影響民眾申裝國道電子收費系統行為意向之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：42

、訪客IP：18.216.187.77

姓名

何基鼎(Ji-Ding Ho) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

影響民眾申裝國道電子收費系統行為意向之研究
(Investigating Factors Affecting the Adoption of Electronic Toll Collection system)

相關論文

★ 製藥業的成本會計評估研究─ 一個ABC成本制度的應用	★ 一個保險業的資料採擷應用--業務員的薪酬制度分析
★ 農漁產品電子化交易中分類分級管理之研究	★ 應用類神經網路建構壽險核保決策支援之研究
★ 企業導入ERP之關鍵成功因素-個案研究	★ 體外診斷醫療器材滿足CE及GMP驗證要求之個案研
★ 企業資訊系統委外研究－以個案銀行為例	★ DRAM月平均價格變動分析
★ 定期航運產業運價及運送時間對經營績效影響之研究-以某外商海運公司在台灣經營為例	★ 以交通儲值卡作為電子支付工具的營運模式及可行性分析
★ 軟體公司能力成熟度評估	★ 加速台灣海關的通關便捷化－提升行動化服務的解決方案
★ 以均勻度係數為預測晶圓良率指標之可行性分析-以國內某DRAM廠為例	★ 某公司資訊部門變革失敗之探討
★ 資訊部門導入ITIL 管理機制之現況分析─ 以企業導入ITIL 服務支援為例	★ 導入WCO SAFE 優質企業之可行性分析–以A航空公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

由於臺灣經濟之蓬勃發展，國民收入快速提高，汽車數量暴增，在國道1號高速公路全線完工後不久即出現壅塞現象，在假日期間尤甚；逢年過節，各收費站前常有長龍，甚為歸心似箭的返鄉人所垢病。為提升人工收費效率及改善車流因繳費而壅塞之狀況，利用短距無線通訊技術發展高速公路電子收費系統 ETC 已成為國際趨勢。許多已開發國家為了提高收費的效率與降低收費的成本，紛紛率先採用高速公路 ETC 系統。因此，本國政府也將高速公路收費電子化列重要的交通政策之一，並將該項計畫委託由遠通電收建構與營運。雖然今天高速公路ETC 系統已正式啟用，但民眾的使用意願卻不高，因此如何有效率地轉移民眾使用人工收費的習慣，以便提升國道的收費效率與減緩國道的壅塞狀況，便成為一個非常重要的議題。故本研究針對此重要議題，從民眾的角度，探討影響民眾申裝電子收費系統 ETC 的因素，希望能藉由瞭解影響民眾申裝電子收費系統 ETC 的影響因素，進而提供相關單位推廣電子收費系統 ETC 的策略建議。
本研究以行為理論作為解釋民眾申裝電子收費系統 ETC 行為的理論基礎，並根據本研究的情境，對「創新擴散理論」、「知覺風險理論」與「程序公平理論」等相關理論做更進一步的探討，經過這些探討後，本研究探討認為「態度」、「主觀規範」、「知覺行為控制」、「知覺風險」應為民眾申裝電子收費系統「行為意向」之影響因素；而「相對優勢」、「知覺易用性」、「程序公平」應為影響民眾使用電子收費系統 ETC 之「態度」；且「財務風險」與「績效風險」對「知覺風險」的影響；最後，本研究認為「程序公平」為影響「態度」對「行為意向」之調節因素。
本研究設計以「問卷調查法」進行，共蒐集 245 位受測樣本，並使用 LISREL 與 SPSS 來進行資料的分析，以檢驗本研究的直接效果假說與調節效果假說。研究結果發現：
1.民眾對知覺到使用電子收費系統的「相對優勢」、「知覺易用性」、「程序公平」等三項因素，皆會顯著對於民眾使用電子收費系統的「態度」有正面的影響，進而影響民眾申裝電子收費系統的「行為意向」。
2.民眾對使用電子收費系統所認知的「財務風險」與「績效風險」二項因素，會顯著的影響民眾所認知的「知覺風險」，進而影響民眾申裝電子收費系統的「行為意向」。
3.民眾對電子收費系統的使用「態度」、社會壓力的「主觀規範」、對申裝行為的「知覺行為控制」等三項因素，皆會顯著正面影響民眾對申辯電子收費系統的「行為意向」；而民眾認知使用電子收費系統的「知覺風險」會對民眾申辯電子收費系統的「行為意向」有顯著的負面影響。
4.民眾所認知的「程序公平」的程度，會對「態度」與「行為意向」之關係，具有調節的作用。

摘要(英)

Because of the flourishing development of the economy in Taiwan, the personal income is raised quickly and the amount of automobile increasing violently. The result of the situation is traffic jam which frequently appeared at every toll station, especially during holidays. That is a very anxious situation to people using the expressway. In order to improve this situation, the establishment of ETC (electronic toll collection) system has been a hot topic and dominant trend in many countries. Many of the developed countries have adopted ETS system in their expressways to improve the efficiency and decrease the cost of charging tolls. Furthermore, the ETC system is listed in the head of the most important traffic policies by the Taiwan government. And, the ETC system is build and operated by a private company. Though the ETC system has already been launched, the people’’s intention to use ETC is still low. Therefore, understanding how to shift people’s habit from using the artificial toll system to the ETC system and how to raise the efficiency of tolling and release the jam in expressway is an important issue. Aim to these questions, the objective of this study is to research factors affecting people’s intention to adopt ETC system.
This research regards action theory as the foundation to explain the behavior of people adopting ETC system. According the situation of ETC system, this research discussed “diffusion of innovation theory”, “perceived risk theory”, and “procedural justice theory”. After these discussions, this study think that the “attitude”, “subjective norm”, “perceived behavior control”, “perceived risk” are the factors which affect people’s “behavior intention” to adopt ETC system. Besides, “relative advantage”, “perceived ease of use”, and “procedural justice” are factors which affect people’s “attitude to use ETC system”. Additionally, the “financial risk” and “the performance risk” are factors which affect “perceived risk”. Finally, this research thinks that “procedure justice” is the moderating variable which affects the relation of “behavior intention” and “attitude”.
The research approached by “the questionnaire investigation method”, collected 245 samples, and used LISREL and SPSS to analyze the data to examine the direct result hypothesis and the moderating affection hypothesis of this research.
The result of the research is found:
1.“The relative advantage”, “the perceived ease of use”, and ”the procedure justice” affect people’s attitude to use ETC system.
2.“Financial risk” and “performance risk” affect “the perceived risk” which is known by people.
3.“Attitude to use ETC system”, “subjective norm”, “perceived behavior control” positively affect “intention to adopt ETC system”. And “perceived risk” negative affect “intention to adopt ETC system”.
4.“Procedure justice” certainly is the moderating variable which affects the relation of “intention to adopt ETC system” and “attitude to use ETC system”.

關鍵字(中)

★ 知覺風險
★ 計畫行為理論
★ 電子收費系統
★ 創新擴散理論
★ 程序公平

關鍵字(英)

★ Electronic toll collection (ETC)
★ planned behavior control (PBC)
★ procedural justice
★ diffusion of innovation theory
★ perceived risk

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 2
第三節論文結構與研究程序 3
第二章電子收費系統 5
第一節電子收費系統ETC的相關技術 5
第二節臺灣電子收費系統的申裝及使用流程 10
第三節臺灣高速公路電子收費系統建置與推行大記事 14
第三章文獻探討 23
第一節行為理論基礎 23
第二節知覺風險 32
第三節創新擴散理論 35
第四節程序公平理論 38
第五節小結 40
第四章研究模型與方法 42
第一節研究模型 42
第二節研究假說 46
第三節變數定義與操作化 56
第四節研究設計 62
第五章資料分析 65
第一節樣本基本資料分析 65
第二節效度與信度檢驗 67
第三節假說檢定 72
第四節假說檢定之結果 77
第六章結論與建議 80
第一節研究結果與討論 80
第二節管理實務建議 86
第三節研究限制 90
第四節未來研究建議 91
參考文獻 94
附錄：正式問卷 101

參考文獻

一、中文部份
1.高速公路局-技術發展現況與國外案例。
2.陳佳宜，高速公路電子收費系統ETC在日本的發展現況，拓墣產業研究所焦點報告，民國93年6月。
3. 高速公路電子收費卡發售與使用須知，遠通電收，民國93年1月。
4. 遠通電收網站，http://www.fetc.net.tw/。
二、英文部份
1.Adams, J.S. (1965), “Inequity in social exchange,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Berkowitz L. (ed.), New York: Academic Press., pp.267-300.
2.Ajzen, I. and Martin F. (1980), Understanding Attitude and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
3.Ajzen, I. (1985), “From Intention to Action: A Theory of Planned Behavior,” in Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Julius, K. and Jurgen, B. (eds.), Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
4.Ajzen, I. and Thomas, J.M. (1986), “Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitude, Intention, and Perceived Behavioral Control,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, pp. 453-474.
5.Ajzen, I. (1988), Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior, Chicago, IL: The Dorsey Press.
6.Ajzen, I. (1991), “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pp. 179-211.
7.Bagozzi, R.P. (1981), “Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, pp. 607-627.
8.Bagozzi, R.P. and Paul R.W. (1990) , “Trying to Consume,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (2), pp. 127-140.
9.Bagozzi, R.P., Hans, B. and Youjae, Y. (1992), “State Versus Action Orientation and the Theory of Reasoned Action,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18(4), pp. 505-528.
10.Bandura, A. (1977), “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychological Review, 84, pp. 191-215.
11.Bandura, A. (1982), “Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency,” American Psychologist, 37, pp. 122-147.
12.Bauer, R.A. (1960), “Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking,” in Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, Hancock, R.S. (ed.), Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp. 389-393.
13.Bhattancherjee, A. (2000), “Acceptance of E-Commerce Services: The Case of Electronic Brokerages,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part A: Systems and Humans, 30 (4), pp.411- 420.
14.Bentler, P.M. (1986), “Structural Modeling and Psychometrika: on Growth and Achievements,” Psychometrika, 51 (1), pp. 35-51.
15.Bies, R.J. and Moag, J.S. (1986), “Interactional Justice: Communication criteria of fairness,” Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, pp. 43-55.
16.Browne, M.W., and Cudeck, R. (1993), “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit,” in Testing Structural Equation Models, Kenneth B., and Long, J.S. (eds.), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, pp.136-162.
17.Chin, W.W., and Todd, P. (1995), “On the Use, Usefulness and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research：A Note of Caution,” MIS Quarterly, 19 (2), pp.237-246.
18.Clemmer, E.C., and Schneider, B. (1996), “Fair Service,” in Advances in Services Marketing andManagement, Swartz, T.A.,Bowen, D.E., and Brown S.W. (eds.), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press., pp. 109-126.
19.Cox, D.F. (1967), “Risk Handling in Consumer Behavior - An Intensive Study of Two Cases,” in Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Donald F.C. (ed.), Boston: Harvard University Press, pp. 34-81.
20.Cropanazano, R.S., and Folger, R. (1991), “Procedural justice and worker motivation,” in Motivation and work behavior, Steers R.M., and Porter L.W. (eds.), New York: McGraw-Hill., pp. 131-143.
21.Cunningham, S.M. (1967), “The Major Dimension of Perceived Risk,” in Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Donald F.C. (ed.), Boston: Harvard University Press, pp. 82-108.
22.Davis, F.D. (1986), “ A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results,” Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT.
23.Davis, F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. (1989), “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Model,” Management Science, 35 (8), pp. 982-1003.
24.Dowling, G.R., and Richard S. (1994), “A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-Handling Activity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (1), pp. 119-134.
25.Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (3), pp. 39-50.
26.Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., and Boudreau, M-C. (2000), “Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines For Research Practice,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), pp. 1-70.
27.Gefen, D., Pavlou, P.A., Warkentin, M., and Rose G.M. (2002), “E-government Adoption,” Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp. 569-576.
28.Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall.
29.Harrison, David, A., Peter, P., Mykytyn, Jr., and Riemenschneider, C.K. (1997), “Executive Decisions About Adoption of Information Technology in Small Business: Theory and Empirical Tests,” Information Systems Research, 8(2), pp. 171-195.
30.Henderson, R., Rickwood, D., and Roberts, P. (1998), “The Beta Test of Electronic Supermarket,” Interacting with Computers, 10, pp.385-399.
31.Homans, G.G. (1961), Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, NY: Harcourt, Brace
32.Jacoby, J., and Kaplan L.B. (1972), “The Components of Perceived Risk,” in Proceedings of Third Annual Conference, Venkatesan M., ed., Association for Consumer Research, pp. 382-393.
33.Karahanna, E., and Straub, D.W. (1999), “The Psychological Origins of Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-Use,” Information and Management, 35 (4), p. 237-250.
34.Klobas, J.E. (1995), “Beyond Information Quality: Fitness for Purpose and Electronic Information Resource Use,” Journal of Information Science, 21 (2), pp. 95-114.
35.Leventhal, G.S. (1980), “What should be done with equity theory?,” in Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, Gergen, K.J., Greenberg M.S., and Willis R.H. (eds.), New York: Plenum Press., pp.27-55.
36.Leventhal, G.S., Karuza, J., and Fry, W.R. (1980), “Beyond fairness: A theory allocation preferences.” in Justice And Interaction, Mikula, G. (ed.), New York: Springer-Verlag., pp.167-182.
37.Liao, Shaoyi, Shao, Y.P., Wang H., and Chen A. (1999), “The Adoption of Virtual Banking: An Empirical Study,” International journal of Information Management, 19 (1), pp. 63-74.
38.Liker, J.K., and Sindi A.A. (1997), “User Acceptance of Expert Systems: A Test of the Theory of Reasoned Action,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14 (2), pp. 147-173.
39.Lin, J.C-C., and Lu H. (2000), “Towards an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use a Web Site,” International Journal of Information Management, 20 (3), pp. 197-208.
40.Lind, E.A., and Tyler, T.R. (1988), The Social Psychology Of Procedural justice, New York: Plenum Press.
41.Mathieson, K. (1991), “Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Information Systems Research, 2 (3), pp. 173-191.
42.Moon, J-W., and Kim, Y-G (2001), “Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context,” Information and Management, 38 (4), pp. 217-230.
43.Moore, G.C., and Benbasat, I. (1991), “Developmetn of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adoption an Information Technology Innovation,” Information Systems Research, 2(3), pp. 192-222.
44.Mykytyn, P. P., and David A. H. (1993), “The Application of the Theory of Reasoned Action to Senior Management and Strategic Information Systems,” Information Resources Management Journal, 6(2), pp. 15-26.
45.Peter, J.P., and Tarpey, L.X. (1975), “A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies,” Journal of Consumer Research.
46.Rogers, E.M. (1983), Diffusion of Innovations, New York: Free Press.
47.Rogers, W.A., Gilbert D.K., and Fraser E. (1997), “An Analysis of Automatic Teller Machine Usage by Older Adults: A Structured Interview Approach,” Applied Ergonomics, 28 (3), pp. 173-180.
48.Roselius, T. (1971), “Consumer Ranking of Risk Reduction Method,” Journal of Marketing, 35, pp. 56-61,.
49.Shimp, T.A., and Kavas A. (1984), “The Theory of Reasoned Action Applied to Coupon Usage,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3), pp. 795-809.
50.Swaminathan, Vanitha, Elzbieta, L-W., and Bharat, P.R. (1999), “Browsers or Buyers in Cyberspace? An Investigation of Factors Influencing Electronic Exchange,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5 (2).
51.Shimp, T.A. and Kavas, A. (1984), “The Theory of Reasoned Action Applied to Coupon Usage,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11(3), pp. 795-809.
52.Shirley, T., and Todd, P.A. (1995a), “Decomposition and Crossover Effect in the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Study of Consumer Adoption Intentions,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12 (2), pp. 137-155.
53.Shirley, T., and Todd, P.A. (1995b), “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information System Research, 6(2), pp. 144-177.
54.Stone, R.N., and Gronhaug, K. (1993), “Perceived Risk: Further Considerations for the Marketing Discipline,” European Journal of Marketing, 27(3), pp.39.
55.Tan, Soo Jiuan (1999), “Strategies for Reducing Consumers’ Risk Aversion in Internet Shopping,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16 (2), pp. 163-180.
56.Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975), Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57.Tyler, T.R., Rasinski, K.A., and Spodick, N. (1985), “Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, pp. 72-81.
58.Zellars, K.I., Liu, Y., Bratton, V., Brymer, R., and Perrewe, PL. (2004), “An Examination of the Dysfunctional Consequences of Organizational Injustice and Escapist Coping,” Journal of Managerial Issues, 16 (4), pp. 528-544

指導教授

范錚強(Cheng-Kiang Farn)

審核日期

2006-7-14

推文