線上拍賣市集中回饋機制之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：17

、訪客IP：3.148.112.165

姓名

陳建志(Chien-Chin Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

線上拍賣市集中回饋機制之研究
(A Study on Reputation Mechanism in Online Auction Market)

相關論文

★ 以個案研究法探討機械式組織之資訊系統導入	★ 銀行企業內部網路導入TCP/IP通信協定之研究
★ 後金控時代臺灣地區金融服務業薪資決策支援系統之設計研究 --以一家中型證券商為例	★ 影響數位在職訓練之學習態度及行為意向研究
★ 台灣銀行業導入電子商務線上金流訊息標準之研究	★ 國防訓儲軍士官制度評估
★ 以關係承諾角度探討組織中軟體專案開發之個案研究	★ 企業工作流程再造之研究─以銀行發卡流程為例
★ 以個案研究法探討B2B電子商務導入之研究—以汽車售後服務件製造商為例	★ 以個案研討方法探討公文簽核流程再造之研究－以變更資訊部門服務為例
★ 醫療資訊系統之資訊安全危安因素探討以台北某醫學中心為例	★ 資訊部門專案經理派遣人員之個案研究
★ 綠色供應鏈管理資訊系統導入問題分析與探討-以A公司為例	★ 企業導入企業資源規劃(ERP)對作業流程之影響－以A公司為例
★ 客訴處理電子化流程管理－以飲料業為例	★ 以個案研究法探討企業垃圾郵件防堵

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

論文摘要
隨著網際網路的蓬勃發展及持續增加的使用者，愈來愈多的企業加入電子商
務的行列。而線上拍賣是電子商務活動中成長最快的項目之一。對於個人買家及
賣家而言，透過網際網路是種新的交易方式。但是，它和傳統的拍賣方式仍有相
當大的不同，因為線上拍賣的使用者都是以匿名的方式參與交易的過程。然而，
就是因為線上交易存在著不確定性及風險性，線上拍賣業者提供多種線上服務，
例如：回饋機制(Feedback Mechanism )、公平擔保人服務(Escrow Service )、
詐欺保障等機制，希望藉著這些機制來降低使用者的認知風險，提高買、賣家交
易的意圖及行為。
然而，儘管在線上拍賣市場中回饋機制是被廣為使用的一種機制，在台灣卻
很少有相關的實證研究去證實它的確能夠有效地引起買家對賣家的信任。因此，
本研究的目的就在探討線上拍賣市集中回饋機制是否能影響買家對賣家的信
任，且買家的信任傾向及過去經驗等因子如何對買家信任的形成產生調節的影
響。而經由線上調查所蒐集的資料提供了有力的證據去支持研究假設的成立。本
研究發現賣家過去的聲譽會影響買家對於賣家的認知信任之程度，且個人的信任
傾向及過去使用線上拍賣的經驗確實存在有調節作用於買家對於賣家信任的形
成。

摘要(英)

Abstract
With the prosperous development of Internet and the increasing Internet
users, a numerous business has engaged in e-commerce. Online auction is
one of the most popular commercial activities on the Internet. It is a new way
for individual buyers and sellers to exchange products through the Internet. But,
it is quite different from traditional auction because of anonymity of participants.
Due to the uncertainty and risk in online trading, the auctioneers have provided
various online services (e.g. feedback mechanisms, escrow services, fraud
protection) to induce buyer and seller’s intention to transact.
However, despite the widely use of feedback mechanisms in online
auction markets, there has been little empirical evidences in Taiwan to verify
the effectiveness of reputation mechanisms that can induce buyers’ trust.
Hence, this study aims to examine the extent to which trust can be induced by
online feedback mechanisms in online auction markets, and how the
moderating factors, such as buyers’ disposition to trust and past experience,
affect buyer’s trust formation. Data collected from Internet survey provide
evidences to support the proposed hypotheses. This study has found that a
seller’s reputation information has an impact on buyer’s perception of trust in a
seller. And, individual’s disposition to trust and past experience in using online
auction services really have moderating effects on buyer’s trust formation
toward seller’s reputation information.

