 |
|
|
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：131 、訪客IP：18.117.183.150
姓名 魏上翔(Shang-Hsiang Wei) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 環境工程研究所 論文名稱 職業安全衛生績效管理機制
(Occupational Health and Safety Performance Management)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中) 近年來，職業安全衛生在各產業中的重要性與日俱增。在職業安全領域中，安全績效指標的應用成為一項最重要的安全衛生績效管理工具。安全績效指標可以分為主動性與被動性安全指標，主動性安全指標用於主動監測安全衛生系統，而被動性安全指標則用於被動監控。但在監測過程中，使用被動性式安全指標的主要缺點為著重事後控管、具有反應措施延遲與資料來源的偏頗。因而組織進行安全績效量測時會配合主動性安全指標的使用，但主動性安全指標的主要缺點為發展過程發散使得數量過多，以及研擬指標時過於主觀等問題。為此，本研究提出整合性的安全績效指標彌補以上兩個安全績效指標的缺點，同時也整合OHSAS 18001法規的要求、HSG (65) 的安全衛生成功管理法則，以及Health Safety Executive提出的安全績效指標等項目進行論述與作為本研究核心理論。
此外，本研究也考慮安全文化與安全績效指標間的相互影響關係，連結改善安全文化五個階段與發展主動性績效指標三個層級，並藉由PDCA管理循環與IPO程序架構來建立整合性安全績效指標的回饋循環程序，以達到持續改善的目標。本研究發現，在一個組織內不能單純只使用主動性或是被動性績效指標量測安全衛生系統績效。本研究將藉由水平與垂直整合的概念發展一套更全面更適用於量測各產業、各層級與各部門的整合性安全績效指標，最後建構一個安全績效量測系統與回饋改善程序，以期能達到有效監控管理安全衛生管理系統，與持續改善的機制。
未來研究將著重於探討更多的績效指標以使目前研究成果更加完備，並將本研究建構之系統藉由實際案例研究加以應用與驗證，希望能更加強現有安全衛生績效量測的精確性及有效性。摘要(英) The systems approach for occupational health and safety management has gained worldwide acceptance since the introduction of OHSAS 18001 and ILO’s guidelines. Since most of the guidelines for health and safety management advocate continual improvement and accident prevention, performance indicators become one of the most critical tools to evaluate the effectiveness of such systems. In most practice, safety performance indicators are divided into two categories: leading and lagging. The major disadvantage of lagging performance indicators is the fact corrective actions can only be initiated after the occurrence of accidents or incidents. The disadvantage of leading performance indicators is their divergent nature, which might result in potential problems due to subjectivity. Hence this study proposes the use of integrated performance indicators to compensate for the disadvantages of both types of performance indicators. The theory of this study is based on the requirements of OHSAS 18001, successful health and safety management of HSG (65) and a guide for measuring health and safety performance proposed by UK’s HSE.
In addition, this study considers the interrelationships between safety culture and safety performance indicators. Vertical and horizontal integration of safety performance indicators are also presented. Finally, based on the PDCA management cycle and the input-process-output framework, the safety performance management system and feedback process is proposed to achieve the goals of effective monitoring and continual improvement of occupational health and safety management.
The proposed performance measurement process should be validated with either case studies or actual implementation. It is highly possible that additional performance indicators need to be explored since the final objective of performance measurement is to ensure the adequacy of the selected health and safety indicators.關鍵字(中) ★ 職業安全衛生管理
★ 安全績效指標
★ 安全文化
★ 安全績效量測系統與回饋改善程序關鍵字(英) ★ Safety Performance Management System and Feedbac
★ Occupational Health and Safety Management
★ Safety Culture
★ Safety Performance Indicators論文目次 中文摘要........................................................................................................i
Abstract ........................................................................................................ii
誌謝..............................................................................................................iii
Table of Contents........................................................................................iv
List of Figures .............................................................................................vi
List of Tables ..............................................................................................vii
Chapter 1 Introduction...............................................................................1
1.1 OHS Performance Measurement Needs ............................................................. 1
1.2 Limitations of Lagging Performance Indicators ................................................. 2
1.3 The Use of Leading Performance Indicators ...................................................... 3
1.4 The Rationale for Combined Use of Leading and Lagging Performance
Indicators............................................................................................................. 5
1.5 Safety Culture and Leading Performance Indicators .......................................... 6
Chapter 2 Review of Occupational Health and Safety Performance
Management.................................................................................................8
2.1 Lagging or Reactive Performance Indicators ..................................................... 8
2.2 Leading Performance Indicators ....................................................................... 10
2.3 The Requirements of OHSAS 18001 for Performance Measurement.............. 13
2.4 Recommendations of the Health and Safety Executive.................................... 15
2.5 Performance Indicators of HSG (65) ................................................................ 17
Chapter 3 Safety Performance Measurement System and the Feedback
Process ........................................................................................................20
3.1 Integrated Safety Performance Indicators......................................................... 20
3.1.1 Primary Performance Indicators ...............................................................20
3.1.2 The Selection Process of Safety Performance Measurement Indicators .. 25
3.1.3 Vertical and Horizontal Integrated Performance Indicators ..................... 28
3.2 The Safety Culture and Safety Performance Indicators.................................... 32
3.2.1 Level 1 Information for Safety Performance Indicators ........................... 33
3.2.2 Level 2 Information for Safety Performance Indicators ........................... 34
3.2.3 Level 3 Information for Safety Performance Indicators ........................... 35
3.3 Health and Safety Management and the IPO Framework ................................ 40
3.4 Performance Measurement System and the Feedback Process of Safety
Performance Measurement ............................................................................... 43
Chapter 4 Application of the Safety Performance Measurement System
.....................................................................................................................50
4.1 Implementation of the Integrated Safety Performance Indicators .................... 50
4.1.1 The Integrated Safety Performance Indicators ......................................... 50
4.1.2 Practical Development and Improvement Process ................................... 53
4.1.3 Schedule Planning.....................................................................................55
4.2 Application of the Safety Performance Measurement System and the Feedback
Process .............................................................................................................. 57
4.2.1 From the PDCA Management Cycle’s Point of View.............................. 58
4.2.2 From the IPO system’s Point of View ...................................................... 60
4.3 OHS Case Study: A Nuclear Facility Application............................................ 61
Chapter 5 Conclusions..............................................................................63
5.1 Recommendations............................................................................................. 63
5.2 Future Study...................................................................................................... 65
References...................................................................................................66參考文獻 1. The Health and Safety Executive, (2000), “guidance on safety performance indicators,” Research Report.
