探討無所不在幾何學習系統與其對幾何學習及量測估算的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：21

、訪客IP：3.144.115.24

姓名

林立凱(Li-Kai Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

探討無所不在幾何學習系統與其對幾何學習及量測估算的影響
(The effect of ubiquitous geometric learning system on geometric learning and measurement estimation ability)

相關論文

★ 同步表演機器人之建構與成效評估	★ 探討國小學童使用電子書多媒體註記系統結合註記分享機制對其學習行為與時間之影響
★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境	★ Facilitating EFL speaking and writing with peer-tutoring and storytelling strategies in authentic learning context
★ An investigation into CKEL-supported EFL learning with TPR to reveal the importance of pronunciation and interactive sentence making	★ Investigation of Facilitating Physics Learning using Ubiquitous-Physics APP with Learning Map and Discussion Board in Authentic Contexts
★ 智慧互動SmartVpen在真實情境對於英文學習之影響	★ 利用合作虛擬化的網絡設計輔助計算機網路學習
★ 探討擴展合作式多媒體認知理論和其對EFL聽力與口語能力之影響 - 結合動覺辨識和學習者設計內容之猜謎遊戲	★ 在真實情境中利用智慧機制提升國小學生之外語口說及對話能力之評估
★ 探討在真實情境下教師回饋對學習認知與學習持續性之影響	★ 註釋、對話代理和協作概念圖支持大學生議論文寫作和後設認知的培養
★ Developing and Validating the Questionnaire and Its Model for Sustainable and Scalable Authentic Contextual Learning Supported by Mobile Apps	★ 探討個人化、情境化及社會化的智慧機制輔助真實情境國小幾何學習與其對學習成效之影響
★ Investigation of smart mechanisms for authentic contextual learning with sensor and recognition technologies	★ 探討智慧回饋如何影響學習時眼動和觸控操作的表現-以 Covid-19 快篩模擬為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

目前已有許多研究指出學習者空間能力與其幾何學科有顯著的正相關，然而大多數量測個體空間能力的方式是以心像旋轉以及空間視覺的測驗量表為主，鮮少探討個體對於感知空間實物大小與距離的能力。雖目前國小課程已將實際量測納入學習活動中，然而礙於傳統教學的限制影響，學習者無法正確的觀察抽象的度量單位與實際大小之間的關係。因此本研究設計一套Ubiquitous Geometry(UG)學習系統，將學習者日常生活常見的物件與其幾何學習內容作結合，並透過行動載具進行實際量測，藉此提升其量測動機與經驗，並強化對於幾何概念的記憶與理解。本研究參與者為某國小五年級三個班級的學生，共計75人，為期五週的實驗期間，三組將進行不同學習方式，以探討不同實驗干預之學習者的學習成效以及其量測估算能力之差異性，並進一步探討實驗組的學習行為與其學習成效間的關聯性。
研究結果表明，在幾何學科測驗中實驗組顯著優於控制組甲、控制組乙；在量測估算能力測驗中實驗組顯著優於控制組乙，此外接受不同學習干預的學習者其量測估算能力與其幾何學習成效皆呈現顯著正相關。實驗組的學習行為分析結果表明，在同儕互評活動中，學習者給予同儕協助(aid)性建議的數量與其學習成效呈現顯著正相關；在同儕競爭的學習活動中，學習者的挑戰次數、挑戰最高分以及觀看挑戰紀錄與其學習成效呈現顯著正相關；學習者實際量測次數與其學習成效和量測估算能力呈現顯著正相關。多數實驗組的學習者皆認為透過實際量測的經驗是能夠有效的提升其對於幾何概念的理解，並且對於其量測估算能力是有幫助的。

摘要(英)

Several researchers recently indicated that individual’s spatial ability and learning achievement of geometry have a significant positive correlation. Out of that most of the researchers employed a questionnaire including mental rotation or spatial visualization to test individual’s spatial ability. However, the individual’s ability in perceiving the real object size or the distance to the object has not been thoroughly investigated so far. In this study, we developed the ubiquitous geometry (UG) learning system to support students to learn about geometric concepts, and to enhance their motivation to perform real world measurements. 75 fifth grade students were participated in this study during five weeks, where they were divided into three groups with different learning ways. We investigated the difference of geometry learning achievement and measurement estimation ability among three groups, and further explored the relationship between the learning behavior and learning achievement.
In the geometry test, the results show that experimental group performed better than control groups I and II. The results of measurement estimation test represent that the experimental group performed better than control group II. Moreover, irrespective of the kind of learning way used, students’ geometry learning achievement has a positive correlation with their measurement estimation ability. The results of the learning behavior analysis show that the amount of aid suggestion feedbacks has a positive correlation with learning achievement. In the peer competition, the amount of competition, the highest score of competition and the amount of review competition have positive correlations with learning achievement. The amount of actual measurement has positive correlations with their learning achievement and measurement estimation ability. Finally, most of the participants had a positive attitude towards the UG system and the designed activities, and expressed that the UG system helped them to enhance their measurement ability and knowledge on geometric concepts effectively.

關鍵字(中)

★ 空間量測估算能力
★ 數學幾何
★ 無所不在的學習

關鍵字(英)

★ Spatial measurement estimated ability
★ Math geometry
★ Ubiquitous learning

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的與待答問題 4
1.3研究限制 5
第二章文獻探討 6
2.1幾何數學與空間能力 6
2.1.1幾何數學 6
2.2.2空間、估算與幾何數學能力 7
2.2情境學習 9
2.3無所不在學習環境 12
2.3.1無所不在學習歷史沿革 12
2.3.2無所不在學習優勢與特性 13
2.3.3無所不在學習相關研究 14
2.4學習動機 18
2.5學習活動 20
2.5.1同儕互評 20
2.5.2同儕競爭 21
第三章系統設計與實作 22
3.1系統設計 22
3.1.1 基本量測 23
3.1.2 幾何面積量測 27
3.1.3 回家作業同儕互評 30
3.1.4 同儕競爭積分挑戰 31
3.1.5 幾何地圖 33
第四章研究方法 35
4.1研究架構 35
4.2研究流程 37
4.3研究對象 40
4.4實驗設計 41
4.5研究工具 44
4.6資料蒐集 47
4.7資料分析 49
第五章結果分析與討論 51
5.1學習成效分析 51
5.1.1幾何學科測驗分析 51
5.1.2量測估算能力測驗分析 52
5.1.3量測估算能力與幾何學科學習成效之相關分析 53
5.2學習者於學習活動之學習行為分析 54
5.2.1 學習者學習行為與學科學習成效之分析 54
5.2.2 不同學習成效於積分挑戰賽之行為差異分析 56
5.3學習者實際量測行為分析 56
5.3.1學習者之實際量測行為與各學習成效之相關分析 57
5.3.2 學習者正確量測幾何面積次數與學習行為之分析 58
5.4學習行為對於幾何學科成效與量測估算能力之預測能力分析 59
5.5問卷分析 60
5.5.1科技接受模型(TAM)問卷分析結果 60
5.5.1凱勒學習動機(ARCS)問卷分析結果 65
第六章結論與建議 70
6.1結論 70
6.1.1　UG學習系統對於國小學童之幾何學習成效之影響 70
6.1.2　UG學習系統對於國小學童之量測估算能力之影響 70
6.1.3　國小學童之幾何學習成效與量測估算能力之關係性 71
6.1.4　學習者的學習行為對於學習成效之影響 71
6.1.5　學習者的實際量測行為對於其幾何學習成效及量測估算能力之影響 71
6.1.6　學習者對於UG學習系統之接受程度與學習動機為何 72
6.2未來工作與建議 73
第七章參考文獻 74
附錄一前測試卷 80
附錄二後測試卷 82
附錄三量測估算能力試卷 85
附錄四科技接受模型問卷 86
附錄五凱勒學習動機問卷 87
附錄六控制組回家作業學習單 88

參考文獻

中文部分
1. 王仁癸（2009）。情境教學在國小英語教學的應用。北縣教育，69期，87-91。
2. 吳姈蓉（2004）。行動學習環境下的數學步道及互動解題討論系統之建置與應用。臺灣師範大學工業科技教育學系學位論文，1-158。
3. 李淑芬（2013）。以行動科技結合學生小組成就區分法 (STAD) 融入社會學習領域教學之行動研究。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班學位論文。
4. 宋千儀（2011）。競爭式學習在實驗策略的合適性探討。臺灣師範大學資訊工程研究所學位論文, 1-140。
5. 林邵珍（2003）。運用 ARCS 動機設計模式之生活科技教學。生活科技教育，36(4)，52-59。
6. 教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北，教育部。
7. 曹雅玲、陳鴻綸（2007）。數學步道活動在數學教學之應用。科學教育(302) ，21-37。
8. 張春興（2006）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐 (修訂版)。臺北：心理。
9. 黃雅琪（2010）。國民小學五年級學童幾何學習表現之研究。國立屏東教育大學數理教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。台灣：屏東。
10. 蕭純如（2009）。網路同儕互評應用於藝術設計領域之研究-以「電腦動畫」課程為例。國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。
11. 韓佳玲（2002）。網路匿名競爭對學習經驗之影響。成功大學教育研究所學位論文, 1-92。

英文部分
Baroody, A., & Coslick, R. T. (1998). Fostering children's mathematical power: An investigative approach to K-8 mathematics instruction: Routledge.
Bayrak, M. E. (2008). Investigation of effect of visual treatment on elementary school student’s spatial ability and attitude toward spatial ability problems. MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY.
Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426.
Bright, G., & Hoeffner, K. (1993). Measurement, probability, statistics, and graphing. Research ideas for the classroom: Middle grades mathematics, 78-98.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Burton, D. M. (1985). The history of mathematics: An introduction. AMC, 10, 12.
Chen, C. C., & Huang, T. C. (2012). Learning in a u-Museum: developing a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Computers & Education, 59(3), 873–883.
Cheng, Y. L., & Mix, K. S. (2013). Spatial training improves children's mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development(ahead-of-print), 1-10.
Chiou, C. K., Tseng, J. C., Hwang, G. J., & Heller, S. (2010). An adaptive navigation support system for conducting context-aware ubiquitous learning in museums. Computers & Education, 55(2), 834-845.
Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, Judy C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning system for natural science course. Computers & Education, 55, 1618-1627.
Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning.
Corno, L., & Rohrkemper, M. (1985). The intrinsic motivation to learn in classrooms. Research on motivation in education, 2, 53-90.
Curtis, M., Luchini, K., Bobrowsky, W., Quintana, C., & Soloway, E. (2002). Handheld use in K-12: A descriptive account. Paper presented at the Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE International Workshop on.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1989). Education of the gifted and talented: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment. Programmed Learning, 32(2), 175-187.
Fallows, S., & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment: reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 229-246.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice: Basic books.
Garrett, A. W., & Davis Jr, O. (2003). A time of uncertainty and change: School mathematics from World War II until the new math. A history of school mathematics, 1, 493-520.
Graf, S. (2008). Adaptivity and personalization in ubiquitous learning systems HCI and Usability for Education and Work (pp. 331-338): Springer.
Guay, R. B., & McDaniel, E. D. (1977). The relationship between mathematics achievement and spatial abilities among elementary school children. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 211-215.
Habibi, M. (2012). The Role of intuitive and Life-related Activities in Improving Teaching of Geometry in Primary School. Journal of American Science, 8(6).
Hannafin, R. D., Truxaw, M. P., Vermillion, J. R., & Liu, Y. (2008). Effects of spatial ability and instructional program on geometry achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(3), 148-157.
Hogan, T. P., & Brezinski, K. L. (2003). Quantitative estimation: One, two, or three abilities? Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(4), 259-280.
Holmes, J., Adams, J. W., & Hamilton, C. J. (2008). The relationship between visuospatial sketchpad capacity and children's mathematical skills. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 272-289.
Huang, S. H., Wu, T. T., Chen, H. R., Yang, P. C., & Huang, Y. M. (2012). Mathematics Assisted Instruction System of M/U-Learning Environment. Paper presented at the Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE), 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on.
Hwang, G. J. (2006). Criteria and Strategies of Ubiquitous Learning. Proceedings of the IEEE InternationalConference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing (vol. 2, pp.72-77). IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA.
Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., Chu, H. C., & Kinshuk Chen, C. Y. (2012). A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach to conducting scientiﬁc inquiry activities in a science park. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 931–947.
Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Yang, Stephen. J. H (2008). Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 81–91.
Hwang, G. J., Wu, T. T., & Chen, Y. J. (2007). Ubiquitous computing technologies in education. Journal of Distance Education Technology, 5 (4), 1-4.
Hwang, W.Y., Chen, H.S.L., Shadiev, R., Huang, R.Y.M. & Chen, C.Y. (2012). Improving English as a foreign language writing in elementary schools using mobile devices in familiar situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-20. DOI:10.1080/09588221.2012.733711
Hwang, W. Y., & Hu, S. S. (2013). Analysis of peer learning behaviors using multiple representations in virtual reality and their impacts on geometry problem solving. Computers & Education, 62, 308-319.
Ibáñez, M. B., García, J. J., Galán, S., Maroto, D., Morillo, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2011). Design and Implementation of a 3D Multi-User Virtual World for Language Learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(4).
Jones, G., Taylor, A., & Broadwell, B. (2009). Estimating linear size and scale: Body rulers. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1495-1509.
Jones, M. G., Gardner, G. E., Taylor, A. R., Forrester, J. H., & Andre, T. (2012). Students' accuracy of measurement estimation: Context, units, and logical thinking. School Science and Mathematics, 112(3), 171-178.
Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2011). Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39(3), 387-406.
Kelch, K. (2011). CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING: INNOVATIONS AND CHALLENGES FOR THE ASIAN CONTEXT. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 3(3).
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, 1, 383-434.
Keller, J. M. (1984). The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. Aspects of educational technology, 17, 140-145.
Keller, J. M. (1987a). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2-10.
Keller, J. M. (1987b). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction, 26(8), 1-7.
Kelley, T. L. (1928). Crossroads in the mind of man: A study of differentiable mental abilities: Stanford university press.
Kohn, A. (1987). The case against competition.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79-97.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation: Cambridge university press.
Lesh, R., & Lamon, S. J. (1992). Assessment of Authentic Performance in School Mathematics. AAAS Press Series on Assessment and Evaluation: ERIC.
Lin, H. C. K., Chen, M. C., & Chang, C. K. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of learning solid geometry by using an augmented reality-assisted learning system. Interactive Learning Environments(ahead-of-print), 1-12.
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child development, 1479-1498.
Liu, T. Y., Tan, T. H., & Chu, Y. L. (2009). Outdoor Natural Science Learning with an RFID-Supported Immersive Ubiquitous Learning Environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 161-175.
Lo, J., & Hyland, F. (2007). Enhancing students’ engagement and motivation in writing: The case of primary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 219-237.
Lohman, D. F., Pellegrino, J. W., Alderton, D. L., & Regian, J. (1987). Dimensions and components of individual differences in spatial abilities Intelligence and cognition: Contemporary frames of reference (pp. 253-312): Springer.
Malone, Thomas W, & Lepper, Mark R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude, learning, and instruction, 3, 223-253.
Marja. (1998). Realistic Mathematics Education as work in progress. Theory into practice in Mathematics Education. Kristiansand, Norway: Faculty of Mathematics and Sciences.
Mathematics., N. C. o. T. o. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics: Natl Council of Teachers of.
Moir, A., & Jessel, D. (1989). Brain sex: The real difference between men and women (Vol. 149): Mandarin London.
Napier, E. (1981). Competition in the Classroom. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 18(1), 18-23.
Nilges, L., & Usnick, V. (2000). The role of spatial ability in physical education and mathematics. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 71(6), 29-33.
Ogata, H., Akamatsu, R., & Yano, Y. (2005). Computer supported ubiquitous learning environment for vocabulary learning using RFID tags Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 121-130): Springer.
Peng, H., Chuang, P. Y., Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Wu, T. T., & Huang, S. X. (2009). Ubiquitous Performance-support System as Mindtool: A Case Study of Instructional Decision Making and Learning Assistant. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1).
Pepitone, E. A. (1985). Children in cooperation and competition Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 17-65): Springer.
Philpot, T. A., Hall, R. H., Hubing, N., & Flori, R. E. (2005). Using games to teach statics calculation procedures: Application and assessment. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 13(3), 222-232.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33.
Pownell, D., & Bailey, G. D. (2001). Getting a Handle on Handhelds: What To Consider before You Introduce Handheld Computers in Your Schools. American School Board Journal, 188(6), 18-21, 48.
Regueras, L. M., Verdú, E., Verdú, M. J., Pérez, M. Á., de Castro, J. P., & Muñoz, M. F. (2008). Motivating students through on-line competition: An analysis of satisfaction and learning styles Advances in Web Based Learning-ICWL 2008 (pp. 167-177): Springer.
Roberts, M. L., & Wortzel, L. H. (1979). NEW LIFE-STYLE DETERMINANTS OF WOMEN'S FOOD SHOPPING BEHAVIOR. Journal of Marketing, 43(3).
Rowan, T. E. (1990). Implementing the Standards: Spatial Sense. The Geometry Standards in K-8 Mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 37(6), 24-28.
Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Jossey-Bass San Francisco.
Shih, S. C., Kuo, B. C., & Liu, Y. L. (2012). Adaptively Ubiquitous Learning in Campus Math Path. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 298-308.
Shih, W. C., Tseng, S. S., Yang, C. C., Lin, C. Y., & Liang, T. (2012). A Folksonomy-based Guidance Mechanism for Context-aware Ubiquitous Learning: A Case Study of Chinese Scenic Poetry Appreciation Activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1).
Shin, S. C., Kuo, B. C., & Liu, Y. L. (2012). Adaptively Ubiquitous Learning in Campus Math Path. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2).
Sowder, J. T. (1992). Estimation and number sense.
Stahl, R. J. (1992). From" academic strangers" to successful members of a cooperative learning group: An inside-the-learner perspective. Cooperative Learning in Social Studies Classroom, An Introduction to Social Study, 8-15.
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication: Cambridge university press.
Tan, T. H., Lin, M. S., Chu, Y. L., & Liu, T. Y. (2012). Educational Affordances of a Ubiquitous Learning Environment in a Natural Science Course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2).
Tartre, L. A. (1990). Spatial orientation skill and mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 216-229.
Thom, R. (2002). Measurement? It's Fun! Didn't You Guess? Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 7(2), 26.
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
Towler, L., & Broadfoot, P. (1992). Self‐assessment in the Primary School. Educational Review, 44(2), 137-151.
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., Bay-Williams, J. M., Wray, J., & Rigelman, N. R. M. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally.
Wen, J. R., Cheng, K. M., Chen, C. P., & Hsieh, Y. H. (2013). A study on the application of ubiquitous learning environment to english learning in elementary schools. Universal Journal of Education and General Studies, 2(2), 53-65.
Yahya, S., Ahmad, E. A., & Jalil, K. A. (2010). The definition and characteristics of ubiquitous learning: A discussion. International Journal of Education & Development using Information & Communication Technology, 6(1).
Yang, W. S., Cheng, H. C., & Dia, J. B. (2008). A location-aware recommender system for mobile shopping environments. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 437-445.
Yu, F. Y., Chang, L. J., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T. W. (2002). Learning preferences towards computerised competitive modes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 341-350.

指導教授

黃武元(Wu-Yuin Hwang)

審核日期

2014-4-22

推文