| 摘要(英) |
Everybody will agree that luck seems to be everywhere in common sense. But there seems to be an area where is irrelevant to luck, that’s the area of morality. But is this right? Is luck an affection in ethics? In the debates of ethics, the issue of moral luck is new one. This thesis tried to analyze that whether the moral luck exists or not and to analyze its affections in ethics.
This thesis is divided into three parts. In the first part, I will discuss the argument whether moral luck exists or not. I will analyze the concept of luck. Then I will make some expansions through the classification of concepts in Nagel’s discussion in moral luck and the study of Nelkin.
Secondly, I will discuss the relations between moral luck, moral judgment and moral responsibility. After this, through the existence of moral luck, I will discuss the influence of it to the issue of moral responsibility. I will also analyze the necessity of responsibility and try to give a reasonable explanation.
Finally, I will discuss the issues between moral luck and equality. If there is moral luck in ethics, then we should pay attention to the claims of moral egalitarianism in a relatively fair and justice society. Through the discussions of moral egalitarianism, prioritarian and democratic equality, I try to justify the importance of moral egalitarianism.
|
| 參考文獻 |
一、外文部分
Daniel Statman(ed.) Moral Luck ,1993, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Fischer, J.M., and Raviza, M., 1992, Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frankena, William K,1973, Ethics, New Jersey, Englewood Cliffs.
John Rawls, 1999, A Theory of Justice, revised ed. Cambridge, Mass.: the Bleknap Press of Harvard University Press.
John Rawls, 2001, Justice as Fairness: a Restatement, ed. By Erin Kelly, (Cambridge, Mass.: the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Joseph Raz, 1986, The Morality of Freedom,(Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Latus, A.,2000, “Moral and Epistemic Luck”, Journal of Philosophical Research, 25.
Michael Gorr, 1991,“Rawls on Natural Inequality”, in J. Angelo Corlett(ed.), Equality and Liberty, London: Macmillan.
Wolf, S.,2001, “The Moral of Moral Luck”, Philosophic Exchange, 31.
二、中文部分
石元康，2004，〈契約、政治權威以及道德原則──傳統的契約論與羅爾斯的契約論〉，《羅爾斯》，桂林：廣西師範大學。
李明輝，2005，《儒家視野下的政治思想》，台北：台灣大學出版中心。
李雄揮(編譯)，Frankena(著)，1990，《倫理學》，台北：五南出版社。
林火旺，1998，《羅爾斯正義論》，台北：台灣書店。
林火旺，1993，〈羅爾斯正義理論中人的觀念之探討〉，《第三屆美國文學與思想研討會論文選集：哲學篇》，台北：中研院歐美所。
林正弘，2005，＜知識的證成結構：基礎論與融貫論＞，《中西哲學研習營手冊》，（台中：台灣哲學學會）。
林南(譯)，W.D.Ross(著)，2008，《正義與善》，上海，上海譯文出版社。
林遠澤，2005，〈責任倫理學的責任問題──科技時代的應用倫理學基礎研究〉，《台灣哲學研究》，第五期。
林遠澤，2007，〈論康德定言令式的共識討論結構──試從理性存有者的道德觀點闡述康德的先驗規範邏輯學〉，收錄自《台灣大學哲學論評》第三十三期，台北：台灣大學哲學系。
劉作揖，1998，《法學概論》，台北：三民書局。
陳文團，1998，《政治與道德》，台北：台灣書店。
徐向東，2006，〈人類自由問題〉，徐向東編，《自由意志與道德責任》，南京，江蘇人民出版社。
葛四友編，《運氣均等主義》，南京：江蘇人民出版社。
楊紹剛(譯)，2002，Fischer, J.M., and Raviza, M(著)，《責任與控制──一種道德責任理論》，北京，華夏出版社。
錢永祥，2009，〈儒家與自由主義的離與合：評李明輝著《儒家視野下的政治思想》〉，收錄在《東吳哲學學報》第18期，台北：東吳大學出版社。
錢永祥，1995，〈社會整合與羅爾斯自由主義的政治性格〉，收錄於《哲學與公共規範》台北：中研院中山人文社會科學研究所。
謝世民，2004，〈羅爾斯與社會正義的場域〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第9期。
三、網路資料
Garrath Williams, “Praise and blame”,(The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy) http://www.iep.utm.edu/p/praise.htm
Andrew Eshleman, “Moral Responsibility”, (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/
John-Stewart Gordon, “Moral Egalitarianims”, (The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy) http://www.iep.utm.edu/m/moral-eg.htm
Dana K. Nelkin, “Moral luck”, (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-luck/
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit