高科技產業之轉換型領導和離職傾向關聯性分析－以信任為中介變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：41

、訪客IP：3.137.173.62

姓名

洪頤安(Yi-an Hung) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

高科技產業之轉換型領導和離職傾向關聯性分析－以信任為中介變項
(A Study on the Relationship among Transformational Leadership, Trust, and Turnover Intention, Trust as the Mediating Variable. – Case for High-tech Industry in Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 企業內部人力資源入口網站使用者滿意度調查–以A公司為例	★ 員工內部行銷知覺、組織承諾與離職傾向之關係研究─以某科技公司為例
★ 研發人員創造力人格特質、工作價值觀對工作績效之影響-以某高科技研究機構為例	★ 組織生涯管理對組織承諾影響之探討-以A公司為例
★ 導入以職能為基礎之評鑑中心可行性研究－－以銀行業為例	★ 360 度管理職能評鑑與受評者自我覺察能力之探討－個案公司跨年度研究
★ 探討中階主管人格特質、領導風格與工作績效之關聯性--以Y公司為例	★ 因應公司經營策略變革之人力資源配置調整個案探討
★ 從組織變革觀點探討業務流程管理成效之個案研究	★ 主管領導風格與員工人格特質對工作績效之影響
★ 矩陣式組織之專案績效考核制度探討-以某公司為例	★ 企業因應員工分紅費用化之措施及其成效探討
★ 證券後勤基層主管職業生涯地圖之建立	★ 企業導入卓越經營績效評量之案例探討
★ 主管領導風格對組織氣候與績效之影響探討-以T公司為例	★ 人力資源管理措施對工作態度之影響探討-以台灣高鐵為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

臺灣，一個由中小企業貿易起家的經濟體，到現在逐步變成高科技製造代工的矽島，其成功關鍵乃在於高科技人才日以繼夜地在研發、產品、製造及各種專利上的努力。然而，面對國際競爭、缺乏關鍵技術等問題，以及一波波的大陸企業紛紛祭出高薪，挖角關鍵人才，造成臺灣科技產業的優秀人才外流。此現象亦成為研究者欲探究高科技產業離職問題的動機所在。本研究目的為探討不同構面對於部屬離職傾向的影響，希望本研究結果能作為高科技產業在招募、訓練與發展或留任人員時的參考。
本研究主要以臺灣高科技產業中有直屬主管的正職員工為調查對象。問卷總計發放312份，回收282份，其中扣除7份無效問卷後，有效問卷總計275份，有效樣本回收率為 88.14%。本研究證實，(1)部屬感受到的轉換型領導對部屬離職傾向具有顯著負向影響；(2)部屬感受到的轉換型領導，對於部屬對主管的信任有顯著正向影響；部屬感受到的轉換型領導，對於部屬對主管的情感信任和認知信任皆有顯著正向影響；(3)部屬對主管的信任對其離職傾向有顯著負向影響；部屬對主管的情感信任以及認知信任，皆對於部屬離職傾向具有顯著負向影響；(4)在部屬感受到轉換型領導與部屬離職傾向的關係中，部屬對主管的信任具有完全中介效果；在部屬感受到轉換型領導與部屬離職傾向的關係中，部屬對主管的情感信任無中介效果；在部屬感受到轉換型領導與部屬離職傾向的關係中，部屬對主管的認知信任具有完全中介效果。
本研究建議高科技業者不僅應重視主管的轉換型領導，亦須強化主管與部屬之信任關係以降低部屬離職傾向，並建議後續研究者可針對本研究限制進行更全面深入的研究。

摘要(英)

Taiwan, an economy started by the SME business, now gradually becoming a high-tech OEM Silicon Island. The key to its success relies on those high-tech talents who put lot of efforts on R&D, new products, manufacturing and diverse patents. However, with world-wide competitions, lack of core technologies, and high pay head hunting from China one after another, all resulted in fierce brain drain of Taiwan technology industry. For these reasons, they intrigued the researcher to explore the issue of turnover in high-tech industry. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on employees’ turnover intention from different variables, and to provide the consultations to the corporations in establishing recruiting, training and development and employee retention principles.
This study collected empirical data from the permanent employees who have direct supervisor in high-tech industry in Taiwan. A total of 312 questionnaires were released, and 282 questionnaires were returned. 275 questionnaires were valid, and 7 questionnaires were invalid. The effective response rate was 88.14%. As predicted, we found there was a significant negative effect between employees’ perception of transformational leadership and employees’ turnover intention. Besides, employees’ perception of transformational leadership had a significant positive effect on trust of direct leader; employees’ perception of transformational leadership had significant positive effects on affect-based trust and cognition-based trust of direct leader. Furthermore, trust of the direct leader had a significant negative effect on employees’ turnover intention; both affect-based trust and cognition-based trust of the direct leader had significant negative effects on employees’ turnover intention. Finally, Trust of direct leader fully mediated the relationship between employees’ perception of transformational leadership and employees’ turnover intention. Affect-based trust of direct leader didn’t mediate the relationship between employees’ perception of transformational leadership and employees’ turnover intention. Cognition-based trust of direct leader fully mediated the relationship between employees’ perception of transformational leadership and employees’ turnover intention.
This study suggests high-tech companies not only pay attention to leader’s transformational leadership, but also create a stronger level of trust between a leader and employees and of intention to stay. Due to the limitations of the study, it is recommended to conduct more in-depth research in the future.

關鍵字(中)

★ 轉換型領導
★ 信任
★ 離職傾向
★ 高科技產業

關鍵字(英)

★ Transformational Leadership
★ Trust
★ Turnover Intention
★ High-tech industry

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 3
第二章文獻探討 4
第一節轉換型領導 4
第二節主管與部屬之信任關係 10
第三節離職傾向 15
第四節轉換型領導與離職傾向 22
第五節轉換型領導與信任 22
第六節信任與離職傾向 23
第七節轉換型領導、信任與離職傾向 24
第三章研究方法 26
第一節研究架構 26
第二節研究假設 26
第三節研究變項之操作型定義及測量工具 27
第四節研究對象和抽樣方法 29
第五節統計分析方法 30
第四章研究結果 31
第一節敘述性統計分析 31
第二節信度分析 32
第三節相關分析 33
第四節迴歸分析 33
第五章研究結論與建議 46
第一節研究結論與討論 46
第二節管理意涵 49
第三節研究限制與後續研究建議 50
參考文獻 51
附錄 59

參考文獻

一、中文部份
1.360 人才庫，(民100) 。離職真原因 7 成以上：再也無法忍受主管！360 人才庫，2011 / 07/19。網址： http://www.360d.com.tw/news/view/838.html。
2.李珍玫 (民85)。主管領導型態、人力資源制度對百貨專櫃人員離職意願之探討。靜宜女子大學管理科學系研究所碩士論文。
3.施妤璇 (民95)。轉換型領導、交易型領導對工作績效與離職傾向之研究-以組織承諾為中介變項。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
4.許科、陳永強 (民94)。管理者信任行為與員工離職傾向的相關研究。華北水利水電學院學報(社科版)，1。
5.陳玉鎂 (民95)。轉換型領導對工作滿足及組織承諾的影響─以工作特性為中介變項。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
6.吳宗祐 (民97)。主管權威領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾：信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究，第三十期，3-63。
7.吳明隆 (民98)。SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。五南出版社。