2. Vectra, A., (2000), “Development of a health and safety performance measurement tool,” the Health and Safety Executive Research Report.
3. Ondategui-Parra, S., Bhagwat, J. G., Gill, I. E., Nathanson, E. Seltzer, S., Ros, P. R., (2005), Essential Practice Performance Measurement.
4. Kahya, E., (2007) “The effects of job characteristics and working conditions on job performance,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37, p. 515-523.
5. The Health and Safety Executive, (2000), “The corporate health and safety performance index: Background to the development of CHaSPI,” Research Report.
6. Step Change in Safety, (2002), “Leading performance indicators guidance for effective use,” Research Report.
7. The Health and Safety Executive, (2001), “A guide to measuring health & safety performance,” Research Report.
8. Occupational health and safety assessment series, (2000), “Occupational health and safety management systems – Guidelines for the implementation of OHSAS 18001,” Technical Report.
9. Greenstreet Berman Ltd., (2006), “Further development of health and safety performance management index,” Research Report.
10. The Health and Safety Executive, (2006), “OH&S Performance Measurement and Reporting Guidelines,” Research Report.
11. Veleva, V., Hart, M., Greiner, T., and Crumbley, C., (2001), “Indicators of sustainable production,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, p.447-452.
12. Maroño, M., Peña, J. and Santamaría, J., (2006), “The ‘PROCESO’ index: A new methodology for the evaluation of operational safety in the chemical,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety.
13. The Office of the Federal Safety Commissioner, (2007), “Positive performance indicators,” Research Report.
14. Parameshwaran, S., Iyer, J. M., Haight, E., Del Castillo, E., Tink, B. W., and Hawkins, P. W. (2004), “Intervention effectiveness research: Understanding and optimizing industrial safety programs using leading indicators,” Chemical Health & Safety.
15. The Health and Safety Executive, (2001), Safety meter positive performance measurement tool, Research Report.
16. Dahlgren, K., Lederman, L., Iberdrola, J. P., and Szikszai, T., (2005), “Safety performance indicators,” Topical Issue Paper, 5.
17. Cheung, S. O., Suen, H. C. H., and Cheung, K. K. W., (2004), “PPMS: A web-based construction project performance monitoring system,” Automation in Construction, 13, p.361-376.
18. The Health and Safety Executive, (2000), Positive performance indicators: Measuring safety, rehabilitation and compensation performance, Research Report.
19. Saji, G., (2003), “Safety goals in ‘risk-informed, performance-based’ regulation,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 80, p.163-172.
20. Alexander, M., (1996), “Performance monitoring indicators: A handbook for task managers,” Operations Policy Department World bank Research Report.
21. Department of Employment and Workplace Relations of Australian Government, (2005), “The use of positive performance indicators to improve workplace health and safety,” Official Document.
22. Guldenmund, F. W., (2000), “The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research,” Safety Science, 34, p.215-257.
23. Jean, M. R. and Desmarais, L., (2006), “A preliminary validation of a new measure of occupational health and safety,” Journal of Safety Research, 37, p.413-419.
24. Mulhall, T., (2002), “Balanced scorecard - key performance indicators,” The HSE Board Research Report.Mohamed, S. (1999), “Empirical investigation of construction safety management activities and performance in Australia,” Safety Science, 33, p.129-142.
25. Bevington, A. M., (2005), “Safety management process - proactive safety metrics that drive performance in manufacturing facilities,” The HSE Research Report, 542.
26. Weber, A. and Thomas, R., (2005), Key performance indicators: Measuring and managing the maintenance function.
27. Sugden, C, Birkbeck, D., and Gadd, S., (2007), “Major hazards industry performance indicators,” The HSL Scoping Study.
28. Kathryn, S. M and Whitaker, R. F., (2003), “Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments,” Safety Science, 41, p.641-680.
29. The Health and Safety Executive, (2003), “Managing health and safety: Five steps to success,” Research Report.
30. Giménez, M. and Grinblat, M. P., (2003), “A cost-effective methodology to internalize nuclear safety in nuclear reactor conceptual design,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, 226, p.293-309.
31. Kadak, A. C. and Matsuo, T., (2007), “The nuclear industry’s transition to risk-informed regulation and operation in the United States,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92, p.609-618.
32. Martorell, S., Sanchez, A., Mun˜oz, A., Pitarch, J. L., Serradell, V., and Roldan, J. (1999), “The use of maintenance indicators to evaluate the effects of maintenance programs on NPP performance and safety,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 65, p.85-94.指導教授 于樹偉(Shuh-Woei Yu) 審核日期 2008-7-22 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit