博碩士論文 101423029 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:70 、訪客IP:3.144.47.27
姓名 陳昱佑(Yun-You Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱
(Impacts of Customer Orientation, Inter-firm Information Sharing, and Supplier-Buyer Relationships on New Product and Business Performance)
相關論文
★ 影響ERP導入過程及成效因素之研究 - 單一公司兩次導入SAP系統之比較分析★ 運用資料倉儲技術建置物力動員資訊系統之開發
★ 買方採用自有電子市集之個案研究─以台塑企業為例★ DEA模型評估經營效率之研究—以某綜合證券商為例
★ 尋求卓越:中小企業資訊部門的管理之個案研究★ 「證券商共同網路交易平台」之可行性分析
★ 產業競合模式策略探討-以自行車產業為例★ RFID導入航空貨運站出口作業流程應用之研究
★ 綠色供應鏈活動建構之個案研究-以筆記型電腦製造業為例★ 導入資訊科技服務管理之評估-以遠東銀行為例
★ 資訊系統導入歷程中專案團隊決策衝突之探討★ 應用資源基礎理論探討持久競爭優勢-以智慧型手機H公司為例
★ 服務導向架構為基礎的企業流程管理之探討 - 以瀚宇博德股份有限公司為例★ 沙賓法案實施與企業遵循個案研究--以K公司為例
★ 資訊服務委外之個案分析-以銀行簡訊為例★ 有線電視業者經營IPTV之競爭優勢分析—以個案公司為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 行銷與創新在這個動態改變的環境中比起以往更加的重要,能夠滿足客戶需求的創新產品對組織來說已成為一個重要的課題。客戶導向的組織必須在了解客戶所傳達的渴望上投入更多的精力,並發展能夠符合客戶需求的產品或服務。因此,與客戶之間的資訊分享對組織來說變得變成一個很重要的課題。本篇研究將以技術與分享意圖的層面共同去探討資訊分享的議題。此外,對於非正式治理機制對於跨組織資訊分享的影響也是本研究著重的議題之一,本研究的目的是探索客戶導向、跨組織資訊分享、供應商與買家關係對新產品績效與組織績效的影響,並進一步探討新產品績效是否對組織績效產生影響。
我們以2013年度台灣前一千大製造業為資料蒐集的來源並驗證本研究所建立的假說。研究結果顯示,客戶導向與跨組織資訊分享對新產品績效正向相關,供應商與買家關係、跨組織資訊分享與新產品績效則對組職績效正向相關。本研究的結果在理論面與實務面都為這些效用提供一個更好的解釋。
摘要(英) Marketing and innovation are more important than ever in the dynamic changing environment. Innovation that is able to meet the customer requirements has become one of the most important issues for firms. A customer oriented organization must put more focus on understanding the expressed desire of the customers and on developing products and services that satisfy those desires. Therefore, information sharing among customers becomes an important issue for firms. This research will view the information sharing issue in both the technical dimension and willingness dimension. Moreover, investigating whether informal governance mechanisms would have an influence on inter-firm information sharing is also an important issue in this study. The object of this study is to explore the effects of customer orientation, inter-firm information sharing, and supplier-buyer relationship on new product performance and firm performance. Moreover, this study also investigates whether new product performance would have an influence on firm performance.
The study collects data survey from top 1000 Taiwanese manufacturing firms to test the hypotheses. The result shows that customer orientation and inter-firm information sharing are positive associated with new product performance, and supplier-buyer relationship, inter-firm information sharing, and new product performance are positive associated with firm performance. Our results provide both theoretical and practical implications that contribute to a better understanding of the effects.
關鍵字(中) ★ 客戶導向
★ 供應商─買方關係
★ 跨組織資訊分享
★ 新產品績效
★ 組織績效
關鍵字(英) ★ Customer Orientation
★ Supplier-Buyer Relationship
★ Inter-firm Information Sharing
★ New Product Performance
★ Firm Performance
論文目次 Abstract i
中文摘要 ii
誌謝 iii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivations 1
1.2 Research Purposes and Questions 4
Chapter 2 Literature review 5
2.1 Customer Orientation 5
2.2 Supplier-Buyer Relationship 6
2.3 Inter-firm Information Sharing 9
Chapter 3 Research Model and Hypotheses 13
3.1 Research Model 13
3.2 Hypothesis Development 14
3.2.1 Customer Orientation and Supplier-Buyer Relationship 14
3.2.2 Customer Orientation and Inter-firm Information Sharing 15
3.2.3 Customer Orientation and New Product Performance 16
3.2.4 Customer Orientation and Firm Performance 17
3.2.5 Supplier-Buyer Relationship and Inter-firm Information Sharing 18
3.2.6 Supplier-Buyer Relationship and Firm Performance 19
3.2.7 Inter-firm Information Sharing and New Product Performance 20
3.2.8 Inter-firm Information Sharing and Firm Performance 21
3.2.9 New Product Performance and Firm Performance 22
Chapter 4 Research Method 23
4.1 Research Design 23
4.2 Instrument Development 23
4.2.1 Customer Orientation 25
4.2.2 Supplier-Buyer Relationship 26
4.2.3 Inter-firm Information sharing 27
4.2.4 New Product Performance 28
4.2.5 Firm Performance 29
4.2.6 Control Variables 30
Chapter 5 Data Analysis and Results 31
5.1 Sample Characteristic 31
5.2 Measurement Model 35
5.3 Structural Model 44
Chapter 6 Conclusions 47
6.1 Findings and Discussion 47
6.2 Implications and Future Research 49
6.3 Limitations 50
References 51
Appendix Questionnaire 57
參考文獻 [1] Allmendinger, G., & Lombreglia, R. (2005). Four strategies for the age of smart services. Harvard business review, 83(10), 131.
[2] Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1989). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing science, 8(4), 310-323.
[3] Ar, I. M., & Baki, B. (2011). Antecedents and performance impacts of product versus process innovation: empirical evidence from SMEs located in Turkish science and technology parks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(2), 172-206.
[4] Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2005). Environmental marketing strategy and firm performance: effects on new product performance and market share. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 33(4), 461-475.
[5] Bastic, M., & Leskovar-Spacapan, G. (2006). What do transition organizations lack to be innovative? Kybernetes, 35(7/8), 972-992.
[6] Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of management review, 20(2), 343-378.
[7] Calantone, R. J., Chan, K., & Cui, A. S. (2006). Decomposing product innovativeness and its effects on new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(5), 408-421.
[8] Carnevale, D. G., & Wechsler, B. (1992). Trust in the public sector individual and organizational determinants. Administration & Society, 23(4), 471-494.
[9] Carr, A. S., & Pearson, J. N. (1999). Strategically managed buyer–supplier relationships and performance outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, 17(5), 497-519.
[10] Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
[11] Clemons, E. K., & Hitt, L. M. (2004). Poaching and the misappropriation of information: Transaction risks of information exchange. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(2), 87-107.
[12] Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What′s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information systems research, 5(4), 400-421.
[13] Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87.
[14] Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
[15] Day, G. S., & Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing advantage: a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. The Journal of Marketing, 1-20.
[16] Deshpande, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E. (1993). Corporate Culture Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis. Journal of marketing, 57(1).
[17] Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4), 660-679.
[18] Ellram, L. M., & Hendrick, T. E. (1995). Partnering characteristics: a dyadic perspective. Journal of Business Logistics, 16, 41-41.
[19] Fawcett, S. E., & Magnan, G. M. (2001). Achieving world-class supply chain alignment: Benefits, barriers, and bridges: Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies Tempe, AZ.
[20] Fawcett, S. E., Osterhaus, P., Magnan, G. M., Brau, J. C., & McCarter, M. W. (2007). Information sharing and supply chain performance: the role of connectivity and willingness. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(5), 358-368.
[21] Fawcett, S. E., Wallin, C., Allred, C., & Magnan, G. (2009). Supply chain information-sharing: benchmarking a proven path. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(2), 222-246.
[22] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 18(1).
[23] Frazier, G. L., Spekman, R. E., & O′neal, C. R. (1988). Just-in-time exchange relationships in industrial markets. Journal of marketing, 52(4).
[24] Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of management review, 21(1), 13-47.
[25] Goffin, K., Lemke, F., & Szwejczewski, M. (2006). An exploratory study of ‘close’supplier–manufacturer relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 189-209.
[26] Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(3), 414-433.
[27] Hofer, C. W. (1975). Toward a contingency theory of business strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 784-810.
[28] Hoonsopon, D., & Ruenrom, G. (2010). Alternative perspective in new product innovation. The Business Review, 14.
[29] Hsu, C.-C., Kannan, V. R., Tan, K.-C., & Leong, G. K. (2008). Information sharing, buyer-supplier relationships, and firm performance: a multi-region analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(4), 296-310.
[30] Hua, S. Y., & Wemmerlov, U. (2006). Product change intensity, product advantage, and market performance: an empirical investigation of the PC industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 316-329.
[31] Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. The Journal of Marketing, 42-54.
[32] Im, S., & Workman, J. P. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of marketing, 68(2), 114-132.
[33] Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 30(2), 199-218.
[34] Jones, E., Busch, P., & Dacin, P. (2003). Firm market orientation and salesperson customer orientation: Interpersonal and intrapersonal influences on customer service and retention in business-to-business buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Business research, 56(4), 323-340.