二、英文部份
1.Abelson, M. A. (1986). Strategic management of turnover: A model for the health service administrator. Health care Manage Review, 11, 61-71.
2.Ackoff, M. H. (1999). Tip for Expatriate Management. Human Resource Focus, 75, 38-48.
3.Amy E. Green., Elizabeth A. Miller., & Gregory A. Aarons. (2011). Transformational Leadership Moderates the Relationship Between Emotional Exhaustion and Turnover Intention Among Community Mental Health Providers. Community Mental Health Journal.
4.Argyris, C. (1962). Interpersonal competence and organizational effectiveness.
Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
5.Aronson, E. (2001). Integrating Leadership Style and Ethical Perspectives. Revue
Canadienne des Sciences de I’Administation. Montreal: Dec 2001, 18(4), 244-257.
6.Barak, M., Nissly, J. & Levin, A. (2001). Antecedents to Retention and Turnover
among Child Welfare, Social Work, and Other Human Service Employees: What
Can We Learn from Past Research? A Review and Metanalysis. Social Service
Review, 75, 625-661.
7.Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (Winter Special Issue), 175--216.
8.Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
9.Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond Expectations. New York : Free Press.
10.Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill′s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
11.Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness though Transformational Leadership. CA:Sage.
12.Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. NY: Harper & Row.
13.Berndt, T. (1981). Effects of Friendship on Prosocial Intentions and Behavior.
Child Development ,52, 636-643.
14.Bhattacharya, R., Devinney, T. M., & Pillutla, M. M. (1998). A formal model of trust based on outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 23, 459-472.
15.Boon, S. D., & Holmes, J. G. (1991). The dynamics of interpersonal trust: Resolving uncertainty in face of risk. In R. A. Hinde & J. Groebel (Eds.), Cooperation and prosocial behavior (pp. 190-211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
16.Bosler, S. R. & Bauman, D. J. (1992). Meeting culture diversity with personal conviction: The teacher as transformational leader. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350283)
17.Bret L. Simmons.(2011). Servant Leadership, Trust, And Team Performance.
http://www.bretlsimmons.com/2011-03/servant-leadership-trust-and-team-perfor
mance/
18.Butler, J.K. Jr, Cantrell, R.S., & Flick, R.J. (1999). Transformational leadership behaviors, upward trust, and satisfaction in self-managed work teams.
Organization Development Journal, 17(1), 13-28.
19.Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 606–632.
20.Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Happer & Row.
21.Bycio, P., Hackett, R. D., & Allen, J. S. (1995). Further assessments of Bass’s (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80,468-478.
22.Canadian Forces Leadership Institute. (2005b). Leadership in the Canadian Forces: Doctrine. Kingston, Ontario: Canadian Defence Academy.
23.Chun, J. U., Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Sosik, J. J., & Moon, H. K. (2009).
Leadership across hierarchical levels: Multiple levels of management and multiple levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 689–707.
24.Clark, M., & Payne, R. (1997). The nature and structure of workers’ trust in
management. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 205-224.
25.Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational
commitment and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational
Psychology, 53, 39-52.
26.Covey, S. M. (2008). The Speed of Trust. New York: Free Press.
27.Dalton. D.R., Todor, W.D., & Krackhardt, D. M.(1982). Turnover overstated: The functional taxonomy. Academy of Managemant Review, 7(1) 118-119.
28.Deutsch, M. (1960a). The effect of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations, 13, 123-139.
29.Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1004-1012.
30.Dirks, K. T., Ferrin D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628.
31.Downton, J. V. (1973). Rebel Leadership: Commitment and Charisma in a
Revolutionary Process. New York: The Free Press.
32.Egan, T.M., Yang, B., & Bartlett, K.R. (2004), The Effects of Organizational
Learning Culture and Job Satisfaction on Motivation to Transfer Learning and
Turnover Intention. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15,3, 279–301.
33.Fishbein M (1967). Attitude and the prediction of behavior. In: Fishbein M, ed.
Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement. New York: Wiley.
34.Friedman, H.H. & Langbert, M. (2000). Transformational Leadership: Instituting Revolutionary Change in Your Accounting Firm. The National Public
