SCI/SSCI文章比對方法之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：59

、訪客IP：3.128.255.103

姓名

魏忠志(Chung-Chih Wei) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

SCI/SSCI文章比對方法之研究

相關論文

★ 零售業商業智慧之探討	★ 有線電話通話異常偵測系統之建置
★ 資料探勘技術運用於在學成績與學測成果分析 -以高職餐飲管理科為例	★ 利用資料採礦技術提昇財富管理效益 -以個案銀行為主
★ 晶圓製造良率模式之評比與分析－以國內某DRAM廠為例	★ 商業智慧分析運用於學生成績之研究
★ 運用資料探勘技術建構國小高年級學生學業成就之預測模式	★ 應用資料探勘技術建立機車貸款風險評估模式之研究－以A公司為例
★ 績效指標評估研究應用於提升研發設計品質保證	★ 基於文字履歷及人格特質應用機械學習改善錄用品質
★ 以關係基因演算法為基礎之一般性架構解決包含限制處理之集合切割問題	★ 關聯式資料庫之廣義知識探勘
★ 考量屬性值取得延遲的決策樹建構	★ 從序列資料中找尋偏好圖的方法 - 應用於群體排名問題
★ 利用分割式分群演算法找共識群解群體決策問題	★ 以新奇的方法有序共識群應用於群體決策問題

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

文件檢索的技術行之有年，現今已廣泛地運用在各種線上文件檢索系統中。大部份的檢索工具是依據使用者輸入的查詢字串進行全文比對，或者將查詢字串做過部份處理之後再行比對文章。目前，已有為數眾多的研究者致力於發展文章分類、相關文章比對、文件相似度衡量方法及權重計算模型，更有許多改良過的方法實際應用於檢索系統中，逐步改善檢索效果與效率。
於本論文中，我們以現行著名之SCI/SSCI期刊文獻資料庫檢索工具為對象，根據此類文章之特色額外發展文章相似度比對方法。本研究專注於該檢索工具所擁有的標題、摘要、關鍵字及引用文獻，共四項不同特色的重要屬性，並利用著名之向量空間模式和TFIDF公式，計算文章向量的相似度。由於四項屬性之權重大小將影響兩兩文章之整體相似度，我們輔以倒傳遞類神經網路技術，建立屬性權重分配與兩兩文章之間的總相似度值之關係模式。而為了驗證ANN模組之成效，以及本文提出的文章比對方法與傳統比對方法之差異，本論文實際建立真實的期刊文章資料庫，並按照文章比對流程進行研究實作。最後則設計實驗，邀請實驗受測者測試文章比對之效果。
實驗結果顯示，我們所提出的文章比對方法，相較傳統方法而言，確實能大幅改善相似度比對效果。同時，我們也驗證了ANN模組確實帶來更佳的成效。
在SCI/SSCI檢索工具中，本研究期望能在保留標準欄位查詢功能之前提下，額外增加本論文所發展之文章相似度比對方法，藉以提昇檢索工具之彈性及實用性，協助研究學者或一般使用者更有效地查詢資料庫內相關文章。

關鍵字(中)

★ 文章比對
★ 倒傳遞類神經網路
★ 資料挖掘

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景 1
第二節研究動機 2
第三節研究目的 3
第四節研究流程 4
第五節論文架構 5
第二章文獻探討與相關技術 6
第一節文章前處理 6
第二節文章比對 12
第三節相關技術與方法 17
第三章文章比對方法 24
第一節文章比對流程概述 24
第二節文章前處理 26
第三節建構文章向量及引用文獻列表 29
第四節處理新文章 41
第五節文章相似度比對 43
第四章實證評估 48
第一節實驗發展工具與環境 48
第二節建立文章資料庫 50
第三節實驗設計及實驗流程 51
第四節評估準則 58
第五節實驗結果及分析 60
第五章結論與未來展望 67
第一節研究結論與貢獻 67
第二節研究限制 67
第三節未來展望 69
參考文獻 70
附錄A：STEMMING－PORTER’S ALGORITHM 75

參考文獻

[1] Amer-Yahia, S., Botev, C. and Shanmugasundaram, J., 2004. TeXQuery: A Full-Text Search Extension to XQuery. In Proceedings International WWW Conference, New York, USA.
[2] Amer-Yahia, S., Fern´andez, M., Srivastava, D. and Xu, Y., 2003. Phrase Matching in XML. Proceedings of the 29th VLDB Conference, Berlin, Germany.
[3] Baeza-Yates, R. and Ribeiro-Neto, B., 1999. Modern Information Retrieval. New York: The ACM Press.
[4] Buckley, C., SMART, Version 7.
[5] Callan, J.P., Croft, W.B. and Harding, S.M., 1995. The INQUERY Retrieval System. In DEXA 3. International Conferrence on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 83-97, Berlin: Springer Verlag.
[6] Cohen, W., June 1998. Integration of Heterogeneous databases Without Common Domains Using Queries Based on Textual Similarity. In Proceeding ACM SIGMOD, 27(2): pp. 201-212, Seattle, WA.
[7] CORDIS: Community Research & Development Information Service, http://www.cordis.lu/en/home.html.
[8] Cutting, D. and Pedersen, J., 1990. Optimizations for Dynamic Inverted Index Maintenance. The 13th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 405-411.
[9] Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K. and Harshman, R., 1990. Indexing by Latent Semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences, 41, 6, pp. 391-407.
[10] Dickson, G.W., Senn, J.A. and Chervany, N.L., May 1977. Research in Management Information Systems: The Minnesota Experiments. Management Science, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 913-923.
[11] Doszkocs, T.E., 1983. From Research to Application: The CITE Natural Language Information Retrieval System. In Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Salton, G. and Schneider, H.J., eds. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, 146) Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 251-262.
[12] Dumais, S.T., 1991. Improving the retrieval of information from external sources. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 229-236.
[13] Ellman, J., 2000. Using Roget's Thesaurus to Determine the Similarity of Texts. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Computing, Engineering and Technology, University of Sunderland, England.
[14] Fagan, J.L., March 1989. The Effectiveness of a Nonsyntactic Approach to Automatic Phrase Indexing for Document Retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (ASIS), Vol. 40, Iss. 2, pp. 115-132.
[15] Fellbaum, C., 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[16] Fontaine, A., May 1995. Sub-element indexing and probabilistic retrieval in the POSTGRES database system. Technical Report CSD-95-876, University of California at Berkeley. ftp://s2k-ftp.CS.Berkeley. EDU/pub/postgres/papers/.
[17] Fox, C., 1990. A stop list for general text. SIGIR Forum 20(12), pp. 19-35.
[18] Frakes, W.B. and Fox, C.J., 2003. Strength and similarity of affix removal stemming algorithms. SIGIR Forum 37(1): pp. 26-30.
[19] Geffet, M. and Feitelson, D.G., Jun 2001. Hierarchical indexing and document matching in BoW. In first ACM/IEEE Joint Conferrence Digital Libraries, pp. 259-267.
[20] George Allan Alderman III, M.A., 2000. Information Retrieval using an adaptive resonance theory (ART)-based Neural Net. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University, UMI Number: 9978116.
[21] Grossman, D.A. and Frieder O., 1998. Information Retrieval: algorithms and heuristics. Boston: Kluwer.
[22] Hammouda, K. and Kamel, M., 2004. Document Similarity Using a Phrase Indexing Graph Model. Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 710-727.
[23] ISI Web of Knowledge, Version 3.0, http://isi01.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi.
[24] Korfhage, R.R., 1997. Information Storage and Retrieval. N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons.
[25] Kowalski, G.J. and Maybury, M.T., 2000. Information Storage and Retrieval Systems: Theory and Implementation. Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval, Inre 8. Kluwer Academic.
[26] Lee, K.H., Choy, Y.C. and Cho, S.B., 2004. An Efficient Algorithm to Compute Differences between Structured Documents. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16(8): pp. 965-979.
[27] Lin, D., 1997. Using Syntactic Dependency as Local Context to Resolve Word-Sense Ambiguity. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Somerset, N.J.: Association for Computational Linguistics.
[28] Lin, S.H., Shih, C.S., Chen, M.C., Ho, J.M., Ko, M.T. and Huang, Y.M., 1998. Extracting Classification Knowledge of Internet Documents with Mining Term Associations: A Semantic Approach. SIGIR: pp. 241-249.
[29] Luhn, H.P., 1958. The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of Research, 2(4): pp. 159-165.
[30] Maayan, G. and Feitelson, D., 2001. Hierarchical Indexing and Document Matching in BoW. Proceedings of the first ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital Libraries, Roanoke, Virginia, pp. 259-267.
[31] Meadow, C.T., Wang, J. and Stamboulie, M., 1993. An Analysis of Zipf-Mandelbrot Language Measures and Their Application to Artificial Languages. Journal of Information Science, 19(4): pp. 247-258.
[32] Meadow, C.T., Boyce, B.R., and Kraft, D.H., 2000. Text Information Retrieval Systems. 2nd edition. San Diego: Academic Press.
[33] Michaelj, A.B., 1997. Data Mining Techniques For Marketing, sales, and Customer Support. Wiley Computer Publishing.
[34] Miller, G., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D. and Miller, K., 1990. Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database. J. Lexicography 3(4): pp. 235-244.
[35] Miller, G.A., 1995. WorldNet: a lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11): pp. 39-41.
[36] Ng, H.T. and Zelle, J., 1997. Corpus based approaches to semantic interpretation in natural language processing. AI Magazine, 18(4): pp. 25-31.
[37] Palo Alto, C.A., 1987. Dialog Information Services. DIALOG System Seminar Manual, Problem Set 3.1.1, pp. 20.
[38] Patel-Schneider, P.F., Simeon, J., 2003. The Yin/Yang Web: A unified model for XML syntax and RDF semantics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15: pp. 797-812.
[39] Petrakis, E.G.M. and Tzeras K., November 2000. Similarity Searching in the CORDIS Text Database. Software Practice and Experience, Vol. 30, No. 13, pp. 1447-1464.
[40] Principe, C.J., Euliano, R.N. and Lefebvre, W.C., 2000. Neural and Adaptive Systems: Fundamentals Through Simulations. John Wiley and Sons.
[41] Quah, T.S. and Srinivasan B., 2000. Utilizing Neural Networks in Stock Pickings. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[42] Raeisi, R., 2005. Modeling and Verification of Digital Logic Circuit Using Neural Networks. 2005 ASEE IL/IN Sectional Conference, Session B-T2-3.
[43] Rijsbergen, C.J., 1975. Information Retrieval. Butterworth.
[44] Salton, G. and Yang, C.S., 1973. On the Specification of Term Values in Automatic Indexing. J. Documentation 29(4), pp. 351-72.
[45] Salton, G. and McGill, M.J., 1983. Text Analysis and Automatic Indexing in Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. New York: McGrae-Hill.
[46] Salton, G., July 1986. Another Look At Automatic Text Retrieval Systems. Communication of the ACM, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 648-656.
[47] Salton, G. (editor), 1988. Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Addison Wesley.
[48] Salton, G. and Buckley, C., 1988. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Computer Science Technical Report TR88-898, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
[49] Salton, G., 1989. Automatic Text Processing. Addison-Wesley.
[50] Weiss, S.M., White, B.F., Apte, C.V. and Damerau, F.J., March 2000. Lightweight Document Matching for Help-Desk Applications. IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 57-61.
[51] Spark Jones, K. and Furnas, G.W., November 1987. Pictures of relevance: A geometric analysis of similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38(6): pp. 420-442.
[52] Suarez, A., Noeda, M. and Palomar, M., 1999. A Method of Restricted Knowledge Acquisition from WordNet. Proceeding of the third International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information Engineering System, IEEE, pp. 38-41.
[53] Turban E. and Aronson J.E., 2001. Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. sixth edition, Prentice Hall.
[54] Tzeras, K. and Petrakis, E.G.M., 1999. Similarity searching in text databases with multiple field types. Proceedings, the fifteenth International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 100.
[55] Utsuro, T., Ikeda, H., Yamane, M., Matsumoto, Y. and Nagao, M., 1994. Bilingual Text Matching using Bilingual Dictionary and Statistics. Proceedings of fifteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 1076-1082, Kyoto.
[56] Wei, J., Bressan, S. and Ooi, B.C., 2000. Mining Term Association Rules for Automatic Global Query Expansion: Methodology and Preliminary Results. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, pp. 366-373.
[57] Web WordNet, Version 2.0, http://wordnet.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn.
[58] Yarowsky, D., 1995. Unsupervised Word Sense Disambiguation rivaling Supervised Method. Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 189-196.
[59] Yunjae Jung, Haesun Park and Ding-zhu Du, 2001. A Balanced Term-Weighting Scheme for Effective Document Matching. Technical Report TR-01-009, Department for Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Mannheim.
[60] Zipf, G.K., 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley. Cambridge, MA, pp. 22-27.

指導教授

陳彥良(Yen-Liang Chen)

審核日期

2005-6-22

推文