影響個人在虛擬社群環境中知識分享因素之探討

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：39

、訪客IP：3.146.37.222

姓名

黃威智(Wei-zhi Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

影響個人在虛擬社群環境中知識分享因素之探討
(The study of factors influencing individual knowledge sharing in the virtual community)

相關論文

★ 以破壞性創新理論分析中國山寨產業--以手機產業為例	★ 初探線上遊戲對未來領導力的影響
★ 研究機構之開放創新模式－以工研院為例	★ Wiki使用者與使用行為之研究
★ 醫療院所科技化服務創新與組織能力關係之研究	★ 社會網路服務網站的利益—以Facebook為例
★ 協同寫作工具對寫作成效的影響	★ 部落格之網路口碑評比機制平台管理與應用
★ 虛擬貨幣交易平台之實現	★ 數位匯流創新經營模式研究 - 以台灣電信業者為例
★ SNS遊戲影響社會網路服務持續使用之探討	★ 網路團體購物之使用者行為分析
★ 探討微網誌使用者持續使用意圖之研究	★ 如何透過Facebook成員轉送線上內容來行銷？
★ 臉書看世界，你!Travel了嗎	★ 跨部門情境下Wiki對協同合作成效影響之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

在以往Web 1.0的時代中，網際網路上的資訊，幾乎全都是由網站營運業者所提供，例如，Yahoo！奇摩提供的新聞、股市等訊息、Microsoft網站上關於電腦技術的知識等。這些網站營運業者幾乎全都是用集權的方式來控制使用者，完全掌握了網站內容生產與管理的權力，使用者只能夠默默的去接受這些制式化的網站內容，不能自己去創造或管理這些內容。現在已經進入Web 2.0的時代，這些網站經營者逐漸體會到，使用者的分享才是網站經營成敗的關鍵。於是，他們開始改集權為分權，將編輯網站內容的權力，下放給這些原本備受控制的使用者。
在這樣的背景下，由於網站內容是由使用者來主導，一個網站是否能成功，往往取決於使用者是否願意在其上分享個人的知識和心得。然而，在虛擬社群網站上分享知識必定會花費使用者許多的時間與精力，一般人通常不會在沒有期望的情況下從事此種分享行為。究竟什麼因素會影響個人在網路虛擬社群環境下的知識分享意願，這是一個值得探討的議題。因此，本研究將探討在網路虛擬社群環境下，影響個人知識分享之因素。藉由整理並研讀相關文獻，提出「期望報酬」、「吸收能力」、以及「組織中自尊」三個影響因素，希望藉由統計方法找出這些因素與個人「知識分享態度」之間的關係，並找出「知識分享態度」對於「知識分享意圖」之影響。
本研究使用SPSS 14.0與LISREL 8.50進行相關統計分析以及結構方程模式驗證，得到的實證結果如下：
1. 「期望報酬」對於「知識分享態度」無有正向且顯著的影響
2. 「吸收能力」對於「知識分享態度」有正向且顯著的影響
3. 「組織中自尊」對於「知識分享態度」有正向且顯著的影響
4. 「知識分享態度」對於「知識分享意圖」有正向且顯著的影響

摘要(英)

In the past era of Web 1.0, the information in Internet, such as news and information of stocks provided by Yahoo! or knowledge about computer technique in Microsoft website, was almost provided by website managers. These website managers nearly controlled users in the way of centralization. All what users can do are merely accept content, and have no ability of creating or managing it. It has been the era of Web 2.0, website managers realize that users are major keys of website success or failure. Therefore, they are starting changing centralization management to distributed one, and giving the right of editing website content to users.
In this background, because website content is dominated by users, the critical point of website success is that users intend to share their knowledge to the website. However, sharing knowledge in the virtual community must spend users a lot of time and energy. Common users usually have no intention of sharing knowledge in this situation. What factor will influence one’s intention to sharing knowledge in the virtual community is an issue worthy of discussion. So this study will investigate factors affecting users to share knowledge in the virtual community. We propose three factors, which are “anticipated extrinsic reward”, “absorptive capacity”, and “organization-based self-esteem”, and expect to find relationships among these three factors and attitude toward knowledge sharing, and influence attitude toward knowledge sharing on intention to share knowledge.
The statistical analysis was done using the Structural Equation Model (SEM) of SPSS 14.0 and LISREL 8.50. The results obtained from correlative statistical analysis and model verification are summarized as follows:
1. “Anticipated extrinsic reward” has no positive effect on the individual’s “attitude toward knowledge sharing” in the virtual community.
2. “Absorptive capacity” has a positive effect on the individual’s “attitude toward knowledge sharing” in the virtual community.
3. “Organization-based self-esteem” has a positive effect on the individual’s “attitude toward knowledge sharing” in the virtual community.
4. “Attitude toward knowledge sharing” has a positive effect on the individual’s “intention to share knowledge” in the virtual community.

關鍵字(中)

★ 組織中自尊
★ 吸收能力
★ 期望報酬
★ 知識分享
★ 虛擬社群
★ 理性行動理論

關鍵字(英)

★ Virtual Community
★ Anticipated Extrinsic Reward
★ Absorptive Capacity
★ Theory of Reasoned Action
★ Organization-Based Self-Esteem
★ Knowledge Sharing

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 3
第三節研究流程與論文架構 3
第二章文獻探討 6
第一節知識分享 6
第二節虛擬社群 10
第三節理性行動理論 14
第四節影響知識分享的因素 17
第三章研究方法 22
第一節研究架構 22
第二節研究假設 23
第三節變數定義與衡量 25
第四節研究設計 29
第四章資料分析 32
第一節研究前測分析 32
第二節樣本結構分析 33
第三節信度效度分析 36
第四節結構方程模式分析 39
第五章結論與建議 45
第一節研究結論 45
第二節管理意涵 47
第三節研究限制 49
第四節後續研究建議 50
參考文獻 52
附錄一前測問卷 59
附錄二正式問卷 62

參考文獻

一、英文部分
Ai-Mei Chang, P. K. Kannan, and A. B. Whinston. “Electronic communities as intermediaries: The issues and economics,” Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (5:1999, pp. 1-10.
Ajzen, I. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior, Springer Verlag, New York, 1985.
Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1980.
Alavi, M., and D. E. Leidner. “Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), 2001, pp. 107-136.
Aldler, P. R., and J. A. Christopher. Internet Community Primer : Overview and Business Opportunities, Internet Community Primer1998.
Armstrong, A. G., and Hagel Ⅲ J. The Real Value of on-Line Communities, Harvard Business Review1996.
Balasubramanian, S., and V. Mahajan. “The economic leverage of the virtual community,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce (5:3), 2001, pp. 103-138.
Bandawe, C. R., and D. Foster. “AIDS-related beliefs, attitudes and intentions among malawian students in three secondary schools,” AIDS Care (8:2), 1996, pp. 223-232.
Bandura, A. Social Learning Theory, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1997.
Bartol, K. M., and A. Srivastava. “Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems,” Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies (9:2002, pp. 64-76.
Bock, G. W., and Y. G. Kim. “Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing,” Information Resources Management Journal (14:2002, pp. 14-21.
Bock, G. W., R. W. Zmud, Y. G. Kim, and J. N. Lee. “Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate,” MIS Quarterly (29:2005, pp. 87-112.
Borycki, C., R. G. Thorn, and J. LeMaster. “Job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A comparison of united states and mexico employees,” International Journal of Commerce and Management (8:1998, pp. 7-25.
Brockner, J. Self-Esteem at Work: Theory, Research , and Practice, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1988.
Carver, C. “Building a virtual community for a tele-learning environment,” IEEE Communications Magzine (37:3), 1999, pp. 114-118.
Cerulo, K., J. Ruane, and M. Chayko. “Technological ties that bind: Media generated primary groups,” Communication Research (19:1992, pp. 109-129.
Chang, M. K. “Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior,” Journal of Business Ethics (17:1998, pp. 1825-1934.
Chattopadhyay, P. “Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior,” Academy of Management Journal (42:1999, pp. 273-287.
Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. “Absorptive capacity: A new pespective on learning and innovatopn,” Administrative Science Quarterly (35:1990, pp. 128-152.
Constant, D., S. Kiesler, and L. Sproull. “What”s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing,” Information Systems Research (5:4), 1994, pp. 400-421.
Davenport, T. H., and L. Prusak. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage what they Know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1998.
Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw. “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science (35:1989, pp. 982-1003.
Eriksson, I. V., and G. W. Dickson. “Knowledge sharing in high technology companies,” Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems(AMCIS) (1:2000, pp. 1330-1335.
Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. Beliefs, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, MA, 1975.
Gardner, D. G., and J. L. Pierce. “Self-esteem and self-efficacy within the organizational context,” Group and Organization Management (23:1998, pp. 48-70.
———. “Self-esteem and self-efficacy within the organizational context: A replication,” Journal of Management Systems (13:2001, pp. 31-48.
Guieford, J. P. Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 1965.
Hall, H. “Input-friendliness: Motivating knowledge sharing across intranets,” Journal of Information Science (27:2001, pp. 139-146.
Harrell, G. D., and P. D. Bennett. “An evaluation of the expectancy value model of attitude MeAsurement for physician prescribing behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research (11:1974, pp. 269-278.
Hartwick, J., and H. Barki. “Explaining the role of user participation in information system use,” Management Science (40:4), 1994, pp. 440-465.
Hendriks, P. “Why share knowledge? the influence of ICT on motivation of knowledge sharing,” Knowledge and Process Management (6:2), 1999, pp. 91-100.
Hui, C., and C. Lee. “Moderating effects of organization-based self-esteem on organizational uncertainty: Employee response relationships,” Journal of Management (26:2000, pp. 215-232.
Kaiser, H. F. “An index of factorial simplicity,” Psychometrika (39:1974, pp. 31-36.
