks 41
References 44
Chapter 3 R&D Resources Allocation and Income Distribution 48
3.1 Introduction 48
3.2 Literature Review 51
3.2.1 The Relationship from R&D Activities to Income Distribution 51
3.2.2 The Relationship from Income Distribution to R&D Activities 55
3.3. Data and Measuring R&D Inequality 57
3.3.1 Data Description 57
3.3.2 Measuring R&D Inequality 59
3.4. Empirical Framework 65
3.4.1 A Panel Unit Roots Test 65
3.4.2 A Panel Granger Causality Test 66
3.5. Empirical Results 69
3.5.1 Results of the Panel Unit Roots Test 69
3.5.2 Results of the Granger Causality Test 70
3.5.3 Robustness for the Granger Causality Tests 71
3.5.4 Summary 77
3.6 Conclusions 79
References 81
Chapter 4 R&D Resources Allocation and Productivity Growth in the OECD Manufacturing 85
4.1 Introduction 85
4.2. Literature Review 88
4.2.1 Cross-country productivity growth 88
4.2.2 Specialization vs. Diversification 89
4.3 Data Description, TFP Measurement and R&D Inequality Indices 93
4.3.1 Data Description 93
4.3.2 Measurement of Total Factor Productivity and R&D
Inequality Indices 95
4.4 Empirical Methodologies 101
4.4.1 Productivity Growth Function 101
4.4.2 Model Specification with Cross-sectional Dependence 108
4.5 Empirical Results 109
4.5.1 The Results of testing for Model Specification 109
4.5.2 The Determinants of Productivity Growth 110
4.5.3 The Effect of the Different Properties of R&D
Activities on Productivity Growth 116
4.6. Conclusions 122
References 124
Appendix A – Testing a Panel Data Model with
Cross-Sectional Dependence 128

參考文獻

References
Aghion, P., and Howitt, P. “Research and Development in the Growth Process.” Journal of Economic Growth, 1996, 1, pp. 49–73.
Barro, R.J. and Sala-i-Matrin, X. Economic Growth. London, England: the MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2003
Brody, H. “What Matters Most Depends on Where You Are,” Technology Review, 2005, 108(4), pp. 43-52.
Cantwell, J. and Vertova, G. “Historical Evolution of Technological Diversification,” Research Policy, 2004, 33, pp. 511-29.
Hurlin, C. and Venet B. “Financial development and growth: a re-examination using a panel granger causality test,” University Orléans. Miméo, 2004.
Jones, C.I. “R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 1995, 103(8), pp. 759-84.
____. “Sources of Us Economic Growth in a World of Ideas,” American Economic Review, 2002, 1, pp. 220–39.
Link, A. N. “An Analysis of the Composition of R&D Spending,” Southern Economic Journal, 1982, 49(2), pp. 342-49.
Kato, A. “Market Structure and the Allocation of R&D Expenditures,” Economic Letter, 2005, 87, pp. 55-59.
OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, 2007 Edition. OECD, Paris, 2007.
____. Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, 2001 Edition. OECD, Paris, 2001.
Romer, P.M. “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98(3), pp. 71-102.
Sedgley, N.H. “A Time Series Test of Innovation-Driven Endogenous Growth,” Economic Inquiry, 2006, 44(2), pp. 318-32.
References
Ahuja, G. "Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes and Innovation: a Longitudinal Study." Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45, pp. 425–455.
Amendola, M., Guerrini, P. and Padoan, P. "International Patterns of Technological Accumulation and Trade." Journal of International Comparative Economics, 1992, 1, pp. 173-197.
Archibugi, D. and Pianta, M. "Specification and Size of Technological Activities in Industrial Countries: The Analysis of Patent Data." Research Policy, 1992, 21, pp. 79-93.
Aw, B.Y., Roberts, M.J. and Winson, T. "Export Market Participation, Investments in R&D and Worker Training, and the Evolution of Firm Productivity." The World Economy, 2007, 30(1), pp. 83-104.
