一維雲模式(ETTM)與WRF的比較

、線上人數：23

、訪客IP：13.58.151.231

姓名	蕭養成(Yang-Cheng Siao) 查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	大氣物理研究所
論文名稱	一維雲模式(ETTM)與WRF的比較 (Compare One-dimensional Cloud Model (ETTM) and WRF)
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式] [Bibtex 格式] [相關文章] [文章引用] [完整記錄] [館藏目錄] [檢視] [下載] 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中)	一維顯式時變傾斜雲模式(explicit one-dimensional time-dependent tilting cloud model, ETTM)是由Chen and Sun (2004)所提出的一維雲模式。ETTM模式考慮了雲的傾斜角的存在，所以雲的傾斜軸不必和(r,θ)平面垂直，因此更符合雲內水平對稱的假設。ETTM模式主要是由上衝流和下衝流所組成，兩者皆使用相同動力和熱力方程式。上衝流是由溼熱包做為初始條件，而下衝流則是由降水的蒸發冷卻和拖曳力所形成。為了檢驗、修正ETTM模式的特徵與模擬結果，在本研究中使用WRF模式，做為三維雲解析模式。因為WRF模式本身具有和ETTM相同的雲微物理(Purdue Lin scheme)，所以利用WRF模擬三維雲的發展，與ETTM模式相比較，並做為未來改進ETTM模式表現的依據。本研究所選用了兩個觀測實驗探空，分別為RICO和IHOP。其CAPE分別為1397 與2449 。將這兩探空做為初始條件，放入WRF與ETTM模式中模擬。其中ETTM模式在模擬時，所需要上衝流的平均半徑與傾斜角，是從WRF模擬三維雲發展時，在最大垂直速度發生時所求得。在WRF三維雲解析模式的模擬結果來看，當植入bubble半徑增大時，最大垂直速度也會隨之增強。且上衝流平均半徑與傾斜角，也和bubble有相當的關係。ETTM的模擬結果，在沒有增加低層水氣時，上衝流與雲的強度、高度，並沒有辦法獲得和三維模式相似的結果。而在增加低層水氣場至88%和95%後，上衝流的最大垂直速度強度有明顯的增強，甚至超過三維的平均值。在比較質量通量、熱通量和水氣通量場上，一維(95%個案)的值都大於三維的值，但是基本上最大值出現的高度是差不多的，主要是因為當水氣增加後，上衝流的強度也隨之增加，所以垂直質量、水氣通量才會較大，但是隨著上衝流平均半徑變大，一維模式的通量高度就不能獲得和三維的高度。所以從兩模式的比較，可知在ETTM模式中，可能對水氣的輻合強度不夠，所以才會造成在沒有增加低層水氣場時，雲發展的強度和三維的結果差很多。
摘要(英)	An Explicit one-dimensional Time-dependent Tilting cloud Model (ETTM) developed by Chen and Sun (2004) was adopted for this study. ETTM considers the tilting effect of the cloud. So the tilting axis is not necessarily orthogonal to the horizontal plane (r,θ), making the horizontal axisymmetric assumption more reasonable. ETTM model consists of an updraft and a downdraft. Both are governed by the same dynamic and thermodynamic equations. The updraft is initiated by a moist thermal bubble, while the downdraft is triggered by the evaporative cooling and the drag force of precipitation separating from the tilting updraft. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model was used as a 3D cloud-resolving model. The Purdue Lin microphysics scheme in the WRF,is the same as that in ETTM.. Therefore, WRF model was used to help identify the characteristics of the ETTM model and to help further improve the performance of the ETTM model. In this study, the input soundings were chosen from two field experiments: IHOP (International H2O Project), and RICO (Rain In Cumulus over the Ocean). The Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE) is about 1400 for RICO and 2450 for IHOP. Two soundings were used as initial conditions for both WRF and ETTM. The ETTM’s radius and the tilting angle were directly estimated from WRF simulated 3D clouds. Results from WRF showed that the maximum vertical velocity took a longer time to reach when the bubble size increased. In addition, the tilting angle and the average radius also strongly depended on the bubble size. With original soundings, simulated clouds from ETTM were much weaker than those from WRF. After adding moisture (i.e., a moist thermal bubble) into the low levels of ETTM, the results were much reasonable. The mass, heat and moisture fluxes in the vertical direction were calculated and compared between these two models. Results from ETTM with a constraint of at least 95% of relative humidity at low levels were large than those from WRF. However, the heights of the maximum values from both models were comparable and this is critical when the ETTM is used in cumulus parameterization.
關鍵字(中)	★ 雲模式 ★ WRF	關鍵字(英)	★ cloud model ★ WRF
論文目次	中文摘要 ………………………………………………………………… i 英文摘要 ………………………………………………………………… ii 誌謝 ………………………………………………………………… iii 目錄 ………………………………………………………………… iv 圖目錄 ………………………………………………………………… v 表目錄 ………………………………………………………………… viii 一、前言 ………………………………………………………………… 1 二、模式簡介 ………………………………………………………………… 5 2-1 Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)模式 ……………………… 5 2-2 Explicit one-dimensional Time dependent Tilting cloud Model (ETTM) ………………………………………………………………… 6 三、個案選取與實驗設計 …………………………………………………… 10 3-1 個案選取 …………………………………………………………… 10 3-2 實驗設計 …………………………………………………………… 10 四、模擬結果 ………………………………………………………………… 12 4-1 WRF三維雲解析模式模擬結果 ……………………………………… 12 4-2 一維雲模式ETTM模擬結果 ……………………………………… 15 4-3 ETTM與WRF的比較 ……………………………………………… 17 五、總結與未來工作 ………………………………………………………… 20 參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………… 22 附錄 ………………………………………………………………… 24 附表 ………………………………………………………………… 26 附圖 ………………………………………………………………… 30
參考文獻	Anthes, R. A, 1977: A cumulus parameterization scheme utilizing a one-dimensional cloud model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 105, 270-286. Arakawa, A. and W. Schubert, 1974: Interactionof a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large-scale environment, Part I. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 674-701. Betts, A. K., 1986: New convective adjustment scheme, Part I, Observational and theoretical basis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 112, 677-691. Chen, S.-H. and W.-Y. Sun, 2002: A one-dimensional time-dependent cloud model, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 80, 99-118. Chen, S.-H. and W.-Y. Sun, 2004: An explicit one-dimensional time-dependent tilting cloud model, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2797-2816. Fritsch, J. M. and C. F. Chappell, 1980: Numerical prediction of convectively driven mesoscale pressure systems. Part I: Convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 1722-1733. Grabowski, W. W., 2001: Coupling cloud processes with the large-scale dynamics using the cloud-resolving convection parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 978-997. Gray, M. E. B., 2000: Characteristics of numerically simulated mesoscale convective systems and their application to parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 3953-3970. Grell, G. A. and Y.-H. Kuo, 1991: Semiprognostic tests of cumulus parameterization schemes in the middle latitudes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119, 5-31. Grell, G. A., 1993: Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 764-787. Haines, P. A. and W. Y. Sun, 1994: A convective cloud model for use in a cumulus parameterization scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 165-182 Hu, Qi, 1997: A cumulus parameterization based on a cloud model of intermittently rising thermals. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 2292-2307. Kain, J. S. and J. M. Fritsch, 1990: A one-dimensional entraining/detaining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2784-2802. Kain, J. S. and J. M. Fritsch, 1993: Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The Kain-Fritsch scheme. Meteor. Monogr., 46, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 165-170. Kuo, H. L., 1965: On formation and intensification of tropical cyclones through latent heat release by cumulus convection. J. Atmos. Sci., 22, 40-63. Kuo, H. L., 1974: Further studies of the parameterization of the influence of cumulus convection on large-scale flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 1232-1240. Lemone, M. A. and E. J. Zipser, 1980: A quasi-one-dimensional cumulus cloud model and parameterization of cumulus heating and mixing effects. Mon. Wea. Rev., 108, 991-1009. Liu, C., M. W. Moncrieff, and W. W. Grabowski, 2001: Explicit and parameterized realizations of convective cloud systems in TOGA COARE. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 1689-1703. Lynn, B., W.-K. Tao, and F. Abramopoulos, 2001: A parameterization for the triggering of landscape-generated moist convection. Part I: analysis of high-resolution model results. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 575-592. Manabe, S., J. Smagorinsky, and R. F. Strickler, 1965: Simulated climatology of a general circulation model with a hydrological cycle. Mon. Wea. Rev., 93, 769-798. Moncrieff, M. W., 1981: A theory of organized steady convection and its transport properties. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 107, 29-50. Ooyama, K., 1971: A theory of parameterization of cumulus convection. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 49, 744-756. Sun, W. Y. and P. A. Haines, 1996: Semi-prognostic tests of a new mesoscale cumulus parameterization scheme. Tellus, 48A, 272-289.
指導教授	陳淑華(Shu-Hua Chen)	審核日期	2007-11-12
推文	facebook plurk twitter funp google live udn HD myshare reddit netvibes friend youpush delicious baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks del.icio.us hemidemi myshare

博碩士論文 946201005 詳細資訊