關鍵字(中)

★ 回饋機制
★ 聲譽
★ 線上拍賣
★ 信任

關鍵字(英)

★ feedback mechanism
★ reputation
★ Trust
★ online auction

論文目次

Table of Content.......................................................I
List of Figures .......................................................III
List of Tables ....................................................... IV
1. Introduction...................................................... - 1 -
1.1 Research Background and Motivations.............................. - 1 -
1.2 Research Objectives ............................................. - 3 -
2. Literature Review............................................................... - 5 -
2.1 Types of Auction.............................................................. - 5 -
2.1.1 Sealed-bid auctions............................................ - 5 -
2.1.2 Open auctions ............................................................ - 5 -
2.2 Online Auction.............................................................. - 7 -
2.2.1 Types of Online Auction......................................... - 8 -
2.3 Reputation systems............................................................. - 9 -
2.3.1 Feedback Mechanism ........................................... - 10 -
2.4 Trust........................................................... - 12 -
2.4.1 Trust in E-Commerce ......................................... - 13 -
2.4.2 Definition of Trust ......................................................... - 14 -
2.4.3 Trust-related Behavior .................................................. - 16 -
2.5 Disposition to Trust......................................... - 17 -
2.6 Past Experience............................................... - 19 -
3. Research Methodology .......................................... - 21 -
3.1 Research Model................................................ - 21 -
3.2 Research Hypothesis ....................................................... - 22 -
3.2.1 Feedback Mechanism ......................................... - 22 -
3.2.2 Disposition to Trust........................................ - 24 -
3.2.3 Past Experience ............................................ - 26 -
3.3 Constructs Definition and Operationalization ................. - 27 -
3.3.1 Feedback Mechanism ......................................... - 27 -
3.3.2 Trust in Seller ............................................ - 28 -
3.3.3 Disposition to Trust........................................ - 28 -
3.3.4 Past Experience ............................................ - 29 -
3.4 Control Variables......................................................... - 30 -
3.4.1 Product Price............................................... - 30 -
3.4.2 Merchandise Description..................................... - 30 -
3.4.3 Feedback Content .......................................... - 31 -
3.5 Research Design............................................... - 31 -
3.5.1 Questionnaire Design......................................... - 32 -
3.5.2 Data Collections ............................................ - 32 -
3.6 Data Analysis Method .......................................... - 33 -
3.6.1 Descriptive Statistics ...................................... - 33 -
3.6.2 Reliability ................................................. - 33 -
3.6.3 Validity .................................................... - 33 -
3.6.4 Hypothesis testing .......................................... - 34 -
4. Data Analysis.................................................. - 35 -
4.1 Descriptive Statistics ....................................... - 35 -
4.2 Reliability and Validity ....................................... - 40 -
4.2.1 Reliability Analysis........................................ - 40 -
4.2.2 Validity Analysis............................................. - 41 -
4.3 Hypothesis Testing .............................................. - 41 -
4.3.1 Feedback Mechanism .......................................... - 41 -
4.3.2 Disposition to Trust.......................................... - 45 -
4.3.3 Past Experience ............................................. - 48 -
4.4 Summary of the Findings ....................................... - 50 -
5. Discussion and Conclusion ...................................... - 51 -
5.1 Discussion of the Findings ................................... - 51 -
5.1.1 Feedback Mechanism ..................................... - 51 -
5.1.2 Disposition to Trust......................................... - 52 -
5.1.3 Past Experience ............................................ - 53 -
5.2 Contributions and Managerial Implication ..................... - 54 -
5.2.1 Contributions ............................................... - 54 -
5.2.2 Managerial Implication ............................. - 54 -
5.3 Research Limitations and Future Research .................. - 56 -
5.3.1 Research Limitations .................................... - 56 -
5.3.2 Suggestion for Future Research........................ - 57 -
Reference ................................................. - 59 -
Appendix: Questionnaire........................................ - 70 -

參考文獻

1. Ba, S., Whinston, A.B., and Zhang, H. “Building Trust in the Electronic Market through an Economic Incentive Mechanism,” International Conference on Information Systems, 1999, pp. 208-213.
2. Ba, S. “Establishing Online Trust through A Community Responsibility System,” Decision Support System, Vol. 31, 3, 2001, pp. 323-336.
3. Ba, S., and Pavlou, P.A. “Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26, 3, Sep 2002, pp. 243-268.
4. Bapna, R., Goes, P., and Gupta, A. “Insights and Analyses of Online Auctions,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 44, 11, Nov 2001, pp. 42-50.
5. Barney, J.B., and Hansen, M.H. “Trustworthiness as A Source of Competitive Advantage,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, 8, winter 1994, pp. 175-190.
6. Beam, C., and Segev, A. “Auctions on the Internet: A Field Study,” Fisher Center for Management and Information Technology, Working Paper 98-WP-1032, May 1998.
7. Bhattacharya, R., and Devinney, T.M. “A Formal Model of Trust Based on Outcomes,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, 3, July 1998, pp. 459-474.
8. Bichler, M., and Segev, A. “A Brokerage Framework for Internet Commerce,” Distributed and Parallel Databases, Vol. 7, 2, April 1999, pp. 133-148.
9. Bigley, G.A., and Pearce, J.L. “Straining for Shared Meaning in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, 1998, pp. 405-421.
10. Brinkmann, U., and Seifert, M. “Face-to-Interface － The Establishment of Trust in the Internet: The Case of E-Auctions,” Journal of Sociology, Vol. 30, 1, Feb 2001, pp. 23-47.
11. Brynjolfsson, E., and Smith, M.D. “Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers,” Management Science, Vol. 46, 4, April 2000, pp. 563-585.
12. Butler, J. K. “Toward Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust: Evolution of a condition of trust Inventory,” Journal of Management, Vol. 17, 1991, pp.643-663.
13. Christy, L. J., and Judith, L.Z. “Bidding Behavior at the Auction,” Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 20(4), April 2003, pp. 303-322.
14. Colon, E.J., and Mayer, R.C. “The Effect of Trust on Principal-Agent Dyads: An Empirical Investigation of Stewardship and Agency,” presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Dallas, Texas, 1994.
15. Cooper, D.R., and Schindler, P.S. “Business Research Methods,” 7th edition New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Cronbach, L.J. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,” Psychometrika, Vol. 16, 1951, pp. 297-334.
17. Deutsch, M. “Trust and Suspicion,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 2, 4, 1958, pp. 265-279.
18. Dholakia, U.M. “The Usefulness of Bidders’ Reputation Ratings to Sellers in Online Auctions,” Journal of interactive marketing, Vol. 19, 1, winter 2004, pp. 31-39.
19. Doney, P.M., and Cannon P. “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61, 2, April 1997, pp. 35-51.
20. Fukuyama, F. “Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity,” The Free Press, N.Y., 1995.
21. Gambetta, D. “Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations,” Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1988.
22. Ganesan, S. “Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, April 1994, pp. 1-19.
23. Gefen, D. “Social Trust and the Adoption and Diffusion of Information Technology,” unpublished Dissertation, Georgla State University, 1997.
24. Gefen, D. “E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust,” Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 28, 6, 2000, 725-737.
25. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. “Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, 1, Mar 2003, pp. 51-90.
26. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D.W. “Inexperience and Experience with Online Stores: The Importance of TAM and Trust,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 50, 3, Aug 2003, pp. 307-321.
27. Gilkeson, J.H., and Reynolds, K. “Determinants of Internet Auction Success and Closing Price: An Exploratory Study,” Psychology & Marketing, 20, 6, Jun 2003, pp. 537-566.
28. Greenleaf, E.A., Rao, A.G., and Sinha, A.R. “Guarantees in Auctions: The Auction House as Negotiator and Managerial Decision Maker,” Management Science, Vol. 39, 9, Sep 1993, pp. 1130-1145.
29. Gwinner, K.P., Gremler, D.D., and Bitner, M.J. “Relational Benefits in Services Industries: The Customer’s Perspective,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 26, 2, Spring 1998, pp. 101-114.
30. Hendricks, K., and Paarsch, H.J. “A Survey of Recent Empirical Work Concerning Auctions,” Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 28, 2, May 1995, pp. 403-426.
31. Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P., and Peralta, M. “Building Consumer Trust Online,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42, 4, April 1999, pp. 80-85.
32. Hofstede, G. “Motivation, Leadership, and Organizations: Do American Theories Apply Abroad,” Organizational Dynamics, 1980.
33. Hosmer, L.T. “Trust: The Connecting Link between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, 2, April 1995, pp. 379-403.
34. Houser, D.E., and Wooders, J. “Reputation in Internet Auctions: Theory and Evidence from eBay,” Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Arizona, 2001.
35. Houston, R.W., and Taylor, G.K. “Consumer Perceptions of CPA Web Trust SM Assurances: Evidence on Expectation Gap,” International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 3, 1999, pp. 89-105.
36. Jacoby, J., Chestnut, R.W., Hoyer, W.D., Sheluga, D.A., and Donahue, M.J. “Psychometric Characteristics of Behavioral Process Data: Preliminary Findings on Validity and Reliability,” Advanced in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, 1, 1978, pp. 546-554.
37. Jarvenpaa, J.S., Knollm K., and Leidner, D.E. “Is Anybody out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams,” Journal of MIS, Vol. 14, 4, spring 1998, pp. 29-64.
38. Jarvenpaa, S.L., and Tractinsky, N. “Consumer Trust in an Internet Store: A Cross-Cultural Validation,” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Vol. 5, 2, Dec 1999, pp. 1-36.
39. Kagel, J.H., and Levin, D. “The Winner’s Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions,” American Economic Review, Vol. 76, 5, Dec 1986, pp. 894-920.
40. Kagel, J.H. “Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research,” The handbook of experimental economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 501-585.
41. Keen, P. “Electronic Commerce Relationships: Trust by Design,” Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1999.
42. Kini, A., and Choobineh, J. “Trust in Electronic Commerce: Definition and Theoretical Considerations,” Proceedings of Thirty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 4, 1998, pp.51-61.
43. Klein, B., and Leffler, K.B. “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 89, 4, Aug 1981, pp. 615-641.
44. Klein, L.R. “Evaluating the Potential of Interactive Media through a New Lens: Search versus Experience Goods,” Journal of Business Research, Vol.41, 3, Mar 1998, pp. 195-203.
45. Kollock, P. “The Production of Trust in Online Market,” In Lawler, E. J., M. Macy, S. Thyne, and H. A. Walker (Eds), Advances in Group Processes (16), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1999, pp. 99-123.
46. Kumar, N., and Scheer, L.K. “The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 32, 3, Aug 1995, pp.348-356.
47. Larzelere, R.E., and Huston, T.L. “The Dyadic Trust Scale: Toward Understanding Interpersonal Trust in Close Relationships,” Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 42, 3, Aug 1980, pp. 595-604.
48. Lee, M.K.O., and Turban, E. “A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping,” Internatinoal Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 6, 1, fall 2001, pp. 75-91.
49. Lewicky, R.J., and Bunker, B. “Trust in Relationships: A Model of Trust Development and Decline,” in B. Bunker and J. Rubin (eds.), Conflict, Cooperation and Justice (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 1995, pp. 133-173.
50. Luhmann, N. “Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives,” In D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, 1988, Basil Blackwell, N.Y., pp. 94-107.
51. Massad, V.J., and Tucker, J.M. “Comparing Bidding and Pricing between In-person and Online Auction,” Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 9, 5, 2000, pp. 325-332.
52. Mayer, R.C, Davis, J.H., and Schoorman, F.D. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, 3, 1995, pp.709-734.
53. McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., and Chervany, N.L. “Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships,” Academy of Management Review, 23, 3, 1998, 472-490.
54. McKnight, D.H., and Chervany, N.L. “What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 2, winter 2001, 35-60.
55. McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. “Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology,” Information System Research, Vol. 13, 3, Sep 2002, pp. 334-359.
56. McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. “Dispositional Trust and Distrust Distinctions in Predicting High- and Low-Risk Internet Expert Advice Site Perceptions,” e-Service Journal, 2004.
57. Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., and Zaltman, G. “Factors Affecting Trust in Market Research Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, Jan 1993, pp. 81-101.
58. Neumann, P.G. “Identity-Related Misuse,” Communications of ACM, Vol. 40, 7, July 1997, pp. 112.
59. Novak, T.P., Hoffman, D.L., and Yung, Y.F. “Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach,” Marketing Science, Vol. 19, 1, winter 2000, pp. 22-42.
60. Nunnally, J.C. “Psychometric Theory,” McGrawHill, New York, 1978.
61. Oh, W. “C2C Versus B2C: A Comparison of the Winner’s Curse in Two Types of Electronic Auctions,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 6, 4, summer 2002, pp. 115-138.
62. Pavlou, P. “Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 7, 3, Spring 2003, pp. 101-134.
63. Pavlou, P. and Gefen, D. “Building Effective Online Marketplace with Institution-Based Trust,” Information System Research, Vol. 15, 1, March 2004, pp. 37-59.
64. Reichheld, F.F., and Schefter, P. “E-Loyalty,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78, 4, Jul/Aug 2000, pp. 105-113.
65. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., and Kuwabara, K. “Reputation Systems,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, 12, Dec 2000, pp. 45-48.
66. Rothkopf, M.H. “On Auctions with Withdrawable Winning Bids,” Marketing Science, Vol. 10, 1, winter 1991, pp. 40-57.
67. Rotter, J.B. “Generalized Expectancies for Interpersonal Trust,” American Psychologiest, Vol. 26, 5, 1971, pp. 443-452.
68. Roussean, D.M., and Sitkin, S.B. “Not So Different After All: A Cross-discipline View of Trust,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, 3, 1998, pp. 393-404.
69. Salam, A.E., Rao, H.R., and Pegels, C.C. “Consumer-Perceived Risk in E-Commerce Transaction,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46, 12, Dec 2003, pp. 325-331.
70. Scott, W., and Derlaga, V.J. “Attributions in T-Groups: A Test of Kelley’s ANOVA Model,” Small Group Behavior, Vol. 14, 1983, pp. 50-62.
71. Shapiro, C. “Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 98, 4, Nov 1983, pp. 659-679.
72. Sheppard, B.H., Hartwick, J., and Warshaw, P.R. “The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, 3, Dec 1988, pp. 325-343.
73. Shim, S., Eastlick, M.A., Lotz, S.L., and Warrington, P. “An Online Prepurchase Intention Model: The Role of Intention to Search,” Journal of Retailing, 77, 2001, pp. 397-416.
74. Sonja, G.K. “The Role of Consumers’ Trust in Online-Shopping,” Journal of Business Ethics, 39, Aug 2002, pp. 43-50.
75. Sonja, G.K., and Ewald, A.K. “Empirical Research in Online Trust: A Review and Critical Assessment,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 2003, pp. 783-812.
76. Spence, M. “Job Market Signaling,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 87, 3, Aug 1973, pp. 355-374.
77. Standifird, S.S. “Reputation and E-Commerce: eBay Auctions and The asymmetrical impact of positive and negative ratings,” Journal of Management, 27, 2001, pp. 279-295.
78. Strader, T.J., and Ramaswami, S.N. “The Value of Seller Trustworthiness in C2C Online Markets,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45, 12, Dec 2002, pp. 45-49.
79. Sultan, F., Shankar, V., and Bart, I.Y. “Determinants and Role of Trust in E-Business: A Large Scale Empirical Study,” eBusiness Research Center Working Paper, 2002.
80. Sutton, S.R., and Hallett, R. “Understanding Seat-belt Intention and Behavior: A Decision-making Approach,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 19, 1989, pp. 1310-1325.
81. Sundaram, D., and Webster, C. “Service Consumption Criticality in Failure Recovery,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 41, 2, Feb 1998, pp. 153-159.
82. Tirole, J. “The Theory of Industrial Organization,” 1988, Cambride, Mass.: MIT Press.
83. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F.D. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, Vol. 46, 2, Feb 2000, pp. 186-201.
84. Walczuch, R., and Lundgren, H. “Psychological Antecedents of Institution-Based Consumer Trust in E-retailing,” Information and Management, 42, 2004, pp. 159-177.
85. Walden, E. “Some Value Propositions of Online Communities,” Electronic Markets, Vol. 10, 4, Oct 2000, pp. 244-250.
86. Wang, K., Wang, E.T.G., and Tai, C.F. “A Study of Online Auction Sites in Taiwan: Product, Auction Rule, and Trading Type,” International Journal of Information Management, 22, 2002, pp. 127-142.
87. Wang, Y.D., and Emurian, H.H. “An Overview of Online Trust: Concepts, Elements, and Implications,” Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 2005, pp. 105-125.
88. Weber, K., and Roehl, W.S. “Profiling People Searching for and Purchasing Travel Products on the World Wide Web,” Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 37, 1999, pp. 291-298.
89. Whitener, E.M., Brodt, S.E., Korsgaard, M.A., and Werner, J.M. “Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, 3, Jul 1998, pp. 513-530.
90. Williamson, O.E. “The Economic Institutions of Capitalism,” Free Press, New York, 1985.
91. Yoon, S.J. “The Antecedents and Consequences of Trust in Online Purchase Decisions,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 16, 2, spring 2002, pp. 47-63.
92. Yousafzai, S.Y., Pallister, J.G., and Foxall, G.R. “A Proposed Model of E-Trust for Electronic Banking,” Technovation, 23, 2003, pp. 847-860.
93. Zand, D.E. “Trust and Managerial Problem Solving,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, 2, Jun 1972, pp. 229-239.
94. Zucker, L.G. “Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840-1920,” Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 8, B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1986, pp. 53-111.
Web data
1. Forrester Research, “Online Auction will Boom through 2007,” http://www.forrester.com/go?docid=15776, accessed on April 16, 2005.
2. Investintaiwan.org, “The online auction sales of Yahoo! Auction Taiwan” http://investintaiwan.nat.gov.tw/zh-tw/news/200502/2005020702.html, accessed on May 24, 2005.
3. Insightxplorer, http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_01_14.html, accessed on April 28, 2005.
4. National Consumers League, “2004 Internet Fraud Statistics,” http://www.fraud.org/2004-internet%20scams.pdf, accessed on May 29, 2005.

指導教授

范懿文(Yi-Wen Fan)

審核日期

2005-6-24

推文