Barro, R.J. and Lee, J.W. "International Data and Educational Attainment: Updates and Implications." Oxford Economic Papers, 2001, 53, pp. 541-63.
Baumol, W.J. "The Free-Market Innovation Machine." Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2002.
Benner, M. and Waldforgel, J. "Close to You? Bias and Precision in Patent-based Measures of Technological Proximity." Research Policy, 2008, 37, pp. 1556-1567.
Brody, H. "What Matters Most Depends on Where You Are” Technology Review, 2005, 108(4), pp. 43-52.
Cantwell, J. and Vertova, G. "Historical Evolution of Technological Diversification." Research Policy, 2004, 33, pp. 511-29.
Cantwell, J.A. "the Globalization and Technology: What Remains of the Product Cycle Model?." Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1995, 19, pp. 155-174.
Cohen, L.R. and Levinthal, D.A. "Absorptive-Capacity-a New Perspective on Learning and Innovation." Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1), pp. 128-152.
Dalum, B., Laursen, K., and Villumsen, G. "Structural Change in OECD Export Specialisation Patterns: De-Specialisation and ’Stickiness." International Review of Applied Economics, 1998, 12(3), pp. 423-443.
David, P.A., Hall, B.H. "Heart of Darkness: Public–Private Interactions Inside the R&D Black Box.” Research Policy, 2000, 29, pp. 1165–1183.
David, P.A., Hall, B.H., and Toole, A.A. "Is public R&D a complement of substitute for private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence." Research Policy, 2000 , 29, pp. 497–529.
Dunning, J. "Globalization and the New Geography of Foreign Direct Investment," Oxford Development Studies, 1998, 26, pp. 47-69.
Erawatch. "Reseach Inventory by Country." Available online at: http://cordis.europa.eu/erawatch/ [Accessed 30 April 2008], 2007.
Falk M. "What Drivers Business Research and Development (R&D) Intensity across Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Countries." Applied Economics, 2006, 38, pp. 533-547.
Foellmi R, and Zweimuller, J. (2006). "Income Distribution and Demand-induced Innovations." Review of Economic Studies, 2006, 73, pp. 941-60.
Fors, G. and Zejan, M.C. “Overseas R&D by Multinationals in Foreign Centers of Excellence." IUI Working Paper No, 458, 1996.
Fors, G. "Utilization of R&D Results in the Home and Foreign Plants of Multinationals." Journal of Industrial Economics, 1996, 45 (3), pp. 341–358.
Frantzen, D. "R&D and Manufacturing Production Specialization in Developed Economies." Applied Economics, 2008, 40, PP. 3009-3027.
Freeman, C., and Louca, F. "As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution." Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.
Fritsch, M. 2000. "Interregional Differences in R&D - an Empirical Investigation." European Planning Studies, 2000, 8, pp. 409-27.
Furman, J.L., Porter, M.E. and Stern, S. "The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity," Research Policy, 2002, 31, pp. 899-933.
Garcia-Vega, M. "Does Technological Diversification Promote Innovation? An Empirical Analysis for European Firms." Research Policy, 2006, 35, pp. 230-46.
Goolsbee, A., "Does Government R&D Policy Mainly Benefit Scientists and Engineers? American Economic Review, 1998, 88 (2), pp. 298–302.
Griffith, R.; Redding, S. and Reenen, J. "Mapping the Two Faces Of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries." Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004, 86(4), pp. 883-95.
Griliches, Z. "R&D and Productivity: Econometric Results and Measurement Issues. " in Stoneman, P. (Ed.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, Oxford: Blackwell, 1995, pp. 52-89.
Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. "Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994, 8, pp. 23-44.
Guellec, D., and van Pottelsberghe, B. "The Impact of Public R&D Expenditure on Business R&D." Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2003, 12 (3), pp. 225-243.
Harris, R., and Li, Q.C. "Exporting, R&D, and Absorptive Capacity in UK Establishments." Oxford Economic Papers, 2009, 61(1), pp. 74-103.
Hu Albert G.Z, and Jaffe, A. B. "Patent Citations and International Knowledge Flow: the Case of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003, 21, pp. 849-80.
Iwasa, T., and Odagiri, H. "Overseas R&D, Knowledge Sourcing and Patenting: an Empirical Study of Japanese R&D Investment in the US." Research Policy, 2004, 33, pp. 807–828.
Jaffe, A.B., Newell, R.G., and Stavins R.N. "Technology Change and the Environment." NBER Working Paper, No.7970, 2000.
Jones, C.I. "Sources of US Economic Growth in a World of Ideas." American Economic Review, 2002, 1, pp. 220–39.
Kleinknecht, A. and Verspagen, B. (1990) “Demand and Innovation: Schmookler Re-examined." Research Policy, 1990, 19, pp. 387-94.
Klinger, B. and Lederman, D. "Innovation and Export Portfolios." World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3983, 2006.
Kneller, R. "Frontier Technology, Absorptive Capacity and Distance." Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2005, 67(1), pp. 1-23.
Kongsted, H., Sorensen, A., Marcusson, M. "R&D, Public Innovation Policy, and Productivity: the Case of Danish manufacturing." Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2003, 12, pp. 163–178.
Kumar, N. "Determinants of Location of Overseas R&D Activity of Multinational Enterprises: the Case of US and Japanese Corporations." Research Policy, 2001, 30, pp. 159–174.
Lachenmaier, S., and Wossmann, L. "Does Innovation Cause Exports? Evidence from Exogenous Innovation Impulses and Obstacles using German Micro Data." Oxford Economic Papers, 2006, 58(2), pp. 317-350.
Laursen, K. "Do Export and Technological Specialization Patterns Co-evolve in Terms of Convergence or Divergence? Evidence from 19 OECD Countries, 1971-1991." Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2000, 10, pp. 415-36.
Lederman, D. and Maloney, W.F. "R&D and Development." 2003, World Bank, Mimeo.
Lukach, R., and Plasmans, J. "Measuring Knowledge Spillovers in the New Economy Firms in Belgium Using Patent Citations." Global Business and Economics Review, 2005, 5(1), pp. 75-99.
Mahmood , I. and Singh, J. "Technological Dynamism in Asia." Research Policy, 2003, 32(6), pp. 1031-54.
Malerba F. and Montobbio, F. "Exploring Factors Affecting International Technological Specialization: the Role of Knowledge Flows." Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2003, 13, pp. 411-34.
Mancusi, M. L. "Geographical Concentration and the Dynamics of Countries’ Specialization in Technologies." Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2003, 12(3), pp. 269-91.
Mancusi, M.L. "International Technological Specialization in Industrial Countries: Patterns and Dynamics." Wetwirtschaftliches Archiv, 2001, 137(4), pp. 593-621.
Martin, R. and Sunley, R. "Path Dependence and Regional Economic Evolution." Journal of Economic Geography, 2006, 6(4), pp. 395-437.
Mathieu, A. and van Pottelsberghe, B. "A Note on the Drivers of R&D Intensity." CEB Working Paper No. 08/002, 2008.
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. "An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change." Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1982.
OECD. "Research and Development Expenditure in Industry (ANBERD): 1973-93." 1996 Edition. OECD, Paris, 1996.
OECD. "Research and Development Expenditure in Industry (ANBERD): 1987-2004." 2005/2006 Edition. 2006.
OECD. "Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard. " 2007 Edition. OECD, Paris, 2007.
Pianta, M. and Meliciani, V. "Technological Specification and Economic Performance in OECD Countries." Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1996, 8(2), pp. 157-74.
Porter, M.E., "The Competitive Advantage of Nations." Free Press, New York, 1990.
Redding, S. "Path Dependence, Endogenous Innovation, and Growth." International Economic Review, 2002, 43(4), pp. 1215-1248.