Kelley, H., and J. W. Thibaut. Interpersonal Relations: A Theory of Interdependence, Wiley, New York, 1978.
Koh, J., and Y. G. Kim. “Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An E-business perspective,” Expert Systems with Applications (26:2004, pp. 155-166.
Kolekofski Jr., K. E., and A. R. Heminger. “Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting,” Information & Management (40:2003, pp. 521-532.
Korman, A. K. “Organizational achievement, aggression and creativity: Some suggestions toward an integrated theory,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance (6:1971, pp. 593-613.
Krauss, R. M., and S. R. Fussell. Mutual Knowledge and Communications Effectiveness, In Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, NJ, 1990.
Lee, F. S., D. Vogel, and M. Limayem. “Virtual community informatics: A review and research agenda,” Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (5:1), 2003, pp. 47-61.
Liebowitz, J., and T. Beckman. Knowledge Organizations: What Every Manager should Know, FLSt. Lucie Press, Boca Ration, 1998.
Maslow, A. Motivation and Personality, Harper & Row, New York, 1954.
Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.
O”dell, C., and J. McAdams. “The revolution in employee rewards,” Management Review (19:3), 1987, pp. 68-73.
Pelham, B. W., and Swann Jr, W. B. “From self-conceptions to self-worth: On the sources and structure of global self-esteem,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (57:1989, pp. 672-680.
Pierce, J. L., and D. G. Gardner. “Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization-based self-esteem literature,” Journal of Management (30:2004, pp. 591-622.
Pierce, J. L., D. G. Gardner, L. L. Cummings, and R. B. Dunham. “Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measurement, and validation,” Academy of Management Journal (32:1989, pp. 622-648.
Pierce, J. L., D. G. Gardner, R. B. Dunham, and L. L. Cummings. “Moderation by organization-based self-esteem of role condition-employee response relationships,” Academy of Management Journal (36:2), Apr, 1993, pp. 271.
Polanyi, M. Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1962.
Preece, J. Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability, Wiley, New York, 2000.
Quinn, J. B., P. Anderson, and S. Finkelstein. Managing Professional Intellect: Making the most of the Best, Harvard Business Review1996.
Rheingold, H. Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, Addison-Wesley1993.
Ridings, C. M., D. Gefen, and B. Arinze. “Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems (11:2002, pp. 271-295.
Romm, C., N. Pliskin, and R. Clarke. “Virtual communities and society: Toward an integrative three phase model,” International Journal of Information Management (17:4), 1997, pp. 261-270.
Rosenberg, M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1965.
Ruggles, R. Knowledge Management Tools, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 1996.
Ryu, S., S. H. Ho, and I. Han. “Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals,” Expert Systems with Applications (25:2003, pp. 113-122.
Sai, H. K., and G. Sheng. “Attitude towards knowledge sharing behavior,” The Journal of Computer Information Systems (46:2), 2005, pp. 45-51.
Senge, P. Sharing Knowledge, Executive Excellence1997.
Shavelson, R. J., J. J. Hubner, and G. C. Stanton. “Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations,” Review of Educational Research (46:1976, pp. 407-441.
Sheppard, B. H., J. Hartwick, and P. R. Warshaw. “The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research,” Journal of Consumer Research (15:1988, pp. 325-343.
Shimp, A., and A. Kavas. “The theory of reasoned action applied to coupon usage,” The Journal of Consumer Research (11:3), 1984, pp. 795-809.
Simpson, C. K., and D. Boyle. “Esteem construct generality and academic performance,” Educational and Psychological Measurement (35:1975, pp. 897-904.
Tampoe, M. Motivating Knowledge Workers: The Challenge for the 1990s, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA, 1996.
Tang, T. L., and Ibrahim, A. H. S. “Antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior revisited: Public personnel in the united states and in the middle east,” Public Personnel Management (27:1998, pp. 529-549.
Van Dyne, L., and J. L. Pierce. “Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior,” Journal of Organization Behavior (25:2004, pp. 439-459.
Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M. G. C. “Why don”t men ever stop to ask for directions? gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior,” MIS Quarterly (24:2000, pp. 115-137.
Wellman, B. “Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework and virtual commnuity,” Annual Review of Sociology (22:1996, pp. 211-238.
Wijnhoven, F. “Knowledge logistic in business contexts: Analyzing and diagnosing knowledge sharing by logistics concepts,” Knowledge and Process Management (5:3), 1998, pp. 143-157.
二、中文部分
吳明隆, and 涂金堂. 「SPSS與統計應用分析」, 五南圖書, 台北, 民95.
邱皓政. 「結構方程模式」, 雙葉書廊, 台北, 民93.
陳順宇. 「多變量分析」, 華泰書局, 台北, 民93.
龔仁文. 「WEB 2.0 網路上有錢創意在裡面」, 財團法人資訊策進會創新服務研究所, 民95.
三、網頁資料
蕃薯藤網路調查(民96), 「在Internet上，通常進行的活動(加權)」
http://survey.yam.com/survey2005/chart/a.php?fid=17

指導教授

粟四維(Wesley Shu)

審核日期

2007-7-5

推文