摘要(英) |
The construction industry in Taiwan has played a fundamental role in the process of economic development. However, the pivotal position of the construction industry has been replaced by the high tech industry as a result of business circle and macro adjustment of industrial structure, which renders a significant number of enterprises in the construction industry have moved to Mainland China for desirable prosperity. Because the domestic documentations and researches related to Entry Mode of Foreign Investment and key success factors of management have paid less attention to further studies on construction industry, the research sets out to explore the Entry Mode and the key success factor of management with a focus on the Taiwan-based enterprises in construction industry that have already entered China market or are planning to enter China market.
The output value of construction industry in China increased more than 20%, accounting for more than 5.5% of GDP and the employment rate of this sector is accounted for 5.28% of the employment in the nation, which is at the growing stage of the industry life cycle. Moreover, the development has expanded to Yangtze Delta, Pearl River Delta and Bohai Bay.
Although the construction sector in China is allowed to run the operations by wholly owned since 2002, it is still a restrictive industry. The current number of Hong Kong-based, Macao-based, Taiwan-based or even foreign enterprises and their market share are low. In terms of the analysis of the strategic group, the advantages of China-based group are pricing competition and domestic protection policy, whereas weaknesses are lack of technology, inefficiency and capital shortage. The advantages of Hong Kong-based, Macao-based and Taiwan-based enterprises are language, technology and strong management capability, while weaknesses are poor access to capital, insufficient international experience and restricted scale of the target market. The advantages of the foreign group are technology and funding capabilities, although weaknesses are language barrier, cultural gap and higher operating cost.
The investment of Taiwanese construction enterprises to China can be categorized into six modes: (1)joint-venture with local firms, (2) obtaining a special permission for a particular project, (3) cooperating with local constructing companies, (4)setting up a consulting company for engineering management, (5) to build up wholly Foreign-owned subsidiary and (6) using the name (license) of a local constructing company.
The factors success factors for Taiwanese construction enterprises with transnational management in China are sole-proprietary operations, integrating technology and funding capability; those for Small and medium size enterprises are joint-venture with local firms, focused professional construction skills and interpersonal relations. This essay suggests Taiwanese construction enterprises should: (1) identify their own advantages and weaknesses, choosing a proper entry mode; (2) be familiar with industrial environment and legal regulations; (3) be honest pragmatic to declare tax; (4) cultivate construction capability which is recognized internationally; (5) build and manipulate interpersonal relations, and (6) select prudently the employees to dispatch and execute the strategy of local human capital hiring. |
參考文獻 |
中文部份
1. 中國建設部, 2002,外商投資建築企業管理規定,北京,中國建築工業出版社。
2. 中國建設部,2001,建築業企業資質管理規定,北京,中國建築工業出版社。
3. 中國統計年鑑,2006,中國國家統計局官方網站,www.stats.gov.cn。
4. 內整部營建署,2006,台閩地區營造業經濟概況調查報告,2006年12月。
5. 王華弘、李賢文,2004,「我國營造業進軍國際之策略」,現代營建,8月。
6. 古秋雄,2000,「台灣大型營造業經營策略之研究─以個案公司為例」,政治大學企管碩士論文。
7. 司徒達賢,1987,策略管理(二版),台北,遠流出版社。
8. 司徒達賢,2005,策略管理新論(再版):觀念架構與分析方法,台北,智盛文化事業。
9. 江克慧,2002,「小型營建企業的策略規劃與策略之探討」,東海大學企管碩士論文。
10. 行政院經建會,2007,「關於日本營建業海外拓展業務可資借鏡的經驗」,12月。
11. 余朝權,1994,產業競爭分析專論,台北,五南書局。
12. 李崇生,2002,「台灣營造業在中國大陸經營策略之探討」,高雄第一科技大學營建工程系碩士論文。
13. 周賜屏,2000,「營造業的轉型策略」,中山大學高階經營碩士班碩士論文。
14. 孟德芸,(1988),企業成功關鍵因素之研究─以個人電腦產業為實證,中興大學企管研究所碩士論文。
15. 林瑞陽,2001,「台灣營建產業不同發展階段經營策略分析之研究」,雲林大學企管碩士論文。
16. 姚義久,1999,「談中國大陸之營建管理」,營造天下,2月。
17. 商業週刊,2006,2005年1000大服務業調查,Vol.966,2006.05.09。
18. 產業分析,2008,國際合作知識分享網,www.ipc.itri.org.tw。
19. 許是詳、吳思華譯,1987,David.A. Aaker著,企業策略管理,台北,中華企業管理發展中心。
20. 陳旭民,1999,「中小企業赴大陸投資進入模式決策與經營績效之研究」,銘傳大學國際企管研究所碩士論文
21. 麥嘉容,2002,「零售商在大陸市場的進入模式」,中山大學企管碩士論文。
22. 黃以方,2001,「營造業大陸行,可行否?」,台北,瓦都國際,12月。
23. 黃宏義譯,1998,大前研一著,策略家的智慧,台北,長河出版社。
24. 黃營杉譯,1999,Charles W.L.Hill & Gareth R. Jones 著,策略管理,台北,華泰文化事業公司。
25. 經理人雜誌,2006,「讓企業更有競爭力」,Vol.22,pp.32-37
26. 經濟部投審會,2007,上市上櫃對大陸投資事業名錄,2007年12月。
27. 經濟部投審會,2007,中華民國對外大陸間接投資統計月年報,2007年12月。
28. 劉同敏,2005,「在台外國營造廠商之探討─營造業者本身需調整自我的經營策略及腳步以因應將來之挑戰」,台北,營造天下,6月。
29. 劉惠民,2002,「台商赴大陸投資進入模式與經營策略之研究─以營建工程相關產業為例」,中山大學高階經營碩士班碩士論文。
30. 潘正華,2001,「面對WTO的劣勢分析」,台北,瓦都國際,12月。
31. 蕭慕荊,2003,「TFT-LCD產業策略群組廠商之關鍵成功因素探討」,管理研究所碩士論文。
32. 謝文雀譯,1998,Philp Kotler et al.著,行銷管理-亞洲實例,台北,華泰書局。
33. 謝浩明、古鴻坤,2000,「中國大陸營建業發展現況檢討」,營造天下,2月。
英文部份
1. Aaker,Daved A.(1984), Strategic Market Management ,Humanities ,New York
2. Ansoff,H.I.(1965),Corporate Strategy, McGraw-Hill, New York.
3. Anderson, E. and Gatignon ,H. (1986),“Mode of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions”, Journal of International Business Studies,17(1),PP.1-26.
4. Andersen, E.(1997), International and market entry mode: A Review of theories and conceptual framework, Management International Review, special issue,V0L.37,PP.27-42.
5. Davidson, W.H.(1980),“The location of foreign direct investment activity: County characteristics and experience effect”,Journal of International Business Studies,pp.9-22.
6. Ferguson, C.R. and Dickinson, R.(1982),“Critical Success Factor for Directors in the Eighties”,Business Horizons,May-June,pp.14-18 .
7. Hatten ,K.J. and Hatten, M.L.(1987)“Strategic Groups Asymmetrical
Mobility Barriers and Contestability ”,Strategic Management Journal,Vol.8,pp.329-342
8. Hill, C.W.L. and Jones, G.R.(1989), Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach, Houghton Mifflin CO., Boston.
9. Hill, C.W.L. and Jones, G.R.(1995),Strategic Management Theory ,Houghton Mifflin Co, New York.
10. Hill, C.W.L. and Jones, G.R. (1997), International Business :Competing in the Global Marketplace (2thed),Irwin, Chicago, PP.413-417.
11. Hofer, C.W. and Schendel, D.E.(1978),Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts, West Publishing Co., St. Paul.
12. Leidecker, Joel. K. and BRUNO, Alberp, V.(1984),“Identifying and Using Critical Success Factors”,Long Range Planning,17(1),p.23.
13. McGee, J. & Thomas, H.,(1986),“Strategic Groups: Theory, Research and Taxonomy”,Strategic Management Journal,Vol.7,pp.151.
14. Mehra, A.(1996),“Resource and Market Based Determinants of Performance in the U.S. Banking Industry ”,Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17,NO.4,Apr.
15. Nohria, N. and Garcia-Pont, C.(1991),“Global Strategic Linkages and Industry Structure.”,Strategic Management Journal,Vol.12(Special Issue),pp.105-124.
16. Palenzula, V.A. and Bobillo, A.M. (1999),“Transaction Costs and Bargaining Power: Entry Mode Choice in Foreign Markets”,Multinational Business Review,7(1):pp.62-75.
17. Porter, M.E.(1980),Competitive Strategy: Techniques of Analyzing Industries and Competitiors, Free Press.
18. Porter, M.E.(1985),Competitive advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance ,Free Press.
19. Reger, R.K. and Huff, A.S.(1993),“Strategic Groups: A Cognitive Perspective”,Strategic Management Journal,Vol.14,1993,pp.103-124.
20. Rockart, J.F.(1979),“Chief executives define their own date needs”,Harvard Business Review,65(8),pp.81-93.
21. Root, F.B.(1994),Entry Strategies for International Markets ,Revised and Expanded, Lexington Books, New York
22. Sheperd, W.G.(1979),The Economics of Industrial Organization, Prentice-Hill, New York.
23. Weihrich, H.(1982),Heinz Wiehrich: The Tows Matrix: A Tool for Situational Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York. |