| 摘要(英) |
Recent years the Earth warmed and the energy crisis question receives various countries to take seriously gradually. After the Kyoto Protocol becomes effective, causes the traditional electricity generation way like using the petroleum, coal-burning, firepower and so on to come under the serious influence. Renewable energy development has become one of important strategies for world future continues forever to develop.
This paper take the market failure concept as a starting point, make the systematic reorganization regarding the renewable energy sources development barrier, and take the European small economy country (Sweden, Denmark) impels policy and the related coordinated sets of measures the renewable energy sources development (subsidy and taxes) as an example, analyzes it to overcome as well as the policy tool’’s utilization regarding each stratification plane barrier, and appraises the policy implementation the result.
The research discovered that Denmark and Sweden in the identical section time use many kinds of measures by no means in the renewable energy sources tool’’s use the ways, but in each measure’’s utilization, each stage respectively has the different method. In the research, development and demonstration stage, has solved technical, cultural and psychological, social and the environment repel and so on three barriers; carbon measures and so on tax system, investment cause, land and other taxes cause, feed-in-tariff have solved the factors of production, the infrastructure and the economic aspect barrier; The voluntary plan as well as quantity foundation’’s electric power certificate system has solved the related demand surface problem. Compares in Taiwan, the legislative procedure is slow, electric power market not open as well as related laws and regulations and reward measure not conformity, hindrance renewable energy sources science and technology development. This research by analyzes experience of Danish and the Sweden, suggested that Taiwan should accelerate the legislative procedure, the conformity laws and regulations and the associated measures, the promotion electric power market liberalization; The policy tool considers besides encourages to increase the installment capacity should simultaneously to take the power rate the cause, and aims at the different renewable energy sources science and technology to provide the different purchase electricity price. Moreover, the conformity produces, studies, grinds the tripartite strength to organize the research and development alliance, the development renewable energy sources industry key technologies, take the international market as the goal, removes the overseas market barrier to trade, increases the export the opportunity, cuts into supply of chain system the international renewable energy sources equipment because of the technical collaboration mechanism, increases competitive power of the renewable energy sources equipment market.
|
| 參考文獻 |
英文部分
1. A. L. Dijk, L. W. M. Beurskens, M. G. Boots, M. B. T. Kaal, T. J. De Lange, E. J. W. Van Sambeek and M. A. Uyterlinde (2003). Remewable Energy Policies and Market Development, REMAC 2000 Project.
2. Brown, M.A. (2001). Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies, Energy Policy, 29, 1197-1207.
3. Carlsson, B. and Jacobsson, S. (1997). In Search of Useful Public Policies: Key Lessons and Issuer for Policy Makers, in Carlsson, B. （ed.）, Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Energy Information Administration (2004). International Energy Outlook, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting U.S. Department of Energy.
5. Foxon, T., Makuch, Z., Mata, M. & Pearson, P. (2004). Innovation systems and policy-making processes for the transition to sustainability, In: Klaus Jacob, Manfred Binder and Anna Wieczorek(eds.) Governance for industrial transformation. Proceedings of the 2003 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Environmental Policy Research Centre: Berlin. pp. 96-112.
6. IEA (2001). Dealing with Climate Change--- Policies and Measures in IEA Member Countries, OECD/IEA.
7. IEA (2004). Renewable energy – Market & policy trends in IEA countries, OECD/IEA.
8. IEA (2007). Key world energy statistics, OECD/IEA.
9. IEA (2007). Renewables in global energy supply – An IEA fact sheet, OECD/IEA.
10. Jacobsson, S. & Johnson, A. (2000). The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research, Energy Policy, 28, 625-640.
11. Koh, M.P. & Hoi, W.K. (2002). Renewable energy in Malaysia: a policy analysis, Energy for Sustainable Development, 6(3).
12. Li, J., Zhu, L., Hu, R., Zhang, Z., Shi, J. & Song, Y. (2002). Policy analysis of the barriers to renewable energy development in the People’s Republic of China, Energy for Sustainable Development, 6(3).
13. Mani & Sunil (2001). Working with the Market, the Israel Experience of promoting R&D in the Enterprise Sector and the Lessons for Developing Countries, INTECH Discussion paper series #2001-9, The United Nations University.
14. NIFU STEP (2008). Competitive policies in the Nordic Energy Research and Innovation Area eNERGIA.
15. Nilsson, H. & Wene, C. O. (2001). Best practices in technology development policies, Workshop on Good Practices in Policies and Measures, pp. 8-10.
16. Owen, A.D. (2006). Renewable energy: Externality cost as market barriers, Energy Policy, 34, 632-642.
17. Painuly, J.P. (2001). Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis, Renewable Energy, 24, 73-89.
18. Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. California: University of California Press.
19. Reddy, A.K.N. (1990). Barriers to improvements in energy efficiency, presented at “Second International Workshop on Energy and Global Climate Change”.
20. Reddy, S. & Painuly, J.P. (2004). Diffusion of renewable energy technologies – barriers and stakeholders’ perspectives, Renewable Energy, 29, 1431-1447.
21. Yan, W. (2006). Renewable electricity in Sweden: an analysis of policy and regulations, Energy Policy, 34, 1209-1220.
中文部分
1. Thomas, L. Friedman. (2008)。世界又熱、又平、又擠。丘羽先等譯。天下文化。
2. 邱憶惠（1999）。個案研究法：質化取向。國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育研究，第7期，頁113-127。
3. Yin, R. K. (1994/2001). Case study research: Design and methods. 尚榮安（譯）。個案研究法。台北：弘智文化。
4. 張世其（2006）。台灣發展太陽光電產業所面臨問題。能源報導（14）。
5. 何美玥（2007）。台灣永續能源政策。行政院經建會。
6. 郭明錦（2004）。地熱資源。科學發展（383）。
7. 工研院工業材料所（2008）。太陽光發電應用簡介。
8. 藍偉庭（2008）。我國風力發電產業分析。工研院IEK-ITIS計劃。
9. 賴怡忠（2004）。全球環境變遷與永續發展趨勢。行政院經建會。
網站
1. 經濟部能源局 http://www.moeaec.gov.tw/
2. 丹麥能源局 http://ens.dk/en-us/Sider/forside.aspx
3. 瑞典能源局 http://www.energimyndigheten.se/en/
4. 材料世界網 http://www.materialsnet.com.tw/default.aspx
5. 工業技術研究院 http://www.itri.org.tw/
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit