博碩士論文 944203028 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:43 、訪客IP:18.188.252.23
姓名 陳昱芬(Yu-fen Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 企業供應鏈管理績效之影響因素研究 - 跨組織資訊分享與夥伴關係的角色
(A study on the Factors Affecting Supply Chain Management Performance – the Roles of Interorganizational Information Sharing and Partnership)
相關論文
★ 製藥業的成本會計評估研究─ 一個ABC成本制度的應用★ 一個保險業的資料採擷應用--業務員的薪酬制度分析
★ 農漁產品電子化交易中分類分級管理之研究★ 應用類神經網路建構壽險核保決策支援之研究
★ 企業導入ERP之關鍵成功因素-個案研究★ 體外診斷醫療器材滿足CE及GMP驗證要求之個案研
★ 企業資訊系統委外研究-以個案銀行為例★ DRAM月平均價格變動分析
★ 定期航運產業運價及運送時間對經營績效影響之研究-以某外商海運公司在台灣經營為例★ 以交通儲值卡作為電子支付工具的營運模式及可行性分析
★ 軟體公司能力成熟度評估★ 加速台灣海關的通關便捷化-提升行動化服務的解決方案
★ 以均勻度係數為預測晶圓良率指標之可行性分析-以國內某DRAM廠為例★ 某公司資訊部門變革失敗之探討
★ 資訊部門導入ITIL 管理機制之現況分析─ 以企業導入ITIL 服務支援為例★ 導入WCO SAFE 優質企業之可行性分析–以A航空公司為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 為因應全球化趨勢,以及在顧客需求變化愈來愈大且產品生命週期越來越短的經營環境之下取得經濟利益與優勢,組織已由以往的一間公司大規模的垂直整合(vertical integration)轉為選擇垂直虛擬整合(vertical virtual integration),如此一方面可以只專注於自己擅長的核心領域即可,減少公司風險外也可增強核心能力,一方面突顯出和上游或下游的買賣交易與供應鏈管理的重要性。供應鏈成員透過密切的協同合作與資訊分享以期獲得供應鏈管理績效並建立長期合作關係,探討供應鏈跨組織資訊分享與夥伴關係將是本研究的研究重點。
在組織尋求獲利之下,透過降低成本、擁有具競爭力的資源(resource)與能力(capability)取得持續競爭優勢(sustained competitive advantage),為公司創造利潤與成長。資訊科技能力(IT capability)可視為組織的能力,是實作供應鏈垂直整合的工具;商業流程特用性可視為組織為某段交易投入的資源,兩者都能幫助資訊的流通,為供應鏈帶來能見度(visibility)以達成上下游的協作(collaboration)。接著探討夥伴的權力以及知識式信任如何影響合作的意願與程度。本研究的目的將致力於找出影響「供應鏈上跨組織資訊分享」的可能因素,以及資訊分享能為組織帶來何種效益。
本研究的研究工具為問卷,樣本發放對象為天下雜誌1000大製造業公司,為符合研究探討內容與方向,故鎖定問卷填答者(informant)為業務部主管。總共郵寄出1000份,回收140份,其中1份因為填答不完整屬於無效問卷,回收率為14%,其中有效問卷139份,有效回收率為13.9%。實徵研究結果發現:(1) 夥伴的權力對組織的商業流程特用性無顯著正向影響。(2) 組織的資訊科技能力會正向影響跨組織資訊分享。(3) 組織的商業流程特用性會正向影響跨組織資訊分享。(4) 組織與合作夥伴之間的資訊分享會正向影響作業性利益。(5) 組織與合作夥伴之間的資訊分享會正向影響策略性利益。(6) 夥伴的權力與商業流程特用性的關係會受資訊科技能力的調節。(7) 組織投入的商業流程特用性與跨組織資訊分享的關係會受組織對夥伴的知識式信任的調節。
摘要(英) Organizations have gradually switched large-scale vertical integration into vertical virtual integration as a result of globalization and outsourcing. Facing varying customers’ changing demands and shorter product life cycle, a company can focus on its core domain to reduce the risk and enhance its core advantage, in collaboration with its supply chain partners. As such, the importance of trading with upstream or downstream partners becomes critical to its competitiveness. SCM partners may enjoy excellent SCM performance and long-term cooperative relationship through close collaboration and information sharing.
Organizations obtain sustained competitive advantage by lowing costs, having competitive resource and capability for the sake of its profit and growth. Moreover, IT capability can be regarded as the ability of a company and a necessary condition in supply chain collaboration. In addition, business-process specificity can be regarded as the source for a good collaborative relationship. These can support the information flow and enhance supply chain visibility to improve collaborations among upstream and downstream partners. Under this background, this study attempts to look into how partner’s power and knowledge-based trust affect the desire and extent towards working together.
A self administered research was conducted. Samples in this study were the top 1000 companies in manufacturing in Taiwan. Sales executives in these companies were invited as the respondents. Empirical results reveal that: (1) both organizations’ IT capability and organizations’ business-process specificity positively affect inter-organizational information sharing; (2) information sharing between an organization and its partners positively affects operational benefits; (3) information sharing between a organization and its partners positively affects strategic benefits; (4) the relationship between partner’s power and business-process specificity is moderated by the ability of IT; (5) the relationship between organizations’ business-process specificity and inter-organizational information sharing is moderated by organizations’ knowledge-based trust towards their partners.
關鍵字(中) ★ 資訊分享
★ 協同合作
★ 垂直虛擬整合
★ 供應鏈管理
★ 能見度
★ 垂直整合
★ 信任
★ 權力
關鍵字(英) ★ Power
★ Information Sharing
★ Collaboration
★ Visibility
★ SCM
★ Vertical Integration
★ Vertical Virtual Integration
論文目次 中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄索引 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
1 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 4
1.3 研究問題與範圍 6
1.4 研究進行的程序 7
2 文獻探討 8
2.1 供應鏈垂直分工與資訊分享 8
2.2 資產特用性 14
2.3 影響資訊分享的能力:資訊科技能力 18
2.3.1 由「資源基礎觀點」看「資訊科技能力」 18
2.3.2 資訊科技能力(IT capability)的貢獻:組織績效、供應鏈績效 20
2.3.3 資訊科技能力的組成與應用 20
2.4 影響合作的意願與程度:權力與信任 23
2.4.1 社會交換理論 23
2.4.2 夥伴關係 24
2.4.3 夥伴的權力 25
2.4.4 夥伴關係中的信任 26
2.5 供應鏈管理績效 29
3 研究方法與設計 30
3.1 研究架構與研究構念 30
3.2 研究假說 34
3.2.1 「夥伴的權力」對於組織投入「商業流程特用性」的影響 35
3.2.2 組織的「資源」與「能力」對「跨組織資訊分享」的影響 36
3.2.3 「跨組織資訊分享」對「供應鏈管理績效」的影響 39
3.2.4 資訊科技能力與知識式信任的調節 40
3.3 研究設計 43
3.3.1 研究方法 43
3.3.2 構念的操作化定義 43
3.4 研究工具—問卷 48
3.5 資料分析方法 50
4 資料分析 52
4.1 樣本基本資料分析 52
4.2 量表品質檢測 55
4.3 研究假說檢定 59
5 結論及建議 66
5.1 研究發現與結論 66
5.2 管理意涵 67
5.3 研究限制 70
5.4 未來研究方向 71
參考文獻 72
附錄1 因素結構矩陣(loading and cross—loading) 79
附錄2 研究問卷 81
參考文獻 【1】 戴基峰,「交易特性對供應鏈協調機制及交易績效之影響─以資源基礎觀點及交易成本理論探討」,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所博士論文,民國91年。
【2】 李信賢,「信任對跨組織資訊系統使用的影響—B計畫供應商觀點」,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,民國93年。
【3】 Akerlof, G.A., (1970), “The market for ‘lemons’: qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, pp. 488—500.
【4】 Andaleeb, Syed Saad, (1995), “Dependence Relations and the Moderating Role of Trust: Implications for Behavioral Intentions in Marketing Channels,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, pp. 157—172.
