使用行動學習於情境式英語字彙學習對學習動機與成效的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：23

、訪客IP：18.227.228.95

姓名

黃信嘉(Shin-Jia Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

使用行動學習於情境式英語字彙學習對學習動機與成效的影響
(Applying Mobile Learning in Situational English Vocabulary Learning: Its Impact on Learning Motivation and Achievement)

相關論文

★ 應用智慧分類法提升文章發佈效率於一企業之知識分享平台	★ 家庭智能管控之研究與實作
★ 開放式監控影像管理系統之搜尋機制設計及驗證	★ 資料探勘應用於呆滯料預警機制之建立
★ 探討問題解決模式下的學習行為分析	★ 資訊系統與電子簽核流程之總管理資訊系統
★ 製造執行系統應用於半導體機台停機通知分析處理	★ Apple Pay支付於iOS平台上之研究與實作
★ 應用集群分析探究學習模式對學習成效之影響	★ 應用序列探勘分析影片瀏覽模式對學習成效的影響
★ 一個以服務品質為基礎的網際服務選擇最佳化方法	★ 維基百科知識推薦系統對於使用e-Portfolio的學習者滿意度調查
★ 學生的學習動機、網路自我效能與系統滿意度之探討-以e-Portfolio為例	★ 藉由在第二人生內使用自動對話代理人來改善英文學習成效
★ 合作式資訊搜尋對於學生個人網路搜尋能力與策略之影響	★ 數位註記對學習者在線上學習環境中反思等級之影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究探討基於FSVL學習策略輔以行動學習輔具於情境英語單字學習環境對EFL學生在學習動機和成效上的影響。本研究所發展的行動學習輔具是整合單字學習策略和情境式學習理論來幫助EFL學生在情境中進行英語單字學習。本研究的實驗參與者為80位EFL學生和1位授課教師，實驗設計分為FSVL學習策略輔以行動學習輔具於情境式英語單字學習環境和FSVL學習策略輔以傳統學習輔具於情境式英語單字學習環境，並利用訪談，測驗和ARCS動機問卷來取得研究結果。最後研究結果顯示FSVL學習策略輔以行動學習輔具於情境式英語單字學習環境相較於FSVL學習策略輔以傳統學習輔具於情境式英語單字學習環境之學習動機與成效表現較為顯著。

摘要(英)

This study explored the effect that applying the 5-step vocabulary learning (FSVL) strategy and a mobile learning tool in a situational English vocabulary learning environment exerted on learning motivation and outcomes for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. The mobile learning tool developed in this study assisted EFL students with learning English vocabulary in real-life situations by integrating a vocabulary learning strategy and the situated learning theory. Overall, 80 EFL students and 1 teacher participated in this study. Regarding the experiment design, 2 learning methods were implemented. The first involved employing the FSVL strategy and the mobile learning tool in a situational English vocabulary learning environment, and the other method involved employing the FSVL strategy and traditional learning tools in a situational English vocabulary learning environment. Data were collected by conducting interviews and tests, and administering the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction motivation questionnaire. The results showed that the learning motivation and outcomes of the students who used the FSVL strategy and mobile learning tool in a situational English vocabulary learning environment were superior to those of the students who used the FSVL strategy and traditional learning tools in a situational English vocabulary learning environment.

關鍵字(中)

★ 行動學習
★ 字彙學習策略
★ 互動學習環境
★ 國小教育

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

中文摘要 I
English Abstract II
致謝 III
Table of Contents IV
List of Figures V
List of Tables VI
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature review 4
2.1 Mobile learning 4
2.2 Situated learning 6
2.3 FSVL strategy 7
3. Situational mobile vocabulary learning tool 11
3.1 System design 11
3.2 System demonstration 13
4. Research methods 17
4.1. Participants 17
4.2. Teaching material content 17
4.3. Measurement tools 19
4.3.1. Pretest quiz design 19
4.3.2. Posttest design 20
4.3.3. Learning motivation questionnaire 21
4.4. Experiment process 23
4.4.1. Experiment group 23
4.4.2. Control group 25
5. Experiment results and discussion 27
5.1 Analysis of learning motivation 27
5.2 Analysis of learning achievements 36
6. Conclusion 39
7. Research Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 41
References 43
Appendix 48

參考文獻

Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11.
Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. Journal of American Psychologist, 30(8), 821-828.
Ballou, K. (2009). Language learner experiences in an online virtual world. The JALT CALL Journal, 5(2), 61-70
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the cultural of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Brown, C., & Payne, M. E. (1994). Five essential steps of processes in vocabulary learning. Paper presented at the TESOL Convention. Baltimore MD, USA.
CEFR. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Language: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg/Cambridge: Council of Europe/Cambridge University Press.
Chaudron, C. (1983). Research on metalinguistic judgments: A review of theory, methods, and results. Language Learning, 33(3), 343-377.
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. New York: Cambridge University.
Chen, C. M., & Hsu, S. H. (2008). Personalized intelligent mobile learning system for supporting effective English learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 153e180.
Chen, Y.S., Kao, T.C., Sheu, J.P., & Chiang, C.Y . (2002). A Mobile Scaffolding-Aid-Based Bird -Watching Learning System. Paper presented at the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE′02), 15-22.
Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning system for natural science course. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618–1627.
Collins, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform, 121-138.
Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: a study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222–241
Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E., & Smrikarov, A. (2004). M-learning-a New Stage of ?-Learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies-CompSysTech, 1-4 June 2004.
Harley, S. (1993). Situated learning and classroom instruction. Educational Technology, 33(3), 46-51.
Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics, and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haynes, M. (1984). Patterns and perils of guessing in a second language. Paper presented at the TESOL, 83, 163-176.
Hay, K. (1993). Legitimate peripheral participation, instructionism, and constructivism: Whose situation is it anyway. Educational Technology, 33(3), 33-38.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(3), 23-48.
Huang, Y. M., Huang, Y. M., Huang, S. H., & Lin, Y. T. (2012). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers & Education, 58(1), 273-282.
Huang, C.S.J., Yang, S.J.H., Su, A.Y.S. (2012). Applying Hebbian Theory to Enhance Search Performance in Unstructured Social-like Peer-to-Peer Networks. ETRI Journal, 34(4), 591-601
Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Shih, J. L., Huang, S. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). A decision-tree-oriented guidance mechanism for conducting nature science observation activities in a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 53-64.
Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., Chu, H. C., Kinshuk, & Chen, C. Y. (2012). A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach to conducting scientific inquiry activities in a science park. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 931–947.
Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1983). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning experiences on social development. Exceptional children.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2-10.
Kim, D., & Gilman, D. A. (2008). Effects of Text, Audio, and Graphic Aids in Multimedia Instruction for Vocabulary Learning. Journal of educational technology & society, 11(3), 114-126.
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203-228.
Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?. Applied linguistics, 19(2), 255-271.
Lee, S. H., & Muncie, J. (2006). From receptive to productive: Improving ESL learners′ use of vocabulary in a postreading composition task. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 295-320.
Liu, T., & Chu, Y. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643.
McLellan, H. (1996). Situated learning: multiple perspectives. Situated learning perspectives, 5-17.
Oskarsson, M. (1975). The Relationship Between Foreign Language Proficiency and Various Psychological Variables.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Payne, J. W. (1994). Thinking aloud: Insights into information processing. Psychological Science, 5, 241-248
Pressley, M. (1977). Imagery and children′s learning: Putting the picture in developmental perspective. Review of Educational Research, 47, 585-622.
Sandberg, J., Maris, M., & de Geus, K. (2011). Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1334-1347.
Shih, J. L., Hwang, G. J., & Chu, Y. C. (2010). The development and instructional application of u-library on butterfly and wetland ecology for context-aware ubiquitous learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 4(3), 253–268.
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge university press.
Sun, K. T., Huang, Y. M., & Liu, M. C. (2011). A WordNet-Based Near-Synonyms and Similar-Looking Word Learning System. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 121-134.
Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 217-228.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
Winn, W. (1993). Instructional design and situated learning: Paradox or partnership. Educational Technology, 33(3), 16-21.

指導教授

楊鎮華

審核日期

2014-6-11

推文