Romer, P.M. "Endogenous Technological Change." Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98(3), pp. 71-102.
Rosenberg, N. "Why Do Firms Do Basic Research (with Their Own Money)?." Research Policy, 1990, 19(2), pp. 165-174.
Rosenkopf, L., and Almeida, P. "Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. " Management Science, 2003, 49 (6), pp. 751–766.
Ruttan, V.W. "Induced Innovation, Evolutionary Theory and Path Dependence: Sources of Technical Change." The Economic Journal, 1997, 107(444), pp. 1520-1529.
Scherer, F.M. "Schumpeter and Plausible Capitalism." Journal of Economic Literature, 1992, 3, pp. 1416-33.
Schmookler, J. "Invention and Economic Growth." Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1966.
Suzuki, J. and Kodama, F. "Technological Diversity of Persistent Innovators in Japan: Two Case Studies of Large Japanese Firms." Research Policy, 2004, 33(3), pp. 531-549.
Van Zeebroeck, N., Van Pottelsberghe De La, P.B. and Wook, H. "Issues in Measuring the Degree of Technological Specialization with Patent Data." Scientometrics, 2006, 66(3), pp. 481-92.
Wolff, G.B. and Reinthaler, V. “The Effectiveness of Subsidies Revisited: Accounting for Wage and Employment Effects in Business R&D.” Research Policy, 2008, 37, pp. 1403-1412.
Wong, P.K. and Singh, A. "Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organization, Networks and System," DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference 2005.
References
Aghion, P. (2002). Schumpeterian growth theory and the dynamics of income inequality. Econometric, 70(3), 854-82.
Acemoglu, D. (1998). Why do new technologies complement skills? directed technical change and wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1055-90.
___. (2002a). Directed technical change. Review of Economic studies, 69; 781-810.
___. (2002b). Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(1), 7-72.
___. (2003a). Patterns of skill premia. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 199 - 230.
___. (2003b). Cross-country inequality trends. Economic Journal, 113(485), 121-49.
Aghion P. (2002), Schumpeterian growth theory and the dynamics of income inequality. Econometrica, 70(3), 854-82.
___, Caroli E, Garcia-Penalosa C. (1999). Inequality and economic growth: the perspective of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1615-60.
Barro R.J, Sala-I-Martin X. (2003). Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Bas C.L., and Sierra C. (2002). Location versus home country advantages' in r&d activities: some further results on multinationals' locational strategies. Research Policy, 31(4), 589-609.
Bhaduri S.N, Durai S.R.S. (2006). Empirical relationship between the dividend and investment decision: do emerging market firms behave differently?. Applied Financial Economics Letters 2, 155-58.
Choi K.S, Jeong J. (2005). Technological change and wage premium in a samll open economy: the case of korea. Applied Economics, 37, 119-31.
Cozzens S.E, Bobb, K. (2003). Measuring the relationship between high technology development strategies and wage inequality. Scientometrics, 58(2), 351-368.
Deininger K, Squire L. (1996). A new data set measuring income inequality. World Bank Economic Review, 10(3), 565-91.
Enders W. (2004). Applied Economertric Time Series, 2nd ed., New York: John Willey and Sons Inc.
Fishman A, Simhon A. (2002). The division of labor, inequality and growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 117-69.
Foellmi R, Zweimuller J. (2006). Income distribution and demand-induced innovations. Review of Economic Studies, 73, 941-60.
Greenhalgh C. (2005) Why does market capitalism fail to deliver a sustainable environment and greater equality of incomes?. Cambridge Journal of Economics,29, 1091-1109.
Grener A, Rubart J, Semmerler W. (2004). Economic growth, skill-biased technical change and wage inequality: a model and estimations for the US and Europe. Journal of Macroeconomics, 26, 597-621.
Grimalda G. (2005). Is inequality the price to pay for higher growth? revisiting the kuznets hypothesis with skill-biased technological change. Mimeo, INEQ project .
Haskel J, Slaughter M.J. Trade, technology and uk wage inequality. The Economic Journal 2001;111; 163–87.
Hoffmann R, Lee C.G. Ramasamy B. and Yeung M. (2005). FDI and pollution: a granger causality test using panel data. Journal of International Development, 17(3), 311-23.
Hu Albert G.Z, Jaffe A. B. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the case of korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 849-80.
Hudson J. (2006). Inequality and the knowledge economy: running to stand still?. Social Policy & Society, 5(2), 207-22.
Hurlin C. (2005). Un test simple de l’hypothèse de non causalité dans un modèle de panel hétérogène. Revue Economique, 56(3), 799-809.
___, Venet B. (2004). Financial development and growth: a re-examination using a panel granger causality test. University Orléans. Miméo. 2004.
Im K.S, Peasaran M.H, Shin Y. (2003), Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.
Jones C.I. (1995). R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103(8), 759-84.
___. (2002). Sources of U.S. economic growth in a world of ideas. American Economic Review, 92(1), 220-239.
Lu W.C, Chen J.R, Wang C. L. (2006). Granger causality test on r&d spatial spillover and productivity growth. Applied Economics Letters, 13, 857-61.
Lundberg M, Squire L. (2003). The simultaneous evolution of growth and inequality. The Economic Journal, 113, 326-44.
Mahmood I, Singh J. (2003), Technological dynamism in Asia. Research Policy, 32(6), 1031-54.
OECD (2007). Science technology and industry scoreboard 2007. OECD, Paris.
___. (2005). OECD Research and development expenditure in industrial 1987-2004, 2005/6. Edition. OECD, Paris.
Panizza U. (2002). Income inequality and economic growth: evidence from American data. Journal of Economic Growth 7(1), 25-41.
Ratanawaraha A. (2006). Does income distribution affect innovation?. In: Gibson D., Heitor M., and Ibarra-Yunez A. (Eds), Connecting People, Ideas, and Resources Across Communities, chapter 14, Purdue University Press.
Romer P.M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 71-102.
Tsou M.W. (2002), Wage differentials in Taiwanese manufacturing: 1982-1997. Asian Economic Journal, 16, 317-335.
Van Zeebroeck N, Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie B, Wook H. (2006). Issues in measuring the degree of technological specialization with patent data. Scientometrics, 66(3), 481-92.
Voitechovsky S. (2005). Does the profile of income inequality matter for economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 10, 273-96.
Von Zedtwitz M.A, Gassmann O.B. (2002). Market versus technology drive in r&d internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, 31(4), 569-88.
WIDER (2005). World income inequality database version 2.0a, United Nations University.
Wolff E.N. (2002). The impact of it investment on income and wealth inequality in the postwar us economy. Information Economic and Policy, 14(2), 233-51.
Wong P.K, Singh A. (2005). Dynamics of industry and innovation: organization, networks and system. DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference.
Zweimuller J, Brunner J.K. (2005). Innovation and growth with rich and poor consumers. Metroeconomica, 56(2), 233-62.
References
Acemoglu, D. "Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market." Journal of Economic Literature, 2002, 40(1), pp. 7-72.
Alginger, K. and Falk, M. "Explaining Differences in Economic Growth among OECD Countries." Empirica, 2005, 32, pp. 19-43.
Archibugi, D. and Pianta, M. "Specification and Size of Technological Activities in Industrial Countries: The Analysis of Patent Data." Research Policy, 1992, 21, pp. 79-93.
Barro, R.J. "Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries." Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991, 106, pp. 407-43.
Barro, R.J. and Lee, J.W. "Internaitonal Data and Educational Attatinment: Updates and Implications." Oxford Economic Papers, 2001, 53, pp. 541-63.
Barro, R.J. and Sala-i-Matrin, X. Economic Growth. London, England: the MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2003.
Baum, C. F. "Residual Diagnostics for Cross-Section Time Series Regression Models." The Stata Journal, 2001, 1(1), pp. 101-04.
