博碩士論文 101427020 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:158 、訪客IP:3.129.195.206
姓名 張幼萱(Yu-hsuan Chang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 工作績效對於離職傾向的影響 -以認知內部與外部市場價值為中介變項
(The study of the relationship between job performance and turnover intention:The mediating effects of perceived inner value and perceived outer value.)
相關論文
★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究-一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討-以內外控人格特質為干擾變項★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 儘管過去對於探討績效表現與離職傾向之關係有相當多的研究,然仍無法釐清績效表現越好的員工會傾向留在組織內部還是離開組織的問題,因此本研究結合雙重觀點,並延伸學者理論基礎欲了解員工是否會因為自己在組織內、外部市場價值以及兩者間的差異而影響其離職意願。

此外,領導與部屬交換關係過去常被認為能提升員工滿意度及組織承諾,以降低部屬離職傾向,因此本研究亦嘗試以此作為調節變項,欲了解當績效越好的員工,了解自己在組織外部市場價值大於組織內部市場價值時,透過領導與部屬交換關係是否能減緩員工的離職傾向。

本研究發展出外-內部市場價值差距模型並於企業實證後認為,當績效表現越好的員工,感知自己在組織外部市場的價值大於在組織內部時,其離職傾向將愈高。因此經理人應注意員工思索離職傾向時,實為共同思考自己在組織外內部的市場價值,而非分開思量。再者,本研究亦發現LMX並無顯著減緩員工離職效果,因此若經理人想透過與員工「深交」,期許員工於「情面」上留在組織中,其效果可能適得其反,值得注意。
摘要(英) In spite of lots of researches study the relationship between job performance and turnover intention, still can’t figure out the question about how the better performance employee intents to stay or leave the organization. Accordingly, this study not only combines with every perspectives but extends the theories to understand that whether the perceived inner value, perceived outer value, and the discrepancy will effect employees’ turnover intention.

LMX was considered to be a way to increase employees’ satisfaction, organization commitment and decrease their intention to leave; therefore, this study tries to use LMX as a moderator to know if LMX has the effect to weaken employees’ turnover intention when employees has perceived their outer value is better than inner value.

This study develops a “Perceived Outer-Inner Value discrepancy” model. After questioning 52 enterprises from multiple industries, the findings of this study list as follows. The better performance employees own, and at the same time they perceive their outer value is better than their inner value, the higher intention to leave they will have. Besides, LMX doesn’t have the weaken effects to decrease employees turnover intention. If managers want to use LMX as a way, they should be careful of the opposite affection.
關鍵字(中) ★ 工作績效
★ 認知內部市場價值
★ 認知外部市場價值
★ 認知外-內部市場價值差距
★ 離職傾向
★ 領導與部屬交換關係
關鍵字(英) ★ job performance
★ perceived inner value
★ perceived outer value
★ perceived outer-inner value discrepancy
★ turnover intention
★ leader-member exchange
論文目次 中文摘要 iv
Abstract v
目錄 vii
圖目錄 viii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 工作績效 7
第二節 離職傾向 8
第三節 領導與部屬交換關係 8
第四節 工作績效對於員工離職傾向之影響 10
第五節 外-內部市場價值綜合探討及差距模型建立 13
第六節 領導與部屬交換關係對認知外-內部市場價值差距與離職傾向關聯性之調 節效果 16
第三章 研究方法 18
第一節 研究架構 18
第二節 研究對象及程序 19
第三節 研究變項及衡量 19
第四節 資料分析方法 21
第四章 資料分析結果 22
第一節 敘述性資料統計 22
第二節 問卷信度分析 23
第三節 驗證性因素分析 23
第四節 收斂效度與區別效度分析結果 24
第五節 相關分析 25
第六節 階層迴歸分析 26
第五章 研究結論與建議 36
第一節 研究結論與討論 36
第二節 學術與實務貢獻 42
第三節 管理意涵 44
第四節 研究限制與建議 45
參考文獻 47
參考文獻 1. Adams, J. S. (1965). "Inequity in social exchange. L. Berkowitz." Advances in experimental social psychology 2: 267-299.
2. Aldhuwaihi, A., Shee, H. K., & Stanton, P. (2012). Organisational culture and the job satisfaction-turnover intention link: A case study of the saudi arabian banking sector. World Journal of Social Sciences, 2(3), 127-141.
3. Allen, David G. & Griffeth, Rodger W. (1999). Job performance and turnover: A review and integrate multi-route model. Human Resource Management Review, 9(4), 525-548.
4. Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bhal, K. (2006), LMX-citizenship behavior relationship: justice as a mediator, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(2), 107-17.
6. Biron, Michal & Boon, Corine.(2012). Performance and turnover intentions: a social exchange perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 28(5), 511-531.
7. Boudreau, J.W., & Berger, C. J. (1985). Decision- theoretic utility analysis applied to employee separations and acquisitions (Monograph). Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 581-612.
8. Cascio, W. F. (1995). Managing Human Resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Chang, H. M. (2008). Relations between team work and innovation in organizations and the job satisfaction of employees: A factor analytic study. International Journal of Management, 25(3), 732-9.
10. Coyle-Shapiro, J. and Kessler, I. (2000), Mutuality, stability and psychological contract breach: a longitudinal study, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto.
11. Dalton, D. R., & Todor, W. D. (1982). Turnover overstated: A functional taxonomy. Academy of Management Review, 7, 117-123
12. Dansereau, F., Cashman, J., & Graen, G. B. (1973). Instrumentality theory and equity theory as complementary approaches in predicting the relationship of leadership and turnover among managers. Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 10(1), 184-200.
13. Dawley, David, Houghton Jeffery D. & Bucklew, Neil S.(2010). Perceived organizational support and turnover intention: The mediating effects of personal sacrifice and job fit. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(3), 238–257
14. Dienesch, R.M. and Liden, R.C. (1986), Leader-member exchange model of leadership: a critique and further development, Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634.
15. Douglas, L R. (2010). The role of follower self- concept and implicit leadership theories in transformational leadership and leader-member exchange. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Nova Southeastern University.
16. Du, Chan & Lin, Ting-Ting. (2011). Ceo Turnover, Equity-based compensation and firm’s investment decisions. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 9(8), 19-40.
17. Elanain, A. & Hossam, M. (2014). Leader-member exchange and intent to turnover: Testing a mediated- effects model in a high turnover work environment. Management Research Review, 37(2), 110-129.
18. French, J. R. P., Jr. and R. D. Caplan (1973). Organizational stress and individual strain. In A. J. Marrow (Ed.), The failure of success. New York: AMACOM.
19. Gouldner, A. (1960), The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement, American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-78.
20. Graen, G. B., Cashman, J., & Haga. W. J. (1975). A role- making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach, in Hunt J. & Larson L. (Eds.), Leadership Frontiers , Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
21. Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488.
22. Guralnik, D.B. (1971).The Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
23. Harris, Kenneth J., Kacmar, K. Michele & Witt, L. A. (2005). An examination of the curvilinear relationship between leader-member exchange and intent to turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 26, 363-378.
24. Heydarian, M., & Abhar, S. (2011). Factors contributing to employees’ turnover intention. SEGi Review, 4(2), 31-41.
25. Hochwarter, W. A., Kiewitz, C., Gundlach, M. J., & Stoner, J. (2004). The impact of vocational and social efficacy on job performance and career satisfaction. Leadership and Organizational Studies, 10(3), 27-40.
26. Hollenbeck, J. R., & Williams, C. R. (1986). Turnover functionality versus turnover frequency: A note on work attitudes and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 606-611.
27. Hom, P. W., Caranikas-Walker, F., Prussia, G. E., & Griffeth, R. W. (1992). A meta-analytical structural equations analysis of a model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 890–909.
28. Hom, P., & Griffeth, R. W. (2000). Employee turnover. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
29. Islam, T., Saif ur Rehman Khan, Ungku Norulkamar Ungku Bt. Ahmad & Ishfaq Ahmed (2013). Organizational learning culture and leader- member exchange quality. The way to enhance organizational commitment and reduce turnover intentions. The Learning Organization, 20 (4/5), 322-337
30. Jamal, M. (2007). Job stress and job performance controversy revisited: An empirical examination in two countries. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 175-187.
