學習導向、資訊科技、知識基礎動態能力與組織績效間之關係探討

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：26

、訪客IP：3.147.205.19

姓名

褚喻欣(Yu-Shin Chu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

學習導向、資訊科技、知識基礎動態能力與組織績效間之關係探討
(The Impacts of Learning Orientation, IT Infrastructure, and Knowledge-based Dynamic Capability on Firm Performance)

相關論文

★ 影響ERP導入過程及成效因素之研究 - 單一公司兩次導入SAP系統之比較分析	★ 運用資料倉儲技術建置物力動員資訊系統之開發
★ 買方採用自有電子市集之個案研究─以台塑企業為例	★ DEA模型評估經營效率之研究—以某綜合證券商為例
★ 尋求卓越：中小企業資訊部門的管理之個案研究	★ 「證券商共同網路交易平台」之可行性分析
★ 產業競合模式策略探討－以自行車產業為例	★ RFID導入航空貨運站出口作業流程應用之研究
★ 綠色供應鏈活動建構之個案研究-以筆記型電腦製造業為例	★ 導入資訊科技服務管理之評估-以遠東銀行為例
★ 資訊系統導入歷程中專案團隊決策衝突之探討	★ 應用資源基礎理論探討持久競爭優勢-以智慧型手機H公司為例
★ 服務導向架構為基礎的企業流程管理之探討 - 以瀚宇博德股份有限公司為例	★ 沙賓法案實施與企業遵循個案研究--以K公司為例
★ 資訊服務委外之個案分析－以銀行簡訊為例	★ 有線電視業者經營IPTV之競爭優勢分析—以個案公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在競爭激烈的環境之下，企業要如何透過快速調整資源，以維持或創造良好的組織績效，一直是企業界及學術界關心的議題。本研究從知識的觀點來探討組織的學習導向、資訊科技基礎建設能力及知識基礎動態能力對組織績效的影響。而組織學習導向及其資訊科技基礎建設能力，會影響組織調整其各領域知識基礎的速度；因此，也欲了解學習導向及資訊科技基礎建設能力經由動態能力作為中介變數，對組織績效的影響效果。此外，資訊科技對知識管理的支援程度，也和組織知識的動態調整息息相關；故本研究亦將資訊科技對知識管理的支援作為一中介變數，探討組織的學習導向及其資訊科技基礎建設能歷經由資訊科技對知識管理支援的中介，對組織知識基礎動態能力的影響效果。
本研究以台灣地區的製造業及服務業為研究對象，研究結果顯示：(1)知識基礎動態能力對組織績效有正向的影響效果；(2)學習導向會經由知識基礎動態能力的中介，而對組織績效產生正向的影響效果；(3)學習導向與資訊科技對知識管理的支援對知識基礎動態能力皆有正向的影響效果；(4)學習導向對資訊科技對知識管理的支援有正向的影響效果；(5)資訊科技基礎建設能力對於知識管理的支援、知識基礎動態能力以及組織績效的影響未獲支持。研究結果、限制及管理上的意涵在論文中皆有詳述。

摘要(英)

With the coming of global competition, it is an important issue for firms to create and sustain competitive advantage by responding to the rapidly changing environment. This study takes a knowledge perspective to examine the relationships between variables, such as learning orientation, IT infrastructure capability, and knowledge-based dynamic capability, and firm performance. Besides, learning orientation and IT infrastructure capability can have effects on the speed for firms to adjust their knowledge base; therefore, this study also explore whether learning orientation and IT infrastructure capability may influence firm performance through the mediation of knowledge-based dynamic capability. Moreover, IT support for KM is also related to the adjustment of firm’s knowledge; thus, this study also treats IT support for KM as a mediator to examine whether learning orientation and IT infrastructure capability have influences on knowledge-based dynamic capability.
This study was conducted with firms from manufacturing industries and service industries in Taiwan. Results indicate that: (1) knowledge-based dynamic capability has positive influence on firm performance; (2) learning orientation has positive influence on firm performance through the mediation of knowledge-based dynamic capability; (3) learning orientation and IT support for KM both have positive influence on knowledge-based dynamic capability; (4) learning orientation has positive influence on IT support for KM; (5) the influences of IT infrastructure capability on IT support for KM, knowledge-based dynamic capability and firm performance are not supported. The results, implications and limitations of this study are also discussed.

關鍵字(中)

★ 組織績效
★ 知識基礎動態能力
★ 資訊科技對知識管理支援
★ 學習導向
★ 資訊科技基礎建設

關鍵字(英)

★ Learning Orientation
★ IT support for KM
★ IT infrastructure capability
★ Knowledge-based dynamic capability
★ Firm performance

論文目次

Contents
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature review 4
2.1 Learning Orientation 4
2.2 IT Infrastructure Capability 7
2.3 IT Support for KM 10
2.4 Knowledge-based Dynamic Capabilities 14
2.5 Firm Performance 18
3. Research model and hypotheses 19
3.1 Research model 19
3.2 Hypotheses 21
3.2.1 Learning orientation and firm performance 21
3.2.2 Learning orientation and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities 23
3.2.3 Learning orientation and IT support for KM 25
3.2.4 IT infrastructure capability and firm performance 27
3.2.5 IT infrastructure capability and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities 29
3.2.6 IT infrastructure capability and IT support for KM 31
3.2.7 IT support for KM and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities 32
3.2.8 Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and firm performance 34
4. Methodology 36
4.1 Research design 36
4.2 Procedure of questionnaire design 37
4.3 The instrument 38
4.3.1 Learning orientation 38
4.3.2 IT infrastructure capability 38
4.3.3 IT support for KM 40
4.3.4 Knowledge-based dynamic capability 40
4.3.5 Firm performance 41
4.3.6 Control variables 42
4.4 Data analysis methods 44
4.4.1 Descriptive statistics 44
4.4.2 Stability test 44
4.4.3 Instrument quality analysis 44
4.4.4 Hypothesis testing 44
5. Data analysis 46
5.1 Response rate 46
5.2 Descriptive statistics 46
5.3 Stability test 48
5.4 Instrument quality analysis 50
5.4.1 Content validity 50
5.4.2 Convergent validity and unidimensionality 50
5.4.3 Reliability analysis 56
5.4.4 Discriminant validity analysis 57
5.5 Hypothesis tests 59
5.5.1 Direct influence effects 60
5.5.2 Indirect influence effects 62
6. Conclusion 66
6.1 Summary and discussion 66
6.2 Research contribution 68
6.3 Implication 69
6.4 Limitations and future research 70
Reference 72
Appendix: Questionnaire 79

參考文獻

Reference
1.Alavi, M. & Leidner, D.E., “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues,” MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 2001, pp.107-136.
2.Anderson, J. C., Gerbing, D. W. & Hunter, J. E., “On the Assessment of Unidimensional Measurement: Internal and External Consistency, and Overall Consistency Criteria,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 1987, pp.432-437.
3.Armstrong, J. S. & Overton, T. E., “Estimating Non-response Bias in Mail Surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 1977, pp.396-402.
4.Baker, W. E. & Sinkula, J. M., “Learning Orientation, Market Orientation and Innovation: Integrating and Extending Models of Organizational Performance,” Journal of Market Focused Management, 4, 1999a, pp.295-308.
5.Baker, W. E. & Sinkula, J. M., “The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance,” Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 27(4), 1999b, pp.411-428.
6.Baker, W. E. & Sinkula, J. M., “Market Orientation, Learning Orientation and Product Innovation: Delving into the Organization’s Black Box,” Journal of Market Focused Management, 5(1), 2002, pp.5-23.
7.Becerra-Fernandez, I. & Sabherwal, R., “Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 2001, pp.23-55.
8.Bentler, PM., EQS Structural Equations Program Manual, Encino, CA, Multivariate Software Inc., 1995.
9.Broadbent, M. & Weill, P., “Management by Maxim: How Business and IT Managers Can Create IT Infrastructures,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 1997, pp.77-92.
10.Broadbent, M., Weill, P. & St. Clair, D., “The Implications of Information Technology Infrastructure for Business Process Redesign,” MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 1999a, pp.159-182.
11.Broadbent, M., Weill, P. & Neo, B. S., “Strategic Context and Patterns of IT Infrastructure Capability,” Journal of Strategic Information System, 8, 1999b, pp.157-187.
12.Byrd, T. A. & Turner, D. E., “Measuring the Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: Exploratory Analysis of a Construct,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(1), 2000, pp.167-208.
13.Celuch, K. G., Kasouf, C. J. & Peruvemba, V., “The Effects of Perceived Market and Learning Orientation on Assessed Organizational Capabilities,” Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 2002, pp.545-554.
14.Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. “Absorption Capability: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 1990, pp.128-152.
15.Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L., Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Boston Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
16.Day, G. S., “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations,” Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 1994, pp.37-52.
17.Dess, G. B. & Robinson, R. B., “Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures: the Case of the Privately-held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit,” Strategic Management Journal, 5, 1984, pp.365-373.
18.Duncan, N. B., “Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and Their Measure,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 1995, pp.37-57.
19.Earl, M. J. & Kuan, B., “How New is Business Process Redesign?” European Management Journal, 12(1), 1994, pp.20-30.
20.Eisenhardt, K. M. & Martin, J. A., “Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?” Strategic Management Journal, 21, 2000, pp.1105-1121.
21.Farrell, M. A., “Developing a Market-Oriented Learning Organization,” Australian Journal of Management, 25(2), 2000, pp.201-223.
22.Gaski, J. F., “Interrelation among a Channel Entity’s Power Sources: Impact of the Exercise of Reward and Coercion on Expert, Referent, and Legitimate Power Sources,” Journal of Marketing Research, 23(1), 1986, pp.62-77.
23.Gatewood, R. D. & Field, H. S., Human Resource Selection 2nd Ed., Chicago, IL, Dryden Press, 1990.
24.Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A. & Segars, A. H., “Knowledge Management: An Organizational Perspective,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 2001, pp.185-214.
25.Gottschalk, P., “Predictors of IT Support for Knowledge Management in the Professions: An Empirical Study of Law Firms in Norway,” Journal of Information Technology, 15, 2000, pp.69-78.
26.Grant, R. M., “Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration,” Organization Science, 7(4), 1996, pp.375-387.
27.Grover, V., Teng, J. T. C. & Fiedler, K. D., “Information Technology Enabled Business Process Redesign: An Integrated Planning Framework,” OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 21(4), 1993, pp.433-447.
28.Grover, V. and Davenport, T.H., “General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1). 2001, pp.5-21.
29.Gunton, T., Infrastructure: Building a Framework for Corporate Information Handling, New York: Prentice-Hall, 1989.
30.Harris, L. C. & Ogbonna, E., “Strategic Human Resource Management, Market Orientation, and Organization Performance,” Journal of Business Research, 51, 2001, pp.157-166.
31.Helfat, C. E., “know-how and Asset Complementarity and Dynamic Capability Accumulation: The Case of R&D,” Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 1997, pp.339-360.
32.Hislop, D., “Mission Impossible? Communicating and Sharing Knowledge via Information Technology,” Journal of Information Technology, 17, 2002, pp.165-177
33.Iansiti, M. & Clark, K. B., “Integration and Dynamic Capabilities: Evidence from Product Development in Automobiles and Mainframe Computers,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 1994, pp.557-605.
34.Jackson, C., “Process to Product: Creating Tools for Knowledge Management,” http://www.brint.com/members/online/120205/jackson
35.Kale, P., Building an Alliance Capability: A Knowledge-based Approach. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1999.
36.Kayworth, T. R., Chatterjee, D. & Sambamurthy, V., “Theoretical Justification for IT Infrastructure Investments,” Information Resources Management Journal, 14(3), 2001, pp.5-14.
37.Lee, H. & Choi, B., “Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 2003, pp.179-228.
38.Lundvall, B. A. & Johnson, B., “The Learning Economy,” Journal of Industry Studies, 1, 1994, pp.23-42.
39.Luo, Y., “Dynamic Capabilities in International Expansion,” Journal of World Business, 35(4), 2000, pp.355-378.
40.Luo, Y., “Capability Exploitation and Building in a Foreign Market: Implications for Multinational Enterprises,” Organization Science, 13(1), 2002, pp.48-63.
41.Marwick, A. D., “Knowledge Management Technology,” IBM System Journal, 40(4), 2001, pp.814-829.
42.McDermott, R., “Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Delivery Knowledge Management,” California Management Review, 41(4), 1999, pp.103-117.
43.Meso, P. & Smith, R., “A Resource-based View of Organizational Knowledge Management Systems,” Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(13), 2000, pp.224-234.
44.Nonaka, I., “A Dynamic Theory of Organization Knowledge Creation,” Organization Science, 5(1), 1994, pp.14-37.
45.Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H., “The Knowledge-Creating Company,” Oxford University Press, 1995.
46.Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. & Konno, N., “SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation,” Long Rang Planning, 33, 2000, pp.5-34.
47.Nunnally, J. C., Psychometric Theory, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1987.
48.Pelham, A. M., “Mediating Influences on the Relationship between Market Orientation and Profitability in Small Industrial Firms,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 5(3), 1997, pp.55-76.
49.Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy K. & Crum, M. R., “Determinants of EDI Adoption in the Transportation industry,” European Journal of Information Systems, 6(2), 1997, pp.549-559.
50.Roberts, J., “From Know-how to Show-how? Questioning the Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Knowledge Transfer,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12(4), 2000, pp.429-443.
51.Robey, D., Boudreau, M. C. & Rose, G. M., “Information Technology and Organizational Learning: A Review and Assessment of Research,” Accounting Management and Information Technologies, 10, 2000, pp.125-155.
52.Ruggles, R., “The State of the Notation: Knowledge Management in Practice,” California Management Review, 40(3), 1998, pp.80-89.
53.Sarvary, M., “knowledge Management and Competition in the Consulting Industry,” California Management Review, 41(2), 1999, pp.95-107.
54.Segars, A. H. & Grover, V., “Strategic Information Systems Planning Success: An investigation of The Construct and Its Measurement,” MIS Quarterly, 1998, pp.139-163.
55.Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E. & Noordewier, T., “A Framework for Market-Based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge, and Behavior,” Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 25(4), 1997, pp.305-319.
56.Slater, S. F. & Narver, J. C., “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization,” Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 1995, pp.63-74.
57.Smith, E. S., Spicer, D. P. & Chaston L., “Learning Orientations and Growth in Smaller Firms,” Long Range Planning, 34(2), 2001, pp.139-158.
58.Teece, D. J., “The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(3), 1994, pp.537-556.
59.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A., “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 1997, pp.509-533.
60.Teece, D. J., “Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-how, and Intangible Assets,” California Management Review, 40(3), 1998, pp.55-79.
61.Venkatraman, N., “The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence,” Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 1989, pp.423-444.
62.Weill, P. & Broadbent, M., Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1998.
63.Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L. & Joreskog, K. G., “Interclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 1974, pp.25-33.
64.Zollo, M. & Winter, S. G., “Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities,” Organization Science, 13(3), 2002, pp.339-351.
65.Zott, C., “Dynamic Capabilities and the Emergence of Intraindustry Differential Firm Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 24, 2003, pp.97-125.

指導教授

王存國(Tswen-Gwo Wang)

審核日期

2004-6-10

推文