Baumol, W.J. The Free-Market Innovation Machine. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2002.
Breschi, S.; Sakakibara, F. and Malerba, F. "Knowledge-Relatedness in Frim Technological Diversification." Research Policy, 2003, 32, pp. 69-87.
Brody, H. "What Matters Most Depends on Where You Are” Technology Review, 2005, 108(4), pp. 43-52.
Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K. Microeconometrices: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press., 2005.
Cantwell, J. and Vertova, G. "Historical Evolution of Technological Diversification." Research Policy, 2004, 33, pp. 511-29.
Caves, D.; Christensen, L. and Diewert, E. "The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity." Econometrica, 1982, 50(6), pp. 1393-414.
Coe, D. and Helpman, E. "International R&D Spillover." European Economic Reviews, 1995, 39, pp. 859-87.
Driswcoll, J.C. and Kraay, A.C. "Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data." Review of Economics and Statistics, 1998, 80, pp. 549-60.
Drukker, D. M. "Testing for Serial Correlation in Linear Panel-Data Models." The Stata Journal, 2003, 3(2), pp. 168-77.
Ericson, R.E. and Pakes, A. "Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work." Review of Economic Studies, 1995, 62, pp. 53-82.
EU. European Competitiveness Report. Luxembouring: European Conmmunities, 2004.
Garcia-Vega, M. "Does Technological Diversification Promote Innovation? An Empirical Analysis for European Firms." Research Policy, 2006, 35, pp. 230-46.
Good, D.H.; Nadiri, M. I. and Sickles, R.C. "Index Number and Factor Demand Approaches to the Estimation of Productivity." NBER Working Paper 5790, 1996.
Greene, W. Econometrics Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2003.
Griffith, R.; Redding, S. and Reenen, J. "Mapping the Two Faces Of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries." Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004, 86(4), pp. 883-95.
Guellec, D. and Potterie, B Van Pottelsberche de la. "From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do the Institutional Settings and the Source of Funds of R&D Matter?" Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2004, 66(3), pp. 353-78.
Harrigan, J. "Estimation of Cross-Country Differences in Industry Production Functions." Journal of International Economics, 1999, 47(2), pp. 267-93.
Hoechle, D. "Robust Standard Errors for Panel Regressions with Cross-Sectional Dependence." The Stata Journal, 2007, 7(3), pp. 281-312.
Hoyos, R. E. De and Sarafidis, V. "Testing for Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel-Data Models." The Stata Journal, 2006, 6(4), pp. 482-96.
Hu, A.G.Z. and Jaffe, A.B. "Patent Citations and International Knowledge Flow: The Case of Korea and Taiwan." International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2003, 21, pp. 849-80.
Jones, C.I. "R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth." Journal of Political Economy, 1995, 103(8), pp. 759-84.
____. "Too Much of a Good Thing?” The Economics of Investment in R&D “Journal of Economic Growth, 2000, 5, pp. 65-85.
____. "Sources of US Economic Growth in a World of Ideas." American Economic Review, 2002, 1, pp. 220–39.
Jones, C. I. and Williams, J. C. "Measuring the Social Return to R&D" Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, 113(4), pp. 1119-35.
Jungmittag, A. "Innovations, Technological Specialization and Economic Growth in the EU" International Economics and Economic Policy, 2004, 1, pp. 247-73.
Klenow, P. J. "Industry Innovation: Where and Why." Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1996, 44, pp. 125-50.
Klinger, B. and Lederman, D. "Innovation and Export Portfolios." World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3983, 2006.
Kneller, R. "Frontier Technology, Absorptive Capacity and Distance." Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2005, 67(1), pp. 1-23.
Kneller, R. and Stevens, P. A. "Frontier Technology and Absorptive Capacity: Evidence from OECD Manufacturing Industries." Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2006, 68(1), pp. 1-21.
