腰椎脊突起間撐開器的有限元素分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：29

、訪客IP：3.12.74.197

姓名

洪一智(Yi-Jhih Hong) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

機械工程學系

論文名稱

腰椎脊突起間撐開器的有限元素分析
(Finite Element Analysis of the Lumbar Interspinous Process Distractor)

相關論文

★ 應用於車身號碼打刻機之號碼辨識	★ 複合式掌紋識別系統
★ 圓形偵測在OLED Panel 檢測上的應用	★ MLCC薄膜厚度即時線上影像檢測技術之研發
★ 全自動微鑽針影像檢測系統之研究	★ 應用類神經網路預測COG製程對於中小尺寸TFT-LCD產生之應力狀態
★ 應用機器視覺系統檢測高滲透壓刀輪切割 TFT-LCD 玻璃後斷面之研究	★ 低成本輕量化機械手臂之研究
★ 應用在同軸電纜加工之雷射光斑導引機構設計與分析	★ 表面電漿波共振-非旋轉方式的新機構設計理論
★ 網路協同式機械設計系統研發	★ 軟膠囊自動辨識系統
★ 心電訊號之擷取與分析	★ 盲人圖樣感知輔助裝置之研發設計
★ 非旋轉式表面電漿共振儀之改良與實現	★ 可攜式無線心電訊號擷取器之設計

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

一般來說，人們隨著年齡的增長椎間盤裡的髓核就會開始乾枯退化，造成椎間盤的厚度減少，進而造成黃韌帶及小面關節的肥大，以致於引發所謂的腰椎狹窄症，造成身體產生神經間歇性跛行的症狀，而解決此種症狀的方法有分為手術及非手術的治療，非手術的治療例如物理性的治療，但往往成效不佳，而手術的方法又可以分為傳統手術及微創手術二種，傳統的手術方法就是將造成腰椎狹窄症的黃韌帶及小面關節去除，此種手術不但傷口大且手術時間長，故風險相對的比較大，而新型的微創手術是在背上開一個小傷口，並植入脊突起間撐開器，進而解決腰椎狹窄症的問題。
而本研究所使用的模型是腰椎第三節及第四節，而模型中包含了硬質骨、鬆質骨、後方骨元件、韌帶，而分析的方法是在脊突起間施加強迫位移，再量測椎孔直徑、椎孔面積、神經根通道寬度、椎間盤高度的恢復情形，之後再判斷脊突起間撐開器是否有明顯的功效。

摘要(英)

In general, the nucleus pulposus in intervertebral disc will begin to dry up and degenerate with age. That can also reduce the thickness of intervertebral disc and hypertrophy of ligamentum flavum as well as facet joint. Thus, it provokes so-called lumbar spinal stenosis and bringing out the body symptom of neurogenic intermittent claudication. The methods of solving this symptom were divided into operative and non-operative treatments. However, the effect of the latter such as physical treatment is not so successful. The operative method can also divide into traditional operation and minimally operation. The traditional operation is to remove the ligamentum flavum and facet joint that would cause lumbar spinal stenosis. It only causes obvious incision wound but also takes long time for the operation. Therefore, the risk is relatively higher. The new minimally operation is by opening a small wound and embedding an interspinous processes distractor to solve the problem.
In this study, we use the models of the 3rd and 4th lumbar, including cortical bone, cancellous bone, posterior element and ligament. The way for analyzing is to exert a force displacement on interspinous processes, and we measure the recovery process for the canal diameter, canal area, subarticular diameter and intervertebral disc height. Then we ascertain that if the interspinous processes distractor has the obvious effect.

關鍵字(中)

★ 有限元素分析
★ 脊突起間撐開器
★ 韌帶
★ 後方骨元件
★ 硬質骨
★ 鬆質骨
★ 髓核
★ 腰椎
★ 神經間歇性跛行
★ 腰椎狹窄症
★ 小面關節
★ 黃韌帶
★ 椎間盤

關鍵字(英)

★ ligament
★ cortical bone
★ cancellous bone
★ posterior element
★ lumbar
★ nucleus pulposus
★ intervertebral disc
★ finite element analysis
★ interspinous processes distractor
★ neurogenic intermittent claudication
★ lumbar spinal stenosis
★ facet joint
★ ligamentum flavum

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 xiv
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究的動機與目的 1
1-2 脊椎之解剖生理學 2
1-2-1 腰椎椎體之生物力學特性 3
1-2-2 腰椎椎間盤之生物力學特性 4
1-2-3 腰椎小面關節之生物力學特性 5
1-2-4 腰椎周圍韌帶之生物力學特性 6
1-3 腰椎之病理學 8
1-4 腰椎人工植入物介紹 13
1-5 文獻回顧 20
1-5-1 脊突起間撐開器的介紹 20
1-5-2 脊突起間撐開器的臨床應用 23
1-5-3 脊突起間撐開器的分析與測試 31
1-5-4 現有脊突起間撐開器的缺點 41
二、材料與方法 42
2-1 腰椎模型與脊突起間撐開器的電腦輔助設計 42
2-1-1 腰椎模型的建立 42
2-1-2 脊突起間撐開器模型建立 46
2-2 脊突起間撐開器的有限元素分析 48
2-2-1 材料性質的給定 48
2-2-2 受力邊界條件的給定 49
2-2-3 接觸型式的設定 50
2-2-4 網格化與分析 52
2-3 腰椎模型有限元素分析參數 63
2-3-1 腰椎模型分析參數位置圖 63
2-3-2 不同椎間盤位置突出的分析 64
2-3-3 改變模型的機械材料性質的分析 65
三、結果 66
3-1 不同椎間盤位置突出的分析結果 66
3-2 不同的機械材料性質的分析結果 68
3-2-1 椎間盤後側方突的結果 68
3-2-2 椎間盤正後方突的結果 70
四、討論 72
4-1 不同椎間盤位置突出的分析結果討論 72
4-2 不同的機械材料性質分析結果討論 76
4-2-1 椎間盤後側方突的結果討論 76
4-2-2 椎間盤正後方突的結果討論 80
五、結論與未來展望 84
5-1 結論 84
5-2 未來展望 85
參考文獻 86