【5】 Anderson, J.C. and Narus, J.A., (1990), “A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships,” Journal of Marketing, 54, pp.42—58.
【6】 Arrow, K.J., (1973), “Information and Economic Behavior,” Federation of Swedish Industries, Stockholm.
【7】 Bakos, J.Y. and Brynjyoolfsson, E., (1993), “From vendors to partners: Information technology and incomplete contracts in buyer—supplier relationships,” Management of Organizational Computer, 3(3), pp. 301—329.
【8】 Ballou, R.H., Gilbert, S.M., and Mukherjee, A., (2000), “New Managerial Challenges from Supply Chain Opportunities,” Industrial Marketing Management, 29, pp. 7—18.
【9】 Barney, J.B., (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17, pp. 99—120.
【10】 Beamon, B.M., (1998), “Supply Chain Design and Analysis : Models and Methods,” International Journal of Production Economics, 55, pp.281—294
【11】 Beier, Frederick J., and Stern, Louis W., (1969), Power in the Channel of Distribution, in Distribution Channels: Behavorial Dimensions, Louis w. Stern, ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 92—116.
【12】 Bensaou, M., (1997), “Interorganizational cooperation: The role of information technology an empirical comparison of U.S. and Japanese supplier relations,” Information Sysem Research, 8(2), pp. 107—124.
【13】 Blau, P.M., (1964), Exchange and Power in Social life, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
【14】 Bleeke, J. and Ernst, D., (1991), “The Way to Win in Cross—border Alliance,” Harvard Business Review, (10—11), pp.127—135
【15】 Buzzell, Robert and Ortmeyer, Gwen, (1995), “Channel Partnerships Streamline Distribution,” Sloan Management Review, 1, pp. 85—96.
【16】 Cannon, J.P. and Perreault, W.D., (1999), “Buyer—seller relationships in business markets,” Journal of Marketing Research., (36), pp. 439—460.
【17】 Carr, A.S. and Smeltzer, L.R., (2002), “The relationship between information technology use and buyer—supplier relationships: An exploratory analysis of the buying firm’s perspective,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 49(3), pp. 293—304
【18】 Childhouse, P. and Towill, D.R., (2003), “Simplified material flow holds the key to supply chain integration,” OMEGA 31(1), pp. 17–27.
【19】 Chin, W. W, “Overview of the PLS Method”, last updated October 18, 1997, http://disc—nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/PLSINTRO.HTM < accessed on 2006/5/15>.
【20】 Coase, R.H., (1937), “The nature of the firm,” Economica, 4, pp. 386—405.
【21】 Cooper, M.C., Lambert, D.M. and Pagh, J.D., (1997), “Supply Chain Management: More Than a New Name for Logistics,” The International Journal of Logistics Management 8(1), 1–13.
【22】 Croom, S., Romato, P., and Giannakis, M., (2000), “Supply Chain Management: An Analytical Framework of Critical Literature Review,” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6, pp. 67—83.
【23】 Dahl, Robert A, (1957), “The concept of Power,” Behavorial Science, 2(7), 201—218.
【24】 Dasgupta, P., (1988), Trust as a Commodity, in Trust, D. G. Gambetta (ed.), Basil Blackwell. New York, pp. 49—72.
【25】 Demsetz, H., (1988), “Vertical Integration: Theories and Evidence,” The Organization of Economic Activity, 1(Blackwell, Oxford).
【26】 Doney, P.M. and Cannon, J.P., (1997), “An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer—Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, (61), pp.35—51.
【27】 Dwyer, F.R., Schurr, P.H. and On, S., (1987), “Developing buyer—Seller Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 51(4), pp.11—27.
【28】 Dyer, J.H., (1994), “Dedicated assets: Japan's manufacturing edge,” Harvard Business Review, 72(6): 174—178.
【29】 Ellram, L.M. and Hendrick, T.E., (1995), “Partnering Characteristics: A Dyadic Perspective,” Journal of Business Logistics, 16, pp.41—63.
【30】 Emerson, M.R, (1962), “Power—dependence relations,” American Sociological Review, 27, pp.31—41.
【31】 Emerson, R.M., (1972). “Exchange theory,” In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress, 2, pp. 38–87. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
【32】 Emmelhainz, M.A., (1987), “Electronic data interchange: Does it change the purchasing process,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 23(4), pp. 2—8.
【33】 Frazier, G.L. and Rody, R.C., (1991), “The use of influence strategies in interfirm relationships in industrial product channels,” Journal of Marketing, 55, pp.52—69.
【34】 French, John R.P. and Raven, Bertram, (1959), the Bases of Social Power, in Studies in Social Power, Dorwin Cartwright, ed., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
【35】 Fukuyama, F., (1995), Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, The Free Press. New York..
【36】 Gambetta, D.G., (1988), Can We Trust Trust? in Trust, D. G. Gambetta (ed.), Basil Blackwell. New York. pp. 213—237.
【37】 Gardner, John T., Cooper, Martha C. and Noordewier, Tom, (1994), “Understanding Shipper—Carrier and Shipper—Warehouser Relationships: Partnerships Revisited,” Journal of Business Logistics, 15(2), pp. 121—143.
【38】 Gaski, John F., (1984), “The Theory of Power and Conflict in Channels of Distribution,” Journal of Marketing, 48, pp 9—29.
【39】 Gefen, David, Karahanna, Elena and Straub, Detmar W., (2003), “Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: an Integrated Model,” MIS Quarterly, 27(1), pp. 51—90.
【40】 Granovetter, M., (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), pp.481—510.
【41】 Grover, V., J. Fiedler, Teng and K., (2002), “Investigation the role of information technology in building buyer—supplier relationships,” Journal of Associaation Information Systems, 3, pp. 217—245.
【42】 Gulati, R., (1995), “Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances,” Academy of Management Journal, (2), pp, 85—112.
【43】 Hallen, Lars, Johanson, Jan, and Seyed—Mohamed, Nazeem, (1991), “Inter—firm Adaptation in Business Relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 55(4): 39.—37.
【44】 Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K., (1996), “Competing in the new economy: Managing out of bounds,” Strategic Management Journal, 17: 237—242.
【45】 Hill, Charles W. L. and Jones, Gareth R., (2007), Strategic management theory an integrated approach, Seventh edition
【46】 Hippel, E., (1994), “Sticky information" and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation,” Management Science, 40: 429—439.
【47】 Homans, G.C., (1958), “Social Behavior as Exchange,” the American Journal of Sociology, pp 597—606.
【48】 Hosmer, L.T., (1995), “Trust: the Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics,” Academy of Management Review (20:2), pp. 379—403.
【49】 Klein, B., Crawford, R.G. and Alchian, A.A., (1978), “Vertical integration, appropriable rents and the competitive contracting process,” Journal of Law and Economics, 21(2), pp. 297—326.
【50】 Klier, T. H., (1993), Transaction cost theory and just—in—time manufacturing: A new look at vertical integration in the US auto industry, Unpublished doctoral thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
【51】 Kogut, B. and Zander, U., (1992), “Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology,” Organization Science, 3: 383—397.
【52】 Kumar, N., Scheer, L.K and Steenkamp, J.—B. E, M., (1995b), “The Effects of Supplier Fairness on Vulnerable ReseWers,” Joumal of Marketing Research (17), pp. 54—65.
【53】 Kumar, N., Scheer, L.K., Steenkamp, J.—B. E. M., (1995a), “The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes,” Journal of Marketing Research (17), pp. 348—356.
【54】 Lalonde, B.J., (1998), “Building a supply chain relationship,” Supply Chain Management Review (2), pp. 7–8
【55】 Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., and Whang, S., (1997), “Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: the Bullwhip Effect,” Management Science, 43(4), pp. 546—58.
【56】 Lee, Hau L., (2004). “The triple—A supply chain,” Harvard Business Review, 82(10), p102—112.
【57】 Lewicki, R.J., and Bunker, B.B., (1996), “Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships,” Trust in Organizations—Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp.114—139. Newbury Park, CA:sage.
【58】 Lucas, H.C., (1999), Information Technology and the Productivity Paradox, Oxford University Press: New York.
【59】 Luhmann, N., (1979), Trust and Power, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.
【60】 M. Blau., P, (1964.), Exchange and Power in Social Life, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
【61】 Madhok, A., (1996), “The Organization of Economic Activities: Transaction Costs, Firm Capabilities, and the Nature of Governance,” Organization Science, 7(5), pp. 577—90.
【62】 Marien, Edward J., (2000), “The four supply chain enablers,” Supply Chain Management Review, pp. 60—68.
【63】 Martin, S., (1986), “Causes and effects of vertical integration,” Applied Economics, 18(7), pp. 737—755.
【64】 Masten, S., (1984), “The organization of production: Evidence from the aerospace industry,” Journal of Law and Economics, 27: 403—417.
【65】 Masten, S.E., (1988), “A legal basis for the firm,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4: 181—198.
【66】 Melville, Nigel, Kraemer, Kenneth and Gurbazani, Vijay, (2004), “Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrated model of IT business value,” MIS Quarterly, 28(2), pp. 283—322.
【67】 Meyer, A.D and Goes, J.B, (1988), “Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multilevel Con— textual Analysis,” Academy of Management Journal (31:4)., pp. 897—923.
【68】 Min, Hokey and Zhou, Gengui, (2002), “Supply chain modeling: past, present and future,” Computers & Industrial Engineering 43 231—249.
【69】 Monczka, R.M., Petersen, K.J., Handfield, R.B. and Ragatz, G.L., (1998), “Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective,” Decision Science 29(3), pp. 5553–5577.
【70】 Monteverde, K., (1995), “Technical dialog as an incentive for vertical integration in the semiconductor industry,” Management Science, 41: 1624—1638.
【71】 Moorman, C., Zaltman, G. and Deshpande, R., (1992), “Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: the Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29(8), pp. 314—328.
【72】 Munch, R., (1993), Socialogical Theory: From the 1850s to the Present, Chicago: Nelson—Hall Publishers.
【73】 Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S.G., (1982), An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
【74】 Nonaka, I., (1994), “Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,” Organization Science, 5: 14—37.
【75】 North, D.C., (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University Press.
【76】 Penrose, E.T., (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, White Plains, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
【77】 Pfeffer, J., (1981), Power in Organization, Pitman Books.
【78】 Porter, M., (1985), Competitive Advantage, Free Press: New York.
【79】 Powell, TC, Dent—Micallef A., (1997), “Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, and technology resources,” StrategicManagement Journal 18(5): 375–405.
【80】 Prahinski, Carol and Benton, W.C., (2003), “Supplier evaluations: communication strategies to improve supplier performance,” Journal of Operations Management, pp. 39—62
【81】 Rindfleisch, A. and Heide, J.B., (1997), “Transaction cost analysis: Past, present and future applications,” Journal of Marketing, 61(4): 30—54.
【82】 Rotter, J.B, (1971), “Generalized Expectancies for Interpersonal Trust,” American Psychologist, 26(5), pp. 443—450.
【83】 Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S. and Camerer, C., (1998), “Not So Different After All: A Cross—Discipline View of Trust,” Academy of Management Review (23:3), pp. 393—404.
【84】 Rumelt, R., (1984), “Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm,” Competitive Strategic Management, pp. 566—70, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
【85】 Sabath, R.E., Autry, C.W., and Daugherty, P.J., (2001), “Automatic replenishment programs: The impacts of organizational structure,” Journal of Business Logistics, 22(1), pp. 91—105.
【86】 Sanders, Nada R. and Premus, Robert, (2005), “Modeling the Relationship between Firm IT Capability, Collaboration, and Performance,” Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1)
【87】 Saparito, P., Chen, C. and Sapienza, H., (2002), “The Central Role of Calculus—Based Trust and Relational Trust in Bank—Small Firm Relationships,” Academy of Management Annual Meeting.
【88】 Sarkar, MB, Echambadi, Raj, Cavusgil, S. Tamer and Aulakh, Preet S., (2001), “The influence of complementarity, compatibility and relationship capital on alliance performance”, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 29(4), ABI/INFORM Global pg. 358.