31. Kahn, R. L., D. D. Wolfe, R. P. Quinn, J. D. Snoek, & R. A. Rosenthal (1964). Organizational stress. Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York, John Wiley.
32. Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Wanberg, C. R., Glomb, T. M., & Ahlburg, D. (2005) The role of temporal shifts in turnover processes: It’s about time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 644–658.
33. Karatepe, O.M. (2013). High-performance work practices, work social support and their effects on job embeddedness and turnover intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25 (6), 903-921.
34. Kleinfeldt, Kathleen M. (2012). The effect of transformational leadership and high quality leader-member exchange on the turnover intentions of younger workers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chicago school.
35. Kottke, J. L., & Sharafinski, C. E. (1988). Measuring perceived supervisory and organizational support. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48:1075-1079.
36. Kraut, A. I. (1975) . Predicting turnover of employees from measured job attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 233-243.
37. Kwon, Ki-Wook (1999). Human resource management, high performer turnover, and firm performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois. Urbana- Champaign.
38. Lambert, E.C., Hogan, N.L., & Barton, S.M. (2001). The impact of job satisfaction on turnover intent: A test of a structural measurement model using a national sample of workers. The Social Science Journal, 38, 233-250.
39. Lee, T. H., Gerhart, B., Weller, I., & Trevor, C. O. (2008). Understanding voluntary turnover: Path-specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 651–671.
40. Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24:31-48.
41. Liden, R.C. and Maslyn, J.M. (1998). Multidimensionafity of leader-member exchange: an empirical assessment through scale development, Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72.
42. Liden, R.C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S.J. and Sparrowe, R.T. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: implications for individual and group performance, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (6), 1-24.
43. Liu, Zhiqiang, Cai, Zhenyao, Li, Ji, Shi, Shengping & Fang, Yongqing (2013). Leadership style and employee turnover intentions: a social identity perspective. Career Development International. 18(3), 305-324.
44. March, J., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
45. Maertz, C. P., & Griffeth, R. W. (2004). Eight motivational forces and voluntary turnover: a theoretical synthesis with implications for research. Journal of Management, 30, 667–683.
46. Marlize Paulo da Silva & Gilberto Tadeu Shinyashiki (2014). The human resource management can reduce turnover? Journal of Management Research, 6(2), 39-52.
47. Masterson, S.S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B.M. and Taylor, M.S. (2000), Integrating justice and social exchange. The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738-748.
48. Mauro, Theodore Darid (2007). Leader- member exchange theory in administrator and educator perceptions of the collaborative nature of the school environment related to special educator retention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Clemson University.
49. McEvoy, G. M., & Cascio, W. F. (1987). Do good or poor performance leave? A meta-analysis of the relationship between performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), 744-762
50. Meijman, T.F. and Mulder, G. (1998), Psychological aspects of workload, in Drenth, P.J.D. and Thierry, H. (Eds), Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2, Psychology Press, New York, NY, 5-33.
51. Michaels, C. E., & Spector, D. E. (1982) . Causes of employee turnover: A text of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand and Meglino model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(1), 53-59.
52. Mobley,W.H. (1977). Employee Turnover:Cause, Consequence and Control Maine:Addison-Wesley.
53. Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237–240.
54. Mobley, W. H. (1982). Some unanswered questions in turnover and withdrawal research. Academy of Management Review, 7: 111-116.
55. Morrell, K., Loan-Clarke, J., & Wilkinson, A. (2001). Unweaving leaving: The use of models in the management of employee turnover. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 219-244.
56. Morrow, Paula C., Suzuki, Yoshinori, Crum, Michawl R., Ruben, Rubert & Pautsch, Gregory(2005). The role of leader-member exchange in high turnover work environments. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(8), 681-694.
57. Newman, J. E. (1974) . Predicting absenteeism and turnover: A field comparison of fish bein’s model and traditional job attitude measures, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 610-615.
58. Nyberg, Anthony. (2010). Retaining your high performers: Moderators of the performance- job satisfaction- voluntary turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 440-453.
59. Nyberg, Anthony J. (2008). Performance, compensation and turnover. ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing. The University of Wisconsin – Madison.
60. Park, H. Y., Ofori-Dankworth, J., & Bishop, D. R. (1994). Organizational and environmental determinants of functional and dysfunctional turnover: Practical and research implications. Human Relations, 47, 353-366.
61. Perez, M. (2008). Turnover intent diploma thesis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Zurich, Zurich.
62. Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1973) . Organizational, work and personal factors in employee turnover absenteeism, Psychological Bullctin, 80(2), 151-176.
63. Price, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
64. Rahman, A., Naqvi, S.M.M.R., & Ramay, M.I. (2008). Measuring turnover intention: A study of IT professionals in Pakistan. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(3), 45-55.
65. Ramlall, S. J.(2001). An analysis of employee retention practices within a large complex organization.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
66. Rego, A. (2002). Comprometimento afetivo dos membros organizacionais: o papel das percepcoes de justica. Revista de Administracao Contemporanea, 6(2), 209-241.
67. Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational Behavior, 10th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
68. Rutherford, Brian N, Wei, Yujie, Park, JungKun & Hur, Won-Moo. (2012). Increasing job performance and reducing turnover: an examination of female Chinese salespeople. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(4) 423–436.
69. Salamin, A., & Hom, P. W. (2005). In search of the elusive u-shaped performance–turnover relationship: Are high-performing Swiss bankers more liable to quit? Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1204–1216.
70. Schwab, D. P. (1991). Contextual variables in employee performance- turnover relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 966-975.
71. Siebert, W.S. & Zubanov, N. (2009), Searching for the Optimal Level of Employee Turnover: A Study of a Large UK Retail Organization, Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 294-313.
72. Sousa-Poza, A., & Henneberger, F. (2004). Analyzing job mobility with job turnover intentions: An international comparative study. Journal of Economic Issues, 38(1), 113-137.
73. Sparrowe, R.T. and Liden, R.C (1997), Process and structure in leader-member exchange, Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 522-52.
74. Staw, B. M. (1980). The consequence of turnover. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 1:253-273.
75. Steers, R. M., & Mowday, R. T. (1981). Employee turnover and post-decision accommodation process. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 3, 235-281, Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
76. Sturman, M. C, Trevor, C. O., Boudreau, J. W., & Gerhart, B.(2003). Is it worth it to win the talent war? Evaluating the utility of performance-based pay. Personnel Psychology. 56: 997-1035.
77. Trevor, C. O. (2001). Interactions among actual ease-of-movement determinants and job satisfaction in the prediction of voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 621–638.
78. Trevor, C. O., & Gerhart, B., & Boudreau, J. W.(1997). Voluntary turnover and job performance: Curvilinearity and the moderating influences of salary growth and promotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 44-61
79. Trevor, C. O. (2001). Interactions among actual ease-of-movement determinants and job satisfaction in the prediction of voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 621–638.
80. Trevor, Charlie O., Hausknecht, John P. & Howard, Michael J. (2007). Why high and low performers leave and what they find elsewhere: Job performance effects on employment transitions. Carnell University: CAHRS WP07-11.
81. Wallace, Jolivette Glasgow(2009). An empirical analysis of dysfunctional and functional voluntary employee turnover. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University, BBA.
82. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M. & Liden, R. C.(1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
83. Williams, C. R., & Livingstone, L. P. (1994). Another look at the relationship between performance and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 269-298
84. Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 18, 295–320.
85. Zenger, T. R.(1992). Why do employers only reward extreme performance? Examining the relationships among performance, pay and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37,2, 198-219
86. Zimmerman, R. D., & Darnold, T. C. (2007). The impact of job performance on employee turnover intentions and the voluntary turnover process: A meta-analysis and path model. Personnel Review, 38(2), 142-158
指導教授 林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin) 審核日期 2014-6-25
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明