[35] Kingshott, R. P. (2006). The impact of psychological contracts upon trust and commitment within supplier–buyer relationships: A social exchange view. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(6), 724-739.
[36] Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. The Journal of Marketing, 1-18.
[37] Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 12(1).
[38] Leonard, D., & Rayport, J. F. (1997). Spark innovation through empathic design. Harvard business review, 75, 102-115.
[39] Li, S., & Lin, B. (2006). Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1641-1656.
[40] Lukas, B. A., & Ferrell, O. (2000). The effect of market orientation on product innovation. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 28(2), 239-247.
[41] McGee, K. (2004). Give me that real-time information. Harvard business review, 82(4), 26.
[42] Mendelson, H. (2000). Organizational architecture and success in the information technology industry. Management science, 46(4), 513-529.
[43] Min, S., Kalwani, M. U., & Robinson, W. T. (2006). Market pioneer and early follower survival risks: A contingency analysis of really new versus incrementally new product-markets. Journal of marketing, 70(1), 15-33.
[44] Moberg, C. R., Cutler, B. D., Gross, A., & Speh, T. W. (2002). Identifying antecedents of information exchange within supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32(9), 755-770.
[45] Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 81-101.
[46] Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 29(3).
[47] Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of marketing, 58(3).
[48] Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of marketing, 54(4).
[49] Ofek, E., & Sarvary, M. (2001). Leveraging the customer base: Creating competitive advantage through knowledge management. Management science, 47(11), 1441-1456.
[50] Paladino, A. (2008). Analyzing the Effects of Market and Resource Orientations on Innovative Outcomes in Times of Turbulence*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(6), 577-592.
[51] Paulraj, A., Lado, A. A., & Chen, I. J. (2008). Inter-organizational communication as a relational competency: antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 26(1), 45-64.
[52] Pelham, A. M. (1999). Influence of environment, strategy, and market orientation on performance in small manufacturing firms. Journal of Business research, 45(1), 33-46.
[53] Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2003). Interfirm cooperation and customer orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(4), 421-436.
[54] Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483-498.
[55] Robinson, W. T. (1990). Product innovation and start-up business market share performance. Management science, 36(10), 1279-1289.
[56] Santos-Vijande, M. L., & Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I. (2007). Innovativeness and organizational innovation in total quality oriented firms: The moderating role of market turbulence. Technovation, 27(9), 514-532.
[57] Siguaw, J. A., Simpson, P. M., & Baker, T. L. (1998). Effects of supplier market orientation on distributor market orientation and the channel relationship: The distributor perspective. Journal of marketing, 62(3).
[58] Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship? Journal of marketing, 58(1).
[59] Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. The Journal of Marketing, 63-74.
[60] Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1998). Research Notes and Communications Customer-Led and Market-Oriented: Let’s not Confuse The Two. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 1001-1006.
[61] Smeltzer, L. R. (1997). The Meaning and Origin of Trust in Buyer?Supplier Relationships. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33(4), 40-48.
[62] Song, M., Kawakami, T., & Stringfellow, A. (2010). A Cross?National Comparative Study of Senior Management Policy, Marketing–Manufacturing Involvement, and Innovation Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(2), 179-200.
[63] Spekman, R. E. (1988). Strategic supplier selection: understanding long-term buyer relationships. Business horizons, 31(4), 75-81.
[64] Sprague, R. H., & Watson, H. J. (1979). Bit by bit: toward decision support systems. California management review, 22(1), 60-68.
[65] Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. Academy of management review, 3(3), 613-624.
[66] Vanhaverbeke, W., & Peeters, N. (2005). Embracing innovation as strategy: corporate venturing, competence building and corporate strategy making. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(3), 246-257.
[67] Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 36(1), 1-10.
[68] Von Hippel, E. (1998). Economics of product development by users: The impact of “sticky” local information. Management science, 44(5), 629-644.
[69] Webster, F. E. (1992). The changing role of marketing in the corporation. Journal of marketing, 56(4).
[70] Williams, M. R., & Attaway, J. S. (1996). Exploring salespersons′ customer orientation as a mediator of organizational culture′s influence on buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 16(4), 33-52.
[71] Williamson, M., & Markets, A. (1975). Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York.
[72] Wilson, D. T. (1995). An integrated model of buyer-seller relationships. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 23(4), 335-345.
[73] Zhang, J., & Duan, Y. (2010). Empirical study on the impact of market orientation and innovation orientation on new product performance of Chinese manufacturers. Nankai Business Review International, 1(2), 214-231.
指導教授 王存國(Eric T.G. Wang) 審核日期 2014-6-25
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明