參考文獻

[1] Martini, Bartholomew, Essentials of Anatomy & Physiology，林自勇、鄧志娟、陳瑩玲等譯，解剖生理學，全威圖書，民國九十二年。
[2] James Watkins，肌肉骨骼系統解剖學:構造與功能，張俊詳等譯，合記圖書，民國九十五年。
[3] Anthony P.Schnuerer,P.A. Julio Gallego, M.D. Cristie Manuel,Anatomy of the Spine & Related Structures.
[4] 陳志鏗、李春穎，COSMOS/Works 2006 應用解析－基礎篇，初版，高立圖書有限公司，民國96年。
[5] 實威科技股份有限公司，COSMOSWorks 電腦輔助工程分析入門篇 Designer，全華圖書股份有限公司，民國96年。
[6] 陳振昇，「腰椎融合手術之生物力學分析」，國立陽明大學醫學工程研究所博士論文；2001.
[7] Kettler A. Schmoelz W. Kast E. Gottwald M. Claes L. Wilke HJ. “In vitro stabilizing effect of a transforaminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages”. [Comparative Study. In Vitro. Journal Article. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] Spine. 30(22):E665-70, 2005 Nov 15.
[8] Frank Kandziora, MD, Philip Schleicher, MD, Matti Scholz, MD,Robert Pflugmacher, MD,Tanja Eindorf, DVM, Norbert P. Haas, MD,and Paul W. Pavlov, MD，“Biomechanical Testing of the Lumbar Facet Interference Screw”SPINE Volume 30, Number 2, pp E34–E39，©2005, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
[9] VINCENT C. TRAYNELIS, M.D., “Spinal arthroplasty”, Neurosurg Focus 13 (2):Article 10, 2002
[10] J. C. LeHuec, T. Kiaer, T. Friesem, H. Mathews, M. Liu, and L. Eisermann, “Shock Absorption in Lumbar Disc Prosthesis A Preliminary Mechanical Study”, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 346–351© 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia
[11] Jean-Philippe Lemaire, MD, Helene Carrier, MD, El-Hadi Sari Ali, MD,Waffa Skalli, MD,and Francxois Lavaste, MD, “Clinical and Radiological Outcomes With the Charite´TM Artificial DiscA 10-Year Minimum Follow-Up”, Spinal Disord Tech _ Volume 18, Number 4, August 2005
[12] 蘇建融，「人工椎間盤之設計與力學分析」，國立台灣大學，碩士論文，2004
[13] 管原璋，「人工椎間盤接觸面之設計與分析」，國立台灣大學機械工程研究所，碩士論文，民國九十四年
[14] 林承頡，「減壓手術對於腰脊髓腔狹窄病人在神經性和功能性恢復的效果」，國立成功大學物理治療研究所碩士論文，2004.
[15] Sasidhar Vadapalli, MS, Koichi Sairyo, MD, Vijay K. Goel, PhD, Matt Robon, MD,Ashok Biyani, MD, Ashutosh Khandha, MS, and Nabil A. Ebraheim, MD, “Biomechanical Rationale for Using Polyetheretherketone(PEEK) Spacers for Lumbar Interbody Fusion–A FiniteElement Study”, SPINE Volume 31, Number 26, pp E992–E998©2006, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
[16] Patrick Simons ,Interspinous Process Decompression – A Dynamic and Minimally Invasive Procedure for Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication,NeuroSurgeon, MediaPark Klinik, Cologne
[17] Patrick Simons, Interspinous Process Decompression for
Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication Secondary to Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Department of NeuroSurgery, MediaPark Klinik
[18] St.Francis Medical Technologies,Inc.X STOP Interspinous Process Distraction for Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication
[19] Manal Siddiqui, FRCS,Efthimios Karadimas, MD,Malcolm Nicol,
MRCS, Francis W. Smith, FRCR,and Douglas Wardlaw, FRCS ChM* ,Influence of Stop on Neural Foramina and Spinal Canal Area in Spinal Stenosis ,SPINE Volume 31, Number 25, pp 2958–2962 v©2006, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
[20] Joshua C. Richards, MD, Sharmila Majumdar, PhD, Derek P. Lindsey, MS, Gary S. Beaupre´, PhD,and Scott A. Yerby, PhD,The Treatment Mechanism of an Interspinous Process Implant for Lumbar Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication, SPINE Volume 30, Number 7, pp 744–749 ©2005, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
[21] CARL LAURYSSEN, M.D. Tower Orthopedics and Neurosurgical Spine, Beverly Hills, California ,Appropriate selection of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis for interspinous process decompression with the X STOP device, Neurosurg Focus 22 (1):E5, 2007
[22] Jangbo Lee, MD, Kazutoshi Hida, MD, Toshitaka Seki, MD, Yoshinobu Iwasaki, MD, and Akino Minoru, MD, An Interspinous Process Distractor (X STOP) for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients Preliminary Experiences in 10 Consecutive Cases ,J Spinal Disord Tech • Volume 17, Number 1, February 2004