Accountant, (45), 8-11.
35.Guralnik, D.B. (1971). The Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American
Language. NJ : Prentice Hall.
36.Hagen, J. M., & Choe, S. (1998). Trust in Japanese inter?rm relations: Institutional sanctions matter. Academy of Management Review, 23, 589-600.
37.Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
38.Hater, J. J., and B. M. Bass (1988), Superiors′ Evaluations and Subordinates′
Perceptions of Transformational and Transactional Leadership, Journal of
Applied Psychology, 73, 695-702.
39.Hayes, S., and Thomas, W. N. Taking Command. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole, 1967.Herrera, F. (2002). Demystifying employee motivation. Employment Relations Today, 28, 4, 37-52.
40.Hogan, R., Curphy, G., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493-504.
41.Hom, P.W., & Griffeth, R.W. (1991). A Structural Equations Modeling Test of a Turnover Theory: Crosssectional and Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology ,76, 350-366.
42.Howell, J.M., & Avolio, B.J. (1989). Transformational versus transactional
leadership: How they impact innovation, risk-taking, organization structure and
performance. Paper presented at the National Meeting of the Academy of
Management, Washington, DC.
43.Hsu, J., Hsu, Jui-Che, Huang, S. Y., Leong, L., & Li, A. M. (2003). Are leadership styles linked to turnover intention: An examination in Mainland China? Journal of American Academy of Business, 3, 37-43.
44.Hunt, J.G. (1991). Leadership: A new synthesis. Newbury Park, CA.:Sage
45.Janelle E. Wells., & Jon Welty Peachey. (2011). Turnover intentions: Do leadership behaviors and satisfaction with the leader matter? Team Performance
Management, 17, 23 – 40.
46.Janine, J.C. (1999). A Field Study of a Cognitive Approach to Understanding
Transformational and Transaction Leadership. Leadership Quarterly. 9 , 55-84.
47.Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791-815.
48.Likert, R. (1967). The human organization: Its management and value, New York: McGraw-Hill.
49.Lin,S.C., Chang, H.T., Chen,F.S., & Lin, Y.M.(2011). Study on the effects of transformational leadership by managers and organizational justice consciousness on organizational citizenship behaviour of high-tech electronics industry in Taiwan. African Journal of Business Management. 5(7), 2930-2941
50.Luhamann, N. (1979), Trust and Power: Two works. New York: John Wiley.
51.Kim, C. W., & Mauborgne, R. A. (1993). Procedural Justice, Attitudes, and Subsidiary. Top Management Journal, 36, 502-526.
52.Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36-51.
53.Mackenzie, S.B. & Podsakoff, P.M., & Rich, G.A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Academy of Marketing Science Journal. Greenvale: Spring 2001. 29(2), 115-135.
54.Madhok, A. (1995). Revisiting multinational ?rms’ tolerance for joint ventures: A trust-based approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(1), 117-137.
55.Martin, R., & O. Epitropaki. (2001). Role of Organizational Identification on Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTS), Transformational leadership and work attitudes. Group Process Intergroup Relations, 4,247-262.
56.Maxime A. Tremblay (2010). Fairness Perceptions and Trust as Mediators on the
Relationship Between Leadership Style, Unit Commitment, and Turnover Intentions of Canadian Forces Personnel. Military Psychology, 22, 510–523.
57.Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
58.McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal,
38, 24-59.
59.McCauley, D. P., & Kuhnert, K. W. (1992). A theoretical review and empirical
investigation of employee trust. Public Administration Quarterly, 16, 265-284.
60.Mellinger, G. (1959). Interpersonal trust and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 304-309.
61.Michaels, C.E. & Spector, P.E.(1982). Causes of Employee Turnover: A Test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino Model. Journal of Applied Psychology,67, 53-59.
62.Miller, H. E., Katerberg, R., & Hulin, C. L. (1979). Evaluation of the Mobley, Horner and Hollingsworth model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(5), 509-517.
63.Mobley,W.H. (1977), Intermediate Linkages in the Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237-240.
64.Mobley, W.H., Horner, S.O., & Hollingsworth, A.T. (1978). An evaluation of precursors of hospital employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4),
408-414.
65.Newman J E (1974). Predicting absenteeism and turnover: A field comparison of Fishbein’s model and traditional job attitude measures. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 59, 610–615.
66.Nyhan, R. C. (2000).Changing the paradigm: Trust and its role in public sector organizations. American Review of Public Administration, 30(1), March, 87-109.
67.Peter, T. J.＆Waterman, R. H., Jr.（1982）, In search of Excellence : Lessons from American’s Best-Run Companies, New York : Harper＆Row.
68.Pillai, R., Schriesheim, C., & Williams, E. (1999). Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of Management, 6, 897-933.
69.Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., & Bommer, W.H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviours and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and OCB. Journal of Management, 22, 259-98.
70.Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S.B., Moorman, R.H., & Fetter, R. (1990).
Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers′ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142.
71.Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T. & Boulian, P. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609.
72.Price, J. L. (1977). The study of Turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
73.Price, J. L. (2001). Reflections on the Determinants of Voluntary Turnover. International Journal of Manpower, 22, 600-624.
74.Price, J.L. and Mueller, C.W.(1981). A Causal of Turnover of Nurses. Academy of Management Journal, 24(3),547.
75.Quinn , R. E., and Hall, R.H.(1983). Environments, organizations, and policy makers: Towards an integrative framework. In R.H. Hall and R. E. Quinn (Eds.),
Organization Theory and Public Policy: Contributions and Limitations. Beverly
Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1983.
76.Randall, D. M. (1987). Commitment and organization: The organization man revisited. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 462-477.
77.Read, W. H. (1962). Upward communication in industrial hierarchies. Human
Relations, 15, 3-15.
78.Robert, Richard, J.Jason, Grazyna, & Vladimir (2013). The significance of direct-leader and co-worker trust on turnover intentions: A cross-cultural study.
Journal of Trust Research, 2, 98-124.
79.Robins, S.P. (1995). Organizational Behavior. Prentice-Hall.
80.Robbins, S.P.(2005). Organizational behavior. (11th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
81.Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574-599.
82.Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
83.Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 863-871.
84.Sergiovanni, T.J. (1990). Value-Added leadership: How to get extraordinary result in Schools. NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
85.Shaw, J.D., Delery, J.E., Jenkins, G.D., & Gupta, N. (1998), An Organization-Level Analysis of Voluntary and Involuntary Turnover. Academy of Management Review, 41, 5, 511–525.
86.Sousa-Poza, A. & Henneberger, F. (2004). Analyzing job mobility with job turnover intentions: An international comparative study. Journal of Economic Issues, 38(1), 113-137.
87.Tett, R. P., and Meyer, J. P., 1993, Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytical findings. Personnel Psychology, 46 (2), 259-295.
88.Trevor, C.O. (2001), Interactive Effects Among Actual Ease of Movement Determinants and Job Satisfaction in the Prediction of Voluntary Turnover.
Academy of Management Journal,44, 621–638.
89.Van Schalkwyk, S., Du Toit, D.H., Bothma, A.S., & Rothmann, S. (2010). Job Insecurity, Leadership Empowerment Behaviour, Employee Engagement and Intention to Leave in a Petrochemical Laboratory. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 8,234–241.
90.Waddell, A. M. (1996). A female in the elementary school principal’s office: A beacon for woman. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytech Institute and State University.
91.Walumbwa, F. O., Orwa, B., Wang, P., & Lawler, J. J. (2005). Transformational leadership, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction: A comparative study of Kenyan and U.S. financial firms. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 235–256.
92.Whitener, E., Brodt, S., Korsgaard, M. A., Werner, J. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 513-530.
93.Williams, L. J., & Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 219-231.
94.Yang, J., & Mossholder, K. W. (2010). Examining the effects of trust in leaders: A bases-and-foci approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 50–63.
95.Yukl, G.A.（1989）, Leadership in Organizations.（Second edition）Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
96.Yukl, G.A. (1994). Leadership in organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
97.Zalenik, A. (1977). Managers and Leaders: Are they different? Harvard Business
Review,1977,55(5),67-80.
98.Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 53-111.

指導教授

鄭晉昌(Jihn-Chang Jehng)

審核日期

2014-6-17

推文