| 姓名 |
邱易慎(Yi-Shen Chiu)
查詢紙本館藏 |
畢業系所 |
環境工程研究所在職專班 |
| 論文名稱 |
膠帶製造業VOCs排放與防制效率之探討
(VOCs Emission and Control Efficiency in Pressure Sensitive Tape Manufacturing Industry)
|
| 相關論文 | |
| 檔案 |
 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[Bibtex 格式]
 [相關文章]  [文章引用]  [完整記錄]  [館藏目錄]  至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
|
| 摘要(中) |
膠帶製造業為國內重要的傳統產業，總產量僅次於美國及義大利，居全球第三名，但於生產之上膠塗布烘乾過程中，揮發性有機物（VOCs）易逸散形成空氣污染物；根據行政院環保署之统計，台灣地區膠帶製造業VOCs總排放量每年約29,500公噸，佔台灣地區固定污染源總排放比率約9.0％，為國內重要之VOCs排放源。
本研究係針對膠帶製造廠進行VOCs排放與防制之探討，分別於96年及97年，針對其二套活性碳污染防制設備之前後，各進行2次總碳氫化合物之檢測作業，並記錄該廠之產能與操作條件，以探討膠帶製造業VOC排放與活性碳吸附系統之處理效率。經分析結果顯示，該廠VOC排放係數（含煙道與逸散）為0.011（kg/m2），接近環保署VOC空污費徵收公告之排放係數0.009 kg/m2；或是0.184（kg-VOC/kg-溶劑），略高於美國之0.10~0.15（kg-VOC/kg-溶劑）。
研究結果發現；上膠機之集氣效率為82.58%，低於美國AP-42設定之90~95%，亦即約有二成VOC未被收集而逸散至環境中；但活性碳吸附系統之處理效率可高達98.84%，高於我國法規要求之90%以及美國要求之95%，顯示國內膠帶業活性碳回收系統之設計與操作技術已臻成熟。整廠甲苯回收率僅為75%，主要是上膠機未收集完全而逸散者，此外尚有甲苯貯存與調製作業時所逸散、殘留於產品中以及活性碳脫附時排入廢水者。
在VOC處理技術方面，不管就處理效率、經濟效益或環境效益之觀點，活性碳回收是膠帶業界最佳的處理技術，其處理效率可達98%以上，回收之溶劑可重複使用或出售，達到節能減碳之目的；二套活性碳設備之年操作維護費用為新台幣1,379萬元，回收之甲苯價值3,122萬元，每年有1,743萬元之收益；另環境效益方面，每年尚可減少CO2排放量約3,121公噸，效益極為顯著。
上膠機之集氣效率偏低是目前業界有待努力的方向，上膠機設置圍封式集氣系統是環保主管機關即將要求的設施；另水性、高固型份與熱熔性黏膠亦是本產業未來發展的方向，但由於生產線必須加以調整，近期內業界採行之意願可能不高。
|
| 摘要(英) |
Pressure sensitive tape production is an important traditional industry in Taiwan, whose grand output is the third place in the world, only next to U.S.A. and Italy. However, some VOCs are emitted from the drying process of glue coating and this issue needs to be addressed from the considerations of workers’ safety and environmental protection. The statistics released from Taiwan Environmental Protection Agency indicate that the annual VOC emissions from pressure sensitive tape manufacturing industry is around 29,500 tons, which accounts for approximately 9% of the total VOC emission from stationary sources in Taiwan, and the tape industry is regarded as one of the the major sources of VOCs.
This research aims to analyze the control efficiency of the activated carbon adsorption systems applied in Plant A for VOC recovery and to compile the VOC emission factors from a typical pressure tape manufacturing process via intensive sampling and analysis of total hydrocarbon emissions conducted in 2007 and 2008. Additionally, the output capacity and operating conditions of the Plant A during the sampling duration are also recorded. The VOC emission factor (including stack and fugitive emissions) is 0.011 kg-VOCs/m2-product, which is close to the emission factor of 0.009 kg-VOCs/m2-product as recommended by Taiwan EPA. Another VOC emission factor is determined as 0.184 kg-VOC/kg-solvent, which is a little higher than 0.10~0.15 kg-VOC/kg-solvent as recommended by USEPA.
The overall VOC capture efficiency of the coating line is 82.6%, which is far below 90~95% regulated by AP-42. Nearly 20% of the solvent input escaped from the VOC capture and control devices, while the adsorption efficiency of the activated carbon systems reaches 98.84%, which is greater than the standard as required by Taiwan EPA (90%) or the standard regulated by USEPA (95%). The high VOC adsorption efficiency achieved with Plant A indicates that the application of an activated carbon adsorption system for recovering VOCs from tape industry is appropriate and the technology is mature and well-developed. However, the recovery of toluene from Plant A is just 75% due to the incomplete capture, the residual on products and some loss to the wastewater during the desorption and condensation process.