【89】 Scheer, L.K. and Stern, L.W., (1992), “The effect of influence type and performance outcomes on attitude toward the influence,” Journal of marketing Research, 29, pp. 128—142.
【90】 Simon, H., (1961), Administrative Behavior, 2nd ed., Macmillan, New York, NY.
【91】 Simon, H.A., (1996), Bounded rationality and organizational learning, In M. D. Cohen & L.S. Sproull (Ed.), Organizational earning: 175—187. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
【92】 Simon, Herbert, (1953), “Notes on the Observation and Measurement of Political Power,” Journal of Politics, 15(11), 500—516.
【93】 Sriram, V. and Banerjee, S., (1994), “Electronic data interchange: does its adoption change purchasing policies and procedures,” Inernational Journal of Purchasing Material Management, 30(1), pp. 31—40.
【94】 Stein, T. and Sweat, J., (1998), “Killer supply chains,” InformationWeek (9), pp. 36–46.
【95】 Stigler, G. J., (1951), “The Division of Labor Is Limited By The Extent of The Market,” Journal of Political Economy, 59(3), 185—193.
【96】 Stigler, G..J., (1961), “The economics of information,” Journal of Political Economy, 69(6), pp. 213—15.
【97】 Stump, R.L. and Sriram, V., (1997), “Employing information technology in purchasing: Buyer—supplier relationships and size of the supplier base,” Industry Marketing Management, 26(2), pp. 127—136.
【98】 Subramani, M.R., (2004), “How do suppliers benefit from IT use in supply chain relationships,” MIS Quarterly., 28(1), pp. 50—75.
【99】 Teece, D. J., (1998), “Capturing value from knowledge assets,” California Management Review, 40(3): 55—79.
【100】 Thibaut, J.W. and Kelley, H.H., (1959), The social psychological of groups, New York: John Wiley.
【101】 Tippins, Michael J. and Sohi, Ravipreet S., (2003), “IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link?”Strategic Management Journal, pp. 745—761.
【102】 Tsang, E.W.K., (1998), “Motives for Strategic Alliance: A Resource—Based Perspective,” Scand. Journal of Management, 14(3), pp. 207—21.
【103】 Turner, J.H., (1986), The Structure of Sociological Theory, Chicago: The Dorsey Press.
【104】 Vijayasarathy, L.R. and Robey, D., (1997), “The effect of EDI on market channel relationships in retailing,” Information Management, 33(2), pp. 73—86.
【105】 Wang, Eric T.G., Tai, Jeffrey C.F. and Wei, Hsiao—Lan, (2006), “A virtual integration theory of improved supply—chain performance,” Journal of Management Information System, 23(2), pp. 41—64
【106】 Wilkinson, I.F., (1974), “Researching the Distribution Channels for Consumer and Industrial Goods: The Power Dimension,” Journal of the Maker Research Society, 16(1), 12—32.
【107】 Williamson, O. E., (1995), Transaction cost economics and organization theory, In O. E. Williamson (Ed.), Organization theory: Erom Chester Barnard to the present and beyond: 207—256. New York: Oxford University Press.
【108】 Williamson, O.E, (1985), Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Free Press, New York.
【109】 Williamson, O.E., (1979), “Transaction cost economics: the governance of contractual relations,” Journal of Law and Economics, 22, pp. 233—62.
【110】 Williamson, O.E., (1993), “Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization,” Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1), pp.453—486.
【111】 Wu, Wann—Yih, Chian, Chwan—Yi, Wu, Ya—Jung and Tu, Hui—Ju, (2004), “The influencing factors of commitment and business integration on supply chain management,” Industrial Management + Data Systems, 104, 3/4; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 322.
【112】 Yu, Z.X., Yan, H. and Cheng, T.C.E., (2001), “Benefits of information sharing with supply chain partnerships,” Industrial Management and Data Systems, 101(3), pp. 114–119
【113】 Zack, M.H., (1999), “Developing a knowledge strategy,” California Management Review, 41(3): 125—145.
指導教授 范錚強(Cheng-Kiang Farn) 審核日期 2007-7-16
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明