博碩士論文 944403011 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:41 、訪客IP:18.218.168.16
姓名 張陳基(Chen-Chi Chang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 以社會資本理論探討虛擬社群中的認知社會閒散行為與社群凝聚力
(Perceived Social Loafing and Community Cohesion inVirtual Communities: a Perspective of Social Capital)
相關論文
★ 探討國內田徑競賽資訊系統-以103年全國大專田徑公開賽資訊系統為例★ 生物晶片之基因微陣列影像分析之研究
★ 台灣資訊家電產業IPv6技術地圖與發展策略之研究★ 台灣第三代行動通訊產業IPv6技術地圖與發展策略之研究
★ 影響消費者使用電子書閱讀器採納意願之研究★ 以資訊素養映對數位學習平台功能之研究
★ 台商群聚指標模式與資料分析之研究★ 境外器官移植遠距照護需求之探討
★ 個人社會網絡服務使用行為之研究:整合使用與滿足理論和媒體系統依賴理論★ 未來輪輔助軟體發展之需求擷取研究
★ 以工作流程圖展現未來研究方法配適於前瞻研究流程之研究★ 以物件導向塑模未來研究方法配適於前瞻研究之系統架構
★ 應用TRIZ 探討核心因素 建構電子商務新畫布★ 企業策略資訊策略人力資源管理策略對組織績效的影響
★ 採用Color Petri Net方法偵測程式原始碼緩衝區溢位問題★ 簡單且彈性化的軟體代理人通訊協定之探討與實作
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 隨著虛擬社群的增加,透過網際網路進行知識分享的行為越來越盛行,社群成員分享知識及參與意願往往決定虛擬社群成功與否,而社群凝聚力在社群成員分享知識及參與過程中扮演重要的角色。近年來關於網路行為方面的研究在管理學界逐漸受到重視,虛擬社群提供網路使用者便捷的知識交換平台,使用者分享知識的意願也成為虛擬社群經營上重要的成功指標。過去的研究指出,社群凝聚力是決定知識分享意願的重要因素。相反地,若是成員認知社群中充滿著社會閒散行為則會影響社群凝聚力的建立,甚至會危害社群的營運與成長。社會閒散行為在傳統社群中的研究很多,但對於虛擬社群中社會閒散行為的研究卻相對較少,過去的研究多半集中在傳統學習團體。因此,本研究將以虛擬社群成員為研究對象,探討認知社會閒散在虛擬社群運作上所扮演的角色,以及對於虛擬社群的凝聚力所造成的影響。為了更清楚了解認知社會閒散的影響因素,本研究整合社會資本理論與虛擬社群的各項特性,將虛擬社群中可能影響認知社會閒散的因素分為三方面:結構社會資本(匿名性、離線活動)、關聯社會資本(社群承諾、強制互惠)以及認知社會資本(社群知名度、知識品質)。結構社會資本是指社群成員連結的型態及緊密程度,虛擬社群的連結型態包括線上活動及離線活動,本研究以線上活動特有的匿名性及離線活動舉辦的頻率作為結構社會資本的衡量指標。關係社會資本主要包含成員之信任程度、共同規範以及對社群之認同感,本研究以虛擬社群中的強制互惠性及對於社群的認同感作為關係社會資本的衡量指標。認知社會資本是指在社群中促進個體對外表現的一致特徵的資源,具體表現在個體對事物共同的解釋與看法,例如:共享價值觀、共同願景及共同語言,因此本研究將社群的知名度視為共享願景,知識交流的品質是為共同語言與價值,結合二者作為認知社會資本的衡量指標。以此三種不同社會資本構面來探討影響認知社會閒散在虛擬社群中所扮演的角色,並進一步分析認知社會閒散與社群凝聚力之間的關係。本研究以過去學術文獻發展出來的問項作為衡量工具,透過網路問卷方式,在不同專業社群中收集問卷,讓不同虛擬社群的網路使用者共同參與本研究。研究貢獻主要是將傳統社群的認知社會閒散研究延伸至虛擬社群之中,探討虛擬社群中認知社會閒散對社群凝聚力的影響。本文也提出主要影響認知社會閒散的因素包括社群承諾、強制互惠、離線活動與社群知名度。綜合以上研究結果,本研究證明採用社會資本理論可以有效瞭解認知社會閒散的影響因素,並且確認社會閒散對於凝聚力在虛擬社群中同樣具有反向效果,為虛擬社群的發展提供具體貢獻與建議。
摘要(英) Recent years have seen increased attention being given to online user behavior research in management science literature. As the virtual communities increase, knowledge sharing in Internet has become more easily. The motivation to share members’ knowledge is critical to virtual community’s survival and success. Previous research has established that knowledge sharing intentions are based on community cohesion. Community cohesion is closely related to community production and performance. However, several studies indicated that social loafing behavior will seriously corrode community cohesion. Therefore, either social loafing or perceived social loafing to the community is obstacle to fostering virtual community development. The majority of prior research in social loafing has focused on traditional community or learning group practices. A substantial studies have been performed on the critical factors that affect social loafing in the traditional learning group, those on virtual communities are still lacking. Little is known about the conceptual framework and working methods of perceived social loafing at present. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of perceived social loafing on community cohesion and examine the relationship between social capital and perceived social loafing. To better understand the reasons for perceived social loafing, a new approach that classifies these characteristics of virtual community into three dimensions of social capital is presented in this study. The research model was tested with data collected from members of various virtual communities via the Internet. In order to target online users, a Web-based survey was employed. The survey measures for this study were derived from previously published studies. The contribution of this study is to extent the research of social loafing on traditional community to virtual community. It also investigates the relationship between social loafing and community cohesion. It then discusses the central theoretical concept, social capital, and virtual community characteristics: anonymity, offline activities, commitment, reciprocity, knowledge quality and external prestige. To conclude, this study may be of importance in explaining the different dimension of social capital effects on perceived social loafing. Implications for theory and practice and suggestions for future research are discussed.
關鍵字(中) ★ 認知社會閒散
★ 虛擬社群
★ 社群凝聚力
★ 社會資本理論
關鍵字(英) ★ social capital theory
★ perceived social loafing
★ community cohesion
★ virtual community
論文目次 中文摘要 ii
Abstract iv
誌 謝 vi
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1. Research Background 1
1.2. Knowledge Gaps 4
1.3. Research Purpose 6
1.4. Research Questions 8
1.5. Research Contributions 9
1.6. Overview of this study 10
Chapter 2. The Study of Social Loafing 13
2.1. Characteristics of Virtual Communities 13
2.2. Perceived Social Loafing 14
2.3. Antecedents of Social Loafing 17
2.4. Consequences of Social Loafing 20
2.5. Community Cohesion 22
Chapter 3. Social Loafing and Social Capital 26
3.1. Social Capital Theory 26
3.2. Structural Social Capital 27
3.2.1. Offline Activities 29
3.2.2. Anonymity 30
3.3. Relational Social Capital 31
3.3.1. Commitment 32
3.3.2. Strong Reciprocity 33
3.4. Cognitive Social Capital 35
3.4.1. Knowledge Quality 36
3.4.2. Perceived External Prestige 37
3.5. Control Variables 38
Chapter 4. Research Methodology 40
4.1. Research Model 40
4.2. Method Sample 41
4.3. Measurement Development 43
4.4. Data Analysis 47
4.5. Measurement model 47
4.6. Structural model 52
Chapter 5. Discussion 55
5.1. Summary of results 55
5.2. Implications for theory 61
5.3. Implications for practice 62
5.4. Limitations and Future Research 64
Chapter 6. Conclusion 69
References 72
Appendix A. Questionnaire 95
Appendix B. LISREL Measurement Model Codes 97
Appendix C. LISREL Measurement Model Result 99
Appendix D. LISREL Measurement Model Fit Index 100
Appendix E. LISREL Structural Model Codes 101
Appendix F. LISREL Structural Model Result 103
Appendix G. LISREL Structural Model Fit Index 104
Appendix H. Questionnaire in Chinese 105
參考文獻 Aggarwal, Praveen, and Connie L. O'Brien. 2008. Social Loafing on Group Projects. Journal of Marketing Education 30 (3):255-264.
Alton, Chua. 2002. The influence of social interaction on knowledge creation. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3 (4):375.
Ammeter, Anthony P., Ceasar Douglas, Gerald R. Ferris, and Heather Goka. 2004. A social relationship conceptualization of trust and accountability in organizations. Human Resource Management Review 14 (1):47-65.
Aringhieri, Roberto, Ernesto Damiani, Sabine De Capitani Di Vimercati, Stefano Paraboschi, and Pierangelo Samarati. 2006. Fuzzy techniques for trust and reputation management in anonymous peer-to-peer systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (4):528-537.
Ashforth, Blake E., and Fred Mael. 1989. Social Identity Theory and the Organization. The Academy of Management Review 14 (1):20-39.
Ba, Sulin. 2001. Establishing online trust through a community responsibility system. Decision Support Systems 31 (3):323-336.
Bagozzi, Richard P., and Yi Youjae. 1988. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (1):74.
Bao, Lin. 2008. The Research on Social Capital of Industry-University-Research Institute Cooperation. Asian Social Science 4 (11):118-123.
Beal, Daniel J., Robin R. Cohen, Michael J. Burke, and Christy L. McLendon. 2003. Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-Analytic Clarification of Construct Relations. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (6):989-1004.
Bentler, P. M. 1988. Theory and Implementation of EQS: A Structural Equation Program. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bieling, Peter J., Randi E. McCabe, and Martin M. Antony. 2006. Cognitive-behavioral therapy in groups. New York: Guilford Press.
Blaskovich, Jennifer L. 2008. Exploring the Effect of Distance: An Experimental Investigation of Virtual Collaboration, Social Loafing, and Group Decisions. Journal of Information Systems 22 (1):27-46.
Bluhm, Dustin J. 2009. ADAPTIVE CONSEQUENCES OF SOCIAL LOAFING. Academy of Management Proceedings:1-6.
Bolin, A. U., and G. A. Neuman. 2006. Personality, process, and performance in interactive brainstorming groups. Journal of Business and Psychology 20 (4):565-585.
Brewer, Neil. 1995. The Effects of Monitoring Individual and Group Performance on the Distribution of Effort Across Tasks. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25 (9):760-777.
Brown, J. S., and P. Duguid. 2000. The Social Life of Information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Celani, Anthony, Sabrina Deutsch-Salamon, and Parbudyal Singh. 2008. In justice we trust: A model of the role of trust in the organization in applicant reactions to the selection process. Human Resource Management Review 18 (2):63-76.
Chi, L., W. K. Chan, G. Seow, and K. Tam. 2009. Transplanting Social Capital to the Online World: Insights from Two Experimental Studies Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 19 (3):214-236.
Chidambaram, L., and L. L. Tung. 2005. Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups. Information Systems Research 16 (2):149-168.
Chiu, C. M., M. H. Hsu, and E. T. G. Wang. 2006. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 42 (3):1872-1888.
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA.: Belknap Press.
Constant, David, Lee Sproull, and Sara Kiesler. 1996. The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice. Organization Science 7 (2):119-135.
de Kervenoael, Ronan, D. Selcen O. Aykac, and Mark Palmer. 2009. Online social capital: Understanding e-impulse buying in practice. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 16 (4):320-328.
DeLone, William H., and Ephraim R. McLean. 1992. Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research 3 (1):60-95.
Demsetz, Harold. 1967. Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review 57 (2):347.
Dowling, Grahame R., and Richard Staelin. 1994. A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-handling Activity. Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1):119-134.
Etezadi-Amoli, Jamshid, and Ali F. Farhoomand. 1996. A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance. Information & Management 30 (2):65-73.
Foddy, Margaret, and Robyn Dawes. 2008. Group-Based Trust in Social Dilemmas In New Issues and Paradigms in Research on Social Dilemmas United States: SPRINGER VERLAG.
Fornell, Claes, and David F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) 18 (1):39-50.
Francescato, Donata, Minou Mebane, Rita Porcelli, Carlo Attanasio, and Marcella Pulino. 2007. Developing professional skills and social capital through computer supported collaborative learning in university contexts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65 (2):140-152.
Garton, L., C. Haythornthwaite, and B. Wellman. 1997. Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3 (1):0-0.
George, Jennifer M. 1992. Extrinsic and intrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 35 (1):191-202.
———. 1995. Asymmetrical effects of rewards and punishments: The case of social loafing. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology 68 (4):327-338.
Goren, Harel, Robert Kurzban, and Amnon Rapoport. 2003. Social loafing vs. social enhancement: Public goods provisioning in real-time with irrevocable commitments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 90 (2):277-290.
Guerin, Bernard. 1999. Social Behaviors As Determined by Different Arrangements of Social Consequences: Social Loafing. Psychological Record 49 (4):565.
Gumpert, G., and S. J. Drucker. 1998. The demise of privacy in a private world: From front porches to chat rooms. Communication Theory 8:408-425.
Høigaard, Rune, Reidar Säfvenbom, and Finn Egil Tønnessen. 2006. The Relationship Between Group Cohesion, Group Norms, and Perceived Social Loafing in Soccer Teams. Small Group Research 37 (3):217-232.