[23] J. F. Zucherman K. Y. Hsu C. A. Hartjen T. F. Mehalic D. A. Implicito M. J. Martin D. R. Johnson II G. A. Skidmore P. P. Vessa J. W. Dwyer S. Puccio J. C. Cauthen R. M. Ozuna, A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results, Eur Spine J (2004) 13 : 22–31 DOI 10.1007/s00586-003-0581-4
[24] Manal Siddiqui, FRCS, Malcolm Nicol, MRCS, Efthimios Karadimas, MD, Frank Smith, MD, and Douglas Wardlaw, FRCS (Ortho) , The Positional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes in the Lumbar Spine Following Insertion of a Novel Interspinous Process Distraction Device,SPINE Volume 30, Number 23, pp 2677–2682 ©2005, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
[25] SchonstromN, Lindahl S, Wille´n J, et al. Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: an experimental study in vitro. J Orthop Res 1989;7:115–21.
[26] Infusa A, An HS, Lim TH, et al. Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion-extension movement. Spine 1996;21:2412–20.
[27] Fujiwara A, An HS, Lim TH, et al. Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramina due to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: an in-vitro anatomic and biomechanical study. Spine 2001;26: 876–82.
[28] Craig M. Wiseman, MD,Derek P. Lindsey, MS, Amy D. Fredrick, MS,andScott A. Yerby, PhD,The Effect of an Interspinous Process Implant on Facet Loading During Extension,SPINE Volume 30, Number 8, pp 903–907©2005, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
[29] Kyle E. Swanson, MD Derek P. Lindsey, MS, Ken Y. Hsu, MD,James F. Zucherman, MD, and Scott A. Yerby, PhD,The Effects of an Interspinous Implant on Intervertebral Disc Pressures ,SPINE Volume 28, Number 1, pp 26–32 ©2003, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
[30] Derek P. Lindsey, MS, Kyle E. Swanson, MD, Paul Fuchs, MD,Ken Y. Hsu, MD,James F. Zucherman, MD, and Scott A. Yerby, PhD ,The Effects of an Interspinous Implant on the Kinematics of the Instrumented and Adjacent Levels in the Lumbar Spine, SPINE Volume 28, Number 19, pp 2192–2197©2003, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
[31] Kai-Jow Tsai, MD 1, 2 , Hideki Murakami, MD, PhD 1, 3 , Gary L. Lowery, MD, PhD 4, William C. Hutton, DSc 1 A Biomechanical Evaluation of an Interspinous Device (coflex™ Device ) used to Stabilize the Lumbar Spine ,Paradigm Spine Journal • Number 1/2006 • 1
[32] Minns, R. J. BEng, MSc, PhD, DScTech; Walsh, W. K. FRCS, Preliminary Design and Experimental Studies of a Novel Soft Implant for Correcting Sagittal Plane Instability in the Lumbar Spine, Lippincott-Raven Publishers Volume 22(16), 15 August 1997, pp 1819-1825
[33] Pasquale Vena, Giampaolo Franzoso, Dario Gastaldi, Roberto Contro and Villiam Dallolio, A finite element model of the L4–L5 spinal motion segment: biomechanical compatibility of an interspinous device,Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 8(1):7-16, 2005
[34] Derek P. Lindsey Vikram Talwar Amy Fredrick Ken Y. Hsu James F. Zucherman Scott A. Yerby, Insertion loads of the X STOP interspinous process distraction system designed to treat neurogenic intermittent claudication, Eur Spine J(2006)15:908–912 DOI 10.1007/s00586-005-0891-9
[35] M.A. Adams and P. Dolan. Recent advances in lumbar spinal mechanics and their clinical significance, Clin. Biomech., 10(1), 3–19(1995).
[36] M.A. Adams and W.C. Hutton. The effect of posture on the role of the apophyseal joints in resisting intervertebral compressive force, J. Bone Joint Surg., 62(3), 358–362(1980).
[37] P. Dolan and M.A. Adams. Recent advances in lumbar spinal mechanics and their significance for modelling,Clin. Biomech.16(S1), S8–S16(2001).
[38] PAUL KHOUEIR, M.D., M.SC., F.R.C.S.C., K. ANTHONY KIM, M.D., AND MICHAEL Y. WANG, M.D. ,Classification of posterior dynamic stabilization devices, Neurosurg Focus 22 (1):E3, 2007
[39] Sean D. Christie, MD, FRCSC, John K. Song, MD, and Richard G. Fessler, MD, PhD, Dynamic Interspinous Process Technology, SPINE Volume 30, Number 16S, pp S73–S78©2005, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

指導教授

黃衍任、林上智
(Yean-Ren Hwang、Lin-Shang,Jhih)

審核日期

2008-1-6

推文