Activated carbon adsorption is one of the best technologies for recovering VOCs from the pressure sensitive tape manufacturing industry in terms of adsorption efficiency as well as economic benefits. The recovered solvent can be reused or sold to save energy and also reduce the carbon dioxide emission. The annual maintenance fee for two activated carbon adsorption systems applied in Plant A is estimated as NTD 13.8 million, while the annual income from toluene recovery reaches NTD 31.2 million. Not only an yearly revenue of NTD 17.4 million can be generated, but also 3,121 tons of CO2 emission can be reduced annually by applying this activated carbon adsorption system. For further reduction of the VOC emissions, an enclosure type coating system should be applied and the operating parameters of the activated carbon adsorption system should be optimized.
|
| 關鍵字(中) |
★ 排放係數
★ 感壓膠帶
★ 活性碳吸附床
★ 揮發性有機物 |
關鍵字(英) |
★ Activated Carbon (AC)
★ Pressure Sensitive Tape
★ Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
★ VOC Emission Factor |
| 論文目次 |
摘 要 I
Abstract II
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
第一章 前言 1
1.1 研究緣起 2
1.2 研究目的 2
第二章 文獻回顧 3
2.1 膠帶製造業現況 3
2.1.1 感壓膠帶感壓膠帶製程介紹 3
2.1.2 產業概況 9
2.2 揮發性有機物管制狀況 14
2.2.1 國內管制現況 14
2.2.2 國外管制現況 15
2.3 揮發性有機物處理技術 17
2.3 1.揮發性有機物可行處理技術 17
2.3.2 揮發性有機物廢氣處理技術選用原則 19
2.3.3 膠帶製造程序污染源 26
2.3.4 膠帶製造場所污染防制設備及使用情形 28
2.3.5 膠帶製造程序VOCs污染防制之BACT 28
2.3.6.活性碳吸脫附處理技術專論 36
第三章. 研究方法與步驟 44
3.1研究流程 44
3.2研究方法 47
3.2.1研究工廠現況說明 47
3.2.2 VOC檢測計畫 51
3.2.3活性碳經濟效益與環境效益分析 53
第四章 結果與討論 54
4.1 VOC檢測結果 54
4.2 活性碳處理效率 62
4.3 整廠集氣效率計算 62
4.4 排放量與排放係數計算 63
4.5 溶劑(甲苯)回收率 65
4.6活性碳脫附效率 65
4.7活性碳單位吸附量與停流時間 66
4.8活性碳吸脫附設備設置及操作費用 69
4.9 活性碳吸脫附設備效益分析 72
第五章 結論與建議 75
5.1 結論 75
5.2..建議 76
參考文獻 77
附錄
附錄一 膠帶製造業揮發性有機空氣污染物管制及排放標準 79
附錄二 第八批應申請設置、變更及操作許可之固定污染源 84
附錄三.空氣污染防制費收費辦法 87
附錄四.甲苯(Toluene)物質安全資料表 95
|
| 參考文獻 |
1.The Northeast Waste Management Officials’ Association and the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, “Pressure Sensitive Tapes and Labels : The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and Pollution Prevention Opportunities”, March 1999.
2.US Environmental Protection Agency, “AP 42, Fifth Edition Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1: Stationary Point and Area Sources, 4.2.2.9 Pressure Sensitive Tapes And Labels”, 2008.
3.National Pollutant Inventory, “Emission Estimation Technique Manual for Pressure Sensitive Tapes and Labels”, 1999.
4.The Freedonia Group, “Freedonia Industry Study #1569, World Pressure Sensitive Tapes”, 2002.
5.Martin Decker, Prakash Naik & Mike Worrall, Pollution Control That Pays Its Way, AMCEC inc.
6.U.K. National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory（NAEI）,
（http://www.naei.org.uk/emissions/index.php, download at 2008/10/12.）
7.USEPA, Factor Information Retrieval System, 2000
( http: // www .epa. gov /ttn /chief/software/fire/ , download at 2008/11/2.)
8.Brock Thomas, “Waste Air Treatment in Paint Production & Application” Adv. Coat. Technol. ACT, 96 Conf. 2nd, paper2.1a. p1-9;1996.
9.Kosteltz, A. M.; Finkelstein, A., “What are ‘Real Opportunities in Biological Gas Cleaning for North American” Proceedings of the 89th Annual A&WMA Conference: Cincinnati, Ohio, June 1996.
10.Van der Vaart, D. R.; Spivey, J. J.; Vatavuk, W. M.; Wehe, A. H. “Thermal and Catalytic Incinerators” in OAQPS Control Cost Manual 5th ed. (EPA 453/B-96-001), 1996.
11.望熙榮，”空氣污染防制”，中央圖書出版社，中華民國87年5月。
12.周明顯，”揮發性有機物空氣污染物控制技術”，膠帶製造業減廢環保技術與法規講習會論文集，中華民國88年10月。
13.劉希平，”揮發性有機物控制技術、效率及成本資料調查”，行政院環境保護署，中華民國88年12月。
14.張書豪，”以活性碳吸附煙道排氣中戴奧辛之初步研究”，國立中央大學碩士論文,中壢，中華民國89年6月。
15.經濟部工業局，”2001黏性膠帶產業年度報告”，財團法人工研院化工所，中華民國90年。
16.環保署,”固定污染源空氣輔導案例及執行成效彙編”，中華民國90年。
17.行政院環境保護署，九十年度”電子產業及特定行業空氣污染改善輔導示範推廣及管制標準研訂專案工作計畫”，中華民國90年。
18.白曛綾，”高科技工業空氣污染防制設施效能提升研析”，國立交通大學，新竹,中華民國91年10月。
19.行政院環境保護署，”特定行業揮發性有機物污染檢測及污染物特性分析計畫”，工業技術研究院，中華民國91年11月。
20.行政院環境保護署，”固定污染源揮發性有機物空氣污染管制策略規劃與減量措施推動計畫”，中華民國92年。
21.吳欽琪，”製程VOCs製程規劃”，亞洲化學公司，中華民國93年9月。
22.環訓所，”甲級空氣污染防制專責人員訓練教材,氣狀污染物控制設備”，行政院環境保護署，中華民國97年9月。
|
| 指導教授 |
張木彬(Moo-Been Chang)
|
審核日期 |
2009-2-3 |
| 推文 |
 facebook  plurk  twitter  funp  google  live  udn  HD  myshare  reddit  netvibes  friend  youpush  delicious  baidu
|
| 網路書籤 |
 Google bookmarks  del.icio.us  hemidemi myshare
|