Laursen, K. "Do Export and Technological Specialization Patterns Co-evolve in Terms of Convergence or Divergence? Evidence from 19 OECD Countries, 1971-1991." Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2000, 10, pp. 415-36.
Leten, B.; Belderbos, R. and Looy, B. V. "Technological Diversification, Coherence, and Performance of Firms." The Product Innovation Management, 2007, 24, pp. 567-79.
Mahmood, I. P. and Singh, J. "Technological Dynamism in Asia." Research Policy, 2003, 32, pp. 1031-54.
Malerba, F. and Montobbio, F. "Exploring Factors Affecting International Technological Specialization: The Role of Knowledge Flows," journal of evolutionary economics, 2003, 13, pp. 411-34.
Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. "Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities." Industrial and Corporate Change, 1997, 6(1), pp. 83-117.
Mancusi, M. L. "Geographical Concentration and the Dynamics of Countries’ Specialization in Technologies." Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2003, 12(3), pp. 269-91.
Mankiw, N. G.; Romer, D. and Wagner, S. "A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992, 107, pp. 407-37.
Marsili, O. "The Anatomy and Evolution of Industrial, Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics," Edward Elgar Press, London. 1999.
Nelson, R. and Winter, S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1982.
Nesta, L. and Saviotti, P. "Coherence of the Knowledge Base and Firm Innovative Performance: Evidence from the US. Pharmaceutical Industry." Journal of Industrial Economics, 2005, 53, pp. 123-42.US.
O'Donoghiue, T. and Zweimuller, J. "Patents in a Model of Endogenous Growth." Journal of Economic Growth, 2004, 9, pp. 81-123.
OECD. OECD Structural Analysis Database (Stan) 2003 Edition. OECD, Paris, 2003.
____. Research and Development Expenditure in Industry (ANBERD): 1973-93 1996 Edition. OECD, Paris, 1996.
____. Research and Development Expenditure in Industry (ANBERD): 1987-2004 2005/2006 Edition. 2006.
____. Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, 2007 Edition. OECD, Paris, 2007.
Park, J. "International and Intersectional R&D Spillovers in the OECD and East Economies." economic inquiry, 2004, 42(4), pp. 739-57.
Park, W. "International R&D Spillovers and OECD Economic Growth." economic inquiry, 1995, 33(4), pp. 571-91.
Pesaran, M. "General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels." Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435 Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, 2004.
Petersen, M.A. "Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Set: Comparing Approaches." Working Paper, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, 2007.
Pianta, M. and Meliciani, V. "Technological Specification and Economic Performance in OECD Countries." Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1996, 8(2), pp. 157-74.
Romer, P.M. "Endogenous Technological Change." Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98(3), pp. 71-102.
Salter, A.J. and Martin, B.R. "The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research." Research Policy, 2001, 30, pp. 509-32.
Savvides, A. and Zachariadis, M. "International Technology Diffusion and the Growth of TFP in the Manufacturing Sector of Developing Economies." Review of Development Economics, 2005, 9(4), pp. 482-501.
Scherer, F.M. "Schumpeter and Plausible Capitalism." Journal of Economic Literature, 1992, 3, pp. 1416-33.
Sedgley, N.H. "A Time Series Test of Innovation-Driven Endogenous Growth." economic inquiry, 2006, 44(2), pp. 318-32.
Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. and Lichtenberg, F. "Does Foreign Direct Investment Transfer Technology across Borders?" Review of Economics and Statistics, 2001, 83(3), pp. 490-97.
Van Zeebroeck, N.; Potterie, B. Van Pottelsberghe De La and Wook, H. "Issues in Measuring the Degree of Technological Specialization with Patent Data." Scientometrics, 2006, 66(3), pp. 481-92.
Wong, P.K. and Singh, A. "Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organization, Networks and System," DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference 2005.
Wooldridge, J.M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
World Bank, World Development Indicators, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2008.

指導教授

朱雲鵬、陳忠榮
(Yun-Peng Chu、Jong-Rong Chen)

審核日期

2009-7-17

推文