Ha, Hong-Youl. 2002. The Effects of Consumer Risk Perception on Pre-purchase Information in Online Auctions: Brand, Word-of-Mouth, and Customized Information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 8 (1):0-0.
Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243-1248.
Harkins, Stephen G. 1987. Social loafing and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 23 (1):1-18.
Harkins, Stephen G., and Richard E. Petty. 1982. Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43 (6):1214-1229.
Harkins, Stephen G., and Kate Szymanski. 1988. Social loafing and self-evaluation with an objective standard. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24 (4):354-365.
Haythornthwaite, C.A. 1996. Media use in support of communication networks in an academic research environment. Ph.D., University of Toronto, Canada.
He, Wei, and Kwok-Kee Wei. 2009. What drives continued knowledge sharing? An investigation of knowledge-contribution and -seeking beliefs. Decision Support Systems 46 (4):826-838.
Hobfoll, Stevan E. 1989. Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist 44 (3):513-524.
Hoon, Hwee, and Tan Min Li Tan. 2008. Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Social Loafing: The Role of Personality, Motives, and Contextual Factors. Journal of Psychology 142 (1):89-108.
Huang, Chien-Chih, Tung-Ching Lin, and Kuei-Ju Lin. 2009. Factors affecting pass-along email intentions (PAEIs): Integrating the social capital and social cognition theories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 8 (3):160-169.
Ingham, Alan G. 1974. The Ringelmann Effect: Studies of Group Size and Group Performance: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Jackson, Jeffrey M., and Kipling D. Williams. 1985. Social Loafing on Difficult Tasks: Working Collectively Can Improve Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (4):937-942.
Jacobs, J. 1965. The death and life of great American cities. London: Penguin Books.
Jansen, Bernard J., Mimi Zhang, Kate Sobel, and Abdur Chowdury. 2009. Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 60 (11):2169-2188.
Jassawalla, Avan R., Avinash Malshe, and Hemant Sashittal. 2008. Student Perceptions of Social Loafing in Undergraduate Business Classroom Teams. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 6 (2):403-426.
Jassawalla, Avan, Hemant Sashittal, and Avinash Malshe. 2009. Students' Perceptions of Social Loafing: Its Antecedents and Consequences in Undergraduate Business Classroom Teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education 8 (1):42-54.
Jones, Gareth R. 1984. Task Visibility, Free Riding, and Shirking: Explaining the Effect of Structure and Technology on Employee Behavior. The Academy of Management Review 9 (4):684-695.
Joreskog, K.G., and D. Sorbom. 1996. LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International Cop.
Karau, Steven J., and Jason W. Hart. 1998. Group Cohesiveness and Social Loafing: Effects of a Social Interaction Manipulation on Individual Motivation Within Groups. Group Dynamics 2 (3):185-191.
Karau, Steven J., and Kipling D. Williams. 1993. Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 65 (4):681-706.
Katz, Jane. 2009. Luring the lurkers 1998 [cited 5/1 2009]. Available from http://slashdot.org/features/98/12/28/1745252.shtml.
Koh, J., and Y. G. Kim. 2003. Sense of virtual community: A conceptual framework and empirical validation. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 8 (2):75-93.
Kravitz, David A., and Barbara Martin. 1986. Ringelmann Rediscovered: The Original Article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (5):936-941.
Kugihara, Naoki. 1999. Gender and Social Loafing in Japan. Journal of Social Psychology 139 (4):516-526.
Latan, Bibb, Kipling Williams, and Stephen Harkins. 1979. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (6):822-832.
Lawler, Edward J., and Jeongkoo Yoon. 1996. Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review 61 (1):89.
Leana, C. R. , and H. J. Van Buren. 1999. Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review 24 (3):538.
Lee, Robert. 2009. Social capital and business and management: Setting a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 11 (3):247-273.
Lewicki, R. J., and B. B. Bunker. 1996. Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships. In Trust in Organizations, edited by R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler. London: Sage Publications.
Liden, Robert C., Sandy J. Wayne, Renata A. Jaworski, and Nathan Bennett. 2004. Social Loafing: A Field Investigation. Journal of Management 30 (2):285.
Lin, Tung-Ching, and Chien-Chih Huang. 2009. Understanding social loafing in knowledge contribution from the perspectives of justice and trust. Expert Systems with Applications 36 (3, Part 2):6156-6163.
MacCoun, R. J. 1996. Is melioration the addiction theory of choice? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):586-587.
Mason, B. 1999. Issues in virtual ethnography. In Ethnographic Studies in Real and Virtual Environments: Inhabited Information Spaces and Connected Communities: Edinburgh.
Maureen, Weicher. 2006. [Name withheld]: Anonymity and its implications. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 43 (1):1-11.
McAllister, Daniel J. 1995. Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations Academy of Management Journal 38 (1):24-59.
McKenna, Katelyn Y. A., and John A. Bargh. 2000. Plan 9 From Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology. Personality & Social Psychology Review (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates) 4 (1):57-75.
Mebane, M., R. Porcelli, A. Lannone, C. Attanasio, and D. Francescato. 2008. Evaluation of the efficacy of affective education online training in promoting academic and professional learning and social capital. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24 (1):68-86.
Moral-Toranzo, Félix, Jes? Canto-Ortiz, and Luis Gómez-Jacinto. 2007. Anonymity effects in computer-mediated communication in the case of minority influence. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (3):1660-1674.
Morgeson, F. P., M. H. Reider, and M. A. Campion. 2005. Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel Psychology 58 (3):583-611.
Mullen, Brian, and Carolyn Copper. 1994. The Relation Between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration. Psychological Bulletin 115 (2):210-227.
Mulvey, Paul W., and Howard J. Klein. 1998. The Impact of Perceived Loafing and Collective Efficacy on Group Goal Processes and Group Performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 74 (1):62-87.
Murphy, Susan M., Sandy J. Wayne, Robert C. Liden, and Berrin Erdogan. 2003. Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human Relations 56 (1):61.
Nahapiet, Janine, and Sumantra Ghoshal. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantageSocial capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23 (2):242-266.
Nonnecke, B. 2000. Lurking in email-based discussion lists, South Bank University, London.
Nunnally, J. 1978. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York McGraw-Hill.
Okoli, Chitu, and Wonseok Oh. 2007. Investigating recognition-based performance in an open content community: A social capital perspective. Information & Management 44 (3):240-252.
Oliver, P. E., and Gerald Marwell. 1988. The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. American Sociological Review 53 (1):1.
Orr, J. . 1996. Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
Orr, J.E. 1990. Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: community memory in a service culture. Edited by D. Middleton and D. Edwards. London: Collective Remembering, Sage.
Oxendine, Alina, Eugene Borgida, John L. Sullivan, and Melinda S. Jackson. 2003. The importance of trust and community in developing and maintaining a community electronic network. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58 (6):671-696.
Pempek, Tiffany A., Yevdokiya A. Yermolayeva, and Sandra L. Calvert. 2009. College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 30 (3):227-238.
Plaks, Jason E., and E. Tory Higgins. 2000. Pragmatic Use of Stereotyping in Teamwork: Social Loafing and Compensation as a Function of Inferred Partner-Situation Fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (6):962-974.
Price, Kenneth H. 1987. Decision Responsibility, Task Responsibility, Identifiability, and Social Loafing. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 40 (3):330-345.
Price, Kenneth H., David A. Harrison, and Joanne H. Gavin. 2006. Withholding Inputs in Team Contexts: Member Composition, Interaction Processes, Evaluation Structure, and Social Loafing. Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (6):1375-1384.
Putnam, R. 1995. Tuning in. Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. Political Science and Politics 28 (4):664-683.
Ray, Reagans, and McEvily Billy. 2003. Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range. Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (2):240.
Reinig, Bruce A., and Bongsik Shin. 2002. The Dynamic Effects of Group Support Systems on Group Meetings. Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (2):303-325.
Rheingold, Howard. 1993. The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ridings, C. M., D. Gefen, and B. Arinze. 2002. Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11:271-295.
Ridings, Catherine, David Gefen, and Bay Arinze. 2006. Psychological barriers: lurker and poster motivation and behavior in online communities. Communications of AIS 2006 (18):329-354.
Riegelsberger, Jens, Angela M. Sasse, and John McCarthy. 2003. The Researcher's Dilemma: Evaluating Trust in Computer Mediated Communications. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 58 (6):759-781.
Ringelmann, M. 1913. Research on animate sources of power: The work of man. Annales de l'Institut National Agronomique 2 (12):1-40.
Rothwell, J. Dan. 2007. In Mixed Company: Communicating in Small Groups and Teams. 6th ed: Wadsworth
Sanna, Lawrence J. 1992. Self-Efficacy Theory: Implications for Social Facilitation and Social Loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62 (5):774-786.
Schiff, Maurice. 1992. Social Capital, Labor Mobility, and Welfare: The Impact of Uniting States. Rationality and Society 4 (2):157-175.
Shepperd, James A. 1993. Productivity Loss in Performance Groups: A Motivation Analysis. Psychological Bulletin 113 (1):67-81.
Shevlin, M., and J. N. V. Miles. 1998. Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences 25 (1):85-90.
Shumaker, S. A., and A. Brownell. 1984. Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps. Journal of Social Issues 40:11-36.
Sirkka, L. Jarvenpaa, Knoll Kathleen, and E. Leidner Dorothy. 1998. Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of Management Information Systems 14 (4):29.
Smith, Brian N., Natalie A. Kerr, Michael J. Markus, and Mark F. Stasson. 2001. Individual Differences in Social Loafing: Need for Cognition as a Motivator in Collective Performance. Group Dynamics 5 (2):150-158.
Stark, Eric M., Jason D. Shaw, and Michelle K. Duffy. 2007. Preference for Group Work, Winning Orientation, and Social Loafing Behavior in Groups. Group & Organization Management 32 (6):699-723.
Steiner, I. D. 1972. Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press
Steinfield, C., N. B. Ellison, and C. Lampe. 2008. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29 (6):434-445.
Stern, Michael J., and Don A. Dillman. 2006. Community Participation, Social Ties, and Use of the Internet. City & Community 5 (4):409-424.
Stone, R. N., and K. Gronhaug. 1993. Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline. European Journal of Marketing 27:39-50.
Strong, James T., and Rolph E. Anderson. 1990. Free-Riding in Group Projects: Control Mechanisms and Preliminary Data Journal of Marketing Education 12 (2):61-67.
Szymanski, Kate, and Stephen G. Harkins. 1993. The Effect of Experimenter Evaluation on Self-Evaluation within the Social Loafing Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 29 (3):268-286.
Tan, H. H., and M. L. Tan. 2008. Organizational citizenship behavior and social loafing: The role of personality, motives, and contextual factors. Journal of Psychology 142 (1):89-108.
Tata, Jasmine. 2002. The Influence of Accounts on Perceived Social Loafing in Work Teams. International Journal of Conflict Management 13 (3):292-308.
Teece, David J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15 (6):285-305.
Uphoff, Norman. 1999. Understanding Social Capital: Learning from the Analysis and Experiences of Participation. In Dasgupta and Seregeldin, Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective. Washington DC: World Bank.
Uwe, Matzat. 2009. Quality of information in academic e-mailing lists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 9999 (9999):1-12.
Wang, C. C., and C. Y. Lai. 2006. Knowledge contribution in the online virtual community: Capability and motivation. Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management 4092:442-453.
Wang, Jyun-Cheng, and Ming-Jiin Chiang. 2009. Social interaction and continuance intention in online auctions: A social capital perspective. Decision Support Systems 47 (4):466-476.
Wang, Shaojung Sharon, Shin-Il Moon, Kyounghee Hazel Kwon, Carolyn A. Evans, and Michael A. Stefanone. 2010. Face off: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 26 (2):226-234.
Warkentin, Merrill E., Lutfus Sayeed, and Ross Hightower. 1997. Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System. Decision Sciences 28 (4):975-996.
Wasko, M. M., and S. Faraj. 2000. "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9 (2-3):155-173.
Wasko, McLure, and Samer Faraj. 2005. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly 29 (1):35-57.
Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wei, Jun, Mian Zhang, and Baiyin Yang. 2009. Does the traditional culture affect organizational identification? An analysis of the perception channels in organizational identification of Chinese employees. Frontiers of Business Research in China 3 (3):343-361.
Wellman, B. 2001. Computer networks as social networks. Science 293 (5537):2031-2034.
Wellman, B. , and M Gulia. 1999. Net Surfers Don't Ride Alone, in Networks in the Global Village. Edited by B. Wellman. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Wellman, B., and S. Wortley. 1990. Different Strokes for Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. American Journal of Sociology 96:558-588.
Westin, A. F. 1970. Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.
Wetzels, Martin, Gaby Odekerken-Schroder, and Claudia van Oppen. 2009. Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly 33 (1):177-195.
Willams, K., S. Harkins, and B. Latane. 1981. Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40:303-311.
Williams, Kipling D., and Steven J. Karau. 1991. Social Loafing and Social Compensation: The Effects of Expectations of Co-Worker Performance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 61 (4):570-581.
指導教授 邱兆民、薛義誠
(Chao-Min Chiu、Yih-Chearng Shiue)
審核日期 2